cancer prevention

Cancer prevention is the practice of taking active measures to decrease the incidence of cancer and mortality. The practice of prevention depends on both individual efforts to improve lifestyle and seek preventive screening, and socioeconomic or public policy related to cancer prevention. Globalized cancer prevention is regarded as a critical objective due to its applicability to large populations, reducing long term effects of cancer by promoting proactive health practices and behaviors, and its perceived cost-effectiveness and viability for all socioeconomic classes.

The majority of cancer cases are due to the accumulation of environmental pollution being inherited as epigenetic damage and most of these environmental factors are controllable lifestyle choices. Greater than a reported 75% of cancer deaths could be prevented by avoiding risk factors including: tobacco, overweight / obesity, an insufficient diet, physical inactivity, alcohol, sexually transmitted infections, and air pollution. Not all environmental causes are controllable, such as naturally occurring background radiation, and other cases of cancer are caused through hereditary genetic disorders. Current genetic engineering techniques under development may serve as preventive measures in the future. Future preventive screening measures can be additionally improved by minimizing invasiveness and increasing specificity by taking individual biological makeup into account, also known as "population-based personalized cancer screening."

While anyone can get cancer, age is one of the biggest factors that increases the risk of cancer: 3 out of 4 cancers are found in people aged 55 or older.

Risk reduction

Dietary

An average 35% of human cancer mortality is attributed to the diet of the individual. Studies have linked excessive consumption of red or processed meat to an increased risk of breast cancer, colon cancer, and pancreatic cancer, a phenomenon which could be due to the presence of carcinogens in meats cooked at high temperatures. More specifically, a higher risk of breast cancer also has been shown to possibly be associated with a higher intake of red and processed meats, refined sugars, alcohol and saturated fats. Researchers suggest that this association may be due to the inflammation processes and the increase of estrogen and testosterone from the foods in this diet. In some cases, a high intake of eggs was also found to may be associated with a higher risk of breast cancer due to its high cholesterol contents.

Dietary recommendations for reducing cancer risk typically include an emphasis on vegetables, fruit, whole grains, and fish, and an avoidance of processed and red meat (beef, pork, lamb), animal fats, and refined carbohydrates. The World Cancer Research Fund recommends a diet rich in fruits and vegetables to reduce the risk of cancer. A diet rich in foods of plant origin, including non-starchy fruits and vegetables, non-starchy roots and tubers, and whole grains, may have protective effects against cancer. Consumption of coffee is associated with a reduced risk of liver cancer and endometrial cancer. Additionally, a higher coffee intake was shown to be related to a lower risk of melanoma and oral/pharyngeal cancer. However, a higher risk of childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia and bladder cancer actually is associated with higher coffee intake. However, it's important to note that these claims are associations and there is not strong evidence that validates the effects of coffee consumption and cancer risk. Substituting processed foods, such as biscuits, cakes or white bread which are high in fat, sugars and refined starches with a plant-based diet may reduce the risk of cancer. In some cases, plant-based diets have shown to be inversely associated with overall cancer risk.

While many dietary recommendations have been proposed to reduce the risk of cancer, the evidence to support them is not definitive. The primary dietary factors that increase risk are obesity and alcohol consumption; with a diet low in fruits and vegetables and high in red meat being implicated but not confirmed. A 2014 meta-analysis did not find a relationship between consuming fruits and vegetables and reduced cancer risk.

Green Tea

Green tea comes from camellia sinensis and is made in a process that does not use fermentation. Some studies have found that green tea could possibly have positive effects relating to cancer prevention. Research shows that over half the studies (58%) they examined found that drinking green tea may prevent certain cancers, such as esophageal, stomach, pancreatic, liver and colorectal cancer. But due to the various methodological problems that come with this type of research, the review concludes that the overall analysis of green tea consumption and cancer prevention is inconclusive.

Physical activity

Research shows that regular physical activity may help to reduce cancer up to 30%, with up to 300 minutes per week of moderate to vigorous intensity of physical activity recommended.

Possible mechanisms by which physical activity may reduce cancer risk include lowering levels of estrogen and insulin, reducing inflammation, and strengthening the immune system.

Medication and supplements

In the general population, NSAIDs reduce the risk of colorectal cancer; however, due to the cardiovascular and gastrointestinal side effects, they cause overall harm when used to lower cancer risk. Aspirin use after a cancer diagnosis is associated with about a 20% reduction in cancer mortality. COX-2 inhibitors may decrease the rate of polyp formation in people with familial adenomatous polyposis however are associated with the same adverse effects as NSAIDs. Daily use of tamoxifen or raloxifene has been demonstrated to reduce the risk of developing breast cancer in high-risk women. The benefit verses harm for 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor such as finasteride is not clear.

Vitamins supplements have not been found to be effective at reducing overall cancer risk, although observational studies consistently show that low blood levels of vitamin D are correlated with increased cancer risk. Whether this relationship is causal and vitamin D supplementation is protective is not determined. Beta-carotene supplementation has been found to increase lung cancer rates in those who are at high risk. Folic acid supplementation has not been found effective in preventing colon cancer and may increase colon polyps. A 2018 systematic review concluded that selenium has no beneficial effect in reducing the risk of cancer based on high quality evidence.

Avoidance of carcinogens

The United States National Toxicology Program (NTP) has identified the chemical substances listed below as known human carcinogens in the NTP's 15th Report on Carcinogens. Simply because a substance has been designated as a carcinogen, however, does not mean that the substance will necessarily cause cancer. Many factors influence whether a person exposed to a carcinogen will develop cancer, including the amount and duration of the exposure and the individual's genetic background.

* Aflatoxins
* Aristolochic acids
* Arsenic
* Asbestos
* Benzene
* Benzidine
* Beryllium
* 1,3-Butadiene
* Cadmium
* Coal Tar and coal-tar pitch
* Coke-oven emissions
* Crystalline silica ( respirable size)
* Erionite
* Ethylene oxide
* Formaldehyde
* Hexavalent chromium compounds
* Indoor emissions from the household combustion of coal
* Mineral oils: untreated and mildly treated
* Nickel compounds
* Radon
* Secondhand tobacco smoke (environmental tobacco smoke)
* Soot
* Strong inorganic acid mists containing sulfuric acid
* Thorium
* Trichloroethylene
* Vinyl chloride
* Sawdust

Ingestion

*Water
**Point of use water filter
** Portable water purification
*Food
*Medication
*Substance abuse

Inhalation

*Outdoor air
*Indoor air
**Air purifier

Skin exposure

*Air
* Skin care products
*Others (clothes, etc.)
Recent Updates in Carcinogen Classification

Updated evaluations by the International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC) continue to confirm the carcinogenicity of long-recognized agents such as asbestos and benzene, which are included above in the NTP 15th report on carcinogens, while also guiding the assessment of emerging substances in consumer products. A meta-analysis published in 2023 found that exposure to certain endocrine-disrupting chemicals, including p,p′-DDT (and its metabolite p,p′-DDE) and several polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) variants, was associated with increased risk of breast cancer.

Genetic and Epigenetic Factors in Cancer Prevention

Genetic factors play a significant role in cancer risk, adding to the influence of modifiable environmental factors. Specific gene polymorphisms are associated with increased cancer risk. For instance, variations in the vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene are associated with elevated risks of both breast and ovarian cancers, suggesting that impaired vitamin D signaling may contribute to carcinogenesis. Similarly, inherited variations in the enzymes that contribute to the metabolism of carcinogens have been linked with an increased risk of colorectal cancer, demonstrating how genetic differences can affect the capacity of the body to break down cancer-causing substances. In addition to these inherited factors, environmental exposures can also alter gene regulation through epigenetic modifications. A systematic review on epigenetics, microbiota, and breast cancer revealed that factors like maternal diet and stress may alter epigenetic markers and impact the development and progression of breast cancer. Research on gene-environment interactions in colorectal cancer identified that lifestyle factors – such as the intake of processed meats, alcohol consumption, and the use of aspirin – affect cancer risk in individuals of specific genetic backgrounds, with aspirin’s protective effects varying according to genetic makeup.

Vaccination

Anti-cancer vaccines can be preventive or be used as therapeutic treatment. All such vaccines incite adaptive immunity by enhancing cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) recognition and activity against tumor-associated or tumor-specific antigens (TAA and TSAs).

Vaccines have been developed that prevent infection by some carcinogenic viruses. Human papillomavirus vaccine ( Gardasil and Cervarix) decreases the risk of developing cervical cancer. The hepatitis B vaccine prevents infection with hepatitis B virus and thus decreases the risk of liver cancer. The administration of human papillomavirus and hepatitis B vaccinations is recommended when resources allow.

Some cancer vaccines are usually immunoglobulin-based and target antigens specific to cancer or abnormal human cells. These vaccines may be given to treat cancer during the progression of disease to boost the immune system's ability to recognize and attack cancer antigens as foreign entities. Antibodies for cancer cell vaccines may be taken from the patient's own body ( autologous vaccine) or from another patient (allogeneic vaccine). Several autologous vaccines, such as Oncophage for kidney cancer and Vitespen for a variety of cancers, have either been released or are undergoing clinical trial. FDA-approved vaccines, such as Sipuleucel-T for metastasizing prostate cancer or Nivolumab for melanoma and lung cancer can act either by targeting over-expressed or mutated proteins or by temporarily inhibiting immune checkpoints to boost immune activity.

Screening

Screening procedures, commonly sought for more prevalent cancers, such as colon, breast, and cervical, have greatly improved in the past few decades from advances in biomarker identification and detection. Early detection of pancreatic cancer biomarkers was accomplished using a SERS-based immunoassay approach. A SERS-based multiplex protein biomarker detection platform in a microfluidic chip can be used to detect several protein biomarkers to predict the type of disease and critical biomarkers and increase the chance of diagnosis between diseases with similar biomarkers (e.g. pancreatic cancer, ovarian cancer, and pancreatitis).

To improve the chances of detecting cancer early, all eligible people should take advantage of cancer screening services. However, overall uptake of cancer screening among the general population is not widespread, especially among disadvantaged groups (e.g. those with low income, mental illnesses, or are from different ethnic groups) who face different barriers that lead to lower attendance rates. Research indicates that these screening barriers are influenced by both individual circumstances and area-level factors. A systematic review of lung cancer screenings found that feelings of fear, anxiety, and negative attitudes toward the screening process can discourage individuals from participating. Additionally, a review examining clinical and psychosocial aspects associated with breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening found that factors like personal beliefs, social support, and effective communication with healthcare providers are associated with screening attendance.

Beyond the personal and psychosocial factors, broader socioeconomic elements also impact screening participation rates. Women with lower income are 20% more likely to not participate in breast cancer screening, with lower education increasing the likelihood of skipping screening by 18%. Immigrant women have nearly triple the odds of non-participation, and individuals living further away from their assigned screening facility, as well as those with a male family doctor, are also less likely to participate in screening. Rural communities often face significant transportation barriers, with long travel distances and limited access to public transportation further reducing access to screening services. In addition, in these rural areas, the uneven distribution of healthcare providers and limited availability of telehealth services can exacerbate these disparities, reducing access to specialized cancer screening.

The Role of Health Literacy in Cancer Prevention

Health literacy – the ability to navigate and use health care information – is an important factor in cancer prevention. Studies show that individuals with better health literacy are more likely to follow through with cancer screening programs for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers. Some intervention programs aimed at improving health literacy are shown to not only boost understanding of health information but also address psychosocial aspects, such as patient communication and decision conflict. These interventions include patient decision aids, multimedia educational tools, and clinician communication training, which are linked to improvements in patient knowledge, risk perception, and comfortability with screening processes. Enhancing health literacy by addressing patients' informational and emotional needs may help to reduce disparities in cancer prevention.

Cervical cancer

Cervical cancer is usually screened through in vitro examination of the cells of the cervix (e.g. Pap smear), colposcopy, or direct inspection of the cervix (after application of dilute acetic acid), or testing for HPV, the oncogenic virus that is the necessary cause of cervical cancer. Screening is recommended for women over 21 years, initially women between 21 and 29 years old are encouraged to receive Pap smear screens every three years, and those over 29 every five years. For women older than the age of 65 and with no history of cervical cancer or abnormality, and with an appropriate precedence of negative Pap test results may cease regular screening.

Still, adherence to recommended screening plans depends on age and may be linked to "educational level, culture, psychosocial issues, and marital status," further emphasizing the importance of addressing these challenges in regards to cancer screening.

Colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is most often screened with the fecal occult blood test (FOBT). Variants of this test include guaiac-based FOBT (gFOBT), the fecal immunochemical test (FIT), and stool DNA testing (sDNA). Further testing includes flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), total colonoscopy (TC), or computed tomography (CT) scans if a total colonoscopy is non-ideal. The recommended age at which to begin and continue screening is 50–75 years. However, this is highly dependent on medical history and exposure to risk factors for colorectal cancer. Effective screening has been shown to reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer by 33% and colorectal cancer mortality by 43%.

Breast cancer

The estimated number of new breast cancer cases in the US in 2018 is predicted to be more than 1.7 million, with more than six hundred thousand deaths. Factors such as breast size, reduced physical activity, obesity and overweight status, infertility and never having had children, hormone replacement therapy (HRT), and genetics are risk factors for breast cancer. Mammograms are widely used to screen for breast cancer, and are recommended for women 50–74 years of age by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). However, the USPSTF does not recommend mammograms for women 40–49 years old due to the possibility of overdiagnosis.

Breast Cancer Prevention

Breast cancer is a leading cause of death for women worldwide, being the most common diagnosis for females in regards to cancer. Current research outlines the possible ability for physical activity and diet to help breast cancer prevention.

Physical Activity

Researchers have found a link between physical activity and a reduced risk, recurrence and mortality in relation to breast cancer. Physical activity has been shown to plays a crucial role in helping the immune system against cancer. Physical activity and body mass index (BMI) are interrelated because of how an increase of physical activity possibly may decrease BMI, which has also shown to be a breast cancer prevention factor. A recent meta-analysis examined 45,000 breast cancer patients and concluded that women who had higher levels of physical activity showed a possible lower risk for breast cancer recurrence and an overall lower risk of mortality from breast cancer. Additionally, mammary tumor growth or volume was also shown to have possibly reduced due to physical activity. When looking at metastasis, two studies found that physical activity may have reduced the metastasis of breast cancer that was present in the lungs, femur or abdominal area. In one meta-analysis it was shown that for every 25 hours/week of nonoccupational activity breast cancer risk may be reduced by up to 2%, for every 10 hours/week of exercise breast cancer risk can be possibly be reduced by 3%, and for every 2 hours/week of moderate-to-vigorous recreational activity can possibly reduce breast cancer risk by 5%. In some cases, physical activity has also been shown to lower the level of sex hormones, which in turn can possibly decrease breast cancer risk among women.

The Mediterranean Diet (MedDiet)

With the rise of new research, it's been suggested that the MedDiet may lower the risk of breast cancer. Some research shows that following this diet could help with breast cancer risk, particularly among women who are postmenopausal. However, other studies have not found an association between the MedDiet and breast cancer risk. The MedDiet is known to be a healthy diet because it focuses on eating foods that are plant-based and high in carbohydrates and antioxidants, which has been shown to help reduce inflammation. This diet includes foods such as various whole grains, nuts, beans, vegetables, fruits, herbs, spices, and olive oil as well as focusing on eating lean sources of meat such as fish and poultry instead of processed proteins.

In some studies, there has been an inverse association between breast cancer risk and whole grain consumption. Research suggests certain aspects as to why whole grains can possibly help prevent breast cancer. Various bioactive phytochemicals including phenolic acids, alkylresorcinols, lignans, vitamin E, polysaccharides, carotenoids, phytosterols, and anthocyanins are present in whole grains. These components are said to help prevent breast carcinogenesis. However, other studies done have shown no association between breast cancer risk and whole grain intake. Another food group, legumes, has been shown to possible lower breast cancer risk due to its high fiber contents. An example of this food group that would be encouraged to eat is lentils, peas, beans and chickpeas. One study found that women who ate >5.5 servings of fruit and vegetables per day had a 11% lower chance of getting breast cancer, compared to those who ate <2.5 servings per day. Researchers suggested this was due to the antioxidants and micronutrients that have been shown to help reduce breast cancer risk. However, other research shows that there is no association between pre- and postmenopausal breast cancer and eating foods with carotenoids or non-starchy vegetables.

Preventable causes of cancer

As of 2017, tobacco use, diet and nutrition, physical activity, obesity/overweight status, infectious agents, and chemical and physical carcinogens have been reported to be the leading areas where cancer prevention can be practiced through enacting positive lifestyle changes, getting appropriate regular screening, and getting vaccinated.

The development of many common cancers are incited by such risk factors. For example, consumption of tobacco and alcohol, a medical history of genital warts and STDs, immunosuppression, unprotected sex, and early age of first sexual intercourse and pregnancy all may serve as risk factors for cervical cancer. Obesity, red meat or processed meat consumption, tobacco and alcohol, and a medical history of inflammatory bowel diseases are all risk factors for colorectal cancer (CRC). On the other hand, exercise and consumption of vegetables may help decrease the risk of CRC.

Several preventable causes of cancer were highlighted in Doll and Peto's landmark 1981 study, estimating that 75 – 80% of cancers in the United States could be prevented by avoidance of 11 different factors. A more recent review of Doll and Peto's work confirmed that most of these estimates remain relevant today. In addition, a 2013 review of more recent cancer prevention literature by Schottenfeld et al., summarizing studies reported between 2000 and 2010, points to most of the same avoidable factors identified by Doll and Peto. However, Schottenfeld et al. considered fewer factors (e.g. non inclusion of diet) in their review than Doll and Peto, and indicated that avoidance of these fewer factors would result in prevention of 60% of cancer deaths. The table below indicates the proportions of cancer deaths attributed to different factors, summarizing the observations of Doll and Peto, Shottenfeld et al. and several other authors, and shows the influence of major lifestyle factors on the prevention of cancer, such as tobacco, an unhealthy diet, obesity and infections.

*Included in diet

†Carcinogenic infections include: for the uterine cervix (human papillomavirus PV, liver (hepatitis B virus BVand hepatitis C virus CV, stomach (''Helicobacter pylori'' 'H pylori'', lymphoid tissues ( Epstein-Barr virus BV, nasopharynx (EBV), urinary bladder ('' Schistosoma hematobium''), and biliary tract ('' Opisthorchis viverrini, Clonorchis sinensis'')

History of cancer prevention

Cancer has been thought to be a preventable disease since the time of Roman physician Galen, who observed that an unhealthy diet was correlated with cancer incidence. In 1713, Italian physician Ramazzini hypothesized that abstinence caused lower rates of cervical cancer in nuns. Further observation in the 18th century led to the discovery that certain chemicals, such as tobacco, soot and tar (leading to scrotal cancer in chimney sweeps, as reported by Percivall Pott in 1775), could serve as carcinogens for humans. Although Pott suggested preventive measures for chimney sweeps (wearing clothes to prevent contact bodily contact with soot), his suggestions were only put into practice in Holland, resulting in decreasing rates of scrotal cancer in chimney sweeps. Later, the 19th century brought on the onset of the classification of chemical carcinogens.

In the early 20th century, physical and biological carcinogens, such as X-ray radiation or the Rous Sarcoma Virus discovered 1911, were identified. Despite observed correlation of environmental or chemical factors with cancer development, there was a deficit of formal prevention research and lifestyle changes for cancer prevention were not feasible during this time.

In Europe, in 1987 the European Commission launched the European Code Against Cancer to help educate the public about actions they can take to reduce their risk of getting cancer. Vi
Archive of European Integration (AEI)
/ref> The first version of the code covered 10 recommendations covering tobacco, alcohol, diet, weight, sun exposure, exposure to known carcinogens, early detection and participation in organized breast and cervical cancer screening programs. In the early 1990s, the European School of Oncology led a review of the code and added details about the scientific evidence behind each of the recommendations. Later updates were coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The fourth edition of the code

developed in 2012‒2013, also includes recommendations on participation in Vaccination schedule, vaccination programs for hepatitis B (infants) and human papillomavirus (girls), breast feeding and hormone replacement therapy, and participation in organized colorectal cancer screening programs.

See also

*ATSDR
*BRCA1 and BRCA2 (DNA repair proteins.) Tests for specific genetic mutations determine cancer susceptibility.
*Cancer alley
* Cancer cluster
* Microplastics ingested through diet
* Human genetic enhancement
*International Agency for Research on Cancer
*Preventive healthcare
*Superfund
* The Cancer Prevention and Treatment Fund
*World Cancer Day

References

External links

Cancer prevention
on the website of Health Service Executive
Cancer prevention
on the website of the National Cancer Institute
Cancer prevention
on the website of the World Health Organization

{{Authority control

Prevention
*Cancer