Ornithocheiridae

Ornithocheiridae (or ornithocheirids, meaning "bird hands") is a group of pterosaurs within the suborder Pterodactyloidea. These pterosaurs were among the last to possess teeth. Members that belong to this group lived from the Early to Late Cretaceous periods (Valanginian to Turonian stages), around 140 to 90 million years ago.

Ornithocheirids are generally infamous for having an enormously controversial and very confusing taxonomy. Although agreements that these animals were related, and therefore similar to istiodactylids and pteranodontians, there is still no virtual consensus over the exact content and interrelationships of this group. Ornithocheirids were the most successful pterosaurs during their reign, they were also the largest pterosaurs before the appearance of the azhdarchids such as ''Quetzalcoatlus''. Ornithocheirids were excellent fish hunters, they used various flight techniques to catch their prey, and they are also capable of flying great distances without flapping constantly. The later existence of the crested pteranodontids made paleontologists think that ornithocheirids were their potential ancestors. This is due to their very similar aspects such as the different flying techniques, the long distance flights, and most of all their diet, which consists mainly on fish.

History

Naming

The family Ornithocheiridae is without a doubt, one of the most well-known pterosaur groups, this is mostly due to their very controversial and convoluted taxonomic history. Most of the ornithocheirid fossil record consists of isolated teeth, as well as fragmentary bones, reaching hundreds or even thousands of remains in some localities. The first uncovered ornithocheirid remains were described in 1861 by British paleontologist Sir Richard Owen; he assigned the fossil remains to a new species of ''Pterodactylus'': ''P. simus''. In 1869, British paleontologist Harry Govier Seeley erected the new generic name '' Ornithocheirus'' (from Ancient Greek meaning "bird hand"), and assigned ''P. simus'' as its type species, therefore creating ''Ornithocheirus simus''. Later, in 1870, Seeley created the name Ornithocheirae to only contain ''Ornithocheirus''. However, in the same year, this was emended to Ornithocheiridae by Seeley himself following the article 11.7.1.3 of the ICZN.
In 1874, Owen had proposed two new genera for the Cretaceous British pterosaurs: '' Coloborhynchus'' (meaning "maimed beak") and ''Criorhynchus'' (meaning "ram beak") based on highly distinctive jaw fragments. Owen reassigned ''P. simus'' as the type species of ''Criorhynchus'', creating ''Criorhynchus simus''. He referred three species to ''Coloborhynchus'', including the addition of a new species called ''C. clavirostris''; no type species was designated, however. In 1876, however, Seeley pointed out that ''Criorhynchus'' was a junior synonym of ''Ornithocheirus'', a concept that was followed by paleontologist Richard Lydekker in 1888. In the latter year, Lydekker acknowledged that ''Ornithocheirus simus'' was the type species of ''Ornithocheirus'', he also distinguished ''O. simus'' by its tall rostrum, while other species referred to ''Ornithocheirus'' had lanceolate jaw tips. Therefore, to avoid confusion, Lydekker preferred to use the name ''Criorhynchus'' for ''O. simus'', and ''Ornithocheirus'' for the species with lanceolate jaw tips, this concept was later favored by paleontologist Reginald Walter Hooley in 1914. In his review of ''Ornithocheirus'', he divided the family Ornithocheiridae into two subfamilies: Ornithocheirinae and Criorhynchinae; the former consisted of ''Ornithocheirus'' and '' Lonchodectes'', while the latter consisted of '' Amblydectes'' and ''Criorhynchus''. In his review, Hooley also considered the species ''Coloborhynchus clavirostris'' as a synonym of ''Criorhynchus simus''. In 1967, paleontologist Oskar Kuhn placed ''Criorhynchus'' within the family Criorhynchidae (which is a term now considered synonymous to Ornithocheiridae), and also recognized ''Ornithocheirus'' within the family Ornithocheiridae and subfamily Ornithocheirinae. He also designated the species ''Coloborhynchus clavirostris'' as the type species of ''Coloborhynchus'', but agreed with Hooley that it was synonymous with ''Criorhynchus simus''. In 1994, however, Yuong-Nam Lee revalidated the genus ''Coloborhynchus'' (with ''C. clavirostris'' as its type species), and regarded it as distinct from ''Criorhynchus simus''. Later, in 2001, paleontologist David Unwin revised the taxonomic history of the Cambridge Greensand pterosaurs, and divided Ornithocheiridae into three genera: ''Ornithocheirus'', ''Coloborhynchus'' and ''Anhanguera''. Unwin also designated ''Pterodactylus simus'' as the type and only species of ''Ornithocheirus''.

In 2003, Unwin defined the family Ornithocheiridae as ''Haopterus gracilis'', ''Ornithocheirus simus'', their most recent common ancestor, and all its descendants. He included the genera ''Anhanguera'', ''Brasileodactylus'', ''Coloborhynchus'', ''Haopterus'', ''Ludodactylus'' and ''Ornithocheirus'' within the family, and also concluded that '' Araripesaurus'', ''Arthurdactylus'' and '' Santanadactylus'' may belong to this family as well. However, their taxonomic status and precise relationships with other ornithocheirids are uncertain. In 2019, upon the description of the pterosaur '' Mimodactylus'', ''Haopterus'', which was assigned to this family by Unwin, and recovered as a basal eupterodactyloid by Brian Andres and colleagues, was reassigned by Alexander Kellner and colleagues as the sister taxon of the former.

In 2014, Andres and colleagues defined the Ornithocheiridae with a different definition: the most inclusive clade containing ''Ornithocheirus simus'' but not ''Anhanguera blittersdorffi''. They placed the genera ''Coloborhynchus'', ''Ornithocheirus'' and '' Tropeognathus'' within the Ornithocheiridae, while placing ''Anhanguera'' within the separate family Anhangueridae. However, back in 2001, Unwin considered the name Anhangueridae a junior synonym of Ornithocheiridae, a concept that was later followed by several paleontologists such as Mark Witton in 2013. Some phylogenetic analyses, however, contradict this name synonymy, with Ornithocheiridae and Anhangueridae classified as different families, therefore following the 2014 analysis by Andres and colleagues instead. Other studies such as the ones by Kellner and colleagues in 2019 have used a different concept, classifying ''Coloborhynchus'', ''Tropeognathus'', as well as several other close relatives such as ''Ludodactylus'' and ''Caulkicephalus'' within the Anhangueridae, which, along with the family Hamipteridae, forms the larger group Anhangueria. They assigned ''Ornithocheirus'' outside the Anhangueria due to being undiagnosable. A lot of recent studies have since then followed this concept.

Description

Among toothed pterodactyloids, ornithocheirids were the largest; they were also among the most successful and widely distributed pterosaurs. Ornithocheirids were characterized by long jaws that had spike-like teeth. Ornithocheirid wingspans varied in size, with smaller species having wingspans of approximately , while giant morphs reached wingspans of up to or more. Specimen NHMUK R481, a specimen that belongs to the species ''Coloborhynchus capito'', the largest toothed pterosaur, had wingspan that may have reached . However, in 2013, a specimen referred to the genus ''Tropeognathus'' (MN 6594-V), a possible ornithocheirid (because it may also be anhanguerid), was calculated to have had a normal wingspan of , while a calculated maximum wingspan reached , meaning that this specimen clearly shows that wingspans of toothed pterosaurs could exceed .

Skull

Ornithocheirids had elongated jaws with rounded sagittal crests on both tips, as well as robust fang-like teeth. The sagittal crest of the species ''Ornithocheirus simus'' and ''Tropeognathus mesembrinus'' extended to the anterior end of the rostrum, a feature that is also seen in the ornithocheirid (or alternately anhanguerid) species '' Siroccopteryx moroccensis''; further synapomorphies between these three species were also found, including the premaxilla having a tall and narrow shape in anterior aspect, the anterolateral margins of the premaxilla being convex in both anterior and lateral view, a feature that resulted in a bluntly rounded outline of the tip of the rostrum. The rostrum in ''S. moroccensis'' lacks a constriction that is posterior to the anterior rosette, a feature also shared by ''O. simus'' and ''T. mesembrinus'', therefore another synapomorphy supported by these three species. Yet another feature shared by these three species is that the teeth are short, straight, and relatively uniform in size, something that is not present in other ornithocheirans such as ''Coloborhynchus'' and ''Anhanguera''. In ''Coloborhynchus'', the teeth were found to have been heterodont, elongated, recurved and caniniform, which is similar to those seen in another ornithocheirid (though also recovered as an anhanguerid) called ''Caulkicephalus''. The genus ''Caulkicephalus'', though having similarities with other ornithocheirids, including the anterior end of the rostrum being transversely expanded, or having a low, bony sagittal crest that includes a smooth dorsal margin on the rostrum, still possesses some unique features. The most distinct characteristic of ''Caulkicephalus'' is that it bores a frontoparietal crest, a feature that is only seen in pteranodontians such as ''Pteranodon'', and in ''Ludodactylus'', a pterosaur once assigned to the Ornithocheiridae, but some recent analysis have placed it within the more inclusive group Anhangueria, outside the Ornithocheiridae. Other studies, however, have recovered it within the Anhangueridae instead.

Postcranial skeleton

The forelimbs of ornithocheirids were proportionally enormous, around five times longer than their legs. Substantial anchorage on the body is required given the mighty arms, and accordingly, ornithocheirids have robust scapulocoracoids, and stout, deeply keeled sterna, which served the purpose of housing their substantial forelimb muscles. The shoulder or pectoral girdle in ornithocheirids is set at a perpendicular angle to the spine, with the coracoids being much longer than the scapulae. The shoulder girdle is also of typical construction for ornithocheiroids. Over 60 percent of the wing length is occupied by the wing fingers, making them among the longest possessed by any pterodactyloids.

In adult ornithocheirids, the sacrum develops a supraneural plate above its neural spines. The tails of ornithocheirids are poorly known, though they appear to be composed of at least eleven short vertebrae, and become relatively circular in cross section toward the end of the series. Like the related istiodactylids, the slender femora of ornithocheirids have femoral heads that project almost in line with the femoral shaft, but seem to lack prominent processes that anchor their hindlimb muscles. Ornithocheirid shinbones (or tibiae) are similarly developed and of equal length to the femora. Although the feet in ornithocheirids are poorly known, they seem to be relatively small and gracile, with undeveloped claws and a hook-like fifth metatarsal.

Classification

The family Ornithocheiridae has had a controversial and very confusing taxonomic history; paleontologists who have studied this group seem to have had a different opinion on the composition of ornithocheirid taxonomy. A term called Anhangueridae was coined by Diogenes de Almeida Campos and Kellner in 1985 to refer to pterosaurs that belong in this family. In 2001, however, Unwin argued that the name Ornithocheiridae refers to an identical group, and should have nomenclatural priority. He therefore considered Anhangueridae a junior synonym of Ornithocheiridae in his study of pterosaur phylogeny in 2003. However, in many recent studies, Anhangueridae is recovered as a separate and distinct family from Ornithocheiridae, each containing different genera. The original term Ornithocheirae by Seeley had been redefined as the least inclusive clade containing ''Anhanguera blittersdorffi'' and ''Ornithocheirus simus'', therefore it is recovered as a larger group comprising the families Anhangueridae and Ornithocheiridae in recent analysis.

Formerly assigned genera

In the past, many pterosaur genera were assigned to the Ornithocheiridae; however, following recent studies, these supposed ornithocheirids had been reclassified to other groups or families. The pterosaur ''Boreopterus'' for example, was initially classified within the Ornithocheiridae; however, later analysis had found it in a different family called Boreopteridae, with ''Boreopterus'' being the sister taxon of ''Zhenyuanopterus''; both pterosaurs were recovered as basal members of the Lanceodontia in several recent studies such as the ones by Rodrigo Pêgas and colleagues, and Adele Pentland and colleagues, both studies of which are from 2019.

'' Aetodactylus'' is another pterosaur that was initially classified within the Ornithocheiridae; later analysis have found it outside the Ornithocheiridae: Timothy Myers in 2015 and Nicholas Longrich and colleagues in 2018 for example, are two studies that found ''Aetodactylus'' as sister taxon to the two species of ''Cimoliopterus'' (''C. cuvieri'' and ''C. dunni''). In 2019, Pêgas and colleagues have found ''Aetodactylus'', along with two other pterosaurs ('' Camposipterus'' and ''Cimoliopterus''), within the clade Targaryendraconia, more specifically placed within the family Cimoliopteridae in a polytomy.

The genus ''Haopterus'' was used to define the Ornithocheiridae in Unwin's 2003 study; however, Andres and Myers in 2013 argued that ''Haopterus'' had not been previously referred to the Ornithocheiridae besides a note added in proof to Unwin in 2001 that stated that ''Haopterus'' appeared to be a small ornithocheirid. Phylogenetic analyses since then have found ''Haopterus'' as a rogue taxon either within the Pterodactyloidea, the Ornithocheiroidea, the Pteranodontoidea, or the Istiodactylidae. In the phylogenetic analysis by Andres and Myers, ''Haopterus'' was recovered as a stable sister taxon to the group Ornithocheiroidea. Some later analyses have also recovered this concept, with both ''Haopterus'' and the Ornithocheiroidea placed within the larger group Eupterodactyloidea. Another study in 2019 had recovered ''Haopterus'' within a different group called Mimodactylidae.

Phylogeny

Different phylogenetic analysis have found Ornithocheiridae to comprise different genera, the most typical ones being ''Tropeognathus'', ''Coloborhynchus'' and ''Ornithocheirus''. In 2014, Andres and colleagues created the subfamily Ornithocheirinae to contain ''Coloborhynchus'' and ''Ornithocheirus'', this subfamily was sister taxon to ''Tropeognathus'', and altogether formed the family Ornithocheiridae. In 2018, Longrich and colleagues had included the genus ''Siroccopteryx'' in their phylogenetic analysis, specifically as a member of the ornithocheirine subfamily, sister taxon to ''Coloborhynchus''. In 2019, a study performed by Adele Pentland and colleagues had found the Ornithocheiridae to comprise more genera; while the typical ''Tropeognathus'', ''Coloborhynchus'' and ''Ornithocheirus'' clade was included in their analysis, Pentland and colleagues have found the genera ''Ferrodraco'' and ''Mythunga'' to belong the Ornithocheiridae as well, specifically sister taxa within the Ornithocheirinae, closely related to ''Ornithocheirus''. In the same year, Megan Jacobs and colleagues have recovered a different set of relationships for ornithocheirids in their analysis. Within the family, three clades emerge: the first one consists of ''Ornithocheirus'', ''Tropeognathus'' and ''Siroccopteryx'', the second one comprises ''Uktenadactylus'' with several ''Coloborhynchus'' species, and the third one comprises ''Cimoliopterus'' and ''Camposipterus''. The close relationship between ''Siroccopteryx'', ''Ornithocheirus'' and ''Tropeognathus'' is supported by several synapomorphies, such the teeth being short, straight, and relatively uniform in size. Several other recent studies such as the ones by Alexander Kellner and colleagues, or the one by Rodrigo Pêgas and colleagues, both in 2019, have recovered ''Coloborhynchus'', ''Siroccopteryx'', ''Tropeognathus'' and ''Uktenadactylus'' within the family Anhangueridae instead of the Ornithocheiridae. In 2020, a study by Borja Holgado and Pêgas had also recovered both ''Ferrodraco'' and ''Mythunga'' within the Anhangueridae instead of this family.

''Cimoliopterus'' has generally been recovered outside the Ornithocheiridae; subsequent analyses have found it as sister taxon to ''Aetodactylus'', as mentioned earlier. Another possible position for ''Cimoliopterus'' is within the clade Targaryendraconia, again, closely related to ''Aetodactylus'', and together with ''Camposipterus'', the three formed the family Cimoliopteridae. In the analysis by Jacobs and colleagues, the two ''Cimoliopterus'' species had been found as sister taxa to the three ''Camposipterus'' species (''C. nasutus'', ''C. colorhinus'' and ''C. segwickii''), altogether formed an unnamed clade within the Ornithocheiridae. However, as noted by Jacobs and colleagues, support for some of these arrangements is relatively weak due to the limited number of characters that can be scored, and the levels of homoplasy are very high.

Below are two cladograms showing the possible genera that are included within the ornithocheirid family. The cladogram to the left is a topology recovered by Jacobs and colleagues, and the one to the right is a topology recovered by Pentland and colleagues.

Topology 1: Jacobs ''et al.'' (2019).

Topology 2: Pentland ''et al.'' (2019).

Paleobiology

Diet and feeding

Ornithocheirids are generally considered piscivorous animals, this is mainly because they seem to have been suited for flight over marine settings, in fact, most ornithocheirids are known from lagoonal, coastal and marine deposits. Although the manner in which ornithocheirids gathered their food has not been researched in detail, it is generally thought that members of this family either fed like modern-day skimmers, pushing their lower jaw through the water to snap up food upon impact, or fed by gleaning food from the water surface like some modern-day terns and frigatebirds. The skim-feeding hypothesis on ornithocheirids has been discounted in recent assessments of pterosaur skim-feeding, while dip-feeding is supported by a number of anatomical features. Elongated ornithocheirid rostra are ideal for reaching into the water to grab swimming creatures. The rostral crests of ornithocheirids would have worked well as stabilizers for the jaws tips while being plunged into the water. Large, forward-facing eyes and well-developed flocculi are ideal for dip-feeding as well, which permits effective spotting of prey as well as judgement of distances when striking at them, as such, it seems likely that at least several ornithocheirids were efficient dip feeders. Sedate foraging methods might have also been used when hunting, example of these methods are: reaching food while being alighted on the water surface, and shallow surface dives.

Locomotion and flight

Similar to modern-day albatrosses, most ornithocheirids used a flight technique called "dynamic soaring", which consists of travelling long distances without flapping using the vertical gradient of wind speed near the ocean surface as an advantage, but the flight speed is moderate. Several studies showed that most ornithocheirids sprawled their limbs to a large degree, similar to crocodiles, while other studies, however, conclude that ornithocheirids were generally quadrupedal. Yet other studies concluded that ornithocheirids held their limbs more or less vertically extended, similar to an avian- or mammal-like configuration. Some studies in the later genera, show that ornithocheirids spend much of their time sea fishing, and as a result, they perhaps influenced the later pteranodontids with the same piscivorous diet, as well as their well-developed flight techniques. Analyses of limb proportions in the genus ''Anhanguera'', however, show that some ornithocheirids were consistent on hopping, but the later genera were suggested that they most likely walked on four limbs, which consists on their wing-fingers as the front limbs, and using their hind limbs to balance.Habib, M. (2011).
Dinosaur Revolution: ''Anhanguera''.
''H2VP: Paleobiomechanics''. Weblog entry, September 20, 2011. Accessed September 28, 2011: http://h2vp.blogspot.com/2011/09/dinosaur-revolution-anhanguera.html

Paleoecology

Ornithocheirids were a widespreaded type of pterosaurs, with many fossil remains found across the world. The first true ornithocheirid specimens were uncovered in the Cambridge Greensand of England, these belong to the infamous genus ''Ornithocheirus'', and dated back to the Albian stage of the Early Cretaceous. Within the fossil site, several other pterosaurs were also found, these include the pterosaurs ''Amblydectes'' and ''Coloborhynchus'', the targaryendraconian ''Camposipterus'', the lonchodraconid ''Lonchodraco'', and the azhdarchoid '' Ornithostoma''. The ornithischians ''Anoplosaurus'', '' Acanthopholis'', and the dubious '' Eucercosaurus'' and ''Trachodon'' were also found within the formation. Fossil remains of the sauropod '' Macrurosaurus'' were also present. The bird ''Enaliornis'', as well as the ichthyosaurs '' Cetarthrosaurus'', ''Platypterygius'' and '' Sisteronia'' were also found alongside the remains of ornithocheirids.

A Lagerstätte called the Santana Group (sometimes known as the Santana Formation) in northeastern Brazil was found to contain a large number of pterosaur genera. The most diverse formation of the group is the Romualdo Formation, known for its wide variety of pterosaur remains.Veldmeijer, A.J. (2006).
Toothed pterosaurs from the Santana Formation (Cretaceous; Aptian-Albian) of northeastern Brazil. A reappraisal on the basis of newly described material
." Tekst. - Proefschrift Universiteit Utrecht. The formation dates back around 111 to 108 million years ago, also during the Albian stage of the Early Cretaceous. The Romualdo Formation is found to contain a variety of ornithocheirids (or anhanguerids), including ''Tropeognathus'', ''Coloborhynchus'' and '' Araripesaurus'', the targaryendraconian ''Barbosania'' as well as close relatives such as ''Anhanguera'' and ''Maaradactylus'' were also found alongside. The related '' Araripedactylus'', ''Brasileodactylus'', '' Cearadactylus'',Leonardi, G. & Borgomanero, G. (1985). "''Cearadactylus atrox'' nov. gen., nov. sp.: novo Pterosauria (Pterodactyloidea) da Chapada do Araripe, Ceara, Brasil." ''Resumos dos communicaçoes VIII Congresso bras. de Paleontologia e Stratigrafia'', 27: 75–80. ''Santanadactylus''P. H. Buisonjé. 1980. ''Santanadactylus brasilensis'' nov. gen., nov. sp., a long-necked, large pterosaurier from the Aptian of Brasil. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, B 83:145-172 and '' Unwindia'' were also present within the fossil site. Many other pterosaur were found within, these include the tapejarid '' Tapejara'', as well as the thalassodromids (or thalassodromines, depending on the author) '' Thalassodromeus'' and ''Tupuxuara''. Other animals such the theropods '' Irritator'', '' Mirischia'' and '' Santanaraptor'', as well as the crocodylomorph '' Araripesuchus'' were also found. Several turtle remains were found within the formation, with some specimens referring to the genera ''Santanachelys'', '' Cearachelys'' and '' Araripemys'', and along with these, many fish remains were also found, these were assigned to the genera '' Brannerion'', '' Rhinobatos'', ''Rhacolepis'', '' Tharrhias'' and '' Tribodus''.

Ornithocheirids were also partially distributed in North America, and several specimens that were found are thought to belong to the genus ''Uktenadactylus'' (originally ''Coloborhychus wadleighi''). This pterosaur was uncovered in the Paw Paw Formation of Texas, United States, which dated back to the Albian and Cenomanian stages. The formation includes several ankylosaurian dinosaurs such as ''Pawpawsaurus'', ''Texasetes'' and an indetermine nodosaurid.Weishampel, David B; et al. (2004). "Dinosaur distribution (Early Cretaceous, North America)." In: Weishampel, David B.; Dodson, Peter; and Osmólska, Halszka (eds.): The Dinosauria, 2nd, Berkeley: University of California Press. Pp. 553-556. . Within the fossil site, several specimens of ammonoids were thought to belong to the genera ''Turrilites'' and '' Scaphites'', and along with these, shark remains of ''Leptostyrax'' were also found.Cappetta H. 1987. Chondrichthyes II. Mesozoic and Cenozoic Elasmobranchii. Schultze H.-P. (ed.), Handbook of Paleoichthyology, Volume 3B. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 193 p.

See also

* Pterosaur size

References

Further reading

*
*

External links

*

{{Taxonbar, from=Q136890

Pteranodontoids
Valanginian first appearances
Cenomanian extinctions
Fossil taxa described in 1870
Taxa named by Harry Seeley
Prehistoric reptile families