French Ship Vengeur Du Peuple

''Vengeur du Peuple'' ("Avenger of the People") was a 74-gun ship of the line of the French Navy. Funded by a ''don des vaisseaux'' donation from the Chamber of Commerce of Marseille, she was launched in 1766 as the ''Marseillois''.The name is sometimes written ''Marseillais'', which is the modern orthography. Se
The dictionary of French naval fighting ships - General remarks
for details.

She took part in the naval operations in the American Revolutionary War in Admiral d'Estaing's squadron, duelling '' Preston'' in a single-ship action on 11 August 1778, taking part in the Battle of the Chesapeake where she duelled HMS ''Intrepid'', and supporting the flagship '' Ville de Paris'' at the Battle of the Saintes. She also took part in the Battle of Saint Kitts.

After the loss of the 74-gun French ship ''Vengeur'' (launched 1789) in June 1793, the 28-year-old ''Marsellois'' was renamed ''Vengeur du Peuple'' in February 1794The name is often shortened to ''Vengeur''. See French ship ''Vengeur'' for details. and under that name she took part in the Battle of the Glorious First of June. There, she was disabled after a furious duel with HMS ''Brunswick'' and surrendered after losing hope of being rescued by a French ship. After a few hours, as British ships were beginning rescue operations, she listed and foundered, taking almost half her crew with her. Thus she only bore the name ''Vengeur du Peuple'' for a few weeks compared with her 28 years of service as the ''Marsellois''.

The sinking of ''Vengeur du Peuple'' was used as propaganda by the National Convention and Bertrand Barère, who gave birth to the legend that the crew had gone down with the ship fighting, rather than surrender. The Scottish historian Thomas Carlyle repeated the tale in his '' The French Revolution: A History'', yielding a rebuttal by Rear-Admiral John Griffiths, who had witnessed the events. Although discredited in naval history circles, the legend lived on as a folk tale, inspiring numerous representations and a fictional account by Jules Verne in his 1870 novel ''Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Seas''.

Career

The French Navy had lost 29 ships during the Seven Years' War, casualties being particularly high at the Battle of Lagos and the Battle of Quiberon Bay. To replace these losses, in 1761 the Duke of Choiseul launched subscriptions, called ''don des vaisseaux'', whereby French individuals and organisations could donate to the Crown the funds necessary to build and equip a warship. 13 million livres were raised and 18 ships, including two three-deckers, were built and named after their patrons. The ''Marseillois'' was funded by the chamber of commerce of Marseille, for 500,000 livres.Under Louis XVI, a French livre contained 0.29 grammes of pure gol

this puts ''Marseillois'' worth at of gold. For a 110-gun ship like French ship Bretagne (1766), ''Bretagne'', the raw wood was already worth 490,000 livres, and the total construction cost amounted to 1,150,000 livres (see ''Les Européens et les espaces océaniques au XVIIIe siècle''
p.17

''Marseillois'' was ordered on 16 January 1762, originally intended to be built in Toulon on a design by the engineer Joseph-Marie-Blaise Coulomb, and named the same day by Louis XV, following the request of her patrons. The chamber of commerce of Marseille further requested that the ship be built in Marseille, but Coulomb determined that the harbour there was too shallow for the launch of a 74-gun ship, and the order for ''Marseillois'' was eventually moved to Toulon. There, lack of timber in the shipyards, which were already busy building ''Languedoc'', '' Zélé'' and ''Bourgogne'', delayed the construction of ''Marseillois'' until 1764. Her design and building was directed by the engineer Joseph-Véronique-Charles Chapelle.Diaz de Soria, ''Le Marseillois'', p. 10.

She was launched on 16 July 1766, and completed quickly, decorated by sculptures carved by Pierre Audibert. After her completion, she was put in reserve, where she would remain for 11 years. On 1 February 1778, ''Marseillois'' was hove down for maintenance and repairs of her hull, which was found to be in "very good shape", although her keel had hogged by ;not an uncommon figure for ships of the era maintenance completed two days later, and she was commissioned under Captain Louis-Armand de La Poype de Vertrieu.

American Revolutionary War

The outbreak of the American War of Independence had caused relations between France and Great Britain to deteriorate, and diplomatic ties were broken on 16 March 1778. Admiral d'Estaing took command of a squadron of thirteen ships of the line and four frigates in Toulon. ''Marseillois'' was assigned to this fleet, the first active service she would see. The fleet set sail on 18 April 1778, crossed Gibraltar on 16 May, and arrived at the mouth of the Delaware River on 8 July.Troude, ''Batailles navales'', p. 12.

Campaign of 1778–1780, La Poype de Vertrieu

The French squadron arrived unopposed off New York City on 8 July. British forces there amounted to a squadron of nine smaller ships of the line and two frigates under Admiral Lord Howe; in order to avoid battle with the more numerous and powerful French ships, Howe retreated under the protection of the strong defences of New York. D'Estaing wished to press the attack, but his pilots advised that the harbour was too shallow for his ships, so the squadron spent two weeks at anchor blockading Howe, resupplying and conferring with the American government.Troude, ''Batailles navales'', p. 13. On 22 July, he departed for Newport to join the American Revolutionaries, where he arrived on 28 July and anchored his fleet outside the harbour to better coordinate his attack with that of the Revolutionary land forces. ''Marseillois'' anchored in front of the main channel with most of the fleet, while ''Fantasque'', ''Sagittaire'' and the frigates blockaded the Sakonnet River, and ''Protecteur'' and ''Provence'' blocked the Connecticut River.Troude, ''Batailles navales'', p. 14.

On 8 August, the French squadron sailed into Newport harbour, ''Marseillois'' coming sixth in the line. They had begun to disembark troops the following day when Howe's squadron arrived from New York. D'Estaing found his anchored ships were now vulnerable to attacks from land batteries, warships and fireships, and cancelled the landing, putting to sea to challenge Howe in battle.Troude, ''Batailles navales'', p. 15 Howe's force moved off, pursued by the French. On 11 August the French closed in and the two fleets manoeuvred in preparation for a battle, but around 16:00, a Nor'easter storm broke out, scattering both fleets. ''Marseillois'' sustained damage to her rigging, losing her mizzen and her bowsprit, and was cut off from the bulk of the French squadron. The next day, around 20:00, having only just erected jury rigging, she was attacked by the 50-gun HMS ''Preston'', under William Hotham. The two ships duelled indecisively for one hour before parting. ''Marseillois'' rejoined the French fleet on 14 August.Troude, ''Batailles navales'', p. 16.

''Marseillois'' took part in the Battle of St. Lucia in September, coming third in the French line of battle,Troude, ''Batailles navales'', p. 19 and was present at other encounters with the British fleets in the Anglo-French War. The next year, on 6 July 1779, ''Marseillois'' took part in the Battle of Grenada, sailing in the rear of the French fleet. Later in the year, she took part in the siege of Savannah, where she was eighth in the line of battle.Troude, ''Batailles navales'', p. 42

The French fleet sustained damage at the siege of Savannah and eventually returned to Europe. ''Marseillois'' returned to Toulon with ''Zélé'', ''Sagittaire'', ''Protecteur'', and ''Experiment''. During the campaign, 46 members of her crew had died; of these, only three had been killed in combat.

La Poype de Vertrieu wrote his report and recommendations for the refitting of ''Marseillois'' on 24 December 1779; he found her a passable ship, but her high poop hindered her sailing when running, and he recommended improvements to the gun ports of the castles, which were obstructed and allowed only two guns on the quarterdeck and one on the forecastle to be used. Furthermore, substantial repairs on the rigging were needed, and she needed her hull heated to kill worms. La Poype de Vertrieu wrote "it appears that ''Marseillois'' shall never be an exceptional sailor, but I am convinced that she will give satisfaction".Diaz de Soria, ''Le Marseillois'', p. 51.Translated from the original: "''Il est apparent que Le Marseillois n'aura jamais une marche distinguée, mias je suis persuadé que l'on en sera content quand on le naviguera à trente pouces de différence et que l'on évitera de trop entasser les poids sur son avant.''" Original quote in Diaz de Soria, ''Le Marseillois'', p. 51.

Campaign of 1780, Albert de Rions

After the repairs had been completed, Captain d'Albert de Rions was given command of ''Marseillois''. She was appointed to a two-ship squadron under Suffren, who had his flag on '' Zélé''. They set sail on 19 May 1780 to patrol off Portugal, and joined up with a division under Rear-Admiral de Beausset in Cadiz on 17 June.Diaz de Soria, ''Le Marseillois'', p. 11.

On 6 November, ''Marseillois'' departed Cadiz with a joint Franco-Spanish fleet under Admiral d'Estaing, bound for Brest, where she arrived on 3 January 1781.

Campaign of 1781–82, Castellane Majastre

In Brest, command of ''Marseillois'' passed to Captain Henri-César de Castellane Majastre, and she became part of a squadron under Admiral François Joseph Paul de Grasse. Champmartin was the first officer, and a young Pierre-Charles Villeneuve served aboard as an ensign. On 22 March 1781, the fleet sailed for America to reinforce D'Estaing's forces there, arriving off Martinique on 29 April. There, the fleet met the British forces under Admiral Hood, and the Battle of Fort Royal broke out, an inconclusive long-ranged artillery duel that lasted until the British retreated the next day due to the damage sustained by HMS ''Intrepid'', ''Centaur'' and ''Russell''.Troude, ''Batailles navales'', p. 102

De Grasse put to sail on 5 July, bound for Saint-Domingue where he arrived on 16 July. At Cap-Français, the fleet joined with the frigate ''Concorde'', under Captain de Tanouarn, which brought news of the status and plans of the Continental Army. Letters from Washington and Rochambeau requested that de Grasse set sail either to New York, or into Chesapeake Bay. Reinforcing his fleet with the squadron under Admiral de Monteil and with 3,300 soldiers taken from the garrisons of the island, De Grasse decided to sail for the Chesapeake.Troude, ''Batailles navales'', p. 105.

On 5 September 1781, the French and British squadrons met in the Battle of the Chesapeake. ''Marseillois'' was in the van of the French squadron, and exchanged the first shots of the day with the 64-gun HMS ''Intrepid'', under Captain Anthony Molloy. In early April, ''Marseillois'' took part in the four-day Battle of the Saintes. She was sailing at the rear of the fleet, and the French and British ships were already trading shots for ten minutes when she took her position in the line of battle.Troude, ''Batailles navales'', p. 156 Later in the afternoon, she maintained a position in the line ahead of the flagship '' Ville de Paris'', and supported her until she struck her colours,Troude, ''Batailles navales'', p. 155 at which point Admiral de Vaudreuil ordered the fleet to regroup and follow him to Saint-Domingue. The fleet reached Cap-Français in several waves, the main corps arriving on 25 April; ''Marseillois'', along with ''Hercule'', ''Pluton'' and ''Éveillé'', arrived on 11 May.Troude, ''Batailles navales'', p. 158

On 25 and 26 January 1782, ''Marseillois'' took part in the Battle of Saint Kitts, where she held the 5th position in the line of battle.Troude, ''Batailles navales'', p. 215 ''Marseillois'' returned to France at some point in 1782, where she was listed on 1 September to be decommissioned.

Campaign of 1782–83, Lombard

In October 1782, she was hove down and coppered. She was then recommissioned in December 1782 in Brest under chevalier de Lombard, and was part of a two-ship squadron along with '' Protecteur''.Diaz de Soria, ''Le Marseillois'', p. 12.

Negotiations for peace with England started in January 1783, and ''Marseillois'' was decommissioned in Rochefort on 13 February 1783. She remained in this state until 1794, with some repairs being conducted in 1785 and 1788.

French Revolutionary War

By February 1794 the still decommissioned, ''Marseillois'' had been renamed ''Vengeur du Peuple'', probably a response to the participation of the city of Marseille in the Federalist revolts of 1793. She was recommissioned in Rochefort, and on 24 March 1794, Captain Jean François Renaudin took command.Barthélemy, pp. 288 and following On 1 April 1794, she sailed to Île-d'Aix, where she joined up with '' Pelletier'', and on 11 April, the squadron sailed on again, reaching Brest on 18 April, having been joined en route by '' Jemmapes''. Upon their arrival the ships were assigned to the fleet under Admiral Villaret de Joyeuse.

Glorious First of June

On 16 May 1794, the fleet departed from Brest with the mission of protecting a convoy of ships carrying food to France, beginning the Atlantic campaign of May 1794. On 1 June, the French squadron encountered the British fleet, in an engagement known as the Glorious First of June. ''Vengeur'' was third in the French line of battle, after the flagship '' Montagne'' and between ''Achille'' and ''Northumberland''.Troude, ''Batailles navales'', p. 338

The British fleet approached the French line in an oblique manner, leading to individual engagements as the British ships attempted to break through at several points. Around 9:30, the British flagship HMS ''Queen Charlotte'' cut the French line aft of ''Montagne'', firing a devastating raking broadside that killed ''Montagne''s commander, Captain Bazire. The ship astern of ''Montagne'', ''Jacobin'', attempted to prevent ''Queen Charlotte'' breaking through by accelerating to close the gap between herself and her flagship; this left a gap behind her, between ''Jacobin'' and ''Achille'', that HMS ''Brunswick'', under Captain John Harvey, attempted to exploit to cut the line and assist ''Queen Charlotte''. ''Achille'' accelerated and closed the gap, and ''Brunswick'' turned her fire against ''Vengeur'', while ''Achille'' engaged HMS ''Ramillies'' and ''Valiant''.Troude, ''Batailles navales'', p. 348.

Prevented from cutting the French line ahead of ''Achille'', HMS ''Brunswick'' turned and tried to cross aft of her, between ''Achille'' and ''Vengeur''. Seeing the manoeuvre, Renaudin also accelerated to close this new gap, and ''Brunswick'' and ''Vengeur'' collided, the anchor of ''Brunswick'' becoming entangled in the rigging of ''Vengeur''. ''Vengeur'' fired an entire broadside at point-blank range, but was then unable to fire her main batteries again, the ships being so close as to prevent French gunners from ramming ammunition into their guns; in contrast, British gunners used rammers with semi-rigid rope handles instead of wooden handles, and were able to reload and maintain a sustained fire, riddling ''Vengeur'' with holes.Troude, ''Batailles navales'', p. 354 The fight went on for four hours, until ''Brunswick'', after shattering the rudder of ''Vengeur'' to prevent her from manoeuvring, separated at 12:45. Her fire also opened a large hole in the hull of ''Vengeur''.

During the duel between ''Vengeur'' and ''Brunswick'', the undamaged HMS ''Ramillies'' had approached and put herself in a favourable position to rake ''Vengeur'', and was waiting for ''Brunswick'' to separate to open fire. When she did so, ''Ramillies'' fired two broadsides, leaving ''Vengeur'' with only her foremast standing, which fell half an hour later. ''Ramillies'' sustained some damage herself.Toude, ''Batailles navales'', p. 349. Soon afterwards, seawater inundated the powder room of ''Vengeur'', denying her all means of defence, and 250 of her crew were out of action.Diaz de Soria, ''Le Marseillois'', p. 17. The '' Trente-et-un Mai'' closed in around 3:30,Diaz de Soria, ''Le Marseillois'', p. 16. attempting to provide assistance, but the proximity of several British sails endangered her so that she eventually sailed away.

Renaudin, seeing the hapless condition of his ship, ordered his flags hoisted half-mast in surrender and distress around 14:00,Troude, ''Batailles navales'', p. 355. but after her surrender no British ship managed to get men aboard to take possession. This left ''Vengeurs few remaining unwounded crew to attempt to salvage what they could. Ultimately the ship's pumps became unmanageable, and ''Vengeur'' began to sink. Only the timely arrival of boats from the undamaged HMS ''Alfred'' and '' Culloden'', as well as the services of the cutter ''Rattler'', saved any of the ''Vengeur's'' crew from drowning, these ships taking off nearly 500 sailors between them.Gardiner, ''Fleet Battle and Blockade'', p. 33 Lieutenant John Winne of ''Rattler'' was especially commended for this hazardous work. By 18:15, ''Vengeur'' was clearly beyond salvage and only the very worst of the wounded and the dead remained aboard, though some possibly stayed aboard in the hope of being rescued by a French ship rather than a British and avoid captivity.

''Alfred'' rescued about 100 men; ''Rattler'', about 40; and '' Culloden'', 127, including Captain Renaudin, who abandoned his ship and left in the very first British boat. He was taken to ''Culloden'' and served a meal in the officers' mess; as he dined with his son and other French and British officers, a commotion was heard; racing to the gallery of ''Culloden'', the party witnessed ''Vengeur'' sink with the remaining wounded aboard. Figures of the casualties on ''Vengeur'' are not precisely known, but amount to approximately 250 killed during the battle, 106 drowned in the sinking, and 367 rescued by the British.Cunot (p.432) gives 267 survivors, including Renaudin, his brother and their two sons who served on ''Vengeur'' as boys; 250 men killed; and 206 drowned in the wreck.

Legacy

The sinking of ''Vengeur du Peuple'' was exploited for political purposes in France, as several sailors were said to have cried "''Vive la Nation, vive la République!''" ("Long live the nation, long live the republic") from the bow of the ship as she foundered; this was bloated out of proportion by French politicians, who added that the sailors had waved the tricolour, sung ''La Marseillaise'' in defiance, and even continued firing guns until water reached them while the ship foundered, to eventually sink with her rather than surrender.Diaz de Soria, ''Le Marseillois'', p. 13. They also extrapolated that the entire crew had disappeared with the ''Vengeur'', a claim disproved by the return of captured crewmembers as they were quickly released from British captivity.Diaz de Soria, ''Le Marseillois'', p. 34.Barère, ''Rapport...'', p.4

The origin of the legend is a speech made by Bertrand Barère at the National Convention on 21 messidor (9 July), ''Rapport sur l'héroïsme des Républicains montant le vaisseau ''le Vengeur, where he claimed that ''Vengeur'' had refused to surrender, nailing her flag, and that all the sailors had died with the ship, giving a last shout of "long live the Republic" and waving all sorts of flags and pennants while the ship disappeared.

Lord Howe denies the account entirely, claiming that it never occurred, a position followed by many British sources.Fraser, p.365 Thomas Carlyle originally included the legend in his '' The French Revolution: A History'', prompting Rear-admiral John Griffiths â€“ who, as a lieutenant on HMS ''Culloden'' at the time, had been an eyewitness to the sinking â€“ to publicly challenge Carlyle's tale. Carlyle set out to get to the bottom of the story, eventually unearthing the official report of ''Vengeur's'' captain, Renaudin. Carlyle concluded that Barère had concocted a "cunningly devised fable", and changed his account of the sinking of the ''Vengeur'' in subsequent editions.In later editions of '' The French Revolution: A History'', Carlyle added a paragraph that dismisses his own previous account. See for instance the Centenary Edition
p.242
/ref>

The three most serious reports of the events are the report of Jean François Renaudin, captain of ''Vengeur'', written in captivity on 1 Messidor an II (19 June 1794), signed by Renaudin, Jean Hugine, Louis Rousseau, Pelet, Trouvée, Lussot and others, then in British custody in Tavistock;Troude, ''Batailles navales'', p. 357.Diaz de Soria, ''Le Marseillois'', p. 19 and following the report of Cyprien Renaudin, first officer of ''Vengeur'' (and cousin to Jean François Renaudin),Diaz de Soria, ''Le Marseillois'', p. 52–58 which was found around 1929 in family archives;Diaz de Soria, ''Le Marseillois'', p. 27. and later accounts written in 1838 by Rear-admiral John Griffiths, who had witnessed the event 44 years earlier.Diaz de Soria, ''Le Marseillois'', p. 29.

In French drawings, ''Vengeur'' is often depicted as flying the Tricolour, which had been recently ordered by the Convention to be flown as battle ensign; however, due to a lack of bunting in Brest, Villaret had not been able to distribute this flag to all his ships, and thus ''Vengeur'' probably still flew the white flag with a canton of three equal columns of red, white, and blue.Diaz de Soria, ''Le Marseillois'', p. 36

The notion that the ship would have nailed her flag and never surrendered, as Barère claimed, is never accounted in any of the reports. Though Jean François Renaudin never explicitly states that he surrendered, he does mention that he had his flag flown half-mast in distress when he was surrounded by British ships, indicating that he was requesting assistance from the enemy.Diaz de Soria, ''Le Marseillois'', p. 24 Griffiths observes that ''Vengeur'' was dismasted to the point that there would have been nothing on which to nail a flag anyway, and James makes mentions of ''Vengeur'' hoisting the Union Jack in submission.

The exact cause of the sinking was also the subject of dispute. Barère's account describes ''Vengeur'' as sinking from the shots that would have holed her hull; actually, Cyprien Renaudin mentions only two such holes in the lower hull of ''Vengeur''Diaz de Soria, ''Le Marseillois'', p. 25 and a noise "like a strong waterfall" at the poop, which he could not identify;Diaz de Soria, ''Le Marseillois'', p. 28 this is consistent with James' account of "''the ''Brunswick'', by a few well-directed shot, split the Vengeur's rudder, and shattered her stern-post; besides making a large hole in her counter, through which the water rushed in great quantity.''"James, ''Naval History''
p. 163
/ref> In any case, the superstructures were very much battered, prompting Lieutenant Rotheram, of ''Culloden'', to report that he "could not place a two-feet rule in any direction, he thought, that would not touch two shot-holes". Claude Farrère attributes the sinking to ineptitude of the crew who had failed to close damaged lower gunports.Farrère, p. 271 The later study conducted by Captain Diaz de Soria in the 1950s suggests that water did enter from the gun ports of the lower battery, ripped off in the collision with ''Culloden'' and shattered by artillery fire, and that the crew failed to obstruct them with temporary contrivances. The panicking crew would have aggravated the situation by failing to man the pumps, explaining why it took four hours for ''Vengeur'' to sink between her surrender around 14:00 until her sinking between 18:00 and 18:30.Diaz de Soria, ''Le Marseillois'', p. 26

The most debated point is the patriotic shouts, sometimes claimed to have been accompanied by singing of the ''Marseillaise''. These shouts are denied entirely by Griffiths, but are mentioned in French accounts. Renaudin's report does claim that sailors shouted "''Vive la République''", but that it was in desperation for being unable to reach the British craft; it does not mention any particular defiance in the intent, though, nor does it mention flags or ''La Marseillaise''; this position is followed by Troude and Farrère. Guérin proposes a variation, that knowing themselves doomed, the sailors remaining on ''Vengeur'' made a last display of patriotic and political fervour before dying. William James provides an alternative theory when he suggests that any person who behaved in such a manner on the stricken ship was acting under the influence of alcohol;James, ''Naval History''
p. 164
/ref> Troude, otherwise very critical of Barère's account, vehemently dismissed this idea.Troude, ''Le Marseillois'', p. 356–357.

Captain Renaudin was said in a naval registry to have swum to safety.Diaz de Soria, ''Le Marseillois'', p. 30 He had in fact abandoned his ship with the first British boat, leaving his men behind in disregard for military customs and the 1765 standing order that Captains had to be last to abandon ship,Guérin (vol.6, p.46) suggests that Renaudin left his ship as a sign that he was surrendering her to the custody of the British. and though his account insinuates that he was on a boat close to ''Vengeur'' when she foundered, he was actually dining in the mess of ''Culloden'' at the moment of the sinking. In 1795, Loutherbourg depicted the rescue of ''Vengeur''s crew by British ships in his large canvas of the battle, '' Lord Howe's action, or the Glorious First of June''.

Contemporary reactions in France

The speech of 9 July by Barère at the National Convention inflamed the nation, and as it specifically encouraged artists to exalt the story, poets like Ponce Denis Écouchard Lebrun and Marie-Joseph Chénier composed eulogies to commemorate the event, wrote new words for existing songs, and even produced a three-act opera.

Barère had the following decree passed at the National Convention on 21 June 1794:

The reappearance of the purportedly sunk crew,Guérin, vol.6, p.506, note 39 and the Thermidorian Reaction, prevented the completion of this programme.

Captain Renaudin was posthumously promoted to contre-amiral on 29 August 1794;RENAUDIN Jean-François.Contre-Amiral
/ref> he was later exchanged for the captain of HMS ''Thames'', Captain James Cotes. On 10 September 1794, Jean-Jacques Bréard declared before the convention:

In spite of these facts, the myth lived on: in his ''Histoire de la révolution française'', Adolphe Thiers wrote an account repeating Barère's version, where ''Vengeur'' refused to surrender. In 1847 Alphonse de Lamartine even invented the story that Renaudin had been killed heroically, cut in half by a cannon shot like Dupetit-Thouars.

Some reports however indicate that the legend was not seriously accepted: Carlyle suggests one near-eyewitness French account amounted to "not a recantation of an impudent amazing falsehood, but to some vague faint murmur or whimper of admission that it is probably false". Captain Diaz de Soria relates the story, probably apocryphal, that in 1840, the Prince of Joinville, while decorating the purported last survivor of ''Vengeur'', would have told him "we do this for the legend, my good man: nations, after all, live only of legends". In 1857, Guérin wrote "one wonders how, after that, history could remain so credulous"."''On se demande comment, après cela, l'histoire a pu rester si crédule''". By "that" ("''cela''"), Guérin refers to the reappearance of the crew of ''Vengeur'', reported sunk with their ship.

Jules Verne's depiction

In ''Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Seas'', published in 1870, Jules Verne reported the incident with its revolutionary slant:

Models

At least two models of ''Vengeur du Peuple'' are known. One, a scrimshaw model crafted by a prisoner of war, is on display at Vancouver Maritime Museum.

The other is a 1/55th arsenal model realised by master Boubénec between 1951 and 1952, under the direction of Captain Diaz de Soria. It was built from the plans of the hull and rafter of the ship, though sculptures were undocumented and had to be reconstituted from drawings.Diaz de Soria, ''Le Marseillois'', p. 7 It is currently on display at the Musée de la Marine et de l'Économie de Marseille.

Notes and references

Notes

References

Bibliography

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

External links

*
Répertoire de vaisseau de ligne français de 1781 à 1815
Ronald Deschênes
*

* ttps://archive.today/20130131175407/http://fandancetres.oldiblog.com/?page=lastarticle&id=1505827 LISTE EQUIPAGE VAISSEAU LE MARSEILLAIS*
VILLENEUVE, Pierre-Charles de, (1763–1806), vice-amiral
*
Le Vengeur livre son dernier combat
Fabienne Manière, herodote.net
*

9 July 1794 ''The World's Famous Orations'', Retrieved 29 May 2008
*
Letter to Mary Rich
10 December 1838 ''The Carlyle Letters'', Retrieved 29 May 2008
*
RENAUDIN Jean-François. Contre-Amiral
Amis du Patrimoine Napoléonien
*
1794 - Marins de la Tremblade (17) survivants du naufrage du Vengeur, héros oubliés
*
Guerres navales révolutionnaires
Jérémie Benoît, histoire-image.org
*
Bone Model ''Le Vengeur du Peuple''
Bridgeman Art Library
*
Featured Exhibits
, vancouvermaritimemuseum.com
*

marseille-images.net

{{DEFAULTSORT:Vengeur du Peuple
Ships of the line of the French Navy
Shipwrecks in the Atlantic Ocean
1766 ships
Maritime incidents in 1794
Don des vaisseaux
Ships built in France