Manchu language

Manchu ( ) is a critically endangered Tungusic language native to the historical region of Manchuria in Northeast China.
As the traditional native language of the Manchus, it was one of the official languages of the Qing dynasty (1644–1912) of China, although today the vast majority of Manchus speak only Mandarin Chinese. Several thousand can speak Manchu as a second language through governmental primary education or free classes for adults in classrooms or online.

The Manchu language has high historical value for historians of China, especially for the Qing dynasty. Manchu-language texts supply information that is unavailable in Chinese, and when both Manchu and Chinese versions of a given text exist, they provide controls for understanding the Chinese.

Like most Siberian languages, Manchu is an agglutinative language that demonstrates limited vowel harmony. It has been demonstrated that it is derived mainly from the Jurchen language though there are many loan words from Mongolian and Chinese. Its script is vertically written and taken from the Mongolian script (which in turn derives from Aramaic via Uyghur and Sogdian). Although Manchu does not have the kind of grammatical gender found in most European languages, some gendered words in Manchu are distinguished by different stem vowels (vowel inflection), as in , 'father', and , 'mother'.

Names

The Qing dynasty used various Mandarin Chinese expressions to refer to the Manchu language, such as "Qingwen" () and "Qingyu" () ("Qing language"). The term "national" was also applied to writing in Manchu, as in ''Guowen'' (), in addition to ''Guoyu'' () ("national language"), which was used by previous non-Han dynasties to refer to their languages and, in modern times, to the Standard Chinese language. In the Manchu-language version of the Treaty of Nerchinsk, the term "Chinese language" (''Dulimbai gurun i bithe'') referred to all three Chinese, Manchu, and Mongol languages, not just one language.

History and significance

Historical linguistics

Manchu is southern Tungusic. Whilst Northern Tungus languages such as Evenki retain traditional structure, the Chinese language is a source of major influence upon Manchu, altering its form and vocabulary.

In 1635 Hong Taiji renamed the Jurchen people and Jurchen language as 'Manchu'. The Jurchen are the ancestors of the Manchu and ruled over the later Jin dynasty (1115–1234).

Decline of use

Manchu began as a primary language of the Qing dynasty Imperial court, but as Manchu officials became increasingly sinicized, many started losing the language. Trying to preserve the Manchu identity, the imperial government instituted Manchu language classes and examinations for the bannermen, offering rewards to those who excelled in the language. Chinese classics and fiction were translated into Manchu and a body of Manchu literature accumulated. As the Yongzheng Emperor (reigned 1722–1735) explained,

"If some special encouragement ... is not offered, the ancestral language will not be passed on and learned."Edward J. M. Rhoads, ''Manchus & Han: Ethnic Relations and Political Power in Late Qing and Early Republican China, 1861–1928.'' University of Washington Press, 2000. Pages 52–54. . Partially availabl
on Google Books
/ref>

Still, the use of the language among the bannermen declined throughout the 18th century. Historical records report that as early as 1776, the Qianlong Emperor was shocked to see a Manchu official, Guo'ermin, not understand what the emperor was telling him in Manchu, despite coming from the Manchu stronghold of Shengjing (now Shenyang). By the 19th century, even the imperial court had lost fluency in the language. The Jiaqing Emperor (reigned 1796–1820) complained that his officials were not proficient at understanding or writing Manchu.

By the end of the 19th century, the language had declined to such an extent that even at the office of the Shengjing general, the only documents written in Manchu (rather than Chinese) would be the memorials wishing the emperor long life; during the same period, the archives of the Hulan banner detachment in Heilongjiang show that only 1% of the bannermen could read Manchu and no more than 0.2% could speak it. Nonetheless, as late as 1906–1907, Qing education and military officials insisted that schools teach Manchu language and that the officials testing soldiers' marksmanship continue to conduct an oral examination in Manchu.

The use of the language for the official documents declined throughout Qing history as well. In particular, at the beginning of the dynasty, some documents on sensitive political and military issues were submitted in Manchu but not in Chinese. Later on, some Imperial records in Manchu continued to be produced until the last years of the dynasty. In 1912 the Qing was overthrown, most Manchus could not speak their language, and the Beijing dialect replaced Manchu.

Use of Manchu

A large number of Manchu documents remain in the archives, important for the study of Qing-era China. Today, written Manchu can still be seen on architecture inside the Forbidden City, whose historical signs are written in both Chinese and Manchu. Another limited use of the language was for voice commands in the Qing army, attested as late as 1878.

Bilingual Chinese-Manchu inscriptions appeared on many things.

Manchu studies during the Qing dynasty

A Jiangsu Han Chinese named Shen Qiliang wrote books on Manchu grammar, including ''Guide to Qing Books'' ( zh, labels=no, t=清書指南; ''Manju bithe jy nan'') and ''Great Qing Encyclopedia'' ( zh, labels=no, t=大清全書; ''Daicing gurun-i yooni bithe''). His father was a naval officer for the Qing and his grandfather was an official of the Ming dynasty before rebels murdered him. Shen Qiliang himself fought against the Three Feudatories as part of the Qing army. He then started learning Manchu and writing books on Manchu grammar from Bordered Yellow Manchu Bannermen in 1677 after moving to Beijing. He translated the Hundred Family Names and Thousand Character Classic into Manchu and spent 25 years on the Manchu language. Shen wrote: "I am a Han. But all my life I have made a hobby of Manchu." Shen didn't have to learn Manchu as part of his job because he was never an official, so he seems to have studied it voluntarily. Most Han people were not interested in learning non-Han languages, so it is not known why Shen was doing it, but he did praise Manchu writing, saying that it was simpler and clearer than Chinese.

A Hangzhou Han Chinese, Chen Mingyuan, helped edit the book ''Introduction to the Qing language'' (; ''Cing wen ki meng bithe''), which was co-written by a Manchu named Uge. Uge gave private Manchu language classes, which were attended by his friend Chen. Chen arranged for its printing.

Hanlin

Han Chinese at the Hanlin Academy studied the Manchu language in the Qing. The Han Chinese Hanlin graduate Qi Yunshi knew the Manchu language and wrote a book in Chinese on the frontier regions of China by translating and using the Manchu-language sources in the Grand Secretariat's archives. In 1740, Hanlin Academy expelled the Han Chinese Yuan Mei for not succeeding in his Manchu studies. Injišan, and Ortai, both Manchus, funded his work. The Han Chinese Yan Changming had the ability to read Tibetan, Oirat, and Mongolian. Han Chinese officials learned languages on the frontier regions and Manchu in order to be able to write and compile their writings on the region.

A Manchu-language course over three years was required for the highest ranking Han degree holders from Hanlin but not all Han literati were required to study Manchu. Towards the end of the Qing it was pointed out that a lot of Bannermen themselves did not know Manchu anymore and that, in retrospect, "the founding emperors of the (Qing) dynasty (had been) unable to coerce the country's ministers and people to learn the national writing and national speech (Manchu)".

Translation between Chinese and Manchu

Chinese fiction books were translated into Manchu. Bannermen wrote fiction in the Chinese language. Huang Taiji had Chinese books translated into Manchu. Han Chinese and Manchus helped Jesuits write and translate books into Manchu and Chinese. Manchu books were published in Beijing.

The Qianlong Emperor commissioned projects such as new Manchu dictionaries, both monolingual and multilingual like the Pentaglot. Among his directives were to eliminate directly borrowed loanwords from Chinese and replace them with calque translations which were put into new Manchu dictionaries. This showed in the titles of Manchu translations of Chinese works during his reign which were direct translations contrasted with Manchu books translated during the Kangxi Emperor's reign which were Manchu transliterations of the Chinese characters.

The Pentaglot was based on the ''Yuzhi Siti Qing Wenjian'' (; "Imperially-Published Four-Script Textual Mirror of Qing"), with Uyghur added as a fifth language. The four-language version of the dictionary with Tibetan was in turn based on an earlier three-language version with Manchu, Mongolian, and Chinese called the "Imperially-Published Manchu Mongol Chinese Three pronunciation explanation mirror of Qing" (), which was in turn based on the "Imperially-Published Revised and Enlarged mirror of Qing" () in Manchu and Chinese, which used both Manchu script to transcribe Chinese words and Chinese characters to transcribe Manchu words with fanqie.

Studies by outsiders

A number of European scholars in the 18th century were frustrated by the difficulties in reading Chinese, with its "complicated" writing system and classical writing style. They considered Manchu translations, or parallel Manchu versions, of many Chinese documents and literary works very helpful for understanding the original Chinese. De Moyriac de Mailla (1669–1748) benefited from the existence of the parallel Manchu text when translating the historical compendium '' Tongjian Gangmu'' (''Tung-chien Kang-mu''; ). Jean Joseph Amiot, a Jesuit scholar, consulted Manchu translations of Chinese works as well, and wrote that the Manchu language "would open an easy entrance to penetrate ... into the labyrinth of Chinese literature of all ages."Anonymous, "Considerations on the language of communication between the Chinese and European governments", in ''The Chinese Repository'', vol XIII, June 1844, no. 6, pp. 281–300
Available on Google Books
Modern reprint exists,

Study of the Manchu language by Russian sinologists started in the early 18th century, soon after the founding of the Russian Orthodox Mission in Beijing, to which most early Russian sinologists were connected.Liliya M. Gorelova, "Manchu Grammar." Brill, Leiden, 2002. (died 1761) translated a number of Manchu works, such as ''The history of Kangxi's conquest of the Khalkha and Oirat nomads of the Great Tartary, in five parts'' (), as well as some legal treatises and a Manchu–Chinese dictionary. In the late 1830s, Georgy M. Rozov translated from Manchu the ''History of the Jin (Jurchen) Dynasty''.''История золотой империи''. (''The History of the Jin (Jurchen) Dynasty'') Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch. Novosibirsk, 1998. 2
Editor's preface
A school to train Manchu language translators was started in Irkutsk in the 18th century, and existed for a fairly long period.

An anonymous author remarked in 1844 that the transcription of Chinese words in Manchu alphabet, available in the contemporary Chinese–Manchu dictionaries, was more useful for learning the pronunciation of Chinese words than the inconsistent romanizations used at the time by the writers transcribing Chinese words in English or French books.

In 1930, the German sinologist Erich Hauer argued forcibly that knowing Manchu allows the scholar to render Manchu personal and place names that have been "horribly mutilated" by their Chinese transliterations and to know the meanings of the names. He goes on that the Manchu translations of Chinese classics and fiction were done by experts familiar with their original meaning and with how best to express it in Manchu, such as in the Manchu translation of the '' Peiwen yunfu''. Because Manchu is not difficult to learn, it "enables the student of Sinology to use the Manchu versions of the classics ..in order to verify the meaning of the Chinese text".

Current situation

Currently, several thousand people can speak Manchu as a second language through primary education or free classes for adults offered in China. However very few native Manchu speakers remain. In what used to be Manchuria virtually no one speaks the language, the entire area having been completely sinicized. As of 2007, the last native speakers of the language were thought to be 18 octogenarian residents of the village of Sanjiazi (), in Fuyu County, in Qiqihar, Heilongjiang Province. A few speakers also remain in Dawujia village in Aihui District of Heihe Prefecture.

The Xibe (or Sibe) are often considered to be the modern custodians of the written Manchu language. The Xibe live in Qapqal Xibe Autonomous County near the Ili valley in Xinjiang, having been moved there by the Qianlong Emperor in 1764. Modern written Xibe is very close to Manchu, although there are slight differences in the writing system which reflect distinctive Xibe pronunciation. More significant differences exist in morphological and syntactic structure of the spoken Xibe language. For one example among many, there is a "converb" ending, -''mak'', that is very common in modern spoken Xibe but unknown in Manchu.

Revitalization movements

Since the 1980s, there have been increased efforts to revive the Manchu language. Revival movements are linked to the reconstruction of ethnic Manchu identity in the Han-dominated country. The Manchus mainly lead the revival efforts, with support from the PRC state, NGOs and international efforts.

Revivalism began in the post- Mao era when non-Han ethnic expression was allowed. By the 1980s, Manchus had become the second largest minority group in China. People began to reveal their ethnic identities that had been hidden due to 20th century unrests and the fall of the Qing Empire.

Language revival was one method the growing numbers of Manchus used in order to reconstruct their lost ethnic identity. Language represented them and set them apart from other minority groups in the " plurality of ethnic cultures within one united culture". Another reason for revivalism lay in the archives of the Qing Empire–a way to translate and resolve historical conflicts between the Manchus and the state. Lastly, the people wanted to regain their language for the rituals and communication to their ancestors–many shamans do not understand the words they use.

Manchu associations can be found across the country, including Hong Kong, as well as Taiwan, which is under the administration of the Republic of China. Consisting of mostly Manchus and Mongols, they act as the link between the people, their ethnic leaders and the state.

NGOs provide large support through "Manchu classes". Manchu is now taught in certain primary schools as well as in universities. Heilongjiang University Manchu language research center in no.74, Xuefu Road, Harbin, listed Manchu as an academic major. It is taught there as a tool for reading Qing-dynasty archival documents. In 2009 ''The Wall Street Journal'' reported that the language is offered (as an elective) in one university, one public middle school, and a few private schools. There are also other Manchu volunteers in many places of China who freely teach Manchu in the desire to rescue the language. Thousands of non-Manchu speakers have learned the language through these measures. Despite the efforts of NGOs, they tend to lack support from high-level government and politics.

The state also runs programs to revive minority cultures and languages. Deng Xiaoping promoted bilingual education. However, many programs are not suited to the ethnic culture or to passing knowledge to the younger generations. If the programs were created via "top-down political processes" the locals tend to look at them with distrust. But if they were formed via specialized governmental organizations, they fare better. According to Katarzyna Golik:

In Mukden, the historical Manchurian capital, there is a Shenyang Manchu Association () which is active in promoting Manchurian culture. The Association publishes books about Manchurian folklore and history and its activities are run independently from the local government. Among the various classes of the Manchurian language and calligraphy some turned out to be a success. Beijing has the biggest and most wealthy Beijing Daxing Regency Manchu Association (). (pp100-101)

Other support can be found internationally and on the Internet. Post-Cultural Revolution reform allowed for international studies to be done in China. The dying language and ethnic culture of Manchus gained attention, providing local support. Websites facilitate communication of language classes or articles. Younger generations also spread and promote their unique identity through popular Internet media.

Despite the increased efforts to revive the Manchu language, there are many obstacles standing in the way. Even with increased awareness, many Manchus choose to give up their language, some opting to learn Mongolian instead. Manchu language is still thought of as a foreign language in a Han-dominated Chinese speaking country. Obstacles are also found when gaining recognition from the state. Resistance through censorship prevented the performing of Banjin festivals, a festival in recognition of a new reconstructed Manchu identity, in Beijing.

Phonology

Written Manchu was close to being called an "open syllable" language because the only consonant that came regularly at the end of native words was , similar to Beijing Mandarin, Northeastern Mandarin, Jilu Mandarin and Japanese. This resulted in almost all native words ending in a vowel. In some words, there were vowels that were separated by consonant clusters, as in the words ''ilha'' ('flower') and ''abka'' ('heaven'); however, in most words, the vowels were separated from one another by only single consonants.

This open syllable structure might not have been found in all varieties of spoken Manchu, but it was certainly found in the southern dialect that became the basis for the written language. It is also apparent that the open-syllable tendency of the Manchu language had been growing ever stronger for the several hundred years since written records of Manchu were first produced: consonant clusters that had appeared in older forms, such as ''abka'' and ''abtara-mbi'' ('to yell'), were gradually simplified, and the words began to be written as ''aga'' or ''aha'' (in this form meaning 'rain') and ''atara-mbi'' ('to cause a commotion').

Consonants

Manchu has twenty consonants, shown in the table using each phoneme's representation in the IPA, followed by its romanization in italics. was rare and found mostly in loanwords and onomatopoeiae, such as ''pak pik'' ('pow pow'). Historically, appears to have been common, but changed over time to . was also found mostly in loanwords and onomatopoeiae and there was no single letter in the Manchu alphabet to represent it, but rather a digraph of the letters for and . is usually transcribed with a digraph ''ni'', and has thus often been considered a sequence of phonemes rather than a phoneme of its own, though work in Tungusic historical linguistics suggests that the Manchu palatal nasal has a very long history as a single segment, and so it is shown here as phonemic.

Early Western descriptions of Manchu phonology labeled Manchu ''b'' as "soft p", Manchu ''d'' as "soft t", and Manchu ''g'' as "soft k", whereas Manchu ''p'' was "hard p", ''t'' was "hard t", and ''k'' was "hard k". This suggests that the phonological contrast between the so-called voiced series (''b, d, j, g'') and the voiceless series (''p, t, c, k'') in Manchu as it was spoken during the early modern era was actually one of aspiration (as shown here) or tenseness, as in Mandarin.

was affricated to in some or all contexts. , , and together with were palatalized before /i/ or /y/ to , , and , respectively. , and were backed before /a/, /ɔ/, or /ʊ/ to , , and respectively. Some scholars analyse these uvular realizations as belonging to phonemes separate from and , and they were distinguished in the Manchu alphabet, but are not distinguished in the romanization.

Vowels

The vowel ''e'' (generally pronounced like Mandarin � is pronounced as /e/ after ''y'', as in niyengniyeri /ɲeŋɲeri/.

Between ''n'' and ''y'', ''i'' is absorbed into both consonants as /ɲ/.

The relatively rare vowel transcribed ''ū'' (pronounced ) was usually found as a back vowel; however, in some cases, it was found occurring along with the front vowel ''e''. Much disputation exists over the exact pronunciation of ''ū''. Erich Hauer, a German sinologist and Manchurist, proposes that it was pronounced as a front rounded vowel initially, but a back unrounded vowel medially. William Austin suggests that it was a mid-central rounded vowel. The modern Xibe pronounce it identically to ''u''.

Diphthongs

There are altogether eighteen diphthongs and six triphthongs. The diphthongs are ''ai'', ''ao'', ''ei'', ''eo'', ''ia'', ''ie'', ''ii'', ''io'', ''iu'', ''oi'', ''oo'', ''ua'', ''ue'', ''ui'', ''uo'', ''ūa'', ''ūe'', ''ūi'', and ''ūo''. The triphthongs are ''ioa'', ''ioo'' (which is pronounced as ), ''io(w)an'', ''io(w)en'', ''ioi'' (), and ''i(y)ao'', and they exist in Chinese loanwords.

The diphthong ''oo'' is pronounced as , and the diphthong ''eo'' is pronounced as .

Stress

Stress in Manchu has been described in very different ways by different scholars. According to Paul Georg von Möllendorff (1892), it was always on the last syllable. In contrast, Ivan Zakharov (1879) gives numerous specific rules: on the one hand, he seems to say that every prosodic word lent slight prominence to the vowel of its first syllable by lengthening it, but on the other hand suffixes such as the case markers and the interrogative particles received stress, as did the perfect participle suffix and the optative suffix when these forms have future meaning. In the closely related Xibe, Jerry Norman (1974) found yet another system – stress was usually penultimate (rarely antepenultimate) in the stem and was not affected by the addition of suffixes, except for monosyllabic suffixes beginning in a voiceless sound, which were treated as part of the stem for the purposes of stress placement. Disyllabic suffixes sometimes had secondary stress of their own.

Loanwords

Manchu absorbed a large number of non-native sounds into the language from Chinese. There were special symbols used to represent the vowels of Chinese loanwords. These sounds are believed to have been pronounced as such, as they never occurred in native words. Among these, was the symbol for the high unrounded vowel (customarily romanized with a ''y'', /ɨ/) found in words such as ''sy'' (Buddhist temple) and ''Sycuwan'' (Sichuan); and the triphthong ''ioi'' which is used for the Chinese ''ü'' sound. Chinese affricates were also represented with consonant symbols that were only used with loanwords such as in the case of ''dzengse'' (orange) (Chinese: ''chéngzi'') and ''tsun'' (inch) (Chinese: ''cùn''). In addition to the vocabulary that was borrowed from Chinese, such as the word ''pingguri'' (apple) (Chinese: píngguǒ), the Manchu language also had a large number of loanwords from other languages such as Mongolian, for example the words ''morin'' (horse) and ''temen'' (camel).

Vowel harmony

A crucial feature of the Manchu language is vowel harmony. It is described as based on the opposition between back and front vowels, but these phonological natural classes differ from the actual phonetic realization. The vowels ''a, o, ū'' function as back, as expected, but the only ''phonologically'' front vowel is ''e'' (even though it is ''phonetically'' central). Finally, the vowels ''i'' and ''u'' function as "neutral" vowels for the purposes of vowel harmony. As a rule, back and front vowels cannot co-occur in a word: in other words, the lone front vowel never occurs in a word with any the regular back vowels (''a, o, ū''). (An exception is the diphthong ''eo'', which does occur in some words, i.e. ''deo'', "younger brother", ''geo'', "a mare", ''jeo'', "department", ''leole'', "to discuss", ''leose'', "building", and ''šeole'', "to embroider", "to collect".) In contrast, the neutral vowels ''i'' and ''u'' are free to occur in a word with any other vowel or vowels.

The form of suffixes often varies depending on the rules of vowel harmony. Certain suffixes have only one form and are not affected by vowel harmony (e.g. ''de''); these include the suffixes of the accusative, dative-locative and alternate ablative cases (''be'', ''de'', ''deri''), the suffix for the imperfect converb (-''me'') and the nominalizers (''-ngge'', ''-ningge'' and ''ba''). Others have two forms (''giyan/giyen'', ''hiyan/hiyen'', ''kiyan/kiyen''), one of which is added to front-vowel stems and the other to back-vowel stems. Finally, there are also suffixes with three forms, either ''a/e/o'' (e.g. ''han/hen/hon'') or ''o/ū/u'' (e.g. ''hon/hūn/hun''). These are used in accordance with the following scheme:

The vowel harmony was traditionally described in terms of the philosophy of the ''I Ching''. Syllables with front vowels were described as being as " yin" syllables whereas syllables with back vowels were called " yang" syllables. The reasoning behind this was that the language had a kind of sound symbolism where front vowels represented feminine objects or ideas and the back vowels represented masculine objects or ideas. As a result, there were a number of word pairs in the language in which changing the vowels also changed the gender of the word. For example, the difference between the words ''hehe'' (woman) and ''haha'' (man) or ''eme'' (mother) and ''ama'' (father) was essentially a contrast between the front vowel, of the feminine and the back vowel, of the masculine counterpart.

Dialects

Dialects of Manchu include a variety of its historical and remaining spoken forms throughout Manchuria, and the city of Beijing (the capital). Notable historical Manchu dialects include Beijing, Ningguta, Alcuka and Mukden dialects.

Beijing Manchu dialect

The Chinese Northern Mandarin dialect spoken in Beijing had a major influence on the phonology of the dialect of Manchu spoken in that city, and because Manchu phonology was transcribed into Chinese and European sources based on the sinicized pronunciation of Manchus from Beijing, the original authentic Manchu pronunciation is unknown to scholars.

The Manchus of Beijing were influenced by the Chinese dialect spoken in the area to the point where pronouncing Manchu sounds was hard for them, and they pronounced Manchu according to Chinese phonetics, whereas the Manchus of Aigun (in Heilongjiang) could both pronounce Manchu sounds properly and mimic the sinicized pronunciation of Manchus in Beijing, because they learned the Beijingese pronunciation from either studying in Beijing or from officials sent to Aigun from Beijing, and they could tell them apart, using the Chinese influenced Beijingese pronunciation when demonstrating that they were better educated or their superior stature in society.

Changes in vowels

Phonetically, there are some characteristics that differentiate the Beijing accent from the standard spelling form of Manchu.
* There are some occasional vowel changes in a word. For example (''cimari'' /t͡ʃʰimari/) is pronounced ͡ʃʰumari (''ojorakū'' /ot͡ʃoraqʰʊ/) is pronounced t͡ɕiraqʰʊ and (''gisun'' /kisun/) is pronounced ysun
** In particular, when the vowel /o/ or diphthong /oi/ appears at the beginning of a word, it is frequently pronounced �and �irespectively in Beijing accent. For example, (''onggolo'' /oŋŋolo/) is pronounced �ŋŋolo (''oilo'' /oilo/) is pronounced �ilo
* Diphthongization of vowels. /ə/ becomes /əi/ (such as ''dehi'' /təxi/ pronounced əixi, /a/ becomes i(such as ''dagilambi'' /takilampi/ pronounced aikilami, and /i/ becomes u(such as ''niru'' /niru/ pronounced iuru and ''nicuhe'' /nit͡ʃʰuxə/ pronounced iut͡ʃʰuxə.
* /oi/ becomes ai especially after /q/ (g). For example, ''goimbi'' /koimpi/ becomes uaimi
* Loss of vowels under certain conditions. The vowel /i/ following consonant /t͡ʃʰ/ (c) or /t͡ʃ/ (j) usually disappears. For example, ''ecike'' /ət͡ʃʰikʰə/ is pronounced �t͡ʃʰkʰə and ''hojihon'' /χot͡ʃiχon/ is pronounced �ot͡ʃχon There are also other cases where a vowel disappears in Beijing accent. For example, ''ekšembi'' /əkʰʃəmpi/ is pronounced �kʰʃmi and ''burulambi'' /purulampi/ is pronounced urlami

Changes in consonants

This section is primarily based upon Aisin Gioro Yingsheng's ''Miscellaneous Knowledge of Manchu'' (满语杂识).

* Systemic merger of /q/ and /χ/ into � and /k/ and /x/ into �between voiced phonemes. For example, (''sargan'' /sɑrqɑn/) is pronounced as ɑrʁɑn and (''urgun'' /urkun/) is pronounced as rɣun
* Conversely, /χ/ may be pronounced as ʰat the beginning of a word. For example, (''hamimbi'' /χɑmimpi/) is pronounced as ʰamimi
* Assmilation of alveolar and postalveolar stops after /n/. For example, (''banjimbi'' /pɑnt͡ʃimpi/) is pronounced as ɑnnimi and (''hendumbi'' /xəntumpi/) is pronounced as ənnumi
* /si/ is pronounced as �ɨin the middle of a word. For example, (''usiha'' /usiχɑ/) is pronounced as ʃɨʁɑ

Grammar

Syntax

All Manchu phrases are head-final; the head-word of a phrase (e.g. the noun of a noun phrase, or the verb of a verb phrase) always falls at the end of the phrase. Thus, adjectives and adjectival phrases always precede the noun they modify, and the arguments to the verb always precede the verb. As a result, Manchu sentence structure is subject–object–verb (SOV).

Manchu uses a small number of case-marking particles that are similar to those found in Korean, but there is also a separate class of true postpositions. Case markers and postpositions can be used together, as in the following sentence:

In this example, the postposition , "with", requires its nominal argument to have the genitive case, which causes the genitive case marker between the noun and the postposition.

Manchu also makes extensive use of converb structures and has an inventory of converbial suffixes to indicate the relationship between the subordinate verb and the finite verb that follows it. An example is these two sentences, which have finite verbs:

Both sentences can be combined into a single sentence by using converbs, which relate the first action to the second:

Morphology

While Manchu is a synthetic and agglutinative language typologically similar to the neighbouring Mongolic and Turkic languages, its morphology is nevertheless less complex than theirs and its synthetic character is not so pronounced as theirs.

Gender

Manchu has no grammatical gender, although the distinction between nouns referring to humans and nouns referring to non-humans does play a certain role in its grammar (as explained below). However, as already mentioned, biological gender is expressed by different vowels in a number of word pairs, where a phonologically back vowel is associated with males and a phonologically front one with females: ''ama'' "father" – ''eme'' "mother", ''haha'' "man" – ''hehe'' "woman", ''naca'' "brother-in-law" – ''nece'' "sister-in-law", ''hūwašan'' (Chinese ''héshang'' ) "monk" – ''huwešen'' "nun", ''amila'' "male animal" – ''emile'' "female animal", ''arsalan'' "lion" – ''erselen'' "lioness", ''garudai'' "male phoenix" – ''gerudei'' "female phoenix"; similarly for words related to genders such as ''habtaha'' "man's belt" – ''hebtehe'' "woman's belt", ''ganggan'' "strong" – ''genggen'' "weak".

Number

Only nouns referring to humans decline for number. The plural number is formed by the addition of several suffixes, depending on the specific noun.
* The suffix ''-sa/se'' has broad usage: it is used, inter alia, with many words expressing occupations (''faksi'' “workman” – ''faksisa'' “workmen”) and nationalities (''manju'' "Manchu" – ''manjusa'' "Manchus").
* The suffix ''-ta/te'' is mostly limited to words denoting persons of a certain age or generation and relatives (''ama'' "father" – ''amata'' "fathers"), although there are a few others such as ''ejen'' "lord" – ''ejete'' "lords". However, the suffix ''-sa/se'' can also be used with nouns with the same types of meaning: ''gege'' "elder sister" – ''gegese'' "elder sisters".
* The less common suffix ''-si'' occurs in a number of nouns mostly with that type of meaning, too, e.g. in ''haha'' “man” — ''hahasi'' “men”.
* Finally, a few words use the suffix ''-ri'': ''mama'' "grandmother" – ''mamari'' "grandmothers".

Note that the final consonant ''-n'' is normally lost before the plural suffixes: ''ahūn'' "elder brother" – ''ahūta'' "elder brothers"; the final ''-i'' is likewise lost in ''jui'' "son" – ''juse'' "sons".

In addition, plurality can be expressed by the addition of some words meaning "all" or "many", such as ''geren'' (''geren niyalma'' “all/many men/persons”), by the addition of words meaning "kind" or "class" (''gurgu jergi'' "various wild animals", ''baita hacin'' "various affairs"), or by reduplication (''jalan'' "generation, world" – ''jalan jalan'' "generations, worlds").

Cases

Manchu has five cases, which are marked by particles: nominative, accusative, genitive, dative-locative, and ablative. The particles can be written with the noun to which they apply or separately. They do not obey the rule of vowel harmony but are also not truly postpositions.

=Nominative

=
One of the principal syntactic cases, it is used for the subject of a sentence and has no overt marking.

=Accusative

=
(''be''): one of the principal syntactic cases, it indicates participants/direct object of a sentence. It is written separate from the word that it follows.

Certain Manchu verbs govern the accusative in spite of the fact that verbs with similar semantics in other languages do not take a direct object:

Direct objects sometimes also take the nominative. It is commonly felt that the marked accusative has a definite sense, like using a definite article in English. However, in the negative form, transitive verbs always take the accusative:

The direct object expressing an object that is caused to perform an action also stands in the accusative:

The accusative may also indicate the space in which motion is happening or the means by which it is happening, as in ''jugūn be yabu-me'' ("going along a road") and ''morin be yabu-me'' ("riding a horse").

=Genitive

=
(''i'' or ''ni''): one of the principal syntactic cases, it is used to indicate possession or the means by which something is accomplished. The allomorph ''ni'' is used after words ending in a consonant other than /n/, whereas ''i'' is used in all other cases: ''boo i'' "of the house", but ''gurung ni'' "of the palace".

Its primary function is to indicate the possessor of an entity:

It can also indicate a person's relationships:

Sometimes a broader attributive relation (not necessarily a possessive one) is expressed, e.g. ''doro i yoro'' "a ceremonial arrow".

Verbs and participles can also be modified by a phrase in the genitive, resulting in adverbial meaning:

Adverbs are regularly formed from nouns by a repetition of the noun followed by a genitive marker: ''giyan'' “order”, “proper” > ''giyan giyan i'' “in proper order”.

=Dative-locative

=
(''de''): indicates location, time, place, or indirect object.

Its primary function is to indicate the semantic role of the recipient:

It can also indicate a person who is in possession of something in the construction meaning "A has B", which is expressed literally as "To A (there) is B":

Another function is to indicate the instrument of action, making it play the role of an instrumental case as well:

However, the genitive can often express the same instrumental meaning. It has been claimed that the genitive is used for the instrument of one's own actions as opposed to those of others (e.g. ''mini yasa i tuwa-ci'' "Seeing with my eyes" vs ''si yasa de tuwa-ki'' "You see with your eyes") and for non-past actions as opposed to past ones (''beye-i gala-i gaisu'' "take with your own hand" vs ''beye i gala de jafa-habi'' “(Someone) caught with his own hand”).

A related function is to express the agent of a verb in the passive voice:

The dative can also indicate the source of a statement or quotation, meaning roughly "according to", as in ''mini gūnin de'' "in my opinion" and ''ejen i hese de'' "according to the emperor's edict".

Finally, as already mentioned, it can express location in space or time, thus functioning as a locative case:

=Ablative

=
(''ci''): indicates the origin of an action or the basis for a comparison.

That can be the starting point in space or time:

It can also be used to compare objects:

In Classical Manchu, there was also a case marker ''deri'', which has been said to have more or less the same ablative uses as ''ci''; in Xibe, however, it differs from ''ci'' by being specialized for the expression of comparison:

= Less-used cases

=

* Terminative: indicates the ending point of an action by the suffix ''-tala''/''-tele''/''-tolo''.
* Indefinite allative: indicates "to a place, to a situation" when it is unknown whether the action reaches exactly to the place or situation or around or near it by the suffix ''-si''.
* Indefinite locative: indicates "at a place, in a situation" when it is unknown whether the action happens exactly at the place or situation or around or near it by the suffix ''-la''/''-le''/''-lo''.
* Indefinite ablative: indicates "from a place, from a situation" when it is unknown whether the action is really from the exact place or situation or around or near it by the suffix ''-tin''.
* Distributive: indicates every one of something by the suffix ''-dari''.
* Essive-formal: indicates a simile ("as/like") by the suffix ''-gese''.
* Identical: indicates that something is the same as something else by the suffix ''-ali''/''-eli''/''-oli'' (apparently derived from the word ''adali'', meaning "same").
* Orientative: indicates "facing/toward" (something/an action) and shows only position and tendency, not movement into by the suffix ''-ru''.
* Revertive: indicates "backward" or "against (something)" from the root 'ca' (see ''cargi'', ''coro'', ''cashu-n'', etc.) by the suffix ''-ca''/''-ce''/''-co''.
* Translative: indicates change in the quality or form of something by the suffix ''-ri''.
* Indefinite accusative: indicates that the touch of the verb on the object is not surely complete by the suffix ''-a''/''-e''/''-o''/''-ya''/''-ye''/''-yo''.

In addition, there were some suffixes, such as the primarily-adjective-forming suffix ''-ngga''/''-ngge''/''-nggo'', that appear to have originally been case markers (in the case of ''-ngga'', marking the genitive case) but had already lost their productivity to become fossilized in certain lexemes by the time of the earliest written records of the Manchu language: ''agangga'' "pertaining to rain" as in ''agangga sara'' (an umbrella), derived from Manchu ''aga'' (rain).

Pronouns

Manchu personal pronouns have a clusivity distinction and mostly use the same case markers as nouns, but with some stem changes.

The 3rd person pronouns are used with human referents, but do not refer to non-humans. With non-humans, the demonstrative pronouns ''ere'' "this" and ''tere'' "that" are used instead. Possession can be expressed with the genitive form of the personal pronouns: ''mini boo'' "my house", ''sini boo'' „your (sing.) house“, ''musei boo'' "our house" etc. Like English, Manchu has special forms for substantively used possessive pronouns; these are formed with the suffix ''-ngge'': ''miningge'' "mine", ''gūwaingge'' "somebody else's".

As in other East Asian languages, educated Manchus in the imperial period tended to avoid personal pronouns, especially for the first and second person, and often used paraphrases instead. For example, Manchu officials, when talking to the Emperor, referred to themselves with the word ''aha'' "slave" (instead of the pronoun ''bi'' "I"), and Han Chinese ones used ''amban'' "subject". The Emperor, when talking to Manchu princes (''amban'' and ''beile''), called himself ''sitahūn niyalma'' "wretched person" or ''emteli beye'' "orphan". In general, calques from Chinese were used. Another alternative were combinations of the personal pronouns in genitive and the word ''beye'' "self": ''mini beye'' "I" (lit. "my self"), ''sini beye'' "you (polite)" (lit. "your self").

The demonstrative pronouns are formed with the stems ''e-'' and ''u-'' for proximal (close) entities and ''te-'' and ''tu-'' for distal (far) entitites: ''ere'' "this", ''enteke'' "such", ''ubaingge'' "local (from here)"; ''tere'' "that", ''tenteke'' "such", ''tubaingge'' "local (from there)".

The demonstrative pronouns ''ere'' "this" and ''tere'' "that" can also be used alone like personal pronouns (and are obligatorily so for non-human referents). They form the plural with ''-se'' and are declined in a way that isn't always entirely regular:

When pronouns function as attributes, the case marker is not placed after the pronoun, but only after the noun:

The most important interrogative pronouns are ''we'' "who", ''ai'' "what", ''ya'' "what, which" (attributive), ''aika'', ''aimaka'', ''yaka'', ''yamaka'' "what sort of", ''aba'', ''aiba'', ''yaba'' "where", ''eke'' "who is this?", ''udu'' "how much/many?", ''ainu'' "how, why?". The following table exemplifies the case declension of interrogative pronouns:

The pronouns ''ai'', ''ya'' and ''we'' are also used as relative pronouns.

The most important indefinite pronouns are ''we we'' "whoever"; ''ai ai'', ''ya ya'' "whatever", ''aika'', ''aimaka'', ''yaka'', ''yamaka'' "whatever, whichever (attributive)"; ''ememu'', ''ememungge'' "many", ''gūwa'' "someone (else)"; ''eiten'', ''yaya'', ''beri beri'', ''meni meni'', ''meimeni'', ''geren'' "every", "all".

Adjectives

Adjectives in Manchu are not very distinct from nouns as regards their grammatical properties, so many scholars have argued that they are not a separate part of speech; it has been claimed that they are simply a special type of nouns with semantics of quality.

An adjective as an attribute stands without case suffixes in front of the noun.

As a predicate it stands at the end of the clause.

The adjective itself does not have comparison as an inflectional category; instead, comparisons are formed just by inflecting the compared noun in the ablative.

Final particles

Final particles can be used as copulas. The most important final particles are ''kai'' (confirming), ''be'' (defining), ''akū'' (negating, "there is not"), ''waka'' (negating, "is not"), ''dere'' (suppositional, "probably"), ''inu'' (also as an adverb: affirmative); ''dabala'' (restricting, "only"), ''semeo'' ( admirative or dubitative), ''unde'' (also a conjunction; "not yet"); ''jiya/jiye'' (exalamatory), ''bai'' (with imperative; "just"), ''na/ne/no'', ''ya'' (interrogative, also exclamatory).Gorelova (2002: 368–380). Of the interrogative particles, ''na'' is placed after nouns as well as verbs, whereas ''o'' is placed after verbs only (both in yes/no-questions), and ''ni'' is placed in the end of the sentence (and occurs also in WH-questions): e.g. ''boo de gemu sain-na'' "Is everything well at home?", ''ere ai bi-he ni'' "What is this?", ''gasha be'' ''eigen gai-ci o-mbi-o?'' "May I take a bird as a husband?", lit. "If taking a bird as a husband, does it become?"

Verbs

The Manchu verb has no number and person agreement. The pure verb stem functions as the imperative of the second person, singular and plural; otherwise the verb takes participial, converbal and verbal suffixes, which also express mood and aspect. It has been argued that the aspect contrast to some extent has acquired the function of a tense contrast as well, because the perfect and imperfect participles have partly developed a secondary meaning of past and present-future tense, respectively.

There are 13 basic verb forms, some of which can be further modified with the verb ''bi'' (is), or the particles ''akū, i, o,'' and ''ni'' (negative, instrumental, and interrogatives).

= Participles

=
Participles play an important role in Manchu grammar, because most finite forms are derived from them. They can have four different functions in the sentence:

# They can be used attributively.
# They can receive nominalizing suffixes – among them case markers – and in that form, they can function like nouns as subject, object, etc.
# They can function as the head of the predicate in the equivalent of a dependent clause.
# They can function as the head of the predicate of a sentence, even without a copula.

Imperfect participle

The imperfect participle is formed by adding the variable suffix ''-ra, -re, -ro'' to the stem of the verb. ''Ra'' occurs when the final syllable of the stem contains an ''a''. ''Re'' occurs when the final syllable of the stem contains ''e'', ''i'', ''u'' or ''ū''. ''Ro'' occurs with stems containing all ''o'''s. An irregular suffix ''-dara, -dere, -doro'' is added to a limited group of irregular verbs (''jon-, wen-, ban-'') with a final ''-n''. (The perfect participle of these verbs is also irregular). Three of the most common verbs in Manchu also have irregular forms for the imperfect participle:

* ''bi-, bisire'' — 'be'
* ''o-, ojoro'' — 'become'
* ''je-, jetere'' — 'eat'

Imperfect participles can be used as objects, attributes, and predicates. Using ''ume'' alongside the imperfect participle makes a negative imperative.

As an attribute:When this form is used predicatively it is usually translated as a future tense in English; it often carries an indefinite or conditional overtone when used in this fashion:As an object:

Perfect participle

The perfect participle in ''-ha/-he/-ho'' often expresses an action in the past tense: e.g. ''araha'', while originally meaning "who has written", can also be used in the sense "(I, you, etc.) wrote". Certain verbs take, instead of ''-ha/-he/-ho,'' the ending ''-ka/-ke/-ko'', fewer still take ''-nka/-nke/-nko'', and a few have irregular forms: ''bahambi'' "find" – ''baha'', ''hafumbi'' "penetrate" – ''hafuka''.

Relative/indefinite participle

When the indefinite pronoun ''ele'' "all" is added to a perfective or imperfective participle, the resulting form has a relative/indefinite meaning: ''bisire ele jaka'' "whatever things are present", ''mini alaha ele ba'' "whatever I said", "everything I said". The pronoun can also merge into the preceding word as a suffix ''-le'': ''arahale'', ''ararale'' „whoever writes“, "whatever is written", ''duleke ele ba'' "whatever places he passed by", "all places he passed by". This suffix didn't exhibit vowel-harmony alternations in older Manchu, but it later acquired the back variant ''-la.''

Durative participle

The durative participle in ''-mbihe'' appears to originate from the imperfect converb in ''-me'' and the perfect participle ''bihe'' of the verb ''bi-'' "to be": thus, almost literally, "(which) was doing (something)". It expresses an incomplete or continuing action in the past: ''arambihe'' "(I was) writing".

= Nominalization

=
Both participles and verbs in the perfect or imperfect form can be nominalized with the suffix ''-ngge.'' These nominalized forms can express either the abstract notion of an action, the object of an action or the subject of an action: ''arahangge'', ''ararangge'' "writing", "something written", "someone writing".

Negated forms can be nominalized like this as well: ''akdarakūngge'' "distrust", "one who does not trust".

Direct speech and quotes are often introduced with nominalized forms like ''alarangge'' "tell, narrate", ''hendurengge'' "speak", ''serengge'' "say", ''fonjirengge'' "ask" or ''wesimburengge'' "relate, report", for example:

Participles can also be nominalized with ''ba'' "place, circumstance, thing": e.g. ''sere ba'' "what is said", "speech", ''afabu ha ba bi'' "there is an order" (lit."A thing which has been ordered exists").

= Converbs

=
Converbs (sometimes referred to as gerunds) have an adverbial function, and constructions with them often correspond to subordinate clauses in English.

Imperfect converb

The imperfect converb in ''-me'' expresses an action that is simultaneous with that of the finite verb, but it may also denote secondary meanings such as manner, condition, cause and purpose, and it can often be translated with an infinitive in English. This is the most frequent type of converb: ''arame'' "(while) writing", ''hendume'' "(while) saying", ''fonjime'' "(while) asking", ''necihiyeme toktobumbi'' "conquer", lit. "stabilise, (while) levelling" (a calque of Chinese ''píng-dìng'' ).

Möllendorff 1892, 9.

Durative converb

The imperfect converb ending ''-me'' can be added not only to the stem, but also to the finite imperfect form in ''-mbi'' (which, in turn, is originally also a combination of an imperfect converb and the copula verb ''bi'' "is", see below)''.'' The resulting form ending in ''-mbime'' has been described as a separate durative converb'','' which expresses a non-completed or continuing action. An example is ''arambime'' (< ''ara-me bi-me'') “while writing”. This form is also used in the following quote by Confucius:

Perfect converb

The perfect converb in ''-fi'' expresses an action that took place before the action of the finite verb; a secondary meaning is one of cause. It is the second most frequent converb: ''arafi'' "(after) having written", "after I wrote", or, more idiomatically, "I wrote and ...".

A frozen form is ''ofi'' "because, since" (from ''ombi'' "be", "become"):

Certain verbs have irregular forms: ''juwambi'' "open" – ''juwampi'', ''colgorombi'' "exceed" – ''colgoropi'', ''hafumbi'' "penetrate" – ''hafupi''.

A similar meaning is expressed by adding the ending not to the stem, but to the finite imperfect form in ''-mbi'', resulting in ''-mbifi'': ''arambifi'' "having written".

Conditional converb

The conditional converb in ''-ci'' can express a condition, but also the time when something happened: ''araci'' "if, when you write"; ''si niyalma de nikeneci'' "if you rely on people"; ''yamun de tucifi tuwaci'' "as/when he went out to the hall and checked,...".

Frozen forms are ''oci'' and ''seci'' "if" (from ''ombi'' "be" and ''sembi'' "say"). They can also serve as topic markers.

Concessive/adversative converb

The concessive or adversative converb in ''-cibe'' forms a construction that can be translated as "even if" or "although": ''aracibe'' "even if I write". It appears to be derived from the conditional.

Terminative converb

The terminative converb in ''-tala/-tele/-tolo'' can be translated with clauses introduced by "until"; it expresses a subordinate action that is taking place simultaneously with that of the finite verb, and the latter continues until the first one is finished. ''hūsun moho-tolo'' "until his power is exhausted".

In Classical Manchu this form is no longer very productive. The most frequent forms are ''isitala'' "until" (from ''isimbi'' "reach") and ''otolo'' "until" (from ''ombi'' "be", "become"):

Descriptive converb

The converb with the suffixes ''-hai/-hei/-hoi'' or ''-kai/-kei/-koi'', also ''-tai/-tei/-toi'', expresses durative, periodic, frequent or intensive actions or processes: ''alahai'' "telling many times", ''jonkoi'' "constantly reminding". It appears to be derived from the perfect participle in ''-ha/he/ho'' (also ''-ka/ke/ko'' in some verbs) and the genitive ending ''-i'' in its adverbial function. Such forms have sometimes turned into adverbs: ''cohotoi'' "especially" from ''cohombi'' "to do especially, regard as the most important aspect". Other examples of this use are the phrases ''beye be waliyatai'' "selflessly", lit. "constantly throwing oneself around", and ''bucetei afambi'' "to fight to the death", lit. "to fight, constantly dying".

Converb in -nggala/-nggele/-nggolo

The converb in ''-nggala/-nggele/-nggolo'' can be translated with the conjunction "before"; it expresses a subordinate action that has not yet taken place at the time of the main one and will only take place ''after'' it: ''aranggala'' "before writing"; ''dosinggala asuki isibumbi'' "before entering, one makes a noise". A frozen form is ''onggolo'' "before".

= Finite forms

=
The Manchu finite verbal forms are set apart from others by the fact that they can function ''only'' as heads of the predicate in an independent clause. (As already mentioned, some participles can have the same function, but they are not limited to it.) All Manchu indicative verbal forms seem to be derived from non-finite ones such as participles and converbs.

Imperfect indicative

The imperfect is formed with the suffix ''-mbi'', which is derived from the imperfect converb ending ''-me'' and the copula verb ''-bi'' "to be". This is the dictionary form of the verb. The meaning of the form is of present or future tense. It can express usual, frequent, generic actions, concrete actions in the present, or actions in the future:

Perfect indicative

The perfect indicative form in ''-habi/-hebi/-hobi'' is derived from the perfect participle in ''-ha/-he/-ho'' and the copula verb ''-bi'' "to be". It expresses an action in the past: ''arahabi'' "I wrote, I have written."

The second part of the suffix, originating from the copula verb ''bi-'', can also be replaced by ''kai'': ''alahabi'', ''alaha kai'' "narrated".

Frequentative indicative

The form in ''-mbihebi'' is derived from the durative participle and the verb ''bi-'' "to be". It expresses usual and frequent actions in the distant past:

= Imperative

=
The pure stem forms the imperative: ''ala'' "Report!", ''te'' "Sit down!", ''wa'' "Kill!"

There is also a stronger form of command in ''-kini'', which is directed at a person of lower rank and which is used also as an optative or impersonal imperative of the third person: ''arakini'' "Let him write!", ''okini'' "Let it be so!", ''alakini'' "Let it be reported!", "Let him report!", ''genekini'' "Let him go!“. It may be used to command another person to cause a third person to do something.

Another, milder form of command is formed with the ending ''-cina'' or ''-kina'', which is used in a concessive sense as well: ''amasi bucina'' "Come on / please, give it back!"; ''alacina'', ''alakina'' "Speak (if you want to)" or "Please speak!"; ''aracina'' "Let him write (if he wants to)". It appears to be derived from the optative form (on which see below) and the interrogative particle ''-na''.

A prohibitative form (corresponding to Chinese ''mò'' ) is constructed from the imperfect converb preceded by ''ume'' : ''ume genere'' "Don't go!“, ''ume fonjire'' "Don't ask!"Möllendorff 1892, 10.

Certain verbs have irregular imperative forms: ''baimbi'' "seek", "request" – ''baisu''; ''bimbi'' "be present", "remain" – ''bisu''; ''jembi'' "eat" – ''jefu''; ''-njimbi'' "come in order to ..." – ''-nju''; ''ombi'' "be, become" – ''osu.''

= Optative

=
The optative in ''-ki'' expresses an action that the speaker wishes or intends to see performed – either by themselves or by others. Its meaning is sometimes akin to that of Chinese ''yào'' . Thus ''bi geneki'' means "I will go", whereas ''i geneki'' means "Let him go". Other examples are ''araki'' "I will/want to write", ''alaki'' "I will/want to say", ''bi manju gisun be taciki'' "I will/want to learn Manchu", ''fa hūbalaki'' "I will paper over the windows“, ''teki'' "please, sit down". When the optative refers to the second or third person, its meaning is close to that of an imperative. When it refers to an action that hasn't yet taken place, it also has the additional meaning of future.

Negation

According to Gorelova, neither the finite verb forms nor the converbs have special negative forms; only the participle does. If a verb or converb need to be negated, a participle must be used instead of them. The participle is negated by a combination with the word ''akū'' "not be (here)": thus, literally, "I am-not doing-X". Still, Möllendorff (1892) does give an example of the negation of an indicative form with ''akū'' "not (be)": ''bi gisurembi akū'' "I don't speak". The particle may be translated with the Chinese particles ''wú'' , ''bù'' , ''wèi'' , ''méiyǒu'' .

= Negation with ''akū''

=
The word ''akū'' "is not" is the most universal negator in Manchu. It is a negative copula: ''mangga'' ''akū "''it is not difficult". It can negate existence: ''etuku akū'' "there is no clothing." It may also negate attributes, as in ''dutu akū'' "not deaf", and it may express the meaning "without": ''gūnin akū niyalma,'' lit. "a person without brains", i.e. "a stupid person".

The participle suffixes ''-ra/-re/-ro'' merge with ''akū'' into ''-rakū'', ''-ha/-ho'' into ''-hakū'' and ''-he'' into ''-hekū'': ''arahaku'' "not have written", ''genehekū'', ''genehakū'' "not have gone"; ''ararakū'' "not (be going to) write", ''generakū'' "not (be going to) go“.

Accordingly, the negated forms of perfect indicative ''-habi/-hebi/-hobi'', which contain the perfect participle in ''-ha/he/ho,'' end in ''-hakūbi/-hekūbi''. There are certain irregular forms: ''sambi'' "know" – ''sarkū'' "don't know", ''dabahakū'' "has not exceeded“, ''jihekū'' "has not come".

The negated participles are often followed by converb forms of the auxiliary verbs ''bimbi'' "be", ''ombi'' "become" or ''sembi'' "say":

The negated form of the conditional converb here is the construction ''gaijirakū oci'' ("if ... doesn't take").

The suffixes ''-ci'', ''-fi'' and ''-ngge'' are placed after ''-akū'' : ''ararakūci'' "if he doesn't write", ''ararakūfi'' "doesn't write and", "not having written", ''ararakūngge'' "the one who does not write", ''bisirakūngge'' "those who aren't here" (Chinese ''bù zài de'' ).

The word ''akū'' alone can take other suffixes, too: ''bi akūmbi'' "I am not". A double negation in ''-akūngge akū'' (Chinese ''wú bù'' ) is also possible: ''serakūngge akū'' "nothing unsaid", "he says everything".

The word ''umai'', which seems to consist of the prohibitative particle ''ume'' and the pronoun ''ai'' "what", may be used before ''akū'' and seems to enhance its negative sense, as seen in the example ''umai niyalma'' ''akū'' "no persons (at all) are there".

= Negation with ''waka''

=
The particle ''waka'' is used predominantly as a negative copula. Examples are ''bi waka aniya kai'' "I am not (at fault), it is the (bad) year", ''inu ja baita waka'' "this is not a simple matter".

= Negation with ''unde''

=
The word ''unde'' "not yet" is placed after the imperfect participle in ''-ra/-re/-ro'' at the end of the clause: ''jidere unde'' "(he) has not come yet", ''bi sabure unde'' "I have not seen it yet".

= Apprehension

=
The imperfect participle can be combined with ''-hū'' to produce a form that expresses apprehension/fear (''participium metuendi''; cf. Mongolian ''-ujai''): ''jiderahū'' "If only he doesn't come“.

Gorelova believes that this form is originally identical to the negation of the imperfect participle in -''ra-(a)kū.''

Interrogative forms

Interrogative forms are derived from declarative ones by the edition of further suffixes. The particle ''-o'' can be added to a verbal form in order to convert a statements into a yes/no-question. It is added to the copula ''bi-'', the imperfect indicative in ''-mbi'' (which also ends in ''-bi'') and to the imperfect and perfect participles in ''-ra/re-/ro'' and ''-ha/he/ho'', forming respectively the sequences ''-bio'', ''-mbio'', ''-rao/-reo/-roo'', ''-hao/-heo/-hoo''. In these sequences, ''-o'' is pronounced /u/. Some examples are: ''Minde bureo?'' "Will you give it to me?"; ''Si terebe tuwahao? Tuwaha.'' "Have you seen him? – Yes." S''i cai omihao?'' "Have you drunk tea?" The particle ''-o'' can also be added to the negative particle ''waka'': ''Manju bithe hūlambi wakao?'' "Are you not studying the Manchu language?" (lit. "Are you not reading Manchu books?").

The imperfect interrogative form in ''-rao/-reo/-roo'' can also be used as an imperative to older or socially superior persons: ''tereo?'' "Please sit down!", lit. "Will (you) sit down?"

The universal interrogative particle is ''-ni''. It can be added to verb forms to produce yes/no-questions in the same way as ''-o;'' after negatives, however, it is reduced to ''-n'': ''si sabu-rakū-n?'' "Have you not seen?", ''suwe sambio sarkūn'' "Do you know this or do you not know it?", ''si sembi akūn?'' "Do you eat it or not?" In addition, the words ''sain'' "good", "well" and ''yargiyan'' "true, real, truth, reality" had the special interrogative forms ''saiyūn'' and ''yargiyūn'': ''si saiyūn?'' "How are you?", ''yargiyūn?'' "Is it true?"

Furthermore, it can be used in wh-questions and be added to nouns and adjectives as well (''ere ai turgun ni "''What is the reason for this?"). It generally stands at the end of a sentence: ''ainu urunakū aisi be hendumbini'' "Why do we necessarily have to talk about profits?"

The combination ''nio'' can be added to negations to form rhetorical questions: ''ere sain akū nio'' "is that not beautiful?"

Auxiliary verbs

Composite verb forms are constructed with the auxiliary verbs ''bimbi'', ''bi'' "be, exist, remain", ''ombi'' "be/become (such), be possible", ''sembi'' "say, tell, consider", ''acambi'' "be suitable", ''mutembi'' "be able to" and ''hamimbi'' "approach, be near".

= bimbi "to be"

=

* Indefinite future – imperfect participle with optative: ''genere biki'' "I will go", "I will be there".
* Definite perfect – Perfect participle with ''bi'': ''wajiha bi'' "is finished" (note that this same construction is the origin of the indicative perfect).
* Past perfect – the perfect participle in ''-ha/-he/-ho'' forms together with the past form of the copula, ''bihe,'' a past perfect tense: ''araha bihe'' "I had written", ''tere bade tehe bihe'' "he had sat down there", ''tuwaha bihe'' "he had seen it"
* Durative past perfect – perfect participle with ''bihebi.''
* Hypothesis – perfect participle with ''bici'' or with ''bihe bici'': ''arahabici'' "if I had written", ''ehe niyalma de hajilaha bici'' "If you had become involved with bad people".
* Preterite – The imperfect converb with ''bihe'' expresses a continuous action that has come to an end: ''alame bihe'' "he used to say".
* Imperative –The synthetic forms of the imperative can be replaced with analytical forms consisting of a converb and ''bisu'' (the imperative of ''bimbi''): ''ala'' – ''alame bisu.''

= ombi "to be, become"

=

* Imperative – The synthetical forms of the imperative can be replaced with analytical forms consisting of a converb and ''osu,'' the imperative of ''ombi'': ''ala'' – ''alame osu.''

= sembi "to say"

=

* Imperative – The synthetical forms of the imperative can be replaced with analytical forms consisting of a converb and ''sereo'': ''alarao'' – ''alame sereo.''

Voice

= Passive and causative

=
Voice is a somewhat problematic and controversial category in Manchu. The form for passive voice in Manchu is generally formed with the suffix ''-bu'' :

In certain verbs, the passive is formed with the suffix ''-mbu'' instead, although it has also been claimed to have a different shade of meaning.

Many verbs in the passive voice have a reflexive meaning:

Surprisingly, the suffix ''-bu'' (or, in many cases, ''-mbu'') also expresses the causative: this, ''arambumbi'' means "be written", but also "make (someone) write".

The combination of both suffixes ''-mbu'' and ''-bu'' is also possible in order to form a passive causative construction: ''arambubumbi'' "have (something) written", lit. "make (something) be written".

= Reciprocal

=
The reciprocal voice is formed with ''-ndu'': ''aisilambi'' "help" – ''aisilandumbi'' "help each other".

= Associative

=
The associative voice is formed with ''-ca/-ce/-co'' or with ''-nu'': ''ilimbi'' "stand" – ''ilicambi'' "to stand together in a group“, ''afambi'' "fight" – ''afanumbi'' "fight together with others".

Aspect: durative, frequentative and intensive

The durative aspect can be expressed by the suffixes ''-ta/-te/-to'', ''-nja/-nje/-njo'' or ''-ša/-še/-šo'', the iterative by ''-ta/-te'' and the frequentative or intensive by ''-ca/-ce/-co'': ''jailambi'' "evade" – ''jailatambi'' "evade everywhere", ''injembi'' "laugh" – ''injecembi'' "laugh persistently in the crowd", ''halambi'' "change" – ''halanjambi'' "alternate", ''ibembi'' "go forward" – ''ibešembi'' "go forward step by step".

Direction: ventive, andative and missive

In verbs of locomotion in the broadest sense there is a distinction between movement away from the speaker ( andative) and towards the speaker ( ventive). This is similar to the complement of direction in Chinese (andative ''qù'' "go" vs ventive ''lái'' "come"). The andative is expressed by the suffix ''-na/-ne/-no'' (possibly connected to ''genembi'' "go") and the ventive is expressed by ''-nji'' (possibly connected to ''jimbi'' "come"). Besides, a missive form is constructed with the suffix ''-nggi'' (possibly connected to ''unggimbi'' "send"): ''alambi'' "report" – ''alanambi'' "go in order to report", ''alanjimbi'' "come with a report", ''alanggimbi'' "send with a report", ''fekumbi'' "jump" – ''fekunembi'' "jump over there" – ''fekunjembi'' "jump over here", ''ebišembi'' "bathe" – ''ebišenembi'' "go bathe".

Word formation

Word formation

Manchu has numerous productive derivational suffixes.

Nouns

''Abstract nouns'' are derived from verbs with the suffixes:

* ''-n'', e.g. ''acan'' "meeting" from ''aca-'' "meet",
* ''-gan/gen/gon / -han/hen/hon'', e.g. ''nirugan'' "a picture" from ''niru-'' "to draw".
* -''cun.'' e.g. ''akacun'' "grief" from ''aka-'' "grieve".

''Nouns denoting instruments'' are derived from verbs with the suffixes:

* ''-ku/kū'', e.g. ''anjikū'' "hatchet" from ''anji-'' "to hack". When derived from a verb stem that ends in the passive/causative suffix ''-bu-'', the meaning is often of an agent noun: ''tacibukū'' "teacher" from ''tacibu-'' "to teach" from ''taci-'' "to learn".
* ''-sun'' and ''-fun'', e.g. ''ijifun'' "comb" from ''iji''- "to comb", ''umiyesun'' "girdle" from ''umiye-'' "to gird oneself"
* ''-tun'', e.g. ''alitun'' "cup", "offering table" from ''ali-'' "receive, hold up"

''Agent nouns'' are derived both from verb and from noun stems with the suffixes ''-si'', ''-msi'', ''-ci'', ''-ji'', ''-lji'', ''-mji'', ''-nju'': ''kimcisi'' "investigator" from ''kimci-'' "to investigate", ''bithesi'' "scribe" from ''bithe'' "book". A more peculiar meaning of an obtained object is expressed by the suffix ''-ci'' in some words like ''ihaci'' "cowhide" from ''ihan'' "bovine".

Adjectives or nouns denoting the possessor of a ''quality'' are derived both from verb and from noun stems; when the word is derived from a verb. the meaning is sometimes of an agent noun. The following suffixes are used:

* -''tu/du,'' e.g. ''bekitu'' "strong man" from ''beki-'' "strong", ''songgotu'' "crybaby" from ''songgo-'' "cry", ''girutu'' "ashamed" from ''giru'' "to be ashamed"
* -''ta/da/to/do'', e.g. ''giohoto'' "beggar" from ''gioho-'' "to beg", ''sanggata'' "having holes" from ''sangga'' "hole"
* ''-ki,'' e.g. ''acabuki'' "flatterer" from ''acabu-'' "to flatter", ''ambaki'' "arrogant" from ''amba'' "big".
The ''diminutive'' suffixes are ''-kan/ken/kon'', ''-gan/gen'' and ''-cen'' : e.g. ''bira'' "river" – ''biragan'' "small river", ''golmin'' "long" – ''golmikan'' "somewhat/rather long".

The augmentative suffix is ''-linggū''/''linggu'': e.g. ''amban'' "big" – ''ambalinggū'' "huge", ''ehe'' "bad" – ''ehelinggu'' "very bad".

Verbs

A number of suffixes derive verbs, mostly ''from nouns''.

* The suffix ''-la/-le/-lo'' forms a verb, in which the base noun is the object of the activity: ''songko'' "a trace" – ''songkolo-'' "to follow a trace"; ''aba'' "a hunt" – ''abala-'' "to hunt".Gorelova 2002, 235; Haenisch 1986, 51.
* The suffix ''-ra/-re/-ro'' is used in a similar way: ''gisun'' "word" – ''gisure-'' "to speak", ''monggo'' "Mongolia" – ''monggoro-'' "to speak Mongolian", "to behave like a Mongol".
* The suffix ''-na/-ne/-no'' forms in part a type of inchoative verb or expresses an inherent development or capability of an object or a person: ''fiyeren'' "fissure" – ''fierene-'' "to split", ''ilha'' "flower" – ''ilhana-'' "to bloom"; .
* The suffix ''-ša/-še/-šo'' forms verbs that express the effort to achieve a certain result: ''sain'' "good" – ''saiša-'' "praise", ''oncohon'' "arrogant" – ''oncohošo-'' "to boast", ''buleku'' "mirror" – ''bulekuše-'' "to look at oneself in a mirror".
* The suffix ''-da/-de/-do'' forms verbs with intensive or durative meaning or the gradual development of an action: ''jili'' "anger" – ''jilida-'' "get angry", ''ceku'' "a swing" – ''cekude-'' "to swing", ''eruwen'' "a drill" – ''eruwede-'' "to drill", ''goho'' "elegant" – ''gohodo-'' "to dress up".
* The suffix ''-ja/-je/-jo'' also has intensive or durative meaning: ''gūninja-'' "to think over carefully" from ''gūnin'' “thought”.

Other suffixes of this type are ''-ta/te/to'' (''gosita-'' "to love" from ''gosin'' "love") ''-tu'', ''-li'', and ''-mi''.

Verbs are derived ''from other verbs'', sometimes with intensive and causative meaning, with the suffixes ''-niye'' and ''-kiya/kiye'', ''-giya/giye'', ''-hiya/hiye'': e.g. ''ebeniye-'' "to wet thoroughly" from ''ebe-'' "to wet", ''jalukiya-'' "to fill" from ''jalu-'' "to be full, filled", ''tuwakiya-'' "to guard" from ''tuwa-'' "to watch".

On the formation of verbs with a certain ''aspect,'' ''voice'' or ''direction'', see the grammar section.

Numerals

The numerals are as follows:

21 ''orin emu'' etc.

101 ''tanggū emu'' etc.

1000 ''minggan'' (from Mongolian ''‹mingɣ-a(n)›'')

10000 ''tumen'' (from Mongolian ''‹tüme(n)›'')

100000 ''juwan tumen''

1000000 ''tanggū tumen''

* irregular; cf. Mongolian ''‹tabu(n)›'' "five"Haenisch 1986, 45.

⁑ cf. Mongolian ''‹qori(n)›''

⁂ cf. Mongolian ''‹ɣuči(n)›''

For higher numbers, loanwords from Sanskrit are also used, above all in the translation of Buddhist texts.

Most ordinal numerals are formed with the suffix ''-ci,'' before which stem-final ''-n'' is elided (except in ''juwanci'' "tenth" and ''tumenci'' "tenthousandth"). Distributive numerals are formed with the suffix ''-ta/-te/-to;'' again, stem-final ''-n'' is elided: ''emte'' "one each", ''juwete'' "two each", ''ilata'' "three each" etc. Fractions are formed according to the following pattern:

The word ''ubu'' "part" can be in the genitive case as well:

This is the same construction as in Chinese:

Multiplicatives are formed with the suffix ''-rsu'' or with a following ''ubu'' "part":

''emursu'', ''emu ubu'' "single"; ''jursu'', ''juwe ubu'' "double"; ''ilarsu'', ''ilan ubu'' "threefold"; etc.

Collectives are formed with the suffix ''-nofi'': ''juwenofi'' "two together", ''ilanofi'' "three together", ''duinofi'' "four together" etc.

Iterative numerals are formed mostly with the suffix ''-nggeri'' or ''-geri'':

''emgeri'' "once", ''juwenggeri'' "twice", ilanggeri "thrice", ''duinggeri'' "fourth" etc.

For dates, Manchu uses a system similar to Chinese, combining a cycle of ten (''juwan cikten'' "the ten colours" or " stems") and cycle of twelve (''juwan juwe gargan'' "the twelve animals" or " branches").

Classifiers

In Manchu there is, as in Chinese, a significant number of classifiers (also called measure words), which stand between the numeral and the noun:

The classifier ''fesin'' "handle" is used for objects with a handle or a hilt such as knives, swords, sabres, spades, fans etc.(similarly to the Chinese classifier ''bǎ'' ).

Further examples of classifiers are ''afaha'' "sheet" for paper, lists etc. (cf. Chinese ''zhāng'' ), ''debtelin'' "volume" for books (cf. Chinese ''běn'' ), ''angga'' "mouth" for animals, objects with openings (pots, bags etc.), ports, mountain passes etc., ''baksan'' "bundle" for “Bundles” for sheaves of grain, bundles of paper, bunches of keys, caravans, etc., ''dalgan'' "surface" for flat objects such as flags, mirrors, fans and meat cutlets etc.

Postpositions

Some postpositions, such as ''baru'' "to", are not derived from other words, while others are originally declined forms of other parts of speech, such as nouns in a certain case (e.g. ''dade'' "in addition to", lit. "in the base of") and converbs (''dahame'' "according to", lit. "following"). Some, like ''dele'' "on top of", "top" are simply identical to nouns. Each postposition governs a certain noun case, with most, like ''baru'' "to", ''dergi'' "above" and ''sasa'' "with" governing the genitive, and two smaller groups governing the dative (e.g. ''isitala'' "until") and the ablative (e.g. ''amala'' "behind"). ''Jaka'' 'together with" takes the nominative. Postpositions may express place (''dergi'' "above"), time (''amari'' "after"), comitative meaning (''emgi'' "with"), causality (''jalinde'' "for the sake of"), similarity (''gele'' "like") or restriction (only ''teile'' "only", governing the genitive case, e.g. ''damu ilan sarhan’i teile ilan boo de tehe'' "only three women lived in three houses", lit. "only of three women only ...". Postpositions may govern participles, which then have the meaning of verbal nouns, and the postpositions themselves acquire a function similar to that of conjunctions (''sain ehe be tuwaha manggi'' "after having seen", from ''manggi'' "with, towards").

Conjunctions

Some conjunctions coincide with adverbs (e.g. ''damu'' "only", "but", ''geli'' "also", "and", ''jai'' "again", "and', ''eici'' "perhaps", "or"). Others are originally case forms or converbs (''bade'' "when", lit. "in the place", ''bici'' "if", lit. "if it is (so)", ''bihede'' "when", lit. "in having become (so)").

Lexis

Apart from the inherited Tungusic vocabulary, Manchu contains loanwords above all from Mongolian and from Chinese. There are also many loanwords of Turkic origin; these probably entered it via Mongolian as well. It has been estimated that twenty to thirty percent of the Manchu vocabulary consists of Mongolian loanwords.

Writing system

The Manchu language uses the Manchu script, which was derived from the traditional Mongol script, which in turn was based on the vertically written pre-Islamic Uyghur script. Manchu is now usually romanized according to the transliteration system employed by Jerry Norman in his ''Comprehensive Manchu-English Dictionary'' (2013). The Jurchen language, which is ancestral to Manchu, used the Jurchen script, which is derived from the Khitan script, which in turn was derived from Chinese characters. There is no relation between the Jurchen script and the Manchu script.

Chinese characters, employed as phonograms, can also be used to transliterate Manchu. All the Manchu vowels and the syllables commencing with a consonant are represented by single Chinese characters as are also the syllables terminating in ''i, n, ng'' and ''o''; but those ending in ''r, k, s, t, p, I, m'' are expressed by the union of the sounds of two characters, there being no Mandarin syllables terminating with these consonants. Thus the Manchu syllable ''am'' is expressed by the Chinese characters ''a mù'', and the word ''Manchu'' is, in the Kangxi Dictionary, written as ''mă ā ān zhū wū''.

Teaching

Mongols learned their script as a syllabary, dividing the syllables into twelve different classes, based on the final phonemes of the syllables, all of which ended in vowels. The Manchus followed the same syllabic method when learning Manchu script, also with syllables divided into twelve different classes based on the final phonemes of the syllables. Today, the opinion on whether it is alphabet or syllabic in nature is still split between different experts. In China, it is considered syllabic and Manchu is still taught in this manner. The alphabetic approach is used mainly by foreigners who want to learn the language. Studying Manchu script as a syllabary takes a longer time.()

Despite the alphabetic nature of its script, Manchu was not taught phoneme per letter like western languages are; Manchu children were taught to memorize all the syllables in the Manchu language separately as they learned to write, like Chinese characters. To paraphrase Meadows 1849,

Manchus when learning, instead of saying l, a—la; l, o—lo; &c., were taught at once to say la, lo, &c. Many more syllables than are contained in their syllabary might have been formed with their letters, but they were not accustomed to arrange them otherwise. They made, for instance, no such use of the consonants l, m, n, and r, as westerners do; hence if the Manchu letters s, m, a, r, t, are joined in that order a Manchu would not able to pronounce them as English speaking people pronounce the word 'smart'.

However this was in 1849, and more research should be done on the current teaching methods used in the PRC.

Further reading

Learning texts of historical interest
*
*
*
For readers of Chinese
*
*
*
Literature
*
*
*
*
*

References

Citations

Sources

*
*
*
*
* Haenisch, Erich. 1961. ''Mandschu-Grammatik''. Leipzig:  
*
* Kane, Daniel. 1997. "Language Death and Language Revivalism the Case of Manchu". Central Asiatic Journal 41 (2). Harrassowitz Verlag: 231–49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41928113.
*
* Erling von Mende. 2015. "In Defence of Nian Gengyao, Or: What to Do About Sources on Manchu Language Incompetence?". Central Asiatic Journal 58 (1–2). Harrassowitz Verlag: 59–87. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.13173/centasiaj.58.1-2.0059.
* Möllendorff, Paul Georg von. 1892. Shanghai.
* Norman, Jerry. 1974. "Structure of Sibe Morphology", ''Central Asian Journal''.
* Norman, Jerry. 1978. ''A Concise Manchu–English Lexicon'', University of Washington Press, Seattle.
* Norman, Jerry. 2013. ''A Comprehensive Manchu–English Dictionary'', Harvard University Press (Asia Center), Cambridge .
* Ramsey, S. Robert. 1987. ''The Languages of China.'' Princeton University Press, Princeton New Jersey
* Tulisow, Jerzy. 2000. ''Język mandżurski'' (« The Manchu language »), coll. « Języki Azjii i Afryki » (« The languages of Asia and Africa »), Dialog, Warsaw, 192 p.  
* Zakharov, Iv. Iv. (Захаров, Ив. Ив.) Грамматика манчжурского языка anchu Grammar St. Petersburg 1879 (in Russian).

External links

* Manchu Swadesh vocabulary list of basic words (from Wiktionary's Swadesh-list appendix)

Abkai — Unicode Manchu/Sibe/Daur Fonts and Keyboards

Manchu language Gospel of Mark


at Omniglot

Mini Buleku A Recorded Sibe Dictionary



Manchu–Chinese–English Lexicon

online Manchu–Chinese, Manchu–Japanese lexicon


Anaku Manchu Script Creator

*

Contrast In Manchu Vowel Systems

Manchu Word Of The Day, Open Source Manchu–English dictionary

Manju Nikan Inggiri Gisun i Buleku Bithe (Manchu–Chinese–English dictionary)


Manchu language guide

The Manchu Studies Group

Tawney, Brian. "Reading Jakdan's Poetry: An Exploration of Literary Manchu Phonology". AM Thesis (Harvard, RSEA)




Meadows, Thomas Taylor. 1849. A Manchu chrestomathy with translations

Klaproth, Julius von. 1828. Chrestomathie mandchou : ou, Recueil de textes mandchou : destiné aux personnes qui veulent s'occuper de l'étude de cette langue
(with some texts translated into French)

Soldierly Methods: Vade Mecum for an Iconoclastic Translation of Sun Zi bingfa. 2008. By Victor H. Mair with a complete transcription and word-for-word glosses of the Manchu translation by H. T. Toh

PCVB:perfect converb
ICVB:imperfect converb
IPTC:imperfect participle
PPTC:perfect participle

{{DEFAULTSORT:Manchu Language

Agglutinative languages
Critically endangered languages
Languages of China
Tungusic languages
Subject–object–verb languages
Manchuria
Vowel-harmony languages
Endangered languages of China