HOME





U-rank
In model theory, a branch of mathematical logic, U-rank is one measure of the complexity of a (complete) type, in the context of stable theories. As usual, higher U-rank indicates less restriction, and the existence of a U-rank for all types over all sets is equivalent to an important model-theoretic condition: in this case, superstability. Definition U-rank is defined inductively, as follows, for any (complete) n-type p over any set A: * ''U''(''p'') ≥ 0 * If ''δ'' is a limit ordinal, then ''U''(''p'') ≥ ''δ'' precisely when ''U''(''p'') ≥ ''α'' for all ''α'' less than ''δ'' * For any ''α'' = ''β'' + 1, ''U''(''p'') ≥ ''α'' precisely when there is a forking extension ''q'' of ''p'' with ''U''(''q'') ≥ ''β'' We say that ''U''(''p'') = ''α'' when the ''U''(''p'') ≥ ''α'' but not ''U''(''p'') ≥ ''α'' + 1. If ''U''(''p'') ≥ ''α'' for all ordi ...
[...More Info...]      
[...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]  


Model Theory
In mathematical logic, model theory is the study of the relationship between theory (mathematical logic), formal theories (a collection of Sentence (mathematical logic), sentences in a formal language expressing statements about a Structure (mathematical logic), mathematical structure), and their Structure (mathematical logic), models (those Structure (mathematical logic), structures in which the statements of the theory hold). The aspects investigated include the number and size of models of a theory, the relationship of different models to each other, and their interaction with the formal language itself. In particular, model theorists also investigate the sets that can be definable set, defined in a model of a theory, and the relationship of such definable sets to each other. As a separate discipline, model theory goes back to Alfred Tarski, who first used the term "Theory of Models" in publication in 1954. Since the 1970s, the subject has been shaped decisively by Saharon Shel ...
[...More Info...]      
[...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]  


Type (model Theory)
In model theory and related areas of mathematics, a type is an object that describes how a (real or possible) element or finite collection of elements in a mathematical structure might behave. More precisely, it is a set of first-order formulas in a language ''L'' with free variables ''x''1, ''x''2,..., ''x''''n'' that are true of a set of ''n''-tuples of an ''L''-structure \mathcal. Depending on the context, types can be complete or partial and they may use a fixed set of constants, ''A'', from the structure \mathcal. The question of which types represent actual elements of \mathcal leads to the ideas of saturated models and omitting types. Formal definition Consider a structure \mathcal for a language ''L''. Let ''M'' be the universe of the structure. For every ''A'' ⊆ ''M'', let ''L''(''A'') be the language obtained from ''L'' by adding a constant ''c''''a'' for every ''a'' ∈ ''A''. In other words, :L(A) = L \cup \. A 1-type (of \mathcal) over '' ...
[...More Info...]      
[...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]  


Stable Theory
In the mathematical field of model theory, a theory is called stable if it satisfies certain combinatorial restrictions on its complexity. Stable theories are rooted in the proof of Morley's categoricity theorem and were extensively studied as part of Saharon Shelah's classification theory, which showed a dichotomy that either the models of a theory admit a nice classification or the models are too numerous to have any hope of a reasonable classification. A first step of this program was showing that if a theory is not stable then its models are too numerous to classify. Stable theories were the predominant subject of pure model theory from the 1970s through the 1990s, so their study shaped modern model theory and there is a rich framework and set of tools to analyze them. A major direction in model theory is "neostability theory," which tries to generalize the concepts of stability theory to broader contexts, such as simple and NIP theories. Motivation and history A common ...
[...More Info...]      
[...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]  


picture info

Monotonic Function
In mathematics, a monotonic function (or monotone function) is a function between ordered sets that preserves or reverses the given order. This concept first arose in calculus, and was later generalized to the more abstract setting of order theory. In calculus and analysis In calculus, a function f defined on a subset of the real numbers with real values is called ''monotonic'' if it is either entirely non-decreasing, or entirely non-increasing. That is, as per Fig. 1, a function that increases monotonically does not exclusively have to increase, it simply must not decrease. A function is termed ''monotonically increasing'' (also ''increasing'' or ''non-decreasing'') if for all x and y such that x \leq y one has f\!\left(x\right) \leq f\!\left(y\right), so f preserves the order (see Figure 1). Likewise, a function is called ''monotonically decreasing'' (also ''decreasing'' or ''non-increasing'') if, whenever x \leq y, then f\!\left(x\right) \geq f\!\left(y\right), ...
[...More Info...]      
[...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]  




Algebraically Closed Field
In mathematics, a field is algebraically closed if every non-constant polynomial in (the univariate polynomial ring with coefficients in ) has a root in . In other words, a field is algebraically closed if the fundamental theorem of algebra holds for it. Every field K is contained in an algebraically closed field C, and the roots in C of the polynomials with coefficients in K form an algebraically closed field called an algebraic closure of K. Given two algebraic closures of K there are isomorphisms between them that fix the elements of K. Algebraically closed fields appear in the following chain of class inclusions: Examples As an example, the field of real numbers is not algebraically closed, because the polynomial equation x^2+1=0 has no solution in real numbers, even though all its coefficients (1 and 0) are real. The same argument proves that no subfield of the real field is algebraically closed; in particular, the field of rational numbers is not algebraically cl ...
[...More Info...]      
[...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]