|
Rigdon V. Perry
{{Italic title''Rigdon v. Perry'' was a 1997 United States case brought by the Becket Fund for Religious Freedom. It set an important precedent that the military could not ban chaplains from following the directives of their religious leaders. The case originated with a military ban on preaching on pending federal legislation by chaplains A chaplain is, traditionally, a cleric (such as a Minister (Christianity), minister, priest, pastor, rabbi, purohit, or imam), or a laity, lay representative of a religious tradition, attached to a secularity, secular institution (such as a ho .... Rigdon, a Catholic priest, as well as an Orthodox Jewish rabbi both wanted to preach in favor of passage of the partial-birth abortion ban on 1997. They brought a suit on First Amendment and Religious Freedom Restoration Act grounds against the federal government ban on them doing so. The case eventually also involved Muslim chaplains, and the Washington, D.C. district court found that the ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Becket Fund For Religious Freedom
Becket, also known as the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, is a non-profit public interest law firm based in Washington, D.C., with a mission to "protect the free expression of all faiths." Becket promotes accommodationism and is active in the judicial system, the media, and in education. Becket has an undefeated record at the Supreme Court, having won eight cases since 2012. History and leadership The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty was founded in 1994 by Kevin Hasson, a lawyer who previously worked in the Reagan Administration Justice Department under Samuel Alito, then-Assistant Attorney General and current U.S. Supreme Court Justice. Subsequently, Hasson worked at the Washington law firm Williams & Connolly, where he became well-known and controversial for defending Catholic University's decision to fire Charles Curran for his opposition to Church doctrine despite his being a respected moral theologian. Hasson, who is Catholic, named The Becket Fund after Saint Thomas ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Chaplains
A chaplain is, traditionally, a cleric (such as a Minister (Christianity), minister, priest, pastor, rabbi, purohit, or imam), or a laity, lay representative of a religious tradition, attached to a secularity, secular institution (such as a hospital, prison, Military organization, military unit, intelligence agency, embassy, school, labor union, business, Police, police department, fire department, university, sports club), or a private chapel. The term chaplaincy refers to the chapel, facility or department in which one or more chaplains carry out their role. Though the term ''chaplain'' originally referred to representatives of the Christian faith, it is now also applied to people of other religions or philosophical traditions, as in the case of chaplains serving with military forces and an increasing number of chaplaincies at U.S. universities. In recent times, many lay people have received professional training in chaplaincy and are now appointed as chaplains in schools, ho ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Partial-birth
Intact dilation and extraction (D&X, IDX, or intact D&E) is a surgical procedure that terminates and removes an intact fetus from the uterus. The procedure is used both after miscarriages and for abortions in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. When used to perform an abortion, an intact D&E can occur after feticide or on a live fetus. In the United States, where federal law describes an intact D&E on a live fetus as a partial-birth abortion,''Gonzales v. Carhart550 U.S. ____ (2007) Findlaw.com. Retrieved 2007-04-30. the procedure is uncommon. For example, in 2000, only 0.17% of all abortions in the United States (2,232 of 1,313,000) were performed using an intact D&E. Around that time, its usage became a focal point of the U.S. abortion debate. The 2003 federal Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, which was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of ''Gonzales v. Carhart'', outlaws an intact D&E of a fetus with a heartbeat under most, though not all, c ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
