HOME

TheInfoList




A third-party beneficiary, in the
law Law is a system A system is a group of Interaction, interacting or interrelated elements that act according to a set of rules to form a unified whole. A system, surrounded and influenced by its environment, is described by its bounda ...
of
contract A contract is a legally binding agreement that defines and governs the rights and duties between or among its parties Image:'Hip, Hip, Hurrah! Artist Festival at Skagen', by Peder Severin Krøyer (1888) Demisted with DXO PhotoLab Clearview ...

contract
s, is a person who may have the right to sue on a contract, despite not having originally been an active
party A party is a gathering of people who have been invited by a host A host is a person responsible for guests at an event or for providing hospitality during it. Host may also refer to: Places *Host, Pennsylvania, a village in Berks Cou ...
to the contract. This right, known as a ''ius quaesitum tertio'', arises when the third party ('' tertius'' or ''alteri'') is the intended beneficiary of the contract, as opposed to a mere incidental beneficiary (''penitus extraneus''). It
vests A waistcoat ( UK and Commonwealth A commonwealth is a traditional English term for a political community founded for the common good In philosophy Philosophy (from , ) is the study of general and fundamental questions, such as th ...
when the third party relies on or assents to the relationship, and gives the third party the right to sue either the promisor (''promittens'', or performing party) or the promisee (''stipulans'', or anchor party) of the contract, depending on the circumstances under which the relationship was created. A contract made in favor of a third party is known as a "third-party beneficiary contract." Under traditional
common law In law, common law (also known as judicial precedent or judge-made law, or case law Case law is the collection of past legal decisions written by courts and similar tribunal A tribunal, generally, is any person or institution with authority ...
, the ''ius quaesitum tertio'' principle was not recognized, instead relying on the doctrine of
privity of contract The doctrine of privity (law), privity of contract law, contract is a common law principle which provides that a contract cannot confer rights or impose obligations upon any person who is not a party to the contract. The premise is that only part ...
, which restricts rights, obligations, and liabilities arising from a contract to the contracting parties (said to be ''privy'' to the contract). However, the
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 The Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 (c. 31) is an Acts of Parliament in the United Kingdom, Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that significantly reformed the common law Privity in English law, doctrine of privity and "thereb ...
introduced a number of allowances and exceptions for ''ius quaesitum tertio'' in
English law English law is the common law In law, common law (also known as judicial precedent or judge-made law, or case law) is the body of law created by judges and similar quasi-judicial tribunals by virtue of being stated in written opinions. ''Blac ...
. Other
common-law In law, common law (also known as judicial precedent or judge-made law, or case law) is the body of law created by judges and similar quasi-judicial tribunals by virtue of being stated in written opinions. ''Black's Law Dictionary'' is the most-us ...
countries are also making reforms in this area, though the
United States The United States of America (U.S.A. or USA), commonly known as the United States (U.S. or US) or America, is a country Continental United States, primarily located in North America. It consists of 50 U.S. state, states, a Washington, D.C., ...

United States
is unique in abandoning privity early in the mid-19th century.


''Ius quaesitum tertio''

While the law on this subject varies, there is nonetheless a commonly accepted construction of third-party rights in the laws of most countries. A right of action arises only when it appears the object of the contract was to benefit the third party's interests and the third-party beneficiary has either relied on or accepted the benefit. A promisee nominates a third party usually for one of two reasons—either the promisee owes something to the third party and the performance of this new obligation will discharge it, or the promisee will somehow get a material benefit by giving something to the third party. There are also two possible ways to explain the functioning of the contractual relationship: either, * The parties A (promisee) and B (promisor) contract each in his own name but with the intention of creating an opportunity for C (third-party beneficiary) to acquire a benefit, conditional upon acceptance, from B; or * C immediately acquires a conditional right, from which A is able to release B until the moment of acceptance, when the right of A to release B is extinguished. In either case, a third-party contract differs from agency in that the promisee acts in his own name and for himself, whereas an agent or representative does not. It is also distinguishable from a ''promesse de porte-fort'' under which the third party has a negative obligation to perform and, by expressing his consent, initially substitutes himself for an intended party to a contract and therefore binds himself. Also, as a somewhat distinct rule, the intended beneficiary of a third-party contract does not need to be in existence at the time the contract is concluded. This means a contract may benefit an unborn person (usually a family member) or secure benefits for a
legal person In law Law is a system A system is a group of Interaction, interacting or interrelated elements that act according to a set of rules to form a unified whole. A system, surrounded and influenced by its environment, is described by ...
, such as a company, still in the process of forming or registering.


Object to benefit

For third-party rights to come into existence, certain contractual criteria must be met to show an object to benefit: * A valid contract must exist between two contracting parties and not some other relationship * The contracting parties must have intended to confer a benefit, and not a simple interest, to a third party, either expressly or impliedly * The third-party beneficiary must be named or referred to, or is a member of a distinct class referred to * The intention to benefit must generally be irrevocable (though a
life insurance Life insurance (or life assurance, especially in the Commonwealth of Nations The Commonwealth of Nations, generally known simply as the Commonwealth, is a political association of 54 member states, almost all of which are former territorie ...
policy is an exception) * Some intimation to the third party of the contract's existence


Irrevocability

To be enforceable, a ''ius quaesitum tertio'' must be irrevocable. This is established by any of the following: * Delivery of the contract to the third party * Registration for publication * Intimation to the third party * The third party coming under onerous obligations on the faith of having a ''ius quaesitum tertio'' * Evidence that the third party knew of the provision intended for his or her benefit


Acceptance

A third-party beneficiary only acquires a right of action to enforce his benefit once he has accepted the benefit provided for in the contract. Under the
South Africa South Africa, officially the Republic of South Africa (RSA), is the southernmost country in Africa. With over 60 million people, it is the world's 23rd-most populous nation and covers an area of . South Africa has three capital citie ...

South Africa
n interpretation, however, prior to formal acceptance of the benefit, the third-party beneficiary only has a ''spes'', or expectation; in other words, he does not have the right to accept, but rather a mere competency. Acceptance may also be a suspensive condition in certain contracts. Under
Scots law Scots law () is the legal system The contemporary national legal systems are generally based on one of four basic systems A system is a group of interacting or interrelated elements that act according to a set of rules to form a unified ...
, acceptance is not necessary to be vested in a right of action, but is necessary to be liable. Before acceptance, however, the ''ius quaesitum tertio'' is tenuous so that acceptance of a benefit does not create a right, but rather entrenches that right. In either case, the contracting parties may vary or rescind the contract until acceptance or reliance.Philip Sutherland, "Third-Party Contracts", ''European Contract Law: Scots and South African Perspectives'', eds. Hector L. MacQueen & Reinhard Zimmermann (Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2006), 215–6.


Intended v. incidental beneficiary

In order for a third party beneficiary to have any rights under the contract, he must be an ''intended beneficiary'', as opposed to an ''incidental beneficiary''. The burden is on the third party to plead and prove that he was indeed an intended beneficiary.


Incidental beneficiary

An incidental beneficiary is a party who stands to benefit from the execution of the contract, although that was not the intent of either contracting party. For example, if Andrew hires Bethany to renovate his house and insists that she use a specific house painter, Charlie, because he has an excellent reputation, then Charlie is an incidental beneficiary. Neither Andrew nor Bethany is entering into the contract with the particular intent to benefit Charlie. Andrew simply wants his house properly renovated; Bethany simply wants to be paid to do the renovation. If the contract is breached by either party in a way that results in Charlie never being hired for the job, Charlie nonetheless has no rights to recover anything under the contract. Similarly, if Andrew were to promise to buy Bethany a
Cadillac The Cadillac Motor Car Division is a division (business), division of the American automobile manufacturer General Motors Company (GM) that designs and builds luxury vehicles. Its major markets are the United States, Canada, and China. Cadilla ...

Cadillac
, and were to later go back on that promise,
General Motors General Motors Company (GM) is an American multinational Multinational may refer to: * Multinational corporation, a corporate organization operating in multiple countries * Multinational force, a military body from multiple countries * Multinat ...

General Motors
would have no grounds upon which to recover for the lost sale.


Intended beneficiary

The distinction that creates an intended beneficiary is that one party—the "promisee"—makes an agreement to provide some
consideration Consideration is a concept of English law, English common law and is a necessity for simple contracts but not for special contracts (contracts by deed). The concept has been adopted by other common law jurisdictions. The court in ''Currie v Mis ...
to a second party—the "promisor"—in exchange for the promisor's agreement to provide some product or service to the third-party beneficiary named in the contract. The promisee must have an ''intention to benefit'' the third party (though this requirement has an unusual meaning under the law). Although there is a presumption that the promisor intends to promote the interests of the third party in this way, if Andrew contracts with Bethany to have a thousand
killer bee The Africanized bee, also known as the Africanized honey bee and known colloquially as the "killer bee", is a Hybrid (biology), hybrid of the western honey bee (''Apis mellifera''), produced originally by crossbreeding of the African bee, East A ...
s delivered to the home of Andrew's worst enemy Charlie, then Charlie is still considered to be the intended beneficiary of that contract. (This would be illegal if the intent was to scare his enemy; contracts are voided based on criminality.) There are two common situations involving intended beneficiaries: * Creditor beneficiary – e.g., when Andrew owes some
debt Debt is an obligation that requires one party, the debtor A debtor or debitor is a legal entity (legal person) that owes a debt Debt is an obligation that requires one party, the debtor, to pay money or other agreed-upon value to ...

debt
to Charlie, and Andrew agrees to provide some consideration to Bethany in exchange for her promise to pay Charlie some of the debt * Donee beneficiary – e.g., when Andrew wishes to make a
gift A gift or a present is an item given to someone without the expectation of payment or anything in return. An item is not a gift if that item is already owned by the one to whom it is given. Although gift-giving might involve an expectation o ...

gift
to Charlie and Andrew agrees to provide some consideration to Bethany in exchange for her promise to pay Charlie the amount of the gift. Under old
common law In law, common law (also known as judicial precedent or judge-made law, or case law Case law is the collection of past legal decisions written by courts and similar tribunal A tribunal, generally, is any person or institution with authority ...
principles, the donee beneficiary actually had a greater claim to the benefits this created, but such distinctions have been abolished.


Vesting of rights

Once the beneficiary's rights have vested, the original parties to the contract are both bound to perform the contract. Any efforts by the promisor or the promisee to rescind or modify the contract at that point are void. Indeed, if the promisee changed his mind and offered to pay the promisor money not to perform, the third party could sue the promisee for
tortious interference Tortious interference, also known as intentional interference with contractual relations, in the common law of torts, occurs when one person intentionally damages someone else's contractual or business relationships with a wikt:third party, third ...
with the third party's contract rights. There are four ways to determine whether the third party beneficiary's rights have vested: # If the beneficiary knows of and has detrimentally relied on the rights created; # If the beneficiary expressly assented to the contract at the request of one of the parties; # If the beneficiary files a lawsuit to enforce the contract; or # If the beneficiary's rights vest pursuant to an express term in the contract providing for such vesting.


Breach and defenses

Where a contract for the benefit of a third party is breached by the non-performance of the promisor, the beneficiary can sue the promisor for the breach just as any party to a contract can sue the other. Because the rights of the third party are defined by the contract created between the promisor and the promisee, the promisor may assert against the beneficiary any defenses to the contract that could be asserted against the promisee. These include all of the traditional basis by which the formation of a contract may be challenged (e.g., lack of
capacity Capacity or capacities may refer to: Mathematics, science, and engineering * Capacity of a container, closely related to Volume#Related terms, the volume of the container * Capacity of a set, in Euclidean space, the total charge a set can hold whi ...
, lack of
consideration Consideration is a concept of English law, English common law and is a necessity for simple contracts but not for special contracts (contracts by deed). The concept has been adopted by other common law jurisdictions. The court in ''Currie v Mis ...
, the
statute of frauds The statute of frauds is the requirement that certain kinds of contract A contract is a legally binding agreement that defines and governs the rights and duties between or among its parties Image:'Hip, Hip, Hurrah! Artist Festival at Ska ...
) and all of the traditional bases by which non-performance on the contract may be excused (e.g., failure of consideration, impossibility, illegality,
frustration of purpose Frustration of purpose, in law, is a defense to enforcement of a contract. Frustration of purpose occurs when an unforeseen event undermines a party's principal purpose for entering into a contract such that the performance of the contract is radi ...
). Because the promisor can assert any defenses that could be asserted against the promisee, the beneficiary also becomes liable for counterclaims on the contract that the promisor could establish against the promisee. This liability can never exceed the amount that the promisor owes under the contract. In other words, if the promisor is owed money by the promisee, any award to the third party for the promisor's failure to perform can be reduced by the amount thus owed. If the promisor is owed more than the value of the contract, the beneficiary's recovery will be reduced to nothing (but the third party can never be made to assume an actual debt). A ''creditor beneficiary'' can sue both the promisor and the promisee, but the beneficiary cannot ''recover'' against both. If the suit is successful against one party to the contract, the other party will be dismissed. Because the creditor beneficiary is receiving the performance of the promisor in order to fulfill the promisee's debt, the failure of the promisor to perform means that the beneficiary can still sue the promisee to recover the ''preexisting debt''. The failure of performance simply means that the debt has never been paid. A ''donee beneficiary'' can sue the promisor directly to enforce the promise. (''Seaver v. Ransom'', 224 NY 233, 120 NE 639
918 __NOTOC__ Year 918 ( CMXVIII) was a common year starting on Thursday A common year starting on Thursday is any non-leap year A leap year (also known as an intercalary year or wikt:bissextile, bissextile year) is a calendar year that contain ...
. A donee beneficiary is when a contract is made expressly for giving a gift to a third party, the third party is known as the donee beneficiary. The most common donee beneficiary contract is a life insurance policy.


Rights that accrue to the promisee

The promisee can also sue the promisor for failing to pay the third party beneficiary. Under the common law, such suits were barred, but courts have since determined that the promisee can sue for
specific performance Specific performance is an equitable remedyEquitable remedies are judicial remedies developed by courts of Equity (law), equity from about the time of Henry VIII of England, Henry VIII to provide more flexible responses to changing social condition ...
of the contract, provided that the beneficiary has not already sued the promisor. Furthermore, if the promisee was in debt to a creditor beneficiary, and the failure of the promisor to perform caused the promisee to be held liable for that debt, the promisee can sue to recover the amount of the debt.


See also

* Beneficial interest *
Pay it forward Pay it forward is an expression for describing the beneficiary of a good deed repaying the kindness to others instead of to the original benefactor. The concept is old, but the particular phrase may have been coined by Lily Hardy Hammond in her 19 ...


Notes

{{DEFAULTSORT:Third Party Beneficiary Contract law