Megalosaurus Cuvieri

''Megalosaurus'' (meaning "great lizard", from Greek , ', meaning 'big', 'tall' or 'great' and , ', meaning 'lizard') is an extinct genus of large carnivorous theropod dinosaurs of the Middle Jurassic Epoch (Bathonian stage, 166 million years ago) of southern England. Although fossils from other areas have been assigned to the genus, the only certain remains of ''Megalosaurus'' come from Oxfordshire and date to the late Middle Jurassic.

The earliest remains of ''Megalosaurus'' were described in the 17th century, and were initially interpreted as the remains of elephants or giants. ''Megalosaurus'' was named in 1824 by William Buckland, becoming the first genus of (non-avian) dinosaur to be validly named. The type species is ''M. bucklandii'', named in 1827 by Gideon Mantell, after Buckland. In 1842, ''Megalosaurus'' was one of three genera on which Richard Owen based his Dinosauria, along with ''Iguanodon'' and ''Hylaeosaurus''. On Owen's directions a model was made as one of the Crystal Palace Dinosaurs, which greatly increased the public interest for prehistoric reptiles. Over 50 other species would eventually be classified under the genus; at first, this was because so few types of dinosaur had been identified, but the practice continued even into the 20th century after many other dinosaurs had been discovered. Today it is understood that none of these additional species was directly related to ''M. bucklandii'', which is the only true ''Megalosaurus'' species. Because a complete skeleton of it has never been found, much is still unclear about its build.

The first naturalists who investigated ''Megalosaurus'' mistook it for a gigantic lizard in length. In 1842, Owen concluded that it was no longer than . He still thought it was a quadruped, though. Modern scientists were able to obtain a more accurate picture, by comparing ''Megalosaurus'' with its direct relatives in the Megalosauridae. ''Megalosaurus'' was about long, weighing about . It was bipedal, walking on stout hindlimbs, its horizontal torso balanced by a horizontal tail. Its forelimbs were short, though very robust. ''Megalosaurus'' had a rather large head, equipped with long curved teeth. It was generally a robust and heavily muscled animal.

At the time ''Megalosaurus'' lived, Europe formed an island archipelago bounded by then narrow Atlantic Ocean and Tethys Ocean, with ''Megalosaurus'' inhabiting an island formed by the London–Brabant Massif, where it likely served as the apex predator of its ecosystem, coexisting with other dinosaurs like the large sauropod ''Cetiosaurus,'' stegosaurs, ankylosaurs, and heterodontosaurids.

Discovery and naming

Edward Lhuyd's tooth (specimen OU 1328)

In 1699, Edward Lhuyd described what he believed to have been a fish tooth (called ''Plectronites''), later believed to be part of a belemnite, that was illustrated alongside the holotype tooth of the sauropod "Rutellum impicatum" and another tooth, from a theropod, in 1699.Lhuyd, E. (1699).
Lithophylacii Britannici Ichnographia, sive lapidium aliorumque fossilium Britannicorum singulari figura insignium
'. Gleditsch and Weidmann:London. Later studies found that the theropod tooth, known as specimen 1328 (University of Oxford coll. #1328; lost?) almost certainly was a tooth crown that belonged to an unknown species of ''Megalosaurus''.Delair, J.B., and Sarjeant, W.A.S. (2002)
The earliest discoveries of dinosaurs: the records re-examined
''Proceedings of the Geologists' Association'' 113:185–197. OU 1328 has since been lost and it was not confidently assigned to ''Megalosaurus'' until the tooth was re-described by Delair & Sarjeant (2002).

OU 1328 was collected near Caswell, near Witney, Oxfordshire sometime during the 17th century and became the third dinosaur fossil to ever be illustrated,Gunther, R.T. (1945). ''Early Science in Oxford: Life and Letters of Edward Lhuyd'', volume 14. Author:Oxford. after "Scrotum humanum" in 1677 and "Rutellum impicatum" in 1699.

"Scrotum humanum"

''Megalosaurus'' may have been the first non avian dinosaur to be described in the scientific literature. The earliest possible fossil of the genus, from the Taynton Limestone Formation, was the lower part of a femur, discovered in the 17th century. Part of a bone was recovered from the Taynton Limestone Formation of Stonesfield limestone quarry, Oxfordshire in 1676. Sir Thomas Pennyson gave the fragment to naturalist Robert Plot, who published a description and illustration in his ''Natural History of Oxfordshire'' in 1676. It was the first illustration of a dinosaur bone published. Plot correctly identified the bone as the lower extremity of the thighbone or femur of a large animal and he recognized that it was too large to belong to any species known to be living in England. He therefore at first concluded it to be the thigh bone of a Roman war elephant and later that of a giant human, such as those mentioned in the Bible. The bone has since been lost, but the illustration is detailed enough that some have since identified it as that of ''Megalosaurus''.

It has also been argued that this possible ''Megalosaurus'' bone was given the very first species name ever applied to an extinct dinosaur. Plot's engraving of the Cornwell bone was again used in a book by Richard Brookes in 1763. Brookes, in a caption, called it "Scrotum humanum", apparently comparing its appearance to a pair of "human testicles". However, it is possible that the attribution of this name stemmed from illustrator error, not Richard Brookes. In 1970, paleontologist Lambert Beverly Halstead pointed out that the similarity of ''Scrotum humanum'' to a modern species name, a so-called Linnaean "binomen" that has two parts, was not a coincidence. Linnaeus, the founder of modern taxonomy, had in the eighteenth century not merely devised a system for naming living creatures, but also for classifying geological objects. The book by Brookes was all about applying this latter system to curious stones found in England. According to Halstead, Brookes thus had deliberately used binomial nomenclature, and had in fact indicated the possible type specimen of a new biological genus. According to the rules of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN), the name ''Scrotum humanum'' in principle had priority over ''Megalosaurus'' because it was published first. That Brookes understood that the stone did not actually represent a pair of petrified testicles was irrelevant. Merely the fact that the name had not been used in subsequent literature meant that it could be removed from competition for priority, because the ICZN states that if a name has never been considered valid after 1899, it can be made a ''nomen oblitum'', an invalid "forgotten name".

In 1993, after the death of Halstead, his friend William A.S. Sarjeant submitted a petition to the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature to formally suppress the name ''Scrotum'' in favour of ''Megalosaurus''. He wrote that the supposed junior synonym ''Megalosaurus bucklandii'' should be made a conserved name to ensure its priority. However, the Executive Secretary of the ICZN at the time, Philip K. Tubbs, did not consider the petition to be admissible, concluding that the term "Scrotum humanum", published merely as a label for an illustration, did not constitute the valid creation of a new name, and stated that there was no evidence it was ever intended as such. Furthermore, the partial femur was too incomplete to definitely be referred to ''Megalosaurus'' and not a different, contemporary theropod.

Buckland's research

During the last part of the eighteenth century, the number of fossils in British collections quickly increased. According to a hypothesis published by science historian Robert Gunther in 1925, among them was a partial lower jaw of ''Megalosaurus''. It was discovered about underground in a Stonesfield Slate mine during the early 1790s and was acquired in October 1797 by Christopher Pegge for 10s.6d. and added to the collection of the Anatomy School of Christ Church, Oxford.

In the early nineteenth century, more discoveries were made. In 1815, John Kidd reported the find of bones of giant tetrapods, again at the Stonesfield quarry. The layers there are currently considered part of the Taynton Limestone Formation, dating to the mid-Bathonian stage of the Jurassic Period. The bones were apparently acquired by William Buckland, Professor of Geology at the University of Oxford and fellow of Corpus Christi. Buckland also studied a lower jaw, according to Gunther the one bought by Pegge. Buckland did not know to what animal the bones belonged but, in 1818, after the Napoleonic Wars, the French comparative anatomist Georges Cuvier visited Buckland in Oxford and realized that they were those of a giant lizard-like creature. Buckland further studied the remains with Mary Morland (later his wife), and his friend William Conybeare who in 1821 referred to them as the "Huge Lizard". In 1822 Buckland and Conybeare, in a joint article to be included in Cuvier's ''Ossemens'', intended to provide scientific names for both gigantic lizard-like creatures known at the time: the remains found near Maastricht would be named ''Mosasaurus'' – then seen as a land-dwelling animal – while for the British lizard Conybeare had devised the name "Megalosaurus", from the Greek μέγας, ''megas'', "large". That year a publication failed to occur, but the physician James Parkinson already in 1822 announced the name "Megalosaurus", illustrating one of the teeth and revealing the creature was 40 feet long and eight feet high. It is generally considered that the name in 1822 was still a ''nomen nudum'' ("naked name"). Buckland, urged on by an impatient Cuvier, continued to work on the subject during 1823. Mary provide drawings of the bones, that were to be the basis of illustrating lithographies. Finally, on 20 February 1824, during the same meeting of the Geological Society of London in which Conybeare described a very complete specimen of ''Plesiosaurus'', Buckland formally announced ''Megalosaurus''. The descriptions of the bones in the ''Transactions of the Geological Society'', in 1824, constitute a valid publication of the name. ''Megalosaurus'' was the first non-avian dinosaur genus named; the first of which the remains had with certainty been scientifically described was ''Streptospondylus'', in 1808 by Cuvier.

By 1824, the material available to Buckland consisted of specimen OUM J13505, a piece of a right lower jaw with a single erupted tooth; OUM J13577, a posterior dorsal vertebra; OUM J13579, an anterior caudal vertebra; OUM J13576, a sacrum of five sacral vertebrae; OUM J13585, a cervical rib; OUM J13580, a rib; OUM J29881, an ilium of the pelvis, OUM J13563, a piece of the pubic bone; OUM J13565, a part of the ischium; OUM J13561, a thigh bone and OUM J13572, the lower part of a second metatarsal. As he himself was aware, these did not all belong to the same individual; only the sacrum was articulated. Because they represented several individuals, the described fossils formed a syntype series. By modern standards, from these a single specimen has to be selected to serve as the type specimen on which the name is based. In 1990, Ralph Molnar chose the famous dentary (front part of the lower jaw), OUM J13505, as such a lectotype.Molnar, R.E.; Seriozha M.K. & Dong Z. (1990). "Carnosauria" In: Because he was unaccustomed to the deep dinosaurian pelvis, much taller than with typical reptiles, Buckland misidentified several bones, interpreting the pubic bone as a fibula and mistaking the ischium for a clavicle. Buckland identified the organism as being a giant animal belonging to the Sauria – the Lizards, at the time seen as including the crocodiles - and he placed it in the new genus ''Megalosaurus'', repeating an estimate by Cuvier that the largest pieces he described, indicated an animal 12 meters long in life.

Etymology

Buckland had not provided a specific name, as was not uncommon in the early nineteenth century, when the genus was still seen as the more essential concept. In 1826, Ferdinand von Ritgen gave this dinosaur a complete binomial, ''Megalosaurus conybeari'', which however was not much used by later authors and is now considered a ''nomen oblitum''. A year later, in 1827, Gideon Mantell included ''Megalosaurus'' in his geological survey of southeastern England, and assigned the species its current valid binomial name, ''Megalosaurus bucklandii''. Until recently, the form ''Megalosaurus bucklandi'' was often used, a variant first published in 1832 by Christian Erich Hermann von Meyer – and sometimes erroneously ascribed to von Ritgen – but the more original ''M. bucklandii'' has priority.

Early reconstructions

The first reconstruction was given by Buckland himself. He considered ''Megalosaurus'' to be a quadruped. He thought it was an "amphibian", i.e. an animal capable of both swimming in the sea and walking on land. Generally, in his mind ''Megalosaurus'' resembled a gigantic lizard, but Buckland already understood from the form of the thigh bone head that the legs were not so much sprawling as held rather upright. In the original description of 1824, Buckland repeated Cuvier's size estimate that ''Megalosaurus'' would have been 40 feet long with the weight of a seven foot tall elephant. However, this had been based on the remains present at Oxford. Buckland had also been hurried into naming his new reptile by a visit he had made to the fossil collection of Mantell, who during the lecture announced to have acquired a fossil thigh bone of enormous magnitude, twice as long as that just described. Today, this is known to have belonged to ''Iguanodon'', or at least some iguanodontid, but at the time both men assumed this bone belonged to ''Megalosaurus'' also. Even taking into account the effects of allometry, heavier animals having relatively stouter bones, Buckland was forced in the printed version of his lecture to estimate the maximum length of ''Megalosaurus'' at 60 to 70 feet. The existence of ''Megalosaurus'' posed some problems for Christian orthodoxy, which typically held that suffering and death had only come into the world through Original Sin, which seemed irreconcilable with the presence of a gigantic devouring reptile during a pre-Adamitic phase of history. Buckland rejected the usual solution, that such carnivores would originally have been peaceful vegetarians, as infantile and claimed in one of the ''Bridgewater Treatises'' that ''Megalosaurus'' had played a beneficial role in creation by ending the lives of old and ill animals, "to diminish the aggregate amount of animal suffering".

Around 1840, it became fashionable in England to espouse the concept of the transmutation of species as part of a general progressive development through time, as expressed in the work of Robert Chambers. In reaction, on 2 August 1841 Richard Owen during a lecture to the British Association for the Advancement of Science claimed that certain prehistoric reptilian groups had already attained the organisational level of present mammals, implying there had been no progress. Owen presented three examples of such higher level reptiles: ''Iguanodon'', ''Hylaeosaurus'' and ''Megalosaurus''. For these, the "lizard model" was entirely abandoned: they would have had an upright stance and a high metabolism. This also meant that earlier size estimates had been exaggerated. By simply adding the known length of the vertebrae, instead of extrapolating from a lizard, Owen arrived at a total body length for ''Megalosaurus'' of 30 feet. In the printed version of the lecture published in 1842, Owen united the three reptiles into a separate group: the Dinosauria. ''Megalosaurus'' was thus one of the three original dinosaurs.

In 1852, Benjamin Waterhouse Hawkins was commissioned to build a life-sized concrete model of ''Megalosaurus'' for the exhibition of prehistoric animals at the Crystal Palace Park in Sydenham, where it remains to this day. Hawkins worked under the direction of Owen and the statue reflected Owen's ideas that ''Megalosaurus'' would have been a mammal-like quadruped. The sculpture in Crystal Palace Park shows a conspicuous hump on the shoulders and it has been suggested this was inspired by a set of high vertebral spines acquired by Owen in the early 1850s. Today, they are seen as a separate genus '' Becklespinax'', but Owen referred them to ''Megalosaurus''. The models at the exhibition created a general public awareness for the first time, at least in England, that ancient reptiles had existed.

The presumption that carnivorous dinosaurs, like ''Megalosaurus'', were quadrupeds was first challenged by the find of ''Compsognathus'' in 1859. That, however, was a very small animal, the significance of which for gigantic forms could be denied. In 1870, near Oxford, the type specimen of ''Eustreptospondylus'' was discovered – the first reasonably intact skeleton of a large theropod. It was clearly bipedal. Shortly afterwards, John Phillips created the first public display of a theropod skeleton in Oxford, arranging the known ''Megalosaurus'' bones, held by recesses in cardboard sheets, in a more or less natural position. During the 1870s, North American discoveries of large theropods, like ''Allosaurus'', confirmed that they were bipedal. The Oxford University Museum of Natural History display contains most of the specimens from the original description by Buckland.

Later finds of ''Megalosaurus bucklandii''

The quarries at Stonesfield, which were worked until 1911, continued to produce ''Megalosaurus bucklandii'' fossils, mostly single bones from the pelvis and hindlimbs. Vertebrae and skull bones are rare. In 2010, Roger Benson counted a total of 103 specimens from the Stonesfield Slate, from a minimum of seven individuals. It has been contentious whether this material represents just a single taxon. In 2004, Julia Day and Paul Barrett claimed that there were two morphotypes present, based on small differences in the thighbones. In 2008 Benson favoured this idea, but in 2010 concluded the differences were illusory. A maxilla fragment, specimen OUM J13506, was, in 1869 assigned, by Thomas Huxley, to ''M. bucklandii''. In 1992 Robert Thomas Bakker claimed it represented a member of the Sinraptoridae; in 2007, Darren Naish thought it was a separate species belonging to the Abelisauroidea. In 2010, Benson pointed out that the fragment was basically indistinguishable from other known ''M. bucklandii'' maxillae, to which it had in fact not been compared by the other authors.

Apart from the finds in the Taynton Limestone Formation, in 1939 Sidney Hugh Reynolds referred remains to ''Megalosaurus'' that had been found in the older Chipping Norton Limestone Formation dating from the early Bathonian, about 30 single teeth and bones. Though the age disparity makes it problematic to assume an identity with ''Megalosaurus bucklandii'', in 2009 Benson could not establish any relevant anatomical differences with ''M. bucklandii'' among the remains found at one site, the New Park Quarry, and therefore affirmed the reference to that species. However, in another site, the Oakham Quarry, the material contained one bone, an ilium, that was clearly dissimilar.

Sometimes trace fossils have been referred to ''Megalosaurus'' or to the ichnogenus ''Megalosauripus''. In 1997, a famous group of fossilized footprints (ichnites) was found in a limestone quarry at Ardley, 20 kilometers northeast of Oxford. They were thought to have been made by ''Megalosaurus'' and possibly also some left by ''Cetiosaurus''. There are replicas of some of these footprints, set across the lawn of the Oxford University Museum of Natural History. One track was of a theropod accelerating from walking to running. According to Benson, such referrals are unprovable, as the tracks show no traits unique to ''Megalosaurus''. Certainly they should be limited to finds that are of the same age as ''Megalosaurus bucklandii''.
In 2024 five more sets of tracks were discovered at a nearby Bicester quarry, with one of them showing clear features of large tridactyl theropod feet distinctive of ''Megalosaurus''.

Finds from sites outside England, especially in France, have in the nineteenth and twentieth century been referred to ''M. bucklandii''. In 2010 Benson considered these as either clearly different or too fragmentary to establish an identity.

Description

Since the first finds, many other ''Megalosaurus'' bones have been recovered; however, no complete skeleton has yet been found. Therefore, the details of its physical appearance cannot be certain. However, a full osteology of all known material was published in 2010 by Benson.

Size and general build

Traditionally, most texts, following Owen's estimate of 1841, give a body length of 30 feet or nine meters for ''Megalosaurus''. The lack of an articulated dorsal vertebral series makes it difficult to determine an exact size. David Bruce Norman in 1984 thought ''Megalosaurus'' was seven to eight meters long. Gregory S. Paul in 1988 estimated the weight tentatively at 1.1 tons, given a thigh bone 76 centimeters long. The trend in the early twenty-first century to limit the material to the lectotype inspired even lower estimates, disregarding outliers of uncertain identity. Paul in 2010 estimated the size of ''Megalosaurus'' at in length and . However, the same year Benson claimed that ''Megalosaurus'', though medium-sized, was still among the largest of Middle Jurassic theropods. Specimen NHMUK PV OR 31806, a thigh bone 803 millimeters long, would indicate a body weight of 943 kilograms, using the extrapolation method of J.F. Anderson - which method, optimized for mammals, tends to underestimate theropod masses by at least a third. Furthermore, thigh bone specimen OUM J13561 has a length of about 86 centimeters.
In general, ''Megalosaurus'' had the typical build of a large theropod. It was bipedal, the horizontal torso being balanced by a long horizontal tail. The hindlimbs were long and strong with three forward-facing weight-bearing toes, the forelimbs relatively short but exceptionally robust and probably carrying three digits. Being a carnivore, its large elongated head bore long dagger-like teeth to slice the flesh of its prey. The skeleton of ''Megalosaurus'' is highly ossified, indicating a robust and muscular animal, though the lower leg was not as heavily built as that of ''Torvosaurus'', a close relative.

Skull and lower jaws

The skull of ''Megalosaurus'' is poorly known. The discovered skull elements are generally rather large in relation to the rest of the material. This can either be coincidental or indicate that ''Megalosaurus'' had an uncommonly large head. The praemaxilla is not known, making it impossible to determine whether the snout profile was curved or rectangular. A rather stubby snout is suggested by the fact that the front branch of the maxilla was short. In the depression around the antorbital fenestra to the front, a smaller non-piercing hollowing can be seen that is probably homologous to the ''fenestra maxillaris''. The maxilla bears 13 teeth. The teeth are relatively large, with a crown length up to seven centimeters. The teeth are supported from behind by tall, triangular, unfused interdental plates. The cutting edges bear 18 to 20 ''denticula'' per centimeter. The tooth formula is probably 4, 13-14/13-14. The jugal bone is pneumatized, pierced by a large foramen from the direction of the antorbital fenestra. It was probably hollowed out by an outgrowth of an air sac in the nasal bone. Such a level of pneumatisation of the jugal is not known from other megalosaurids and might represent a separate autapomorphy.

The lower jaw is rather robust. It is also straight in top view, without much expansion at the jaw tip, suggesting the lower jaws as a pair, the mandibula, were narrow. Several traits in 2008 identified as autapomorphies, later transpired to have been the result of damage. However, a unique combination of traits is present in the wide longitudinal groove on the outer side (shared with ''Torvosaurus''), the small third dentary tooth and a vascular channel, below the row of interdental plates, that only is closed from the fifth tooth position onwards. The number of dentary teeth was probably 13 or 14, though the preserved damaged specimens show at most 11 tooth sockets. The interdental plates have smooth inner sides, whereas those of the maxilla are vertically grooved; the same combination is shown by ''Piatnitzkysaurus''. The surangular has no bony shelf, or even ridge, on its outer side. There is laterally an oval opening present in front of the jaw joint, a ''foramen surangulare posterior'', but a second ''foramen surangulare anterior'' to the front of it is lacking.

Vertebral column

Although the exact numbers are unknown, the vertebral column of ''Megalosaurus'' was probably divided into 10 neck vertebrae, 13 dorsal vertebrae, five sacral vertebrae and 50 to 60 tail vertebrae, as is common for basal Tetanurae.

The Stonesfield Slate material contains no neck vertebrae; but a single broken anterior cervical vertebra is known from the New Park Quarry, specimen NHMUK PV R9674. The breakage reveals large internal air chambers. The vertebra is also otherwise heavily pneumatized, with large pleurocoels, pneumatic excavations, on its sides. The rear facet of the centrum is strongly concave. The neck ribs are short. The front dorsal vertebrae are slightly opisthocoelous, with convex front centrum facets and concave rear centrum facets. They are also deeply keeled, with the ridge on the underside representing about 50% of the total centrum height. The front dorsals perhaps have a pleurocoel above the diapophysis, the lower rib joint process. The rear dorsal vertebrae, according to Benson, are not pneumatized. They are slightly amphicoelous, with hollow centrum facets. They have secondary joint processes, forming a hyposphene–hypantrum complex, the hyposphene having a triangular transverse cross-section. The height of the dorsal spines of the rear dorsals is unknown, but a high spine on a tail vertebra of the New Park Quarry material, specimen NHMUK PV R9677, suggests the presence of a crest on the hip area. The spines of the five vertebrae of the sacrum form a supraneural plate, fused at the top. The undersides of the sacral vertebrae are rounded but the second sacral is keeled; normally it is the third or fourth sacral having a ridge. The sacral vertebrae seem not to be pneumatized but have excavations at their sides. The tail vertebrae are slightly amphicoelous, with hollow centrum facets on both the front and rear side. They have excavations at their sides and a longitudinal groove on the underside. The neural spines of the tail basis are transversely thin and tall, representing more than half of the total vertebral height.

Appendicular skeleton

The shoulderblade or scapula is short and wide, its length about 6.8 times the minimum width; this is a rare and basal trait within Tetanurae. Its top curves slightly to the rear in side view. On the lower outer side of the blade a broad ridge is present, running from just below the shoulder joint to about mid-length where it gradually merges with the blade surface. The middle front edge over about 30% of its length is thinned, forming a slightly protruding crest. The scapula constitutes about half of the shoulder joint, which is orientated obliquely sideways and to below. The coracoid is in all known specimens fused with the scapula into a scapulocoracoid, lacking a visible suture. The coracoid as such is an oval bone plate, with its longest side attached to the scapula. It is pierced by a large oval foramen but the usual boss for the attachment of the upper arm muscles is lacking.

The humerus is very robust with strongly expanded upper and lower ends. Humerus specimen OUMNH J.13575 has a length of 388 millimeters. Its shaft circumference equals about half of the total humerus length. The humerus head continues to the front and the rear into large bosses, together forming a massive bone plate. On the front outer side of the shaft a large triangular deltopectoral crest is present, the attachment for the '' Musculus pectoralis major'' and the '' Musculus deltoideus''. It covers about the upper half of the shaft length, its apex positioned rather low. The ulna is extremely robust, for its absolute size more heavily built than with any other known member of the Tetanurae. The only known specimen, NHMUK PV OR 36585, has a length of 232 millimeters and a minimal shaft circumference of 142 millimeters. The ulna is straight in front view and has a large olecranon, the attachment process for the '' Musculus triceps brachii''. Radius, wrist and hand are unknown.

In the pelvis, the ilium is long and low, with a convex upper profile. Its front blade is triangular and rather short; at the front end there is a small drooping point, separated by a notch from the pubic peduncle. The rear blade is roughly rectangular. The outer side of the ilium is concave, serving as an attachment surface for the ''Musculus iliofemoralis'', the main thigh muscle. Above the hip joint, on this surface a low vertical ridge is present with conspicuous vertical grooves. The bottom of the rear blade is excavated by a narrow but deep trough forming a bony shelf for the attachment of the ''Musculus caudofemoralis brevis''. The outer side of the rear blade does not match the inner side, which thus can be seen as a separate "medial blade" that in side view is visible in two places: in the corner between outer side and the ischial peduncle and as a small surface behind the extreme rear tip of the outer side of the rear blade. The pubic bone is straight. The pubic bones of both pelvis halves are connected via narrow bony skirts that originated at a rather high position on the rear side and continued downwards to a point low on the front side of the shaft. The ischium is S-shaped in side view, showing at the transition point between the two curvatures a rough boss on the outer side. On the front edge of the ischial shaft an obturator process is present in the form of a low ridge, at its top separated from the shaft by a notch. To below, this ridge continues into an exceptionally thick bony skirt at the inner rear side of the shaft, covering over half of its length. Towards the end of the shaft, this skirt gradually merges with it. The shaft eventually ends in a sizeable "foot" with a convex lower profile.

The thigh bone is straight in front view. Seen from the same direction its head is perpendicular to the shaft, seen from above it is orientated 20° to the front. The greater trochanter is relatively wide and separated from the robust lesser trochanter in front of it, by a fissure. At the front base of the lesser trochanter a low accessory trochanter is present. At the lower end of the thigh bone a distinct front, extensor, groove separates the condyles. At the upper inner side of this groove a rough area is present continuing inwards into a longitudinal ridge, a typical megalosauroid trait. The shinbone, or ''tibia'', is relatively straight, slightly curving inwards. To below, its shaft progressively flattens from front to rear, resulting in a generally oval cross-section. For about an eighth of its length the front lower end of the shaft is covered by a vertical branch of the astragalus. Of the foot, only the second, third and fourth metatarsals are known, the bone elements that were connected to the three weight-bearing toes. They are straight and robust, showing ligament pits at their lower sides. The third metatarsal has no clear condyles at its lower end, resulting in a more flexible joint, allowing for a modicum of horizontal movement. The top inner side of the third metatarsal carries a unique ridge that fits into a groove along the top outer side of the second metatarsal, causing a tighter connection.

Diagnosis

For decades after its discovery, ''Megalosaurus'' was seen by researchers as the definitive or typical large carnivorous dinosaur. As a result, it began to function as a "wastebasket taxon", and many large or small carnivorous dinosaurs from Europe and elsewhere were assigned to the genus. This slowly changed during the 20th century, when it became common to restrict the genus to fossils found in the middle Jurassic of England. Further restriction occurred in the late 20th and early 21st centuries, researchers such as Ronan Allain

HOME


Content is Copyleft
Website design, code, and AI is Copyrighted (c) 2014-2017 by Stephen Payne


Consider donating to Wikimedia



As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases