In ''Paramount Communications, Inc. v. QVC Network, Inc.'', 637 A.2d 34 (Del. 1994), the Delaware Supreme Court clarified the type of transaction that triggers ''
Revlon
Revlon, Inc. is an American multinational company dealing in cosmetics, skin care, fragrance, and personal care. The headquarters of Revlon was established in New York City on March 1, 1932, where it still remains. Revlon was founded by brot ...
'' duties.
Facts
This case, an appeal from a decision of the
Delaware Chancery Court, involved a proposed
merger
Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are business transactions in which the ownership of companies, other business organizations, or their operating units are transferred to or consolidated with another company or business organization. As an aspect ...
between
Viacom and
Paramount Communications
Paramount Pictures Corporation is an American film and television production and distribution company and the main namesake division of Paramount Global (formerly ViacomCBS). It is the fifth-oldest film studio in the world, the second-oldest ...
; as part of the merger agreement, Paramount agreed to an array of defensive measures, including a no-shop provision, $100 million
termination fee and a lock-up option on approximately 20% of Paramount’s
common stock
Common stock is a form of corporate equity ownership, a type of security. The terms voting share and ordinary share are also used frequently outside of the United States. They are known as equity shares or ordinary shares in the UK and other Com ...
. However, QVC intervened with its own, facially more generous merger proposal, conditioned on cancellation of the defensive measures. The Paramount board refused to conduct a formal bidding process with QVC on the grounds that it would be inconsistent with its contractual obligations to Viacom.
The court found that,
Holding
;''Revlon'' triggers
:When a corporation undertakes a transaction which will cause (a) a change in corporate control, or (b) a break-up of the corporate entity, the directors' obligation is to seek the best value reasonably available to the stockholders
;Burden of proof
:The "directors have the burden of proving that they were adequately informed and acted reasonably."
;Key features of the enhanced scrutiny test
:The courts will look into the adequacy of the directors’ decision making process, including what information they used in coming to their decision. In addition, the court will consider the reasonableness of the directors’ action in light of the circumstances then existing.
See also
* ''
Buchwald v. Paramount''
* ''
Leibovitz v. Paramount Pictures Corp.''
* ''
United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.
''United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.'', 334 U.S. 131 (1948) (also known as the Hollywood Antitrust Case of 1948, the Paramount Case, or the Paramount Decision), was a landmark United States Supreme Court antitrust case that decided the f ...
''
External links
* {{caselaw source
, case = ''Paramount Communications, Inc. v. QVC Network, Inc.'', 637 A.2d 34 (Del. 1994)
, courtlistener =https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1947768/paramount-communications-v-qvc-network/
, googlescholar = https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=18043382785093371066
, justia =https://law.justia.com/cases/delaware/supreme-court/1994/637-a-2d-34-5.html
United States corporate case law
Delaware state case law
1994 in United States case law
1994 in Delaware
Paramount Global
Paramount Pictures
QVC