Two-barred Flasher

''Telegonus fulgerator'', the two-barred flasher, is a species of spread-wing skipper butterfly in the family Hesperiidae which may constitute a possible cryptic species complex. It ranges all over the Americas, from the southern United States to northern Argentina.

Description

''Telegonus fulgerator'' is a mid-sized skipper butterfly with the wing shape typical of this group. The upperside is black, with basal to postbasal blue corners which are more extensive on the forewings. There is one discal-tomal and one apical band on the forewing; these are usually off white to light blue but the former may be quite white towards the costal margin. The thorax has bluish hair on the back, the underside is yellow to orange.Hebert ''et al.'' (2004)

The caterpillars and pupae show a wide range of colors and patterns, and the caterpillars also vary in food preference. Last-instar caterpillars are black with a pattern consisting of light to bright yellow dots along the sides, or rings of varying thickness, sometimes interrupted on the back, in a range of colors varying from white to orange red.

Larval food plants

This species is highly polyphagous, with most food plants belonging to the Fabaceae (legume family):

Selected primary food plants Area de Conservación Guanacaste World Heritage Site, NW Costa Rica: Hébert ''et al.'' (2004)
* Fabaceae
** ''Inga'': '' I. exalata'', '' I. oerstediana'', '' I. punctata'', '' I. sapindoides'', '' I. vera'' and probably others
** '' Lonchocarpus'' (see also below)
** '' Senna'': candle bush (''S. alata''), '' S. cobanensis'', '' S. hayesiana'', '' S. pallida'', '' S. papillosa'', '' S. undulata'' and probably othersHébert ''et al.'' (2004) refer to ''"Cassia emarginata"'', which today is either of '' Chamaecrista pilosa'', Rambling Senna (''S. bicapsularis'') or '' Senna candolleana''. The last does not occur in their study area; given the general importance of ''Senna'' species and the lack of records for ''Chamaecrista'' species as food plants in the study area, ''S. bicapsularis'' seems to be the plant in question.
* Malvaceae
** ''Hampea appendiculata'' (but see below)
* Sapindaceae
** ''Cupania'': '' C. glabra'', '' C. guatemalensis'' and probably others

Selected secondary and accidental food plants
* Capparaceae
** '' Capparis frondosa''
* Fabaceae
** '' Canavalia brasiliensis''
** '' Cassia'': golden shower tree (''C. fistula''), '' C. grandis'' and possibly others
** '' Centrosema'' (butterfly peas): '' C. macrocarpum'', '' C. plumieri'' and possibly others
** '' Desmodium glabrum''
** '' Dioclea'': '' D. malacocarpa'', '' D. violacea'' and possibly others
** '' Mucuna holtonii''
** '' Piscidia carthagenensis''
* Malvaceae
** '' Byttneria catalpaefolia''
* Rhamnaceae
** '' Karwinskia calderoni''
* Salicaceae
** '' Casearia sylvestris''
* Styracaceae
** '' Styrax argenteus''

Systematics

Due to the diversity of caterpillar colors and food plants it was suspected that the butterflies referred to as ''Telegonus fulgerator'' might be more than a single species. A controversial 2004 DNA barcoding study of a 648 base pair sequence from the Cytochrome c oxidase (COI) DNA sequence by Paul D. N. Hébert ''et al''. led the authors to claim that at least ten sympatric populations in the Area de Conservación Guanacaste World Heritage Site in north-western Costa Rica were in various stages of reproductive isolation. However, a later reanalysis of the same DNA sequence data using neighbor joining bootstrap, population aggregation analysis and cladistic haplotype analysis found that: " least three, but not more than seven mtDNA clades that may correspond to cryptic species are supported by the evidence". Also, where a specific DNA sequence did not correspond to its purported host plant, it was " simply dismissed with an ad hoc hypothesis and manifestly incorrect explanation" by Hébert and his coworkers. The improper use of taxonomic vocabulary was also criticized; Hébert ''et al''. apply the terms "species" and "taxa" as if they were synonymous, but never actually validly described their proposed "species".Brower (2006)

Cryptic variation

The exact number of taxa involved is disputed, most of the "species" detected by the DNA barcoding study seem to be nothing more than morphs or incipient subspecies, coupled with a serious underestimation of variation. Still, two lineages appear to be well distinct and separable at least as subspecies: "CELT" has larvae with bold orange bands in the last instar, which were recorded only on '' Celtis iguanaea'' (Ulmaceae); "TRIGO" last-instar larvae have bold yellow bands and were found on the Malpighiales '' Trigonia'' ('' T. arborea'', '' T. laevis'' and '' T. rugosa'') and, apparently accidentally, on '' Licania arborea''.

Three more lineages are in need of further study. One, "NUMT", was initially dismissed as a numt pseudogene combined with sequencing error but may represent a hitherto unrecognized taxon. Two other lineages, "LOHAM" and "LONCHO", were considered highly distinct in the barcoding study but the reanalysis showed that this might be an error. The latter two are peculiar in some aspects, such as apparently never having bands or orange colors in the last instar stage and showing a preference for '' Lonchocarpus costaricensis'', '' Lonchocarpus oliganthus'', and ''Hampea appendiculata'' as larval food but are not monophagous. They appear to be an intermediate stage in lineage sorting and might be considered one or two subspecies if the two most distinct lineages are split off as species.

The other lineages show a marked lack of agreement between morphological, ecological and genetical variation in the reanalysis of the supposed clusters. The entire range of caterpillar colors and patterns is found across one huge ill-structured cluster of genetic diversity. They are polyphagous, feeding preferentially on ''Inga'' and '' Senna'' as well as a variety of other plants, but apparently not on those preferred by the more distinct lineages except ''Hampea appendiculata''.

The proposed divergence times for the lineages are derived from a standard molecular clock model, which is today known to be incorrect.

Footnotes

References

* (2006): Problems with DNA barcodes for species delimitation: 'ten species' of ''Astraptes fulgerator'' reassessed (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). ''Systematics and Biodiversity'' 4(2): 127–132. PDF fulltext
* (2004): Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the semitropical skipper butterfly ''Astraptes fulgerator''. ''PNAS'' 101(41): 14812-14817. PDF fulltextSupporting Appendices

External links

Gallery of specimens
as per Hébert ''et al.'' (2004). Retrieved 2007-DEC-17.

{{Taxonbar, from1=Q97672923, from2=Q3503407

Astraptes
Butterflies of North America
Butterflies described in 1775
Hesperiidae of South America
Taxa named by Johann Ernst Immanuel Walch