Archaeological site
Excavations were led in 1963 and 1966 by archaeologists Thomas C. Patterson and Edward P. Lanning, who noticed three cultural assemblages in the Chillón valley and uncovered large quantities of debris of lithic artifact production, initially interpreted as lithic instruments (hand axes, spearheads, scrapers, etc.). In an area of coastalQuarry operations
Chivateros was initially defined as a gigantic lithic workshop of the Paleolithic. Patterson and Lanning identified lithic pieces made of quartzite, such as knives, scrapers, arrowheads and hand axes. Moreover, they established a factual differentiation between what they called Chivateros I and Chivateros II, establishing equivalents in other points of America. Thanks to the works of Chauchat in Cupisnique and Chicama, this interpretation has largely been superseded. Chauchat determined that Chivateros was actually a quarry, and that there was not only one site of this type, but many Chivateros sites, for much of the Peruvian coast and Yungas (which have been dubbed as Chivateros quarries), where groups of hunter-gatherers were supplied raw materials, such as partially processed rock, which they took to their workshops located close to their homes or near the quarries already mentioned. The most widely known material of these quarries are the Chivateros preforms (erroneously described by Lanning as "handaxes" and "spearheads"), which were the first outline of pedunculate tips. The rest of lithic materials are nothing more than wastes of the activity of carving and edging. People who provisioned the raw material from Chivateros hill lived in Pampa Piedras Gordas and in Carabayllo, where Lanning found his workshops and housing areas, which he called the Lítico Light Complex. There preforms of the Chivateros type were processed to be converted into pedunculadas tips of the Paijanense type. This tradition spread along the Peruvian coast from Lambayeque to Ica during the period between 10,000 BC to 6000 BC.Current status
Since its discovery in the 1960s, Chivateros was constantly plundered by collectors, academics and the general population to obtain lithic artifacts. In spite of its importance, the Peruvian government never undertook any plan to care for the site. Subsequently, the activity of private companies and the illegal occupation of land by traffickers has destroyed most of this important archaeological site.See also
* Paijan cultureReferences
Bibliography
* ^ Richard W. Keatinge (10 March 1988). Peruvian Prehistory: An Overview of Pre-Inca and Inca Society. Cambridge University Press. pp. 45–. . * ^ Karen Olsen Bruhns (4 August 1994). Ancient South America. Cambridge University Press. pp. 53–. . * ^ Sigfried J. de Laet (1994). History of Humanity: Prehistory and the beginnings of civilization. Taylor & Francis. pp. 344–. . * Cardich, Augusto: Origen del hombre y de la cultura andinos. Tomo I de la Historia del Perú, pp. 108–109. Lima, Editorial Juan Mejía Baca, 1982. Cuarta edición. * Kaulicke, Peter: "El Perú Antiguo I (9000 a.C.-200d.C.) Los periodos arcaico y formativo". Tomo primero de la Historia del Perú. Empresa Editora El Comercio S.A. Lima, 2010. * Tauro del Pino, Alberto: Enciclopedia Ilustrada del Perú. Tercera Edición. Tomo 4. CAN/CHO. Lima, PEISA, 2001. * Silva Sifuentes, Jorge E. T.: «Origen de las civilizaciones andinas». Incluida en la Historia del Perú, p. 50. Lima, Lexus Editores, 2000.External links
{{Navbox prehistoric caves Caves of Peru Archaeological sites in Peru