Commission V Italy (2004)

	Commission V Italy (2004) ''Commission v Italy'' may refer to: In ''Commission v Italy (1968)'', Italy was not allowed to tax the export of art treasures. This case was important because it helped define the meaning of the word "goods" under European Law. In ''Commission v Italy (1972)'', Italy failed to enforce EU Dairy Regulations on time. In ''Commission v Italy (2003)'', Italy had wrongly limited the use of the word "chocolate" to products without vegetable fat. In ''Commission v Italy (2009)'', Italy wrongly banned motorcycles and mopeds from pulling trailers, which affected imported goods because Italian manufacturers didn't make such goods. In ''Commission v Italy (2011)'', Italy could not require lawyers to abide by maximum tariffs, unless the client agreed, because this discouraged lawyers from other Member States from moving to Italy. See also ''Commission v France (other)'' ''Commission v Germany (other)'' ''Commission v Ireland (other)'' ''Commission v United K ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR:* [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Commission V Italy (1968) ''Commission v Italy'' (1968) C-7/68 is an European Union law, EU law case concerning European Single Market, particularly free movement of goods. In this case, the European Commission asked Italian Republic, Italy to abolish the tax on exportation of articles having an artistic, historic, archaeological or ethnographic value. Italy did not do so, claiming that the national law applied only to a specific category of goods. They argued that export restrictions could be justified on grounds of the protection of national treasures possessing artistic, historic or archaeological value. European Court of Justice, The European Court of Justice had to specify the scope of application of an Treaty of Rome, EEC Treaty provision on customs union and define the term of goods. According to this ruling, the Court defined the concept of goods as products which can be valued in money and which are capable, as such, of forming the subject of commercial transactions. Therefore, the articles of an ar ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Commission V Italy (1972) ''Commission v Italy'' (1972) , is an EU law case, concerning the conflict of law between a national legal system and European Union law. Facts The Commission brought enforcement proceedings against Italy for failing to enforce Regulations on dairy on time. The EU wanted to stop over-production of dairy products , p. 38 by introducing a premium for slaughter of (dairy) cows. The Italian government decreed the regulations were ‘deemed to be included’ in the decree, and reproduced them with extra procedural provisions. However, Italy failed to operate the scheme on time. Judgment The Court of Justice held that Italy was in breach both for delay, and also ‘the manner of giving effect’ to the Regulation. In one respect it departed from the Regulation, as it did not account for extension of time allowed for slaughter. See also European Union law European Union law is a system of Supranational union, supranational Law, laws operating within the 27 member states of t ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR:* [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Commission V Italy (2003) ''Commission v Italy'' (2003C-14/00is an EU law case, concerning the free movement of goods in the European Union. Facts An Italian rule limited the name ‘chocolate Chocolate is a food made from roasted and ground cocoa beans that can be a liquid, solid, or paste, either by itself or to flavoring, flavor other foods. Cocoa beans are the processed seeds of the cacao tree (''Theobroma cacao''); unprocesse ...’ to products without vegetable fats. Those with vegetable fats, mainly British, Irish, and Danish chocolate, were made to label themselves ‘chocolate substitutes’. The Commission argued this breached Directive 73/241, passed under what is now article 115 TFEU, where article 1 said cocoa and chocolate products mean those in Annex 1, within minimum cocoa content to be described as chocolate. It also argued it infringed TFEU article 34, as the word ‘substitute’ devalued the good. Italy, under point 7(a) of the Annex said the free movement clause only applied ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Commission V Italy (2009) ''Commission v Italy'' (2009) C-110/05 is an EU law case, concerning the free movement of goods in the European Union. This case is commonly referred to as Italian Trailers''', and is predominantly known for establishing the 'market access test'. Facts Italian law prohibited motorcycles and mopeds A moped ( ) is a type of small motorcycle, generally having a less stringent licensing requirement than full motorcycles or automobiles. Historically, the term exclusively meant a similar vehicle with both bicycle pedals and a motorcycle engine. ... from pulling trailers (that is, it regulated the use of a product). It applied without regard to the origin of the trailers, but it only affected imported goods in fact. Italian manufacturers did not make such trailers to be towed by motorcycles. The Commission challenged the Italian law as being contrary to TFEU article 34. Judgment Advocate General Bot AG Bot argued that this should be considered a measure equivalent to a quanti ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Commission V Italy (2011) ''Commission v Italy'' (2011C-565/08is an EU law case, concerning the freedom of establishment in the European Union. Facts Italian law required lawyers comply with maximum tariffs for calculation of their fees, unless there was an agreement between a lawyer and a client. Commission argued this discouraged lawyers established in other member states from going to Italy. Judgment The Court of Justice, Grand Chamber held that having maximum fees for lawyers was lawful. It was not a restriction just because service providers had to follow a new set of rules. See also European Union law European Union law is a system of Supranational union, supranational Law, laws operating within the 27 member states of the European Union (EU). It has grown over time since the 1952 founding of the European Coal and Steel Community, to promote ... Notes {{reflist, 2 References Court of Justice of the European Union case law ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
picture info	Commission V France (other) ''Commission v France'' (or Commission of the European Communities v French Republic) refers to several different cases heard by the European Court of Justice, which the European Commission brought against France for infringing European Union law. This includes breach of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), or a failure to implement European Union Directives: In '' Commission v France (1984)'C-202/82 France and Italy require that pasta products be manufactured from durum wheat and do not contain common wheat. France used a different method of analysis to Italy when testing whether pasta contained common wheat. In '' Commission v France (1987)'C-196/85 France's system of differential tax treatment for natural sweet wines and liqueur wines did not violate the Treaty of Rome 1957, Article 95. In '' Commission v France (1988)'C-312/86 France had failed to adopt all measures to implement Directive 76/207 on gender discrimination by allowing certain privileges fo ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR:* [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Commission V Germany (other) ''Commission v Germany'' may refer to: '' Commission v Germany'' (1987), in which article 34 TFEU did not permit the German Beer Tax Act to limit the definition of "beer" to just products that contained only malted barley, hops, yeast, water. '' Commission v Germany'' (2007), on freedom of capital, holding it was "disproportionate" to limit big shareholders' votes and for Lower Saxony to have a golden share, for the government's stated aim of protecting workers or minority shareholders. See also ''Commission v France (other) ''Commission v France'' (or Commission of the European Communities v French Republic) refers to several different cases heard by the European Court of Justice, which the European Commission brought against France for infringing European Union law. ...'' '' Commission v Ireland (other)'' '' Commission v Italy (other)'' '' Commission v United Kingdom (other)'' {{Caselaw disambiguation Court of Justice of the European U ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Commission V Ireland (other) ''Commission v Ireland'' refers to several different cases heard by the European Court of Justice, which the European Commission brought against Ireland for infringing European Union law. This includes breach of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), or a failure to implement European Union Directives: In ''Commission v Ireland'' (1982) Case 249/81, the Irish government was wrong to fund and manage the "Buy Irish" campaign because it breached (what is now) TFEU article 34, by restricting free movement of goods. See also ''Commission v France (other)'' ''Commission v Germany (other) ''Commission v Germany'' may refer to: '' Commission v Germany'' (1987), in which article 34 TFEU did not permit the German Beer Tax Act to limit the definition of "beer" to just products that contained only malted barley, hops, yeast, water. '' ...'' '' Commission v United Kingdom (other)'' '' Commission v Italy (other)'' {{Caselaw disam ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR:* [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Commission V United Kingdom (other) ''Commission v United Kingdom'' may refer to: * ''Commission v United Kingdom'' (C-337/89) (1992), an EU law case concerning water quality standards and enforcement under the Drinking Water Directive * ''Commission v United Kingdom'' (C-484/04) (2006), a European labour law and UK labour lawcase concerning the Working Time Directive, which is relevant for the Working Time Regulations 1998 * ''Commission v United Kingdom'' (C-516/22) (2024) See also ''Commission v France (other)'' ''Commission v Germany (other)'' '' Commission v Italy (other)'' ''Commission v Ireland (other) ''Commission v Ireland'' refers to several different cases heard by the European Court of Justice, which the European Commission brought against Ireland for infringing European Union law. This includes breach of the Treaty on the Functioning of the ...'' {{Caselaw disambiguation Court of Justice of the European Union case law ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]

	Commission V Italy (2004) ''Commission v Italy'' may refer to: In ''Commission v Italy (1968)'', Italy was not allowed to tax the export of art treasures. This case was important because it helped define the meaning of the word "goods" under European Law. In ''Commission v Italy (1972)'', Italy failed to enforce EU Dairy Regulations on time. In ''Commission v Italy (2003)'', Italy had wrongly limited the use of the word "chocolate" to products without vegetable fat. In ''Commission v Italy (2009)'', Italy wrongly banned motorcycles and mopeds from pulling trailers, which affected imported goods because Italian manufacturers didn't make such goods. In ''Commission v Italy (2011)'', Italy could not require lawyers to abide by maximum tariffs, unless the client agreed, because this discouraged lawyers from other Member States from moving to Italy. See also ''Commission v France (other)'' ''Commission v Germany (other)'' ''Commission v Ireland (other)'' ''Commission v United K ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR:* [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Commission V Italy (1968) ''Commission v Italy'' (1968) C-7/68 is an European Union law, EU law case concerning European Single Market, particularly free movement of goods. In this case, the European Commission asked Italian Republic, Italy to abolish the tax on exportation of articles having an artistic, historic, archaeological or ethnographic value. Italy did not do so, claiming that the national law applied only to a specific category of goods. They argued that export restrictions could be justified on grounds of the protection of national treasures possessing artistic, historic or archaeological value. European Court of Justice, The European Court of Justice had to specify the scope of application of an Treaty of Rome, EEC Treaty provision on customs union and define the term of goods. According to this ruling, the Court defined the concept of goods as products which can be valued in money and which are capable, as such, of forming the subject of commercial transactions. Therefore, the articles of an ar ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Commission V Italy (1972) ''Commission v Italy'' (1972) , is an EU law case, concerning the conflict of law between a national legal system and European Union law. Facts The Commission brought enforcement proceedings against Italy for failing to enforce Regulations on dairy on time. The EU wanted to stop over-production of dairy products , p. 38 by introducing a premium for slaughter of (dairy) cows. The Italian government decreed the regulations were ‘deemed to be included’ in the decree, and reproduced them with extra procedural provisions. However, Italy failed to operate the scheme on time. Judgment The Court of Justice held that Italy was in breach both for delay, and also ‘the manner of giving effect’ to the Regulation. In one respect it departed from the Regulation, as it did not account for extension of time allowed for slaughter. See also European Union law European Union law is a system of Supranational union, supranational Law, laws operating within the 27 member states of t ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR:* [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Commission V Italy (2003) ''Commission v Italy'' (2003C-14/00is an EU law case, concerning the free movement of goods in the European Union. Facts An Italian rule limited the name ‘chocolate Chocolate is a food made from roasted and ground cocoa beans that can be a liquid, solid, or paste, either by itself or to flavoring, flavor other foods. Cocoa beans are the processed seeds of the cacao tree (''Theobroma cacao''); unprocesse ...’ to products without vegetable fats. Those with vegetable fats, mainly British, Irish, and Danish chocolate, were made to label themselves ‘chocolate substitutes’. The Commission argued this breached Directive 73/241, passed under what is now article 115 TFEU, where article 1 said cocoa and chocolate products mean those in Annex 1, within minimum cocoa content to be described as chocolate. It also argued it infringed TFEU article 34, as the word ‘substitute’ devalued the good. Italy, under point 7(a) of the Annex said the free movement clause only applied ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Commission V Italy (2009) ''Commission v Italy'' (2009) C-110/05 is an EU law case, concerning the free movement of goods in the European Union. This case is commonly referred to as Italian Trailers''', and is predominantly known for establishing the 'market access test'. Facts Italian law prohibited motorcycles and mopeds A moped ( ) is a type of small motorcycle, generally having a less stringent licensing requirement than full motorcycles or automobiles. Historically, the term exclusively meant a similar vehicle with both bicycle pedals and a motorcycle engine. ... from pulling trailers (that is, it regulated the use of a product). It applied without regard to the origin of the trailers, but it only affected imported goods in fact. Italian manufacturers did not make such trailers to be towed by motorcycles. The Commission challenged the Italian law as being contrary to TFEU article 34. Judgment Advocate General Bot AG Bot argued that this should be considered a measure equivalent to a quanti ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Commission V Italy (2011) ''Commission v Italy'' (2011C-565/08is an EU law case, concerning the freedom of establishment in the European Union. Facts Italian law required lawyers comply with maximum tariffs for calculation of their fees, unless there was an agreement between a lawyer and a client. Commission argued this discouraged lawyers established in other member states from going to Italy. Judgment The Court of Justice, Grand Chamber held that having maximum fees for lawyers was lawful. It was not a restriction just because service providers had to follow a new set of rules. See also European Union law European Union law is a system of Supranational union, supranational Law, laws operating within the 27 member states of the European Union (EU). It has grown over time since the 1952 founding of the European Coal and Steel Community, to promote ... Notes {{reflist, 2 References Court of Justice of the European Union case law ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
picture info	Commission V France (other) ''Commission v France'' (or Commission of the European Communities v French Republic) refers to several different cases heard by the European Court of Justice, which the European Commission brought against France for infringing European Union law. This includes breach of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), or a failure to implement European Union Directives: In '' Commission v France (1984)'C-202/82 France and Italy require that pasta products be manufactured from durum wheat and do not contain common wheat. France used a different method of analysis to Italy when testing whether pasta contained common wheat. In '' Commission v France (1987)'C-196/85 France's system of differential tax treatment for natural sweet wines and liqueur wines did not violate the Treaty of Rome 1957, Article 95. In '' Commission v France (1988)'C-312/86 France had failed to adopt all measures to implement Directive 76/207 on gender discrimination by allowing certain privileges fo ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR:* [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Commission V Germany (other) ''Commission v Germany'' may refer to: '' Commission v Germany'' (1987), in which article 34 TFEU did not permit the German Beer Tax Act to limit the definition of "beer" to just products that contained only malted barley, hops, yeast, water. '' Commission v Germany'' (2007), on freedom of capital, holding it was "disproportionate" to limit big shareholders' votes and for Lower Saxony to have a golden share, for the government's stated aim of protecting workers or minority shareholders. See also ''Commission v France (other) ''Commission v France'' (or Commission of the European Communities v French Republic) refers to several different cases heard by the European Court of Justice, which the European Commission brought against France for infringing European Union law. ...'' '' Commission v Ireland (other)'' '' Commission v Italy (other)'' '' Commission v United Kingdom (other)'' {{Caselaw disambiguation Court of Justice of the European U ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Commission V Ireland (other) ''Commission v Ireland'' refers to several different cases heard by the European Court of Justice, which the European Commission brought against Ireland for infringing European Union law. This includes breach of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), or a failure to implement European Union Directives: In ''Commission v Ireland'' (1982) Case 249/81, the Irish government was wrong to fund and manage the "Buy Irish" campaign because it breached (what is now) TFEU article 34, by restricting free movement of goods. See also ''Commission v France (other)'' ''Commission v Germany (other) ''Commission v Germany'' may refer to: '' Commission v Germany'' (1987), in which article 34 TFEU did not permit the German Beer Tax Act to limit the definition of "beer" to just products that contained only malted barley, hops, yeast, water. '' ...'' '' Commission v United Kingdom (other)'' '' Commission v Italy (other)'' {{Caselaw disam ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR:* [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Commission V United Kingdom (other) ''Commission v United Kingdom'' may refer to: * ''Commission v United Kingdom'' (C-337/89) (1992), an EU law case concerning water quality standards and enforcement under the Drinking Water Directive * ''Commission v United Kingdom'' (C-484/04) (2006), a European labour law and UK labour lawcase concerning the Working Time Directive, which is relevant for the Working Time Regulations 1998 * ''Commission v United Kingdom'' (C-516/22) (2024) See also ''Commission v France (other)'' ''Commission v Germany (other)'' '' Commission v Italy (other)'' ''Commission v Ireland (other) ''Commission v Ireland'' refers to several different cases heard by the European Court of Justice, which the European Commission brought against Ireland for infringing European Union law. This includes breach of the Treaty on the Functioning of the ...'' {{Caselaw disambiguation Court of Justice of the European Union case law ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]