Empirical examples
The distributions of a wide variety of physical, biological, and human-made phenomena approximately follow a power law over a wide range of magnitudes: these include the sizes of craters on theProperties
Statistical incompleteness
The power-law model does not obey the treasured paradigm of statistical completeness. Especially probability bounds, the suspected cause of typical bending and/or flattening phenomena in the high- and low-frequency graphical segments, are parametrically absent in the standard model.Scale invariance
One attribute of power laws is theirLack of well-defined average value
A power-law has a well-definedUniversality
The equivalence of power laws with a particular scaling exponent can have a deeper origin in the dynamical processes that generate the power-law relation. In physics, for example,Power-law functions
Scientific interest in power-law relations stems partly from the ease with which certain general classes of mechanisms generate them. The demonstration of a power-law relation in some data can point to specific kinds of mechanisms that might underlie the natural phenomenon in question, and can indicate a deep connection with other, seemingly unrelated systems; see also universality above. The ubiquity of power-law relations in physics is partly due to dimensional constraints, while inExamples
More than a hundred power-law distributions have been identified in physics (e.g. sandpile avalanches), biology (e.g. species extinction and body mass), and the social sciences (e.g. city sizes and income). Among them are:Artificial Intelligence
*Astronomy
* Kepler's third law * TheBiology
*Chemistry
* Rate lawClimate science
* Sizes of cloud areas and perimeters, as viewed from space * The size of rain-shower cells * Energy dissipation in cyclones * Diameters ofGeneral science
* Highly optimized tolerance *Proposed form ofEconomics
* Population sizes of cities in a region or urban network,Finance
* Returns for high-riskMathematics
*Physics
*The Angstrom exponent in aerosol optics *The frequency-dependency ofPolitical Science
* Cube root law of assembly sizesPsychology
*Variants
Broken power law
Smoothly broken power law
The pieces of a broken power law can be smoothly spliced together to construct a smoothly broken power law. There are different possible ways to splice together power laws. One example is the following:Power law with exponential cutoff
A power law with an exponential cutoff is simply a power law multiplied by an exponential function: :Curved power law
:Power-law probability distributions
In a looser sense, a power-lawGraphical methods for identification
Although more sophisticated and robust methods have been proposed, the most frequently used graphical methods of identifying power-law probability distributions using random samples are Pareto quantile-quantile plots (or ParetoPareto Q–Q plots
Pareto Q–Q plots compare theMean residual life plots
On the other hand, in its version for identifying power-law probability distributions, the mean residual life plot consists of first log-transforming the data, and then plotting the average of those log-transformed data that are higher than the ''i''-th order statistic versus the ''i''-th order statistic, for ''i'' = 1, ..., ''n'', where n is the size of the random sample. If the resultant scatterplot suggests that the plotted points tend to stabilize about a horizontal straight line, then a power-law distribution should be suspected. Since the mean residual life plot is very sensitive to outliers (it is not robust), it usually produces plots that are difficult to interpret; for this reason, such plots are usually called Hill horror plots.Log-log plots
Bundle plots
Another graphical method for the identification of power-law probability distributions using random samples has been proposed. This methodology consists of plotting a ''bundle for the log-transformed sample''. Originally proposed as a tool to explore the existence of moments and the moment generation function using random samples, the bundle methodology is based on residualPlotting power-law distributions
In general, power-law distributions are plotted on doubly logarithmic axes, which emphasizes the upper tail region. The most convenient way to do this is via the (complementary) cumulative distribution (ccdf) that is, theEstimating the exponent from empirical data
There are many ways of estimating the value of the scaling exponent for a power-law tail, however not all of them yield unbiased and consistent answers. Some of the most reliable techniques are often based on the method ofMaximum likelihood
For real-valued,Kolmogorov–Smirnov estimation
Another method for the estimation of the power-law exponent, which does not assumeTwo-point fitting method
This criterion can be applied for the estimation of power-law exponent in the case of scale-free distributions and provides a more convergent estimate than the maximum likelihood method. It has been applied to study probability distributions of fracture apertures. In some contexts the probability distribution is described, not by theValidating power laws
Although power-law relations are attractive for many theoretical reasons, demonstrating that data does indeed follow a power-law relation requires more than simply fitting a particular model to the data. This is important for understanding the mechanism that gives rise to the distribution: superficially similar distributions may arise for significantly different reasons, and different models yield different predictions, such as extrapolation. For example,See also
*References
Notes Bibliography * * * * * * * * * *External links