Definition
One of the common factors associated with successful adaptation and coping is identified as resilience of individual family members. Resilience can be generally defined as the ability to "bounce back" to healthy functioning when faced with significant stressors and events. The concept of resilience has been heavily researched in adolescents and now includes specific character traits and behaviors known as protective and recovery factors. Previously, researchers have focused on identifying the characteristics of resilient individuals and started to explore the possibility of family resilience and family coping with stress. Currently, researchers are focused on specific interventions to increase resilience in the family unit, while considering related genetic and environmental factors. There are diverse definitions of what resilience and/or family resilience is. The National Network for Family Resiliency defines resilience as "the family's ability to cultivate strengths to positively meet the challenges of life". Atkinson, Martin, & Rankin define resilience as "the ability to bounce back and have better physical and mental health outcomes". For family resilience specifically, McCubbin & McCubbin have posited that "family resilience includes the characteristics, dimensions, and properties of families which help families to be resilient to disruption in the face of change and adaptive in the face of crisis situations". Using a combination of the above work, family resilience can be generally defined as: a dynamic process of families that have been exposed to a significant stressor or adversity that requires protective and recovery factors, identified by the family, as helpful to promote healthy coping in families and their self-identified family members. In the February 2015 special issue of Family Relations (journal) on individual and family resilience, authors provide a variety of definitions of family resilience. For example, Masten and Monn (p. 6) define resilience as "the capacity for adapting successfully in the context of adversity".Research
Resilience and family resilience have been studied in the context of various theoretical underpinnings. These include Bandura's Self-Efficacy Theory, Lazarus' Stress Theory, Froma Walsh's Family Resilience Framework, and McCubbin and Patterson's Family Stress and Resilience Model. The family stress theory originates from the family systems model that considers all members of the family as important and as a system where all parts and interactions between and among those parts as important. The Family Stress and Resilience Model by McCubbin & McCubbin has been adopted by the field of family nursing because of the use in diverse families and because of the connection to the nursing metaparadigm of person, environment, health, and nursing This strong theoretical connection to resilience and nursing supports the interest from nursing, which focuses on caring for diverse families and individuals in a holistic manner. Henry, Morris, & Harrist proposed the overarching Family Resilience Model (FRM) as a general model of family resilience within which existing models fit as ways of looking at family resilience. Based on a review of existing individual and family resilience scholarship, these authors developed the FRM to include key ideas from individual resilience, proposing that significant risk suggests increased risk for negative outcomes. This risk can be lowered through protective mechanisms, increasing the potential for positive outcomes, or heightened through vulnerabilities that pile up to increase the potential for negative outcomes. However, significant risk, protection, vulnerability, and outcomes (or adaptation) occur within the context of family meanings, family adaptive systems (emotional systems, control systems, identity systems, maintenance systems, stress-response systems) in the particular family, and broader ecosystems. Resilience as a concept has been heavily studied on the individual level in children who have experienced significant stress or adversities. Family resilience is another level of resilience that is related to complex relationships and environmental factors. Fields that have utilized resilience research includeDifference with individual resilience
Family and individual resilience factors are not always the same. Family factors consist ofMeasuring
According to Henry et al. when examining family resilience is critical to be aware of some key issues: (a) significant risk must be present for resilience to occur, (b) other vulnerabilities (e.g., chronic illness, addiction, poor conflict management or communication beyond the focal risk may "pile-up" to present additional challenges; c) protection (factors or processes of resilience) must be distinguished from outcomes (short or long term indicators of resilience), (d) family situational meanings (how a family collectively perceives the risk, protection, and vulnerabilities) interact with risk, vulnerabilities, protection, and outcomes, (e) these all occur within family adaptive systems (patterns of interaction within families described as ''meaning systems, control systems, emotion systems, maintenance systems, stress-response systems'') and ecosystems. Thus, assessing resilience requires consideration of which component(s) the researcher is addressing. Further, measurement can occur at the level of the family-ecosystem (e.g., school-family, healthcare-family), overall family system, in family subsystems (e.g., couple relationships, sibling relationships, parent-child relationship, grandparent-grandchild relationship). Once the researcher clarifies which level(s) upon which they wish to focus, measures can be identified at the appropriate level. The problem with a nebulous definition of family resilience is that it is difficult to measure without a concrete definition. Specific measurement tools of resilience include the Family Strengths and Resilience Scale, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, the Resilience Scale and other self-report measures such as Brief Symptom Inventory, Child Behavior Checklist, Child Depression Inventory, and Mental Health Inventories have been most commonly used. One can also measure all of the attributes and antecedents of family resilience individually to attempt to capture what it means to be resilient at a certain phase of a family developmental cycle. Protective factors that can be quantitatively measured include: celebrations, hardiness, time together, routines,Family resilience prevention and intervention
Professionals who work with families may employ a variety of educational, therapeutic, or community-based approaches to helping protect families against adversity or facilitate the abilities of families to mobilize their strengths or gain new resources to successfully rebound from adversity (i.e., demonstrate resilience). Examples of such approaches are to inoculate against risk (or expose families to low levels of risk in preparation for potential greater risks), reducing risk, increasing resources, or changing meanings to make them more manageable, according to Henry et a. (2015). Disability within a family critically affects each family members life. People with disabilities may encounter societal, medical, environmental, physical, and attitudinal barriers. These barriers can have the ability to put these individuals and their families in the face of adversity. Family functioning is also key in identifying basic elements in resilience, including such processes as cohesion, flexibility, open communication, problem-solving, and an affirming belief system. In addition, in order for families to frame the stress and uncertainty of having a child with a disability as a challenge that provides opportunities for finding resilience and meaning finding the right resources and professionals is essential. When a family who is facing adversity is surrounded by a community who lack in responding to hardships they are bound to family disruption. This proves that as family adversities become more challenging and difficult, the availability of community resources and a family's outreach to use them are essential. This may include resources like providing financial security, practical assistance, social support, a basic sense of connectedness through kin and friendship networks, and religious or other group affiliations.In military families
Recent literature has focused on identifying healthySee also
* Psychological resilience * Comprehensive Soldier Fitness *External links
References
{{Reflist, refs= {{cite journal , last1 = Ali , first1 = M. M. , last2 = Dwyer , first2 = D. S. , last3 = Vanner , first3 = E. A. , last4 = Lopez , first4 = A. , year = 2010 , title = Adolescent propensity to engage in health risky behaviors: The role of individual resilience , journal = International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health , volume = 7 , issue = 5, pages = 2161–2176 , doi = 10.3390/ijerph7052161 , pmid = 20623017 , pmc = 2898042 , doi-access = free {{cite journal , last1 = Atkinson , first1 = P. A. , last2 = Martin , first2 = C. R. , last3 = Rankin , first3 = J. , year = 2009 , title = Resilience revisited , journal = Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing , volume = 16 , issue = 2, pages = 137–145 , doi = 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2008.01341.x , pmid = 19281544 {{cite journal , last1 = Benzies , first1 = K , year = 2009 , title = Fostering family resiliency: A review of the key protective factors , journal = Child & Family Social Work , volume = 14 , pages = 103–114 , doi=10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00586.x {{cite journal , last1 = Black , first1 = K. , last2 = Lobo , first2 = M. , year = 2008 , title = A conceptual review of family resilience factors , journal = Journal of Family Nursing , volume = 14 , issue = 1, pages = 33–55 , doi = 10.1177/1074840707312237 , pmid = 18281642 , s2cid = 206660293 {{cite journal , last1 = Chapin , first1 = M , year = 2011 , title = Family resilience and the fortunes of war , journal = Social Work in Health Care , volume = 50 , issue = 7, pages = 527–542 , doi = 10.1080/00981389.2011.588130 , pmid = 21846253 , s2cid = 30214121 {{cite journal , last1 = Criss , first1 = M. M. , last2 = Henry , first2 = C. S. , last3 = Harrist , first3 = A. W. , last4 = Lazrelere , first4 = R. E. , year = 2015 , title = Interdisciplinary and innovative approaches to strengthening family and individual resilience: An introduction to the special issue , journal = Family Relations , volume = 64 , issue = 1, pages = 1–4 , doi = 10.1111/fare.12109 {{cite journal , last1 = Dyer , first1 = J. G. , last2 = McGuinness , first2 = T. M. , year = 1996 , title = Resilience: Analysis of the concept , journal = Archives of Psychiatric Nursing , volume = 10 , issue = 5, pages = 276–282 , doi=10.1016/s0883-9417(96)80036-7, pmid = 8897710 {{cite journal , last1 = Earvolino-Ramirez , first1 = M , year = 2007 , title = Resilience: A concept analysis , journal = Nursing Forum , volume = 42 , issue = 2, pages = 73–82 , doi = 10.1111/j.1744-6198.2007.00070.x , pmid = 17474940 , doi-access = free Friedl, K. E. & Penetar, D. M. (2008). Resilience and survival in extreme environments. In Biobehavioral resilience to stress. B.J.Lukey & V. Tepe (Eds.) Taylor & Francis Group: Florida. {{cite journal , last1 = Gorman , first1 = G. H. , last2 = Eide , first2 = M. , last3 = Hisle-Gorman , first3 = E. , year = 2010 , title = Wartime military deployment and increased pediatric mental and behavioral health complaints , journal = Pediatrics , volume = 126 , issue = 6, pages = 1058–1066 , doi = 10.1542/peds.2009-2856 , pmid = 21059715 , doi-access = free {{cite journal , last1 = Gottman , first1 = J. M. , last2 = Gottman , first2 = J. S. , last3 = Atkins , first3 = C. L. , year = 2011 , title = The comprehensive soldier fitness program: Family skills component , journal = American Psychologist , volume = 66 , issue = 1, pages = 52–57 , doi=10.1037/a0021706, pmid = 21219048 {{cite journal , last1 = Hawley , first1 = D. R. , last2 = DeHaan , first2 = L. , year = 1996 , title = Toward a definition of family resilience: Integrating life-span and family perspectives , journal = Family Process , volume = 35 , issue = 3, pages = 283–298 , doi = 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1996.00283.x , pmid = 9111710 {{cite journal , last1 = Henry , first1 = C. S. , last2 = Morris , first2 = A. S. , last3 = Harrist , first3 = A. W. , year = 2015 , title = Family resilience: Moving into the third wave , journal = Family Relations , volume = 64 , issue = 1, pages = 22–43 , doi = 10.1111/fare.12106 , doi-access = free {{cite journal , last1 = Lee , first1 = I. , last2 = Lee , first2 = E. , last3 = Park , first3 = Y. , last4 = Song , first4 = M. , last5 = Park , first5 = Y. H. , year = 2004 , title = Concept development of family resilience: A study of Korean families with a chronically ill child , journal = Women, Families, and Children , volume = 13 , issue = 5, pages = 636–645 , doi=10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.00845.x, pmid = 15189417 {{cite journal , last1 = Lester , first1 = P , year = 2010 , title = The long war and parental combat deployment: Effects on military children and at-home spouses , journal = Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry , volume = 49 , issue = 4, pages = 310–320 , doi = 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.01.003 , pmid = 20410724 , pmc = 2875082 Lester, P. & Bursch, B. (2011). The long war comes home. Mitigating risk and promoting resilience in military children and families. Psychiatric Times, 26-29. Luthar, S. S. (2006). Resilience in development: A synthesis of research across five decades. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Risk, disorder, and adaptation (pp. 740-795). New York: Wiley. MacDermid, S., Samper, R., Schwarz, R., Nishida, J., & Nyaronga, D. (2008). Understanding and promoting resilience in military families, Military Family Research Institute-Purdue University. {{cite journal , last1 = Mansfield , first1 = A. J. , last2 = Kaufman , first2 = J. S. , last3 = Marshall , first3 = S. W. , last4 = Gaynes , first4 = B. N. , last5 = Morrissey , first5 = J. P. , last6 = Engel , first6 = C. C. , year = 2010 , title = Deployment and the use of mental health services among U.S. army wives , journal = The New England Journal of Medicine , volume = 362 , issue = 2, pages = 101–109 , doi=10.1056/nejmoa0900177, pmid = 20071699 , doi-access = free {{cite journal , last1 = Masten , first1 = A. S. , last2 = Monn , first2 = A. R. , year = 2015 , title = Child and Family Resilience: A Call for Integrated Science, Practice, and Professional Training , journal = Family Relations , volume = 64 , pages = 5–21 , doi = 10.1111/fare.12103 {{cite journal , last1 = Masten , first1 = A. S. , last2 = Obradovic , first2 = J. , year = 2006 , title = Competence and resilience in development , journal = Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences , volume = 1094 , issue = 1 , pages = 13–27 , doi = 10.1196/annals.1376.003 , pmid = 17347338 , bibcode = 2006NYASA1094...13M , s2cid = 14518021 {{cite journal , last1 = McCubbin , first1 = H. I. , last2 = McCubbin , first2 = M. A. , year = 1988 , title = Typologies of resilient families: Emerging roles of social class and ethnicity , journal = Family Relations , volume = 37 , issue = 3, pages = 247–254 , doi=10.2307/584557, jstor = 584557 McCubbin, H., McCubbin, M., McCubbin, A., & Futrell, J. (Eds.). (1998). Resiliency in ethnic minority families: Vol. 2. African-American families. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. {{cite journal , last1 = McCubbin , first1 = H.I. , last2 = McCubbin , first2 = M.A. , last3 = Thompson , first3 = A.I. , last4 = Han , first4 = S.V. , last5 = Allen , first5 = C.T. , year = 1997 , title = Families under stress: What makes them resilient? , journal = Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences , volume = 89 , pages = 2–11 McCubbin, H.I., & McCubbin, M.A. (1989). Families coping with illness: The resiliency model of family stress, adjustment and adaptation. In C.B. Danielson, B. Hansel-Bissel, & P. Winstead-Fry. Families, health, & illness. Perspectives on coping and interventions. St. Louis: Mosby. McCubbin, H. I.; Marilyn A. McCubbin; & Thompson, A. I. (1993). Resiliency in families: The role of family schema and appraisal in family adaptation to crisis. In T.H. Brubaker (Ed.). Family relations: Challenges for the future. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. McCubbin, H. I. and Patterson, J. M., (1983). The family stress process: The Double ABCX model of adjustment and adaptation, In H. I. McCubbin, M. Sussman, & J.M. Patterson (eds.), Social stress and the family: Advances in family stress theory and research. (pp. 7-38). New York: Haworth Press. National Network for Family Resiliency, Children, Youth and Families Network, CSREES-USDA (1995). Family resiliency: Building strengths to meet life’s challenges. Iowa State University Extension: Ames, Iowa. {{cite journal , last1 = Patterson , first1 = J. M. , year = 2002 , title = Understanding family resilience , journal = Journal of Clinical Psychology , volume = 58 , issue = 3, pages = 233–246 , doi=10.1002/jclp.10019, pmid = 11836706 {{cite journal , last1 = Saltzman , first1 = W. R. , last2 = Lester , first2 = P. , last3 = Beardslee , first3 = W. R. , last4 = Layne , first4 = C. M. , last5 = Woodward , first5 = K. , last6 = Nash , first6 = W. P. , year = 2011 , title = Mechanisms of risk and resilience in military families: Theoretical and empirical basis of a family-focused resilience enhancement program , journal = Clinical Child & Family Psychology Review , volume = 14 , issue = 3, pages = 213–230 , doi=10.1007/s10567-011-0096-1, pmid = 21655938 , pmc = 3162635 {{cite journal , last1 = Sapienza , first1 = J. K. , last2 = Masten , first2 = A. S. , year = 2011 , title = Understanding and promoting resilience in children and youth , journal = Current Opinion in Psychiatry , volume = 24 , issue = 4, pages = 267–273 , doi=10.1097/yco.0b013e32834776a8, pmid = 21546838 , s2cid = 45527383 {{cite journal , last1 = Shin , first1 = S. H. , last2 = Choi , first2 = H. , last3 = Kim , first3 = M. J. , last4 = Kim , first4 = Y. H. , year = 2010 , title = Comparing adolescents' adjustment and family resilience in divorced families depending on the types of primary caregiver , journal = Journal of Clinical Nursing , volume = 19 , issue = 11–12, pages = 1695–1706 , doi = 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03081.x , pmid = 20345833 {{cite journal , last1 = Simon , first1 = J. B. , last2 = Murphy , first2 = J. J. , last3 = Smith , first3 = S. M. , year = 2005 , title = Understanding and fostering family resilience , journal = The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families , volume = 13 , issue = 4, pages = 427–436 , doi = 10.1177/1066480705278724 , s2cid = 144805736 {{cite journal , last1 = Walsh , first1 = F , author-link1=Froma Walsh , year = 1996 , title = Family resilience: A concept analysis and its application , journal = Family Practice , volume = 35 , issue = 3, pages = 261–281 , doi=10.1111/j.1545-5300.1996.00261.x, pmid = 9111709 {{cite journal , last1 = Walsh , first1 = F , author-link1=Froma Walsh , year = 2002 , title = A family resilience framework: Innovative practice applications , url = http://rcin.org.pl/Content/1934, journal = Family Relations , volume = 51 , issue = 2, pages = 130–138 , doi=10.1111/j.1741-3729.2002.00130.x {{cite journal , last1 = Walsh , first1 = F , author-link1=Froma Walsh , year = 2003 , title = Family resilience: A framework for clinical practice , journal = Family Process , volume = 42 , issue = 1, pages = 1–18 , doi=10.1111/j.1545-5300.2003.00001.x, pmid = 12698595 Westphal, M., Bonanno, G.A. & Bartone, P.A. (2008). Resilience and personality. In Biobehavioral Resilience to Stress. Tepe, V. & Lukey, B. J. Eds. (pp. 321-331). {{cite journal , last1 = Windle , first1 = G. , last2 = Bennett , first2 = K. M. , last3 = Noyes , first3 = J. , year = 2011 , title = Methodological review of resilience measurement scales , journal = Health and Quality of Life Outcomes , volume = 9 , issue = 8, pages = 1–18 , doi = 10.1186/1477-7525-9-8 , pmid = 21294858 , pmc = 3042897 , doi-access = free