Quantization Of The Electromagnetic Field

The quantization of the electromagnetic field is a procedure in physics turning Maxwell's classical electromagnetic waves into particles called photons. Photons are massless particles of definite energy, definite momentum, and definite spin.

To explain the photoelectric effect, Albert Einstein assumed heuristically in 1905 that an electromagnetic field consists of particles of energy of amount ''hν'', where ''h'' is the Planck constant and ''ν'' is the wave frequency. In 1927 Paul A. M. Dirac was able to weave the photon concept into the fabric of the new quantum mechanics and to describe the interaction of photons with matter. He applied a technique which is now generally called second quantization,The name derives from the second quantization of quantum mechanical wave functions. Such a wave function is a scalar field (the "Schrödinger field") and can be quantized in the very same way as electromagnetic fields. Since a wave function is derived from a "first" quantized Hamiltonian, the quantization of the Schrödinger field is the second time quantization is performed, hence the name. although this term is somewhat of a misnomer for electromagnetic fields, because they are solutions of the classical Maxwell equations. In Dirac's theory the fields are quantized for the first time and it is also the first time that the Planck constant enters the expressions. In his original work, Dirac took the phases of the different electromagnetic modes ( Fourier components of the field) and the mode energies as dynamic variables to quantize (i.e., he reinterpreted them as operators and postulated commutation relations between them). At present it is more common to quantize the Fourier components of the vector potential. This is what is done below.

A quantum mechanical photon state $, \mathbf,\mu \rangle$ belonging to mode $(\mathbf,\mu)$ is introduced below, and it is shown that it has the following properties:

:$\begin m_\textrm &= 0 \\ H , \mathbf,\mu \rangle &= h\nu , \mathbf,\mu \rangle && \hbox\quad \nu = c , \mathbf, \\ P_ , \mathbf,\mu \rangle &= \hbar\mathbf , \mathbf,\mu\rangle \\ S_z , \mathbf,\mu \rangle &= \mu , \mathbf,\mu \rangle && \mu=\pm 1. \end$

These equations say respectively: a photon has zero rest mass; the photon energy is ''hν'' = ''hc'', k, (k is the wave vector, ''c'' is speed of light); its electromagnetic momentum is ''ħ''k 'ħ'' = ''h''/(2''π'') the polarization ''μ'' = ±1 is the eigenvalue of the ''z''-component of the photon spin.

Second quantization

Second quantization starts with an expansion of a scalar or vector field (or wave functions) in a basis consisting of a complete set of functions. These expansion functions depend on the coordinates of a single particle. The coefficients multiplying the basis functions are interpreted as operators and (anti)commutation relations between these new operators are imposed, commutation relations for bosons and anticommutation relations for fermions (nothing happens to the basis functions themselves). By doing this, the expanded field is converted into a fermion or boson operator field. The expansion coefficients have been promoted from ordinary numbers to operators, creation and annihilation operators. A creation operator creates a particle in the corresponding basis function and an annihilation operator annihilates a particle in this function.

In the case of EM fields the required expansion of the field is the Fourier expansion.

Electromagnetic field and vector potential

As the term suggests, an EM field consists of two vector fields, an electric field $\mathbf(\mathbf, t)$ and a magnetic field $\mathbf(\mathbf, t)$. Both are time-dependent vector fields that in vacuum depend on a third vector field $\mathbf(\mathbf, t)$ (the vector potential), as well as a scalar field $\phi (\mathbf, t)$

:$\begin \mathbf(\mathbf, t) &= \boldsymbol\times \mathbf(\mathbf, t)\\ \mathbf(\mathbf, t) &= - \boldsymbol \phi (\mathbf, t) - \frac, \\ \end$

where ∇ × A is the curl of A.

Choosing the Coulomb gauge, for which ∇⋅A = 0, makes A into a transverse field. The Fourier expansion of the vector potential enclosed in a finite cubic box of volume ''V'' = ''L''³ is then
: $\mathbf(\mathbf, t) = \sum_\mathbf\sum_ \left(\mathbf^(\mathbf) a^_\mathbf(t) e^ + \bar^(\mathbf) \bar^_\mathbf(t) e^ \right),$
where $\overline$ denotes the complex conjugate of $a$. The wave vector k gives the propagation direction of the corresponding Fourier component (a polarized monochromatic wave) of A(r,''t''); the length of the wave vector is
: $, \mathbf, = \frac = \frac,$
with ''ν'' the frequency of the mode. In this summation k runs over all integers, both positive and negative. (The component of Fourier basis $e^$ is complex conjugate of component of $e^$ as $\mathbf(\mathbf, t)$ is real.) The components of the vector k have discrete values (a consequence of the boundary condition that A has the same value on opposite walls of the box):
: $k_x = \frac,\quad k_y = \frac,\quad k_z = \frac, \qquad n_x, n_y, n_z = 0, \pm 1, \pm 2, \ldots.$

Two e^(''μ'') ("polarization vectors") are conventional unit vectors for left and right hand circular polarized (LCP and RCP) EM waves (See Jones calculus or Jones vector, Jones calculus) and perpendicular to k. They are related to the orthonormal Cartesian vectors e_''x'' and e_''y'' through a unitary transformation,
: $\mathbf^ \equiv \frac(\mathbf_x \pm i \mathbf_y) \qquad \hbox\quad \mathbf_x\cdot\mathbf = \mathbf_y\cdot\mathbf = 0.$

The kth Fourier component of A is a vector perpendicular to k and hence is a linear combination of e⁽¹⁾ and e⁽⁻¹⁾. The superscript ''μ'' indicates a component along e^(''μ'').

Clearly, the (discrete infinite) set of Fourier coefficients $a^_\mathbf(t)$ and $\bar^_\mathbf(t)$ are variables defining the vector potential. In the following they will be promoted to operators.

By using field equations of $\mathbf$ and $\mathbf$ in terms of $\mathbf$ above, electric and magnetic fields are
: \begin
\mathbf(\mathbf,t) &= i \sum_ \\ pt\mathbf(\mathbf,t) &= i \sum_ \sum_ \left \
\end

By using identity $\nabla \times e^ =A\times e^$ ($A$ and $r$ are vectors) and $a_^(t)=a_^$ as each mode has single frequency dependence.

Quantization of EM field

The best known example of quantization is the replacement of the time-dependent linear momentum of a particle by the rule
: $\mathbf(t) \to -i\hbar\boldsymbol.$

Note that the Planck constant is introduced here and that the time-dependence of the classical expression is not taken over in the quantum mechanical operator (this is true in the so-called Schrödinger picture).

For the EM field we do something similar. The quantity $\epsilon_0$ is the electric constant, which appears here because of the use of electromagnetic SI units. The ''quantization rules'' are:
: $\begin a^_\mathbf(t) &\to \sqrt a^(\mathbf) \\ \bar^_\mathbf(t) &\to \sqrt ^(\mathbf) \\ \end$
subject to the boson commutation relations
: \begin
\left a^(\mathbf), a^(\mathbf') \right& = 0 \\
\left ^(\mathbf), ^(\mathbf')\right &=0 \\
\left a^(\mathbf), ^(\mathbf')\right &= \delta_ \delta_
\end

The square brackets indicate a commutator, defined by $$, B\equiv AB - BA for any two quantum mechanical operators ''A'' and ''B''. The introduction of the Planck constant is essential in the transition from a classical to a quantum theory. The factor
: $\sqrt$
is introduced to give the Hamiltonian (energy operator) a simple form, see below.

The quantized fields (operator fields) are the following
: $\begin \mathbf(\mathbf) &= \sum_ \sqrt \left \ \\ \mathbf(\mathbf) &= i\sum_ \sqrt \left \ \\ \mathbf(\mathbf) &= i\sum_ \sqrt \left \ \end$
where ''ω'' = ''c'' = ''ck''.

Hamiltonian of the field

The classical Hamiltonian has the form
: $H=\frac \epsilon_0 \iiint_\mathbf= V \epsilon_0 \sum_\sum_ \omega^2 \left (\bar_^(t)a_^(t)+a_^(t)\bar_^(t) \right ).$

The right-hand-side is easily obtained by first using
: $\int_ e^ e^ dr=V \delta_$
(can be derived from Euler equation and trigonometric orthogonality) where ''k'' is wavenumber for wave confined within the box of ''V'' = ''L'' × ''L'' × ''L'' as described above and second, using ''ω'' = ''kc''.

Substitution of the field operators into the classical Hamiltonian gives the Hamilton operator of the EM field,
: $H= \frac\sum_ \hbar \omega \left (^(\mathbf) a^(\mathbf) + a^(\mathbf) ^(\mathbf)\right) = \sum_ \hbar \omega \left (^(\mathbf)a^(\mathbf) + \frac\right )$

The second equality follows by use of the third of the boson commutation relations from above with k′ = k and ''μ''′ = ''μ''. Note again that ''ħω'' = ''hν'' = ''ħc'', k, and remember that ''ω'' depends on k, even though it is not explicit in the notation. The notation ''ω''(k) could have been introduced, but is not common as it clutters the equations.

Digression: harmonic oscillator

The second quantized treatment of the one-dimensional quantum harmonic oscillator is a well-known topic in quantum mechanical courses. We digress and say a few words about it. The harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian has the form
: $H = \hbar \omega \left ( a^\dagger a + \tfrac \right)$
where ''ω'' ≡ 2''πν'' is the fundamental frequency of the oscillator. The ground state of the oscillator is designated by $, 0 \rangle$; and is referred to as the "vacuum state". It can be shown that $a^\dagger$ is an excitation operator, it excites from an ''n'' fold excited state to an ''n'' + 1 fold excited state:
: $a^\dagger , n \rangle = , n+1 \rangle \sqrt.$

In particular: $a^\dagger , 0 \rangle = , 1 \rangle$ and $(a^\dagger)^n , 0\rangle \propto , n\rangle.$

Since harmonic oscillator energies are equidistant, the ''n''-fold excited state $, n\rangle$; can be looked upon as a single state containing ''n'' particles (sometimes called vibrons) all of energy ''hν''. These particles are bosons. For obvious reason the excitation operator $a^\dagger$ is called a ''creation operator''.

From the commutation relation follows that the Hermitian adjoint $a$ de-excites: $a , n \rangle = , n-1 \rangle \sqrt$ in particular $a , 0 \rangle \propto 0,$ so that $a , 0 \rangle = 0.$ For obvious reason the de-excitation operator $a$ is called an ''annihilation operator''.

By mathematical induction the following "differentiation rule", that will be needed later, is easily proved,
: \left , (a^\dagger)^n \right = n (a^\dagger)^\qquad\hbox\quad \left (a^\dagger \right )^0 = 1.

Suppose now we have a number of non-interacting (independent) one-dimensional harmonic oscillators, each with its own fundamental frequency ''ω_i'' . Because the oscillators are independent, the Hamiltonian is a simple sum:
: $H = \sum_i \hbar\omega_i \left (a^\dagger(i) a(i) +\tfrac \right ).$

By substituting $(\mathbf, \mu)$ for $i$ we see that the Hamiltonian of the EM field can be considered a Hamiltonian of independent oscillators of energy ''ω'' = ''c'' oscillating along direction e^(''μ'') with ''μ'' = ±1.

Photon number states (Fock states)

The quantized EM field has a vacuum (no photons) state $, 0 \rangle$. The application of it to, say,
: $\left ( ^(\mathbf) \right )^m \left ( ^(\mathbf') \right)^n , 0 \rangle \propto \left, (\mathbf,\mu)^m; (\mathbf', \mu')^n \right\rangle,$
gives a quantum state of ''m'' photons in mode (k, ''μ'') and ''n'' photons in mode (k′, ''μ''′). The proportionality symbol is used because the state on the left-hand is not normalized to unity, whereas the state on the right-hand may be normalized.

The operator
: $N^(\mathbf) \equiv ^(\mathbf) a^(\mathbf)$
is the ''number operator''. When acting on a quantum mechanical photon number state, it returns the number of photons in mode (k, ''μ''). This also holds when the number of photons in this mode is zero, then the number operator returns zero. To show the action of the number operator on a one-photon ket, we consider
: $\begin N^(\mathbf), \mathbf',\mu' \rangle &= ^(\mathbf) a^(\mathbf) ^(\mathbf) , 0 \rangle \\ &= ^(\mathbf) \left(\delta_\delta_ + ^(\mathbf) a^(\mathbf)\right) , 0 \rangle \\ &=\delta_\delta_ , \mathbf,\mu\rangle, \end$
i.e., a number operator of mode (k, ''μ'') returns zero if the mode is unoccupied and returns unity if the mode is singly occupied. To consider the action of the number operator of mode (k, ''μ'') on a ''n''-photon ket of the same mode, we drop the indices k and ''μ'' and consider
: N (a^\dagger)^n , 0 \rangle = a^\dagger \left( , (a^\dagger)^n+ (a^\dagger)^n a\right), 0\rangle =a^\dagger , (a^\dagger)^n, 0 \rangle.

Use the "differentiation rule" introduced earlier and it follows that
: $N (a^\dagger)^n , 0 \rangle = n (a^\dagger)^n , 0 \rangle.$

A photon number state (or a Fock state) is an eigenstate of the number operator. This is why the formalism described here is often referred to as the ''occupation number representation''.

Photon energy

Earlier the Hamiltonian,
: $H = \sum_ \hbar \omega \left (^(\mathbf)a^(\mathbf) + \frac\right )$
was introduced. The zero of energy can be shifted, which leads to an expression in terms of the number operator,
: $H= \sum_ \hbar \omega N^(\mathbf)$

The effect of ''H'' on a single-photon state is
: $H, \mathbf,\mu\rangle \equiv H \left(^(\mathbf) , 0\rangle\right) = \sum_ \hbar\omega' N^(\mathbf') ^(\mathbf) , 0 \rangle = \hbar\omega \left( ^(\mathbf) , 0\rangle\right) = \hbar\omega , \mathbf,\mu\rangle.$

Thus the single-photon state is an eigenstate of ''H'' and ''ħω'' = ''hν'' is the corresponding energy. In the same way
: H \left , (\mathbf,\mu)^m; (\mathbf', \mu')^n \right \rangle = \left (\hbar\omega) + n(\hbar\omega') \right\left , (\mathbf,\mu)^m; (\mathbf', \mu')^n \right \rangle , \qquad \text \quad \omega = c , \mathbf, \quad\hbox\quad \omega' = c , \mathbf', .

Photon momentum

Introducing the Fourier expansion of the electromagnetic field into the classical form
: $\mathbf_\textrm = \epsilon_0 \iiint_V \mathbf(\mathbf,t)\times \mathbf(\mathbf,t) \textrm^3\mathbf,$
yields
: $\mathbf_\textrm = V \epsilon_0 \sum_\mathbf\sum_ \omega \mathbf \left( a^_\mathbf(t)\bar^_\mathbf(t) + \bar^_\mathbf(t) a^_\mathbf(t) \right).$

Quantization gives
: $\mathbf_\textrm = \sum_ \hbar \mathbf \left (^(\mathbf)a^(\mathbf) + \frac\right) = \sum_ \hbar \mathbf N^(\mathbf).$

The term 1/2 could be dropped, because when one sums over the allowed k, k cancels with −k. The effect of P_EM on a single-photon state is
: $\mathbf_\textrm, \mathbf,\mu \rangle =\mathbf_\textrm \left(^(\mathbf) , 0\rangle \right) = \hbar\mathbf \left( ^(\mathbf) , 0\rangle\right)= \hbar \mathbf , \mathbf,\mu \rangle.$

Apparently, the single-photon state is an eigenstate of the momentum operator, and ''ħ''k is the eigenvalue (the momentum of a single photon).

Photon mass

The photon having non-zero linear momentum, one could imagine that it has a non-vanishing rest mass ''m''₀, which is its mass at zero speed. However, we will now show that this is not the case: ''m''₀ = 0.

Since the photon propagates with the speed of light, special relativity is called for. The relativistic expressions for energy and momentum squared are,
: $E^2 = \frac, \qquad p^2 = \frac.$

From ''p''²/''E''²,
: $\frac = \frac \quad\Longrightarrow\quad E^2= \frac\quad\Longrightarrow\quad m_0^2 c^4 = E^2 - c^2p^2.$

Use
: $E^2 = \hbar^2 \omega^2 \qquad\text\qquad p^2 = \hbar^2 k^2 = \frac$
and it follows that
: $m_0^2 c^4 = E^2 - c^2p^2 = \hbar^2 \omega^2 - c^2 \frac = 0,$
so that ''m''₀ = 0.

Photon spin

The photon can be assigned a triplet spin with spin quantum number ''S'' = 1. This is similar to, say, the nuclear spin of the ¹⁴N isotope, but with the important difference that the state with ''M''_S = 0 is zero, only the states with ''M''_S = ±1 are non-zero.

Define spin operators:
: $S_z \equiv -i\hbar\left( \mathbf_\otimes \mathbf_ - \mathbf_\otimes \mathbf_\right ) \qquad\hbox\quad x\to y \to z \to x.$

The two operators $\otimes$ between the two orthogonal unit vectors are dyadic products. The unit vectors are perpendicular to the propagation direction k (the direction of the ''z'' axis, which is the spin quantization axis).

The spin operators satisfy the usual angular momentum commutation relations
: _x, S_y= i \hbar S_z \qquad\hbox\quad x\to y \to z \to x.

Indeed, use the dyadic product property
: $\left (\mathbf_ \otimes \mathbf_\right) \left ( \mathbf_ \otimes \mathbf_\right)= \left (\mathbf_\otimes\mathbf_ \right ) \left ( \mathbf_ \cdot \mathbf_ \right ) = \mathbf_\otimes\mathbf_$
because e_''z'' is of unit length. In this manner,
: \begin
\left _x, S_y\right&=-\hbar^2 \left (\mathbf_ \otimes \mathbf_ - \mathbf_ \otimes \mathbf_\right ) \left ( \mathbf_ \otimes \mathbf_ - \mathbf_ \otimes \mathbf_\right ) + \hbar^2 \left ( \mathbf_ \otimes \mathbf_ - \mathbf_ \otimes \mathbf_\right)\left ( \mathbf_ \otimes \mathbf_ - \mathbf_ \otimes \mathbf_\right) \\
&= \hbar^2 \left [ -\left (\mathbf_ \otimes \mathbf_ - \mathbf_ \otimes \mathbf_\right ) \left ( \mathbf_ \otimes \mathbf_ - \mathbf_ \otimes \mathbf_\right ) + \left ( \mathbf_ \otimes \mathbf_ - \mathbf_ \otimes \mathbf_\right)\left ( \mathbf_ \otimes \mathbf_ - \mathbf_ \otimes \mathbf_\right) \right ] \\
&= i\hbar \left [ -i\hbar \left (\mathbf_ \otimes \mathbf_ - \mathbf_ \otimes \mathbf_\right )\right ] \\
&=i\hbar S_z
\end

By inspection it follows that
: $-i\hbar\left (\mathbf_ \otimes \mathbf_ - \mathbf_ \otimes \mathbf_\right)\cdot \mathbf^ = \mu \hbar \mathbf^, \qquad \mu=\pm 1,$
and therefore ''μ'' labels the photon spin,
: $S_z , \mathbf, \mu \rangle = \mu \hbar , \mathbf, \mu \rangle,\quad \mu=\pm 1.$

Because the vector potential A is a transverse field, the photon has no forward (μ = 0) spin component.

Classical approximation

The classical approximation to EM radiation is good when the number of photons is much larger than unity in the volume $\tfrac,$ where ''λ'' is the length of the radio waves. In that case quantum fluctuations are negligible.

For example, the photons emitted by a radio station broadcast at the frequency ''ν'' = 100 MHz, have an energy content of ''νh'' = (1 × 10⁸) × (6.6 × 10⁻³⁴) = 6.6 × 10⁻²⁶ J, where ''h'' is the Planck constant. The wavelength of the station is ''λ'' = ''c''/''ν'' = 3 m, so that ''λ''/(2''π'') = 48 cm and the volume is 0.109 m³. The energy content of this volume element at 5 km from the station is 2.1 × 10⁻¹⁰ × 0.109 = 2.3 × 10⁻¹¹ J, which amounts to 3.4 × 10¹⁴ photons per $\tfrac.$ Since 3.4 × 10¹⁴ > 1, quantum effects do not play a role. The waves emitted by this station are well-described by the classical limit and quantum mechanics is not needed.

See also

* QED vacuum
* Generalized polarization vector of arbitrary spin fields.

References

{{reflist

Gauge theories
Mathematical quantization