Etymology and nomenclature
The Pali term ' ( sa, āryāṣṭāṅgamārga, script=Latn) is typically translated in English as "Noble Eightfold Path". This translation is a convention started by the early translators of Buddhist texts into English, just like ''ariya sacca'' is translated asThe eight divisions
Origins: the Middle Way
According to Indologist Tilmann Vetter, the description of the Buddhist path may initially have been as simple as the term ''the Middle Way''. In time, this short description was elaborated, resulting in the description of the Eightfold Path. Tilmann Vetter and historian Rod Bucknell both note that longer descriptions of "the path" can be found in the early texts, which can be condensed into the Eightfold Path.Tenfold path
In the ''Mahācattārīsaka Sutta'' which appears in the Chinese and Pali canons, the Buddha explains that cultivation of the noble eightfold path of a learner leads to the development of two further paths of the Arahants, which are right knowledge, or insight (''sammā-ñāṇa''), and right liberation, or release (''sammā-vimutti''). These two factors fall under the category of wisdom (''paññā'').Short description of the eight divisions
The eight Buddhist practices in the Noble Eightfold Path are: # Right View: our actions have consequences, death is not the end, and our actions and beliefs have consequences after death. The Buddha followed and taught a successful path out of this world and the other world (heaven and underworld/hell). Later on, right view came to explicitly include ''karma'' and rebirth, and the importance of the Four Noble Truths, when "insight" became central to Buddhist soteriology, especially in Theravada Buddhism. # Right Resolve or Intention: the giving up of home and adopting the life of a religious mendicant in order to follow the path; this concept aims at peaceful renunciation, into an environment of non-sensuality, non-ill-will (to loving kindness), away from cruelty (to compassion). Such an environment aids contemplation of impermanence,Right view
The purpose of "right view" (' / ') or "right understanding" is to clear one's path from confusion, misunderstanding, and deluded thinking. It is a means to gain right understanding of reality.Sequences in the suttas
The Pali canon and the Agamas contain various "definitions" or descriptions of "right view. The '' Mahasatipatthana Sutta'' ( Digha Nikaya 22), compiled from elements from other suttas possibly as late as 20 BCE, defines right view summarily as the Four Noble Truths: In this, right view explicitly includes '' karma'' and rebirth, and the importance of theTheravada
Right View can be further subdivided, states translator Bhikkhu Bodhi, into mundane right view and superior or supramundane right view: # Mundane right view, knowledge of the fruits of good behavior (''karma''). Having this type of view will bring merit and will support the favourable rebirth of the sentient being in the realm of samsara. # Supramundane (world-transcending) right view, the understanding of the Four Noble Truths, leading to awakening and liberation from rebirths and associated dukkha in the realms of samsara. According to Boikhy Bodhi, this kind of right view comes at the end of the path, not at the beginning. According to Theravada Buddhism, mundane right view is a teaching that is suitable for lay followers, while supramundane right view, which requires a deeper understanding, is suitable for monastics. Mundane and supramundane right view involve accepting the following doctrines of Buddhism: # Karma: Every action of body, speech, and mind has karmic results, and influences the kind of future rebirths and realms a being enters into. # Three marks of existence: everything, whether physical or mental, is impermanent (''anicca''), a source of suffering (''dukkha''), and lacks a self (''anatta''). # The Four Noble Truths are a means to gaining insights and ending ''dukkha''.A-ditthi
Gombrich notes that there is a tension in the suttas between "right view" and 'no view', release by not clinging to any view at all. According to Chryssides and Wilkins, "right view is ultimately non-view: though the Enlightened One sees things as they really are, 'he has a "critical awareness" of the impossibility of giving full and final expression to his conviction in fixed conceptual terms'. One therefore cannot cling to any particular formulation in a rigid and dogmatic manner."Right resolve
Right Resolve (''samyak-saṃkalpa'' / ''sammā-saṅkappa'') can also be known as "right thought", "right aspiration", or "right motivation". In this factor, the practitioner resolves to leave home, renounce the worldly life and dedicate himself to an ascetic pursuit. In section III.248, the Majjhima Nikaya states, Like right view, this factor has two levels. At the mundane level, the resolve includes being harmless (Right speech
Right speech (''samyag-vāc'' / ''sammā-vācā'') in most Buddhist texts is presented as four abstentions, such as in the Pali Canon thus: Instead of the usual "abstention and refraining from wrong" terminology, a few texts such as the Samaññaphala Sutta and Kevata Sutta in ''Digha Nikaya'' explain this virtue in an active sense, after stating it in the form of an abstention. For example, Samaññaphala Sutta states that a part of a monk's virtue is that "he abstains from false speech. He speaks the truth, holds to the truth, is firm, reliable, no deceiver of the world." Similarly, the virtue of abstaining from divisive speech is explained as delighting in creating concord. The virtue of abstaining from abusive speech is explained in this Sutta to include affectionate and polite speech that is pleasing to people. The virtue of abstaining from idle chatter is explained as speaking what is connected with the Dhamma goal of his liberation. In the ''Abhaya-raja-kumara Sutta'', the Buddha explains the virtue of right speech in different scenarios, based on its truth value, utility value and emotive content. The '' Tathagata'', states Abhaya Sutta, never speaks anything that is unfactual or factual, untrue or true, disagreeable or agreeable, if that is unbeneficial and unconnected to his goals. Further, adds Abhaya Sutta, the ''Tathagata'' speaks the factual, the true, if in case it is disagreeable and unendearing, only if it is beneficial to his goals, but with a sense of proper time. Additionally, adds Abhaya Sutta, the ''Tathagata'', only speaks with a sense of proper time even when what he speaks is the factual, the true, the agreeable, the endearing and what is beneficial to his goals. The Buddha thus explains right speech in the Pali Canon, according to Ganeri, as never speaking something that is not beneficial; and, only speaking what is true and beneficial, "when the circumstances are right, whether they are welcome or not".Right action
Right action (''samyak-karmānta'' / ''sammā-kammanta'') is like right speech, expressed as abstentions but in terms of bodily action. In the Pali Canon, this path factor is stated as: The prohibition on killing precept in Buddhist scriptures applies to all living beings, states Christopher Gowans, not just human beings. Bhikkhu Bodhi agrees, clarifying that the more accurate rendering of the Pali canon is a prohibition on "taking life of any sentient being", which includes human beings, animals, birds, insects but excludes plants because they are not considered sentient beings. Further, adds Bodhi, this precept refers to ''intentional'' killing, as well as any form of intentional harming or torturing any sentient being. This moral virtue in early Buddhist texts, both in context of harm or killing of animals and human beings, is similar to ''ahimsa'' precepts found in the texts particularly of Jainism as well as of Hinduism, and has been a subject of significant debate in various Buddhist traditions. The prohibition on stealing in the Pali Canon is an abstention from intentionally taking what is not voluntarily offered by the person to whom that property belongs. This includes taking by stealth, by force, by fraud or by deceit. Both the intention and the act matters, as this precept is grounded on the impact on one's karma. The prohibition on sexual misconduct in the Noble Eightfold Path refers to "not performing sexual acts". This virtue is more generically explained in the ''Cunda Kammaraputta Sutta'', which teaches that one must abstain from all sensual misconduct, including getting sexually involved with someone unmarried (anyone protected by parents or by guardians or by siblings), and someone married (protected by husband), and someone betrothed to another person, and female convicts or by ''dhamma''. For monastics, the abstention from sensual misconduct means strict celibacy while for lay Buddhists this prohibits adultery as well as other forms of sensual misconduct. Later Buddhist texts state that the prohibition on sexual conduct for lay Buddhists includes any sexual involvement with someone married, a girl or woman protected by her parents or relatives, and someone prohibited by ''dhamma'' conventions (such as relatives, nuns and others).Right livelihood
Right livelihood (''samyag-ājīva'' / ''sammā-ājīva'') precept is mentioned in many early Buddhist texts, such as the ''Mahācattārīsaka Sutta'' in ''Majjhima Nikaya'' as follows: The early canonical texts state right livelihood as avoiding and abstaining from wrong livelihood. This virtue is further explained in Buddhist texts, states Vetter, as "living from begging, but not accepting everything and not possessing more than is strictly necessary". For lay Buddhists, states Harvey, this precept requires that the livelihood avoid causing suffering to sentient beings by cheating them, or harming or killing them in any way. The Anguttara Nikaya III.208, states Harvey, asserts that the right livelihood does not trade in weapons, living beings, meat, alcoholic drink or poison. The same text, in section V.177, asserts that this applies to lay Buddhists. This has meant, states Harvey, that raising and trading cattle livestock for slaughter is a breach of "right livelihood" precept in the Buddhist tradition, and Buddhist countries lack the mass slaughter houses found in Western countries.Right effort
Right effort (''samyag-vyāyāma'' / ''sammā-vāyāma'') is preventing the arising of unwholesome states, and the generation of wholesome states. This includes ''indriya-samvara'', "guarding the sense-doors", restraint of the sense faculties.Analayo (2013), ''Satipatthana'', Windhorse Publications: "... sense-restraint, which in fact constitutes an aspect of right effort." Right effort is presented in the Pali Canon, such as the ''Sacca-vibhanga Sutta'', as follows: The unwholesome states (''akusala'') are described in the Buddhist texts are related to thoughts, emotions, intentions. These include the ''pancanivarana'' ( five hindrances), that is, sensual thoughts, doubts about the path, restlessness, drowsiness, and ill will of any kind. Of these, the Buddhist traditions consider sensual thoughts and ill will needing more right effort. Sensual desire that must be eliminated by effort includes anything related to sights, sounds, smells, tastes and touch. This is to be done by restraint of the sense faculties (''indriya-samvara''). Ill will that must be eliminated by effort includes any form of aversion including hatred, anger, resentment towards anything or anyone.Right mindfulness
While originally, in Yogic practice, ''sati'' may have meant to remember the meditation object, to cultivate a deeply absorbed, secluded state of mind, in the oldest Buddhism it has the meaning of "retention", being mindful of the ''dhammas'' (both wholesome states of mind, and teachings and practices that remind of those wholesome states of mind) that are beneficial to the Buddhist path. According to Gethin, ''sati'' is a quality that guards or watches over the mind; the stronger it becomes, the weaker unwholesome states of mind become, weakening their power "to take over and dominate thought, word and deed." According to Frauwallner, mindfulness was a means to prevent the arising of craving, which resulted simply from contact between the senses and their objects. According to Frauwallner this may have been the Buddha's original idea. According to Trainor, mindfulness aids one not to crave and cling to any transitory state or thing, by complete and constant awareness of phenomena as impermanent, suffering and without self. Gethin refers to the ''Milindapanha'', which states that ''sati'' brings to mind the ''dhammas'' and their beneficial or unbeneficial qualities, aiding the removal of unbeneficial dhammas and the strengthening of beneficial dhammas. Gethin further notes that ''sati'' makes one aware of the "full range and extent of ''dhammas''", that is, the relation between things, broadening one's view and understanding. The '' Satipatthana Sutta'' describes the contemplation of four domains, namely body, feelings, mind and phenomena. The ''Satipatthana Sutta'' is regarded by the vipassana movement as the quintessential text on Buddhist meditation, taking cues from it on "bare attention" and the contemplation on the observed phenomena as '' dukkha'', '' anatta'' and '' anicca''. According to Grzegorz Polak, the four ''upassanā'' have been misunderstood by the developing Buddhist tradition, including Theravada, to refer to four different foundations. According to Polak, the four ''upassanā'' do not refer to four different foundations of which one should be aware, but are an alternate description of the ''jhanas'', describing how the ''samskharas'' are tranquilized: * the six sense-bases which one needs to be aware of (''kāyānupassanā''); * contemplation on vedanās, which arise with the contact between the senses and their objects (''vedanānupassanā''); * the altered states of mind to which this practice leads (''cittānupassanā''); * the development from the five hindrances to the seven factors of enlightenment (''dhammānupassanā''). In the vipassana movement, mindfulness (' / ''sammā-sati'') is interpreted as "bare attention": never be absent minded, being conscious of what one is doing. Rupert Gethin notes that the contemporary vipassana movement interprets the ''Satipatthana Sutta'' as "describing a pure form of insight (''vipassanā'') meditation" for which '' samatha'' (calm) and ''jhāna'' are not necessary. Yet, in pre-sectarian Buddhism, the establishment of mindfulness was placed before the practice of the ''jhanas'', and associated with the abandonment of the five hindrances and the entry into the first ''jhana''. The '' dhyāna''-scheme describes mindfulness also as appearing in the third and fourth ''dhyana'', after initial concentration of the mind. Gombrich and Wynne note that, while the second ''jhana'' denotes a state of absorption, in the third and fourth ''jhana'' one comes out of this absorption, being mindfully awareness of objects while being indifferent to them. According to Gombrich, "the later tradition has falsified the jhana by classifying them as the quintessence of the concentrated, calming kind of meditation, ignoring the other – and indeed higher – element".Right samadhi (unification of mind)
''Samadhi''
'' Samadhi'' (''samyak-samādhi'' / ''sammā-samādhi'') is a common practice or goal in Indian religions. The term ''samadhi'' derives from the root sam-a-dha, which means 'to collect' or 'bring together', and thus it is often translated as 'concentration' or 'unification of mind'. In the early Buddhist texts, samadhi is also associated with the term " samatha" (calm abiding).Dhyana
Bronkhorst notes that neither the Four Noble Truths nor the Noble Eightfold Path discourse provide details of right ''samadhi''. Several ''Suttas'', such as the following in ''Saccavibhanga Sutta'', equate it with ''dhyana'': Bronkhorst has questioned the historicity and chronology of the description of the four ''jhanas''. Bronkhorst states that this path may be similar to what the Buddha taught, but the details and the form of the description of the ''jhanas'' in particular, and possibly other factors, is likely the work of later scholasticism. Bronkhorst notes that description of the third ''jhana'' cannot have been formulated by the Buddha, since it includes the phrase "Noble Ones say", quoting earlier Buddhists, indicating it was formulated by later Buddhists. It is likely that later Buddhist scholars incorporated this, then attributed the details and the path, particularly the insights at the time of liberation, to have been discovered by the Buddha.Concentration
In the Theravada tradition, ''samadhi'' is interpreted as concentration on a meditation object.Development into equanimity
Although often translated as "concentration", as in the limiting of the attention of the mind on one object, in the fourth ''dhyana'' "equanimity and mindfulness remain", and the practice of concentration-meditation may well have been incorporated from non-Buddhist traditions. Vetter notes that ''samadhi'' consists of the four stages of awakening, but Gombrich and Wynne note that, while the second ''jhana'' denotes a state of absorption, in the third and fourth ''jhana'' one comes out of this absorption, being mindfully awareness of objects while being indifferent to it. According to Gombrich, "the later tradition has falsified the jhana by classifying them as the quintessence of the concentrated, calming kind of meditation, ignoring the other – and indeed higher – element."Liberation
Following the Noble Eightfold Path leads to liberation in the form of nirvana:Practice
Order of practice
Vetter notes that originally the path culminated in the practice of ''dhyana/samadhi'' as the core soteriological practice. According to the Pali and Chinese canon, the ''samadhi'' state (right concentration) is dependent on the development of preceding path factors: According to the discourses, right view, right resolve, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, and right mindfulness are used as the support and requisite conditions for the practice of right concentration. Understanding of the right view is the preliminary role, and is also the forerunner of the entire Noble Eightfold Path. According to the modern Theravada monk and scholar Walpola Rahula, the divisions of the noble eightfold path "are to be developed more or less simultaneously, as far as possible according to the capacity of each individual. They are all linked together and each helps the cultivation of the others." Bhikkhu Bodhi explains that these factors are not sequential, but components, and "with a certain degree of progress all eight factors can be present simultaneously, each supporting the others. However, until that point is reached, some sequence in the unfolding of the path is inevitable." The stage in the Path where there is no more learning in Yogachara Abhidharma, state Buswell and Gimello, is identical to '' Nirvana'' or '' Buddhahood'', the ultimate goal in Buddhism.Sila-samadhi-prajna
The Noble Eightfold Path is sometimes divided into three basic divisions, with right view and right intention concluding the sequence: This order is a later development, when discriminating insight (''prajna'') became central to Buddhist soteriology, and came to be regarded as the culmination of the Buddhist path. Yet, Majjhima Nikaya 117, ''Mahācattārīsaka Sutta'', describes the first seven practices as requisites for right samadhi. According to Vetter, this may have been the original soteriological practice in early Buddhism. The " moral virtues" (Sanskrit: ''Schools of Buddhism and their views of the Eightfold Path
Theravada presentations of the path
Theravada Buddhism is a diverse tradition and thus includes different explanations of the path to awakening. However, the teachings of the Buddha are often encapsulated by Theravadins in the basic framework of the Four Noble Truths and the Eighthfold Path. Some Theravada Buddhists also follow the presentation of the path laid out in Buddhaghosa'sMahayana presentations of the path
Mahāyāna Buddhism is based principally upon the path of a Bodhisattva. A ''Bodhisattva'' refers to one who is on the path to buddhahood. The term ''Mahāyāna'' was originally a synonym for ''Bodhisattvayāna'' or "Bodhisattva Vehicle". In the earliest texts of Mahāyāna Buddhism, the path of a bodhisattva was to awaken the ''bodhicitta''. Between the 1st and 3rd century CE, this tradition introduced the ''Ten Bhumi'' doctrine, which means ten levels or stages of awakening. This development was followed by the acceptance that it is impossible to achieve Buddhahood in one (current) lifetime, and the best goal is not nirvana for oneself, but Buddhahood after climbing through the ten levels during multiple rebirths. Mahāyāna scholars then outlined an elaborate path, for monks and laypeople, and the path includes the vow to help teach Buddhist knowledge to other beings, so as to help them cross samsara and liberate themselves, once one reaches the Buddhahood in a future rebirth. One part of this path are the '' pāramitā'' (perfections, to cross over), derived from the ''Jatakas'' tales of Buddha's numerous rebirths. The doctrine of the bodhisattva bhūmis was also eventually merged with the Sarvāstivāda Vaibhāṣika schema of the "five paths" by the Yogacara school''.Watanabe, Chikafumi (2000), ''A Study of Mahayanasamgraha III: The Relation of Practical Theories and Philosophical Theories''. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Calgary, pp. 38-40.'' This Mahāyāna "five paths" presentation can be seen in Asanga's '' Mahāyānasaṃgraha''. The Mahāyāna texts are inconsistent in their discussion of the ''pāramitās'', and some texts include lists of two, others four, six, ten and fifty-two. The six paramitas have been most studied, and these are: # '' Dāna pāramitā'': perfection of giving; primarily to monks, nuns and the Buddhist monastic establishment dependent on the alms and gifts of the lay householders, in return for generating religious merit; some texts recommend ritually transferring the merit so accumulated for better rebirth to someone else # '' Śīla pāramitā'': perfection of morality; it outlines ethical behaviour for both the laity and the Mahayana monastic community; this list is similar to Śīla in the Eightfold Path (i.e. Right Speech, Right Action, Right Livelihood) # '' pāramitā'': perfection of patience, willingness to endure hardship # '' Vīrya pāramitā'': perfection of vigour; this is similar to Right Effort in the Eightfold Path # '' Dhyāna pāramitā'': perfection of meditation; this is similar to Right Concentration in the Eightfold Path # '' Prajñā pāramitā'': perfection of insight (wisdom), awakening to the characteristics of existence such as karma, rebirths, impermanence, no-self, dependent origination and emptiness; this is complete acceptance of the Buddha teaching, then conviction, followed by ultimate realisation that "dharmas are non-arising". In Mahāyāna Sutras that include ten ''pāramitā'', the additional four perfections are "skillful means, vow, power and knowledge". The most discussed ''pāramitā'' and the highest rated perfection in Mahayana texts is the "Prajna-paramita", or the "perfection of insight". This insight in the Mahāyāna tradition, states Shōhei Ichimura, has been the "insight of non-duality or the absence of reality in all things".East Asian Buddhism
Indo-Tibetan Buddhism
In Indo-Tibetan Buddhism, the path to liberation is outlined in the genre known as Lamrim ("Stages of the Path"). All the various Tibetan schools have their own Lamrim presentations. This genre can be traced to Atiśa's 11th-century '' A Lamp for the Path to Enlightenment'' (''Bodhipathapradīpa'').Cognitive psychology
The noble eightfold path has been compared to cognitive psychology; Gil Fronsdal says the right view factor can be interpreted to mean how one's mind views the world, and how that leads to patterns of thought, intention and actions. In contrast, Peter Randall states that it is the seventh factor or right mindfulness that may be thought in terms of cognitive psychology, wherein the change in thought and behavior are linked.See also
*Notes
References
Sources
;Primary sources * * Carter, John Ross and Palihawadana, Mahinda; tr. ''Buddhism: The Dhammapada''. New York: History Book Club, 1992. * Ñanamoli Thera (tr.) & Bhikkhu Bodhi (ed., rev.) (1991)External links