Restrictiveness in English
English does not generally mark modifiers for restrictiveness, with the exception of relative clauses: non-restrictive ones are set off in speech through intonation (with a pause beforehand and ) and in writing by using commas, whereas restrictive clauses are not. Furthermore, although restrictive clauses can be headed by any of the relative pronouns ''who(m)'', ''which'', ''that'' or by a zero, non-restrictive clauses can only be headed by ''who(m)'' or ''which''. For example: *Restrictive: ''We saw two puppies this morning: one that was born yesterday and one that was born last week. The one that (''or'' which) was born yesterday is tiny.'' *Non-restrictive: ''We saw a puppy and a kitty this morning. The puppy, which was born yesterday, was tiny.'' Although English does not consistently mark ordinary adjectives for restrictiveness, they can be marked periphrastically by moving them into relative clauses. For example, "John's beautiful wife" can be rewritten as "John's wife, who is beautiful", to avoid the suggestion of disambiguation between John's various wives. A sentence unmarked for restrictiveness, like "The red car is fancier than the blue one," can—if necessary—be rephrased to make it explicitly restrictive or non-restrictive: *Restrictive: ''The car that's red is fancier than the one that's blue.'' *Non-restrictive: ''The car, which is red, is fancier than the other, which is blue.'' English speakers do not generally find such locutions necessary, however.See also
* Apposition * English relative clauses * Relative clause * Relative pronounNotes and references
Notes
Citations
Sources
* On the intonation question, see Beverly Colins and Inger M. Mees (2003), ''Practical Phonetics and Phonology'', London: Routledge, . {{formal semantics Semantics Grammar