Types
The airflow is not completely stopped in the production of fricative consonants. In other words, the airflow experiences friction.Sibilants
* voiceless coronal sibilant, as in English ''s''ip * voiced coronal sibilant, as in English ''z''ip ** voiceless dental sibilant ** voiced dental sibilant ** voiceless apical sibilant ** voiced apical sibilant ** voiceless predorsal sibilant ( laminal, with tongue tip at lower teeth) ** voiced predorsal sibilant (laminal) ** voiceless postalveolar sibilant (laminal) ** voiced postalveolar sibilant (laminal) * voiceless palato-alveolar sibilant ( domed, partially palatalized), as in English ''sh''ip * voiced palato-alveolar sibilant (domed, partially palatalized), as the ''si'' in English vi''si''on * voiceless alveolo-palatal sibilant (laminal, palatalized) * voiced alveolo-palatal sibilant (laminal, palatalized) * voiceless retroflex sibilant ( apical or subapical) * voiced retroflex sibilant (apical or subapical) All sibilants are coronal, but may be dental, alveolar, postalveolar, or palatal ( retroflex) within that range. However, at the postalveolar place of articulation, the tongue may take several shapes: domed, laminal, or apical, and each of these is given a separate symbol and a separate name. Prototypical retroflexes are subapical and palatal, but they are usually written with the same symbol as the apical postalveolars. The alveolars and dentals may also be either apical or laminal, but this difference is indicated with diacritics rather than with separate symbols.Central non-sibilant fricatives
* voiceless bilabial fricative * voiced bilabial fricative * voiceless labiodental fricative, as in English ''f''ine * voiced labiodental fricative, as in English ''v''ine * voiceless linguolabial fricative * voiced linguolabial fricative * voiceless dental non-sibilant fricative, as in English ''th''ing * voiced dental non-sibilant fricative, as in English ''th''at * voiceless alveolar non-sibilant fricative * voiced alveolar non-sibilant fricative * Voiceless alveolar fricative trill * Voiced alveolar fricative trill * voiceless palatal fricative * voiced palatal fricative * voiceless velar fricative * voiced velar fricative * voiceless palatal-velar fricative (articulation disputed) The IPA also has letters for epiglottal fricatives, * voiceless epiglottal fricative * voiced epiglottal fricative with allophonic trilling, but these might be better analyzed as pharyngeal trills. * voiceless velopharyngeal fricative (often occurs with a cleft palate) * voiced velopharyngeal fricativeLateral fricatives
* voiceless dental lateral fricative * voiced dental lateral fricative * voiceless alveolar lateral fricative * voiced alveolar lateral fricative * voiceless postalveolar lateral fricative ( Mehri) * voiced postalveolar lateral fricative * or extIPA voiceless retroflex lateral fricative * or extIPA Voiced retroflex lateral fricative (in Ao) * or or extIPA voiceless palatal lateral fricative * or extIPA voiced palatal lateral fricative (allophonic in Jebero) * or extIPA voiceless velar lateral fricative * or extIPA voiced velar lateral fricative The lateral fricative occurs as the ''ll'' of Welsh, as in '' Lloyd'', '' Llewelyn'', and '' Machynlleth'' (, a town), as the unvoiced 'hl' and voiced 'dl' or 'dhl' in the several languages of Southern Africa (such as Xhosa and Zulu), and in Mongolian. * or and voiceless lateral-median fricative (a laterally lisped or ) (Modern South Arabian) * or and voiced lateral-median fricative (a laterally lisped or ) (Modern South Arabian)IPA letters used for both fricatives and approximants
* voiceless uvular fricative * voiced uvular fricative * voiceless pharyngeal fricative * voiced pharyngeal fricative No language distinguishes fricatives from approximants at these places, so the same symbol is used for both. For the pharyngeal, approximants are more numerous than fricatives. A fricative realization may be specified by adding the uptack to the letters, . Likewise, the downtack may be added to specify an approximant realization, . (The bilabial approximant and dental approximant do not have dedicated symbols either and are transcribed in a similar fashion: . However, the base letters are understood to specifically refer to the fricatives.)Pseudo-fricatives
* voiceless glottal transition, as in English ''hat'' * breathy-voiced glottal transition In many languages, such as English or Korean, the glottal "fricatives" are unaccompanied phonation states of the glottis, without any accompanying manner, fricative or otherwise. They may be mistaken for real glottal constrictions in a number of languages, such as Finnish.Aspirated fricatives
Fricatives are very commonly voiced, though cross-linguistically voiced fricatives are not nearly as common as tenuis ("plain") fricatives. Other phonations are common in languages that have those phonations in their stop consonants. However, phonemically aspirated fricatives are rare. contrasts with a tense, unaspirated in Korean; aspirated fricatives are also found in a few Sino-Tibetan languages, in some Oto-Manguean languages, in the Siouan language Ofo ( and ), and in the (central?) Chumash languages ( and ). The record may be Cone Tibetan, which has four contrastive aspirated fricatives: , , and .Nasalized fricatives
Phonemically nasalized fricatives are rare. Umbundu has and Kwangali and Souletin Basque have . In Coatzospan Mixtec, appear allophonically before a nasal vowel, and in Igbo nasality is a feature of the syllable; when occur in nasal syllables they are themselves nasalized. ----Occurrence
Until its extinction, Ubykh may have been the language with the most fricatives (29 not including ), some of which did not have dedicated symbols or diacritics in the IPA. This number actually outstrips the number of all consonants in English (which has 24 consonants). By contrast, approximately 8.7% of the world's languages have no phonemic fricatives at all. This is a typical feature ofAcoustics
Fricatives appear in waveforms as somewhat random noise caused by the turbulent airflow, upon which a periodic pattern is overlaid if voiced. Fricatives produced in the front of the mouth tend to have energy concentration at higher frequencies than ones produced in the back. The centre of gravity (''CoG''), i.e. the average frequency in a spectrum weighted by the amplitude (also known as ''spectral mean''), may be used to determine the place of articulation of a fricative relative to that of another.See also
* Affricate * Apical consonant * Hush consonant * Laminal consonant * List of phonetics topicsNotes
References
Sources
*External links