Representations Of Classical Lie Groups
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In mathematics, the finite-dimensional representations of the complex classical Lie groups GL(n,\mathbb), SL(n,\mathbb), O(n,\mathbb), SO(n,\mathbb), Sp(2n,\mathbb), can be constructed using the general representation theory of semisimple Lie algebras. The groups SL(n,\mathbb), SO(n,\mathbb), Sp(2n,\mathbb) are indeed simple Lie groups, and their finite-dimensional representations coincide with those of their
maximal compact subgroup In mathematics Mathematics is a field of study that discovers and organizes methods, Mathematical theory, theories and theorems that are developed and Mathematical proof, proved for the needs of empirical sciences and mathematics itself. T ...
s, respectively SU(n), SO(n), Sp(n). In the classification of simple Lie algebras, the corresponding algebras are : \begin SL(n,\mathbb)&\to A_ \\ SO(n_\text,\mathbb)&\to B_ \\ SO(n_\text,\mathbb) &\to D_ \\ Sp(2n,\mathbb)&\to C_n \end However, since the complex classical Lie groups are
linear group In mathematics, a matrix group is a group ''G'' consisting of invertible matrices over a specified field ''K'', with the operation of matrix multiplication. A linear group is a group that is isomorphic to a matrix group (that is, admitting a ...
s, their representations are
tensor representation In mathematics, the tensor representations of the general linear group are those that are obtained by taking finitely many tensor products of the fundamental representation and its dual. The irreducible factors of such a representation are also ca ...
s. Each irreducible representation is labelled by a Young diagram, which encodes its structure and properties.


General linear group In mathematics, the general linear group of degree n is the set of n\times n invertible matrices, together with the operation of ordinary matrix multiplication. This forms a group, because the product of two invertible matrices is again inve ...
, special linear group and
unitary group Unitary may refer to: Mathematics * Unitary divisor * Unitary element * Unitary group * Unitary matrix * Unitary morphism * Unitary operator * Unitary transformation * Unitary representation * Unitarity (physics) * ''E''-unitary inverse semi ...


Weyl's construction of tensor representations

Let V=\mathbb^n be the defining representation of the general linear group GL(n,\mathbb). Tensor representations are the subrepresentations of V^ (these are sometimes called polynomial representations). The irreducible subrepresentations of V^ are the images of V by Schur functors \mathbb^\lambda associated to
integer partition In number theory and combinatorics, a partition of a non-negative integer , also called an integer partition, is a way of writing as a summation, sum of positive integers. Two sums that differ only in the order of their summands are considered ...
s \lambda of k into at most n integers, i.e. to Young diagrams of size \lambda_1+\cdots + \lambda_n = k with \lambda_=0. (If \lambda_>0 then \mathbb^\lambda(V)=0.) Schur functors are defined using Young symmetrizers of the
symmetric group In abstract algebra, the symmetric group defined over any set is the group whose elements are all the bijections from the set to itself, and whose group operation is the composition of functions. In particular, the finite symmetric grou ...
S_k, which acts naturally on V^. We write V_\lambda = \mathbb^\lambda(V). The dimensions of these irreducible representations are : \dim V_\lambda = \prod_\frac = \prod_ \frac where h_\lambda(i,j) is the hook length of the cell (i,j) in the Young diagram \lambda. * The first formula for the dimension is a special case of a formula that gives the characters of representations in terms of Schur polynomials, \chi_\lambda(g) = s_\lambda(x_1,\dots, x_n) where x_1,\dots ,x_n are the eigenvalues of g\in GL(n,\mathbb). * The second formula for the dimension is sometimes called Stanley's hook content formula. Examples of tensor representations:


General irreducible representations

Not all irreducible representations of GL(n,\mathbb C) are tensor representations. In general, irreducible representations of GL(n,\mathbb C) are mixed tensor representations, i.e. subrepresentations of V^ \otimes (V^*)^, where V^* is the dual representation of V (these are sometimes called rational representations). In the end, the set of irreducible representations of GL(n,\mathbb C) is labeled by non increasing sequences of n integers \lambda_1\geq \dots \geq \lambda_n . If \lambda_k \geq 0, \lambda_ \leq 0 , we can associate to (\lambda_1, \dots ,\lambda_n) the pair of Young tableaux ( lambda_1\dots\lambda_k \lambda_n,\dots,-\lambda_ . This shows that irreducible representations of GL(n,\mathbb C) can be labeled by pairs of Young tableaux . Let us denote V_ = V_ the irreducible representation of GL(n,\mathbb C) corresponding to the pair (\lambda,\mu) or equivalently to the sequence (\lambda_1,\dots,\lambda_n) . With these notations, * V_=V_, V = V_ * (V_)^* = V_ * For k \in \mathbb Z , denoting D_k the one-dimensional representation in which GL(n,\mathbb C) acts by (\det)^k , V_ = V_ \otimes D_ . If k is large enough that \lambda_n + k \geq 0 , this gives an explicit description of V_ in terms of a Schur functor. * The dimension of V_ where \lambda = (\lambda_1,\dots,\lambda_r), \mu=(\mu_1,\dots,\mu_s) is : \dim(V_) = d_\lambda d_\mu \prod_^r \frac \prod_^s \frac\prod_^r \prod_^s \frac where d_\lambda = \prod_ \frac . See for an interpretation as a product of n-dependent factors divided by products of hook lengths.


Case of the special linear group

Two representations V_,V_ of GL(n,\mathbb) are equivalent as representations of the special linear group SL(n,\mathbb) if and only if there is k\in\mathbb such that \forall i,\ \lambda_i-\lambda'_i=k. For instance, the determinant representation V_ is trivial in SL(n,\mathbb), i.e. it is equivalent to V_. In particular, irreducible representations of SL(n,\mathbb C) can be indexed by Young tableaux, and are all tensor representations (not mixed).


Case of the unitary group

The unitary group is the maximal compact subgroup of GL(n,\mathbb C) . The complexification of its Lie algebra \mathfrak u(n) = \ is the algebra \mathfrak(n,\mathbb C). In Lie theoretic terms, U(n) is the compact real form of GL(n,\mathbb C) , which means that complex linear, continuous irreducible representations of the latter are in one-to-one correspondence with complex linear, algebraic irreps of the former, via the inclusion U(n) \rightarrow GL(n,\mathbb C) .


Tensor products

Tensor products of finite-dimensional representations of GL(n,\mathbb) are given by the following formula: : V_ \otimes V_ = \bigoplus_ V_^, where \Gamma^_ = 0 unless , \nu, \leq , \lambda_1, + , \lambda_2, and , \rho, \leq , \mu_1, + , \mu_2, . Calling l(\lambda) the number of lines in a tableau, if l(\lambda_1) + l(\lambda_2) + l(\mu_1) + l(\mu_2) \leq n , then : \Gamma^_ = \sum_ \left(\sum_\kappa c^_ c^_\right)\left(\sum_\gamma c^_c^_\right)c^_c^_, where the natural integers c_^\nu are Littlewood-Richardson coefficients. Below are a few examples of such tensor products: In the case of tensor representations, 3-j symbols and
6-j symbol Wigner's 6-''j'' symbols were introduced by Eugene Paul Wigner in 1940 and published in 1965. They are defined as a sum over products of four Wigner 3-j symbols, Wigner 3-''j'' symbols, : \begin \begin j_1 & j_2 & j_3\\ j_4 & j_5 & j_ ...
s are known.


Orthogonal group In mathematics, the orthogonal group in dimension , denoted , is the Group (mathematics), group of isometry, distance-preserving transformations of a Euclidean space of dimension that preserve a fixed point, where the group operation is given by ...
and
special orthogonal group In mathematics, the orthogonal group in dimension , denoted , is the group of distance-preserving transformations of a Euclidean space of dimension that preserve a fixed point, where the group operation is given by composing transformations. ...

''In addition to the Lie group representations described here, the orthogonal group O(n,\mathbb) and special orthogonal group SO(n,\mathbb) have spin representations, which are
projective representation In the field of representation theory in mathematics, a projective representation of a group ''G'' on a vector space ''V'' over a field ''F'' is a group homomorphism from ''G'' to the projective linear group \mathrm(V) = \mathrm(V) / F^*, where G ...
s of these groups, i.e. representations of their universal covering groups.''


Construction of representations

Since O(n,\mathbb) is a subgroup of GL(n,\mathbb), any irreducible representation of GL(n,\mathbb) is also a representation of O(n,\mathbb), which may however not be irreducible. In order for a tensor representation of O(n,\mathbb) to be irreducible, the tensors must be traceless. Irreducible representations of O(n,\mathbb) are parametrized by a subset of the Young diagrams associated to irreducible representations of GL(n,\mathbb): the diagrams such that the sum of the lengths of the first two columns is at most n. The irreducible representation U_\lambda that corresponds to such a diagram is a subrepresentation of the corresponding GL(n,\mathbb) representation V_\lambda. For example, in the case of symmetric tensors, : V_ = U_ \oplus V_


Case of the special orthogonal group

The antisymmetric tensor U_ is a one-dimensional representation of O(n,\mathbb), which is trivial for SO(n,\mathbb). Then U_\otimes U_\lambda = U_ where \lambda' is obtained from \lambda by acting on the length of the first column as \tilde_1\to n-\tilde_1. * For n odd, the irreducible representations of SO(n,\mathbb) are parametrized by Young diagrams with \tilde_1\leq\frac rows. * For n even, U_\lambda is still irreducible as an SO(n,\mathbb) representation if \tilde_1\leq\frac-1, but it reduces to a sum of two inequivalent SO(n,\mathbb) representations if \tilde_1=\frac. For example, the irreducible representations of O(3,\mathbb) correspond to Young diagrams of the types (k\geq 0),(k\geq 1,1),(1,1,1). The irreducible representations of SO(3,\mathbb) correspond to (k\geq 0), and \dim U_=2k+1. On the other hand, the dimensions of the spin representations of SO(3,\mathbb) are even integers.


Dimensions

The dimensions of irreducible representations of SO(n,\mathbb) are given by a formula that depends on the parity of n: : (n\text) \qquad \dim U_\lambda = \prod_ \frac\cdot \frac : (n\text) \qquad \dim U_\lambda = \prod_ \frac \prod_ \frac There is also an expression as a factorized polynomial in n: : \dim U_\lambda = \prod_ \frac \prod_ \frac where \lambda_i,\tilde_i,h_\lambda(i,j) are respectively row lengths, column lengths and hook lengths. In particular, antisymmetric representations have the same dimensions as their GL(n,\mathbb) counterparts, \dim U_=\dim V_, but symmetric representations do not, : \dim U_ = \dim V_ - \dim V_ = \binom- \binom


Tensor products

In the stable range , \mu, +, \nu, \leq \left frac\right/math>, the tensor product multiplicities that appear in the tensor product decomposition U_\lambda\otimes U_\mu = \oplus_\nu N_ U_\nu are Newell-Littlewood numbers, which do not depend on n. Beyond the stable range, the tensor product multiplicities become n-dependent modifications of the Newell-Littlewood numbers. For example, for n\geq 12, we have : \begin otimes &= + 1+ [] \\ otimes &= 1+ + [1] \\ otimes 1&= 11+ 1+ \\ otimes 1&= 1 2 11 + 1 \\ \otimes &= 1 \\ otimes &= 1 2 1[] \\ otimes 1&= 1 11+ 1 \\ 1otimes 1&= 111+ 11+ 2+ + 1+ [] \\ [21]\otimes &=[321]+[411]+[42]+[51]+ 11 22 1 1 \end


Branching rules from the general linear group

Since the orthogonal group is a subgroup of the general linear group, representations of GL(n) can be decomposed into representations of O(n). The decomposition of a tensor representation is given in terms of Littlewood-Richardson coefficients c_^\nu by the Littlewood restriction rule : V_\nu^ = \sum_ c_^\nu U_\lambda^ where 2\mu is a partition into even integers. The rule is valid in the stable range 2, \nu, ,\tilde_1+\tilde_2\leq n . The generalization to mixed tensor representations is : V_^ = \sum_ c_^\lambda c_^\mu c_^\nu U_\nu^ Similar branching rules can be written for the symplectic group.


Symplectic group In mathematics, the name symplectic group can refer to two different, but closely related, collections of mathematical groups, denoted and for positive integer ''n'' and field F (usually C or R). The latter is called the compact symplectic gr ...


Representations

The finite-dimensional irreducible representations of the symplectic group Sp(2n,\mathbb) are parametrized by Young diagrams with at most n rows. The dimension of the corresponding representation is : \dim W_\lambda = \prod_^n \frac \prod_ \frac \cdot \frac There is also an expression as a factorized polynomial in n: : \dim W_\lambda = \prod_ \frac \prod_ \frac


Tensor products

Just like in the case of the orthogonal group, tensor product multiplicities are given by Newell-Littlewood numbers in the stable range, and modifications thereof beyond the stable range.


External links


Lie online service
an online interface to th
Lie software


References

{{Reflist, refs= {{cite arXiv , last=Artamonov , first=Dmitry , title=Calculation of 6j-symbols for the Lie algebra \mathfrak{gl}_n , date=2024-05-09 , eprint=2405.05628 , class=math.RT {{cite journal, last1=Howe, first1=Roger, authorlink=Roger Evans Howe, last2=Tan, first2=Eng-Chye, last3= Willenbring, first3= Jeb F., authorlink3=Jeb Willenbring, title=Stable branching rules for classical symmetric pairs, journal=Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, volume= 357, issue=4, year=2005, pages= 1601–1626, doi=10.1090/S0002-9947-04-03722-5, doi-access=free, arxiv=math/0311159 {{cite arXiv , last=Hawkes , first=Graham , title=An Elementary Proof of the Hook Content Formula , date=2013-10-19 , class=math.CO , eprint=1310.5919v2 {{cite web , author = Steven Sam, title=Littlewood-Richardson coefficients for classical groups , website=Concrete Nonsense , date=2010-01-18 , url=https://concretenonsense.wordpress.com/2010/01/18/littlewood-richardson-coefficients-for-classical-groups/ , archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190618084957/https://concretenonsense.wordpress.com/2010/01/18/littlewood-richardson-coefficients-for-classical-groups/ , archive-date=2019-06-18 , url-status=live , access-date=2021-01-05 {{cite journal , last1=Gao , first1=Shiliang , last2=Orelowitz , first2=Gidon , last3=Yong , first3=Alexander , title=Newell-Littlewood numbers , journal=Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , year=2021 , volume=374 , issue=9 , pages=6331–6366 , doi=10.1090/tran/8375 , arxiv=2005.09012v1, s2cid=218684561 {{cite book , last=Hamermesh , first=Morton , title=Group theory and its application to physical problems , publisher=Dover Publications , publication-place=New York , year=1989 , isbn=0-486-66181-4 , oclc=20218471 Representation theory of Lie groups Lie groups