Examples
English
Most light verb constructions in English include a noun and are sometimes called stretched verbs. Some light verb constructions also include a preposition, e.g. ::They did the review of my paper first. ::Sam did the cleaning yesterday. ::Who got such intense criticism? ::Susan is getting much support from her family. ::I am going to have a nice nap. ::She had a smoke. ::We had a slow, boring conversation. ::Are you giving a presentation at the conference? ::They gave the kids a hard time. ::Who will give you a hug? ::Who made such a severe mistake? ::I made the first request. ::Sam has taken a shower. ::Why is Larry taking a nap? ::We should take a break soon. ::Have you taken advantage of that opportunity. ::I haven't taken that into consideration. The light verbs are underlined, and the words in bold together constitute the light verb constructions. Each of these constructions is the (primary part of the) main predicate of the sentence. Note that the determiner ''a'' is usually NOT part of the light verb construction. We know that it is not part of the light verb construction because it is variable, e.g. ''I took a long/the first/two/the best nap''. The light verb contributes little content to its sentence; the main meaning resides with the noun in bold.Hindi-Urdu
Light verb constructions inAlternative constructions with full verbs
Many light verb constructions are closely similar in meaning to a corresponding full verb, e.g. ::a. Sam did a revision of his paper. – Light verb construction ::b. Sam revised his paper. -Full verb ::a. Larry wants to have a smoke. – Light verb construction ::b. Larry wants to smoke. – Full verb ::a. Jim made an important claim that.... – Light verb construction ::b. Jim claimed that... – Full verb ::a. Mary is taking a nap. – Light verb construction ::b. Mary is napping. – Full verb Alternative formulations such as these lead to the insight that light verb constructions are predicates just like the corresponding full verb alternatives. There can be, however, nuanced differences in meaning across these alternative formulations. The light verb constructions produce possibilities for modification that are less available with the corresponding full verb alternatives.Contrasted with auxiliary verbs and full verbs
Many verbs that serve as light verbs can also serve as auxiliary verbs and/or full verbs depending on the context in which they appear. Light verbs are similar to auxiliary verbs insofar as they contribute mainly functional content (as opposed to semantic content) to the clauses in which they appear. Light verbs, however, are not auxiliary verbs, nor are they full verbs. Light verbs differ from auxiliary verbs in English insofar as they do not pass the syntactic tests that identify auxiliary verbs. The following examples illustrate that light verbs fail the inversion and negation diagnostics that identify auxiliary verbs: ::a. He did call Susan yesterday. ::b. Did he call Susan yesterday? – The auxiliary ''did'' inverts with the subject. ::c. He did not call Susan yesterday. – The auxiliary ''did'' can take ''not'' as a postdependent. ::a. He did the review of my paper yesterday. ::b. *Did he the review of my paper yesterday? – The light verb ''did'' cannot invert with the subject. ::c. *He did not the review of my paper yesterday. – The light verb ''did'' cannot take ''not'' as a postdependent. ::a. He has opened the window. ::b. Has he opened the window? – The auxiliary ''has'' inverts with the subject. ::c. He has not opened the window. – The auxiliary ''has'' takes ''not'' as a postdependent. ::a. She had a smoke. ::b. *Had she a smoke? – The light verb ''had'' cannot invert with the subject. ::c. *She had not a smoke. – The light verb ''had'' cannot take ''not'' as a postdependent. Light verbs differ from full verbs in that light verbs lack the semantic content that full verbs have. Full verbs are the core of a predicate, whereas light verbs form a predicate with another expression (often a noun) with full semantic content. This distinction is more difficult to illustrate, but it can be seen in the following examples involving reflexive pronouns: ::a. Jim1 took a picture of himself1. – The light verb ''took'' requires the reflexive pronoun to appear. ::b. *Jim1 took a picture of him1. – The light verb ''took'' prohibits the simple pronoun from appearing. ::a. Jim1 took a picture of himself1 to school. – The full verb ''took'' allows the reflexive pronoun to appear. ::b. Jim1 took a picture of him1 to school. – The full verb ''took'' allows the simple pronoun to appear. ::a. Sally1 gave a description of herself1. – The light verb ''gave'' requires the reflexive pronoun to appear. ::b. *Sally1 gave a description of her1. – The light verb ''gave'' prohibits the simple pronoun from appearing. ::a. Sally1 gave me a description of herself1. – The full verb ''gave'' allows the reflexive pronoun to appear ::b. Sally1 gave me a description of her1. – The full verb ''gave'' allows the simple pronoun to appear. The indices indicate coreference, i.e. the two coindexed words denote the same person. The reflexive pronoun must appear with the light verb, whereas the full verb allows the simple pronoun to appear as well. This distinction has to do with the extent of the predicate. The main predicate reaches down into the noun phrase when the light verb appears, whereas it excludes the noun phrase when the full verb is present.Compositionality in terms of catenae
Light-verb constructions present the same difficulty associated with idiosyncratic expressions of every sort: the meaning is not compositional in a straightforward way. This fact is evident in the examples above, inasmuch as the words that constitute a light-verb construction often do ''not'' qualify as aIn other languages
Examples in other languages include theAustralian Languages
A significant proportion ofBardi
One such Australian language with prevalent uses of light verbs is Bardi, aJingulu
Typically, in languages with coverb+light-verb predicates, these words must be directly adjacent; however, in extremely rare cases in languages such as Jingulu, there can be intervening elements between the semantically-rich preverb and the inflected matrix verb. See the following example where the subject ''ngaya'' appears between the preverb ''ambaya'' 'speak' and the inflected main verb ''nu'' 'do.' This rare but significant phenomenon provides evidence that, even in more heavily agglutinating languages like Jingulu wherein the main verb may not be morphologically independent from the preverb, these are in fact light verbs and not inflectional affixes.Diachronic considerations
Light verbs are interesting to linguists from a variety of perspectives, including those of diachronic linguistics andSee also
*Notes
References
* Adger, D. 2003. Core syntax: A minimalist approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. * Butt, M. 2003. The Light Verb Jungle. In Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics, ed. G. Aygen, C. Bowern, and C. Quinn. 1–49. Volume 9, Papers from the GSAS/Dudley House workshop on light verbs. * Collins Cobuild English Grammar 1995. London: HarperCollins Publishers. * Grimshaw, J. and A. Mester. 1988. Light verbs and ɵ-Marking. Linguistic Inquiry 19, 205–232. * Hornstein, N., J. Nunes, and K. Grohmann 2005. Understanding Minimalism. New York: Cambridge University Press. * Jespersen, O. 1965. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part VI, Morphology. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd. * Osborne, T. and T. Groß 2012. Constructions are catenae: Construction Grammar meets Dependency Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 23, 1, 163–214. * * * * Steven, S., A. Fazly, and R.North. 2004. Statistical measures of the semi-productivity of light verb constructions. In ''2nd ACL workshop on multiword expressions: Integrating processing'', pp. 1–8.External links