Theoretical orientation
Those in ''The Cultural School'' of thought include Horney,Early life
Horney was born Karen Danielsen on 16 September 1885 in Blankenese, Germany, nearEducation
Against her parents' wishes, Horney entered medical school in 1906. TheCareer and works
In 1920, Horney was a founding member of the Berlin Psychoanalytic Institute. She then took up a teaching position within the Institute. She helped design and eventually directed the Society's training program, taught students, and conducted psychoanalytic research. She also saw patients for private psychoanalytic sessions, and continued to work at the hospital. By 1923, Oskar Horney's firm became insolvent, and Oskar developedNarcissism
Horney saw narcissism quite differently from Freud, Kohut, and other mainstream psychoanalytic theorists in that she did not posit a primary narcissism but saw the narcissistic personality as the product of a certain kind of early environment acting on a certain kind of temperament. For her, narcissistic needs and tendencies are not inherent in human nature. Narcissism is different from Horney's other major defensive strategies or solutions in that it is not compensatory. Self-idealization is compensatory in her theory, but it differs from narcissism. All the defensive strategies involve self-idealization, but in the narcissistic solution, it tends to be the product of indulgence rather than deprivation. The narcissist's self-esteem is not strong, however, because it is not based on genuine accomplishments.Paris, Bernard J, ''Personality and Personal Growth'', edited by Robert Frager and James Fadiman, 1998Neo-psychoanalytic theories
Mosak (1989) states that while there is no direct evidence Alfred Adler and Horney influenced one another, they landed at similar theoretical understandings. While Horney acknowledged and agreed with Freud on many issues, she was also critical of him on several key beliefs. Like others whose views differed from that of Freud, Horney felt sex and aggression were not the primary factors that shape personality. Horney, along with Adler, believed there were greater influences on personality, including social relationship factors during childhood, rather than just repressed sexual passions. The two focused more on how the conscious mind plays a role in human personality, not just subconscious repression. Freud's notion of " penis envy" was particularly subject to criticism, as well.Paris, ''Karen Horney: a psychoanalyst's search. Chapter 10. The masculinity complex'' She thought Freud had merely stumbled upon women's jealousy of men's generic power in the world. Horney accepted penis envy might occur occasionally in neurotic women, but stated that " womb envy" occurs just as much in men: Horney felt men were envious of a woman's ability to bear children. The degree to which men are driven to success may be merely a substitute for the fact they cannot carry, bear, and nurture children. Horney also thought men were envious of women because they fulfill their position in society by simply "being", whereas men achieve their manhood according to their ability to provide and succeed. Horney was bewildered by psychiatrists' tendency to place so much emphasis on the male sexual organ. Horney also reworked the Freudian Oedipal complex of the sexual elements, claiming the clinging to one parent and jealousy of the other was simply the result of anxiety, caused by a disturbance in the parent-child relationship. Despite these variances with the prevalent Freudian view, Horney strove to reformulate Freudian thought, presenting a holistic, humanistic view of the individual psyche which placed much emphasis onFeminine psychology
Horney was also a pioneer in the discipline of feminine psychiatry.Paris, ''Karen Horney: a psychoanalyst's search.'' Part 2. The Freudian phase and feminine psychology.Marcia Westcott, ''The feminist legacy of Karen Horney'', New Haven, Conn. 1986. As one of the first female psychiatrists, she was the first known woman to present a paper regarding feminine psychiatry. Fourteen of the papers she wrote between 1922 and 1937 were amalgamated into a single volume titled ''Feminine Psychology'' (1967). As a woman, she felt the mapping out of trends in female behaviour was a neglected issue. Women were regarded as objects of charm and beauty—at variance with every human being's ultimate purpose of self-actualization. Women, according to Horney, traditionally gain value only through their children and the wider family. She de-romanticized the Victorian concept of how a marriage bond should be. Horney explained that the "monogamous demand represents the fulfillment of narcissistic and sadistic impulses far more than it indicates the wishes of genuine love”. Most notably, her work ''"The Problem of the Monogamous Ideal"'' was fixed upon marriage, as were six other of Horney's papers. Her essay ''"Maternal Conflicts"'' attempted to shed new light on the problems women experience when raising adolescents. Horney believed both men and women have a drive to be ingenious and productive. Women are able to satisfy this need normally and internally—to do this they become pregnant and give birth. Men satisfy this need only through external ways; Horney proposed that the striking accomplishments of men in work or some other field can be viewed as compensation for their inability to give birth to children. Horney developed her ideas to the extent that she released one of the first " self-help" books in 1946, entitled ''Are You Considering Psychoanalysis?''. The book asserted that those, both male and female, with relatively minor neurotic problems could, in effect, be their own psychiatrists. She continually stressed self-awareness was a part of becoming a better, stronger, richer human being.Mature theory
In the mid-1930s, Horney stopped writing on the topic of feminine psychology and never resumed. Her biographer B.J. Paris writes: Instead, she became increasingly interested in the subject of neurosis. Horney's mature theory of neurosis, according to Paris, "makes a major contribution to psychological thought—particularly the study of personality—that deserves to be more widely known and applied than it is." Horney looked at neurosis in a different light from other psychoanalysts of the time. Her expansive interest in the subject led her to compile a detailed theory of neurosis, with data from her patients. Horney believed neurosis to be a continuous process—with neuroses commonly occurring sporadically in a person's lifetime. This was in contrast to the opinions of her contemporaries who believed neurosis was, like more severe mental conditions, a negative malfunction of the mind in response to external stimuli, such as bereavement, divorce or negative experiences during childhood and adolescence. This has been debated widely by contemporary psychologists. Horney believed these stimuli to be less important, except for influences during childhood. Rather, she placed significant emphasis on parental indifference towards the child, believing a child's perception of events, as opposed to the parent's intentions, is the key to understanding a person's neurosis. For instance, a child might feel a lack of warmth and affection should a parent make fun of the child's feelings. The parent may also casually neglect to fulfill promises, which in turn could have a detrimental effect on the child's mental state. From her experiences as a psychiatrist, Horney named ten patterns of neurotic needs.Horney, ''Self-Analysis.'' These ten needs are based upon things which she thought all humans require to succeed in life. Horney modified these needs somewhat to correspond with what she believed were individuals' neuroses. A neurotic person could theoretically exhibit all of these needs, though in practice fewer than the ten here need to be present for a person to be considered a neurotic.Ten neurotic needs
The ten needs, as set out by Horney, (classified according to her so-called coping strategies) are as follows:Horney, ''Our inner conflicts.'' Moving Toward People (Compliance) * 1. The need for affection and approval; pleasing others and being liked by them. * 2. The need for a partner; one whom they can love and who will solve all problems. Moving Against People (Aggression) * 3. The need for power; the ability to bend wills and achieve control over others—while most persons seek strength, the neurotic may be desperate for it. * 4. The need to exploit others; to get the better of them. To become manipulative, fostering the belief that people are there simply to be used. * 5. The need for social recognition; prestige and limelight. * 6. The need for personal admiration; for both inner and outer qualities—to be valued. * 7. The need for personal achievement; though virtually all persons wish to make achievements, as with No. 5, the neurotic may be desperate for achievement. Moving Away from People (Withdrawal) * 8. The need for self-sufficiency and independence; while most desire someThree categories of needs
Upon investigating the ten needs further, Horney found she was able to condense them into three broad categories:Self-realization
Near the end of her career, Karen Horney summarized her ideas in ''Neurosis and Human Growth: The Struggle Toward Self-Realization'', her major work published in 1950. It's in this book she summarizes her ideas regarding neurosis, clarifying her three neurotic "solutions" to the stresses of life.Paris, ''Karen Horney: a psychoanalyst's search. Part 5. Horney's mature theory.'' The expansive solution became a tripartite combination of narcissistic, perfectionistic and arrogant-vindictive approaches to life. (Horney had previously focused on the psychiatric concept of narcissism in a book published in 1939, ''New Ways in Psychoanalysis''.) Her other two neurotic "solutions" were also a refinement of her previous views: self-effacement, or submission to others, and resignation, or detachment from others. She described case studies of symbiotic relationships between arrogant-vindictive and self-effacing individuals, labeling such a relationship bordering on sadomasochism as a ''morbid dependency''. She believed individuals in the neurotic categories of narcissism and resignation were much less susceptible to such relationships of co-dependency with an arrogant-vindictive neurotic. While non-neurotic individuals may strive for these needs, neurotics exhibit a much deeper, more willful and concentrated desire to fulfill the said needs.Theory of the self
Horney also shared Abraham Maslow's view that self-actualization is something that all people strive for. By "self" she understood the core of one's own being and potential.Horney, ''Neurosis and human growth.'' Chapter 6. Alienation from self. Horney believed that if we have an accurate conception of our own self, then we are free to realize our potential and achieve what we wish, within reasonable boundaries. Thus, she believed self-actualization is the healthy person's aim through life—as opposed to the neurotic's clinging to a set of key needs. According to Horney we can have two views of our self: the " real self" and the "ideal self". The real self is who and what we actually are. The ideal self is the type of person we feel we should be. The real self has the potential for growth, happiness, will power, realization of gifts, etc., but it also has deficiencies. The ideal self is used as a model to assist the real self in developing its potential and achieving self-actualization. (Engler 125) But it is important to know the differences between our ideal and real self. The neurotic person's self is split between an idealized self and a real self. As a result, neurotic individuals feel they somehow do not live up to the ideal self. They feel there is a flaw somewhere in comparison to what they "should" be. The goals set out by the neurotic are not realistic, or indeed possible. The real self then degenerates into a "despised self", and the neurotic person assumes this is the "true" self. Thus, the neurotic is like a clock's pendulum, oscillating between a fallacious "perfection" and a manifestation of self-hate. Horney referred to this phenomenon as the " tyranny of the shoulds" and the neurotic's hopeless "search for glory".Horney, ''Neurosis and human growth. Chaps. 1–5. She concluded these ingrained traits of the psyche forever prevent an individual's potential from being actualized unless the cycle of neurosis is somehow broken, through treatment or, in less severe cases, life lesson.Karen Horney Clinic
Works
The following are all still in print: *See also
Notes
References
Further reading
* *Further reading
* Carlson, N.R. & Heth, C.D. (2007). ''Psychology the science of behaviour''. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc., 459. * DeMartino, R. (1991). Karen Horney, Daisetz T. Suzuki, and Zen Buddhism. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, September, 51(3), 267–83. * * Kondo, A. (1961). The therapist-patient relationship in psychotherapy: On Horney's school and Morita therapy. Seishin Bunseki Kenyu. (Japanese Journal of Psychoanalytic Research), (7), 30–35. * LeVine, P. (1994). Impressions of Karen Horney's final lectures. Australian Psychologist. 29 (1), 153–57. * Paris, Bernard J. ''Karen Horney: a Psychoanalyst's Search for Self-understanding'', Yale University Press, New Haven, 1994. * Quinn, Susan. ''Mind of Her Own: the Life of Karen Horney'', Summit Books, New York, 1987. * Rubins, Jack L. ''Karen Horney: Gentle Rebel of Psychoanalysis'', Summit Books, New York, 1978. * Westkott, Marcia. ''The Feminist Legacy of Karen Horney'', Yale University Press, New Haven, 1986. * Dr. C. George Boeree (Psychology Department, Shippensburg UniversityExternal links