HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In mathematics, specifically the algebraic theory of
fields Fields may refer to: Music *Fields (band), an indie rock band formed in 2006 *Fields (progressive rock band), a progressive rock band formed in 1971 * ''Fields'' (album), an LP by Swedish-based indie rock band Junip (2010) * "Fields", a song by ...
, a normal basis is a special kind of
basis Basis may refer to: Finance and accounting *Adjusted basis, the net cost of an asset after adjusting for various tax-related items *Basis point, 0.01%, often used in the context of interest rates *Basis trading, a trading strategy consisting of ...
for Galois extensions of finite degree, characterised as forming a single orbit for the Galois group. The normal basis theorem states that any finite Galois extension of fields has a normal basis. In
algebraic number theory Algebraic number theory is a branch of number theory that uses the techniques of abstract algebra to study the integers, rational numbers, and their generalizations. Number-theoretic questions are expressed in terms of properties of algebraic ob ...
, the study of the more refined question of the existence of a normal integral basis is part of Galois module theory.


Normal basis theorem

Let F\subset K be a Galois extension with Galois group G. The classical normal basis theorem states that there is an element \beta\in K such that \ forms a basis of ''K'', considered as a vector space over ''F''. That is, any element \alpha \in K can be written uniquely as \alpha = \sum_ a_g\, g(\beta) for some elements a_g\in F. A normal basis contrasts with a primitive element basis of the form \, where \beta\in K is an element whose minimal polynomial has degree n= :F/math>.


Group representation point of view

A field extension K/F with Galois group ''G'' can be naturally viewed as a representation of the group ''G'' over the field ''F'' in which each automorphism is represented by itself. Representations of ''G'' over the field ''F'' can be viewed as left modules for the group algebra F /math>. Every homomorphism of left F /math>-modules \phi:F rightarrow K is of form \phi(r) = r\beta for some \beta \in K. Since \ is a linear basis of F /math> over ''F'', it follows easily that \phi is bijective iff \beta generates a normal basis of ''K'' over ''F''. The normal basis theorem therefore amounts to the statement saying that if K/F is finite Galois extension, then K \cong F /math> as left F /math>-module. In terms of representations of ''G'' over ''F'', this means that ''K'' is isomorphic to the regular representation.


Case of finite fields

For finite fields this can be stated as follows: Let F = \mathrm(q)=\mathbb_q denote the field of ''q'' elements, where ''q = pm'' is a prime power, and let K= \mathrm(q^n)=\mathbb_ denote its extension field of degree ''n'' ≥ 1. Here the Galois group is G = \text(K/F) = \ with \Phi^n = 1, a cyclic group generated by the ''q''-power Frobenius automorphism \Phi(\alpha)=\alpha^q,with \Phi^n = 1 =\mathrm_K. Then there exists an element such that \ \ = \ \ is a basis of ''K'' over ''F''.


Proof for finite fields

In case the Galois group is cyclic as above, generated by \Phi with \Phi^n=1, the Normal Basis Theorem follows from two basic facts. The first is the linear independence of characters: a ''multiplicative'' ''character'' is a mapping ''χ'' from a group ''H'' to a field ''K'' satisfying \chi(h_1h_2)=\chi(h_1)\chi(h_2); then any distinct characters \chi_1,\chi_2,\ldots are linearly independent in the ''K''-vector space of mappings. We apply this to the Galois group automorphisms \chi_i=\Phi^i: K \to K, thought of as mappings from the multiplicative group H=K^\times. Now K\cong F^nas an ''F''-vector space, so we may consider \Phi : F^n\to F^n as an element of the matrix algebra M_n(F); since its powers 1,\Phi,\ldots,\Phi^ are linearly independent (over ''K'' and a fortiori over ''F''), its minimal polynomial must have degree at least ''n'', i.e. it must be X^n-1. The second basic fact is the classification of finitely generated modules over a PID such as F /math>. Every such module ''M'' can be represented as M \cong\bigoplus_^k \frac, where f_i(X) may be chosen so that they are monic polynomials or zero and f_(X) is a multiple of f_i(X). f_k(X) is the monic polynomial of smallest degree annihilating the module, or zero if no such non-zero polynomial exists. In the first case \dim_F M = \sum_^k \deg f_i, in the second case \dim_F M = \infty. In our case of cyclic ''G'' of size ''n'' generated by \Phi we have an ''F''-algebra isomorphism F cong \frac where ''X'' corresponds to 1 \cdot \Phi, so every F /math>-module may be viewed as an F /math>-module with multiplication by ''X'' being multiplication by 1\cdot\Phi. In case of ''K'' this means X\alpha = \Phi(\alpha), so the monic polynomial of smallest degree annihilating ''K'' is the minimal polynomial of \Phi. Since ''K'' is a finite dimensional ''F''-space, the representation above is possible with f_k(X)=X^n-1. Since \dim_F(K) = n, we can only have k=1, and K \cong \frac as F /math>-modules. (Note this is an isomorphism of ''F''-linear spaces, but ''not'' of rings or ''F''-algebras!) This gives isomorphism of F /math>-modules K\cong F /math> that we talked about above, and under it the basis \ on the right side corresponds to a normal basis \ of ''K'' on the left. Note that this proof would also apply in the case of a cyclic Kummer extension.


Example

Consider the field K=\mathrm(2^3)=\mathbb_ over F=\mathrm(2)=\mathbb_, with Frobenius automorphism \Phi(\alpha)=\alpha^2. The proof above clarifies the choice of normal bases in terms of the structure of ''K'' as a representation of ''G'' (or ''F'' 'G''module). The irreducible factorization X^n-1 \ =\ X^3-1\ = \ (X1)(X^2X1) \ \in\ F /math> means we have a direct sum of ''F'' 'G''modules (by the
Chinese remainder theorem In mathematics, the Chinese remainder theorem states that if one knows the remainders of the Euclidean division of an integer ''n'' by several integers, then one can determine uniquely the remainder of the division of ''n'' by the product of the ...
):K\ \cong\ \frac \ \cong\ \frac \oplus \frac. The first component is just F\subset K, while the second is isomorphic as an ''F'' 'G''module to \mathbb_ \cong \mathbb_2 (X^2X1) under the action \Phi\cdot X^i = X^. (Thus K \cong \mathbb F_2\oplus \mathbb F_4 as ''F'' 'G''modules, but ''not'' as ''F''-algebras.) The elements \beta\in K which can be used for a normal basis are precisely those outside either of the submodules, so that (\Phi1)(\beta)\neq 0 and (\Phi^2\Phi1)(\beta)\neq 0. In terms of the ''G''-orbits of ''K'', which correspond to the irreducible factors of: t^-t \ = \ t(t1)\left(t^3 + t + 1\right)\left(t^3 + t^2 + 1\right)\ \in\ F the elements of F=\mathbb_2 are the roots of t(t1), the nonzero elements of the submodule \mathbb_4 are the roots of t^3+t+1, while the normal basis, which in this case is unique, is given by the roots of the remaining factor t^3t^21. By contrast, for the extension field L = \mathrm(2^4)=\mathbb_ in which ''n'' = 4 is divisible by ''p'' = 2, we have the ''F'' 'G''module isomorphism L \ \cong\ \mathbb_2 (X^41)\ =\ \mathbb_2 (X1)^4. Here the operator \Phi\cong X is not
diagonalizable In linear algebra, a square matrix A is called diagonalizable or non-defective if it is similar to a diagonal matrix, i.e., if there exists an invertible matrix P and a diagonal matrix D such that or equivalently (Such D are not unique.) F ...
, the module ''L'' has nested submodules given by generalized eigenspaces of \Phi, and the normal basis elements ''β'' are those outside the largest proper generalized eigenspace, the elements with (\Phi1)^3(\beta)\neq 0.


Application to cryptography

The normal basis is frequently used in
cryptographic Cryptography, or cryptology (from grc, , translit=kryptós "hidden, secret"; and ''graphein'', "to write", or ''-logia'', "study", respectively), is the practice and study of techniques for secure communication in the presence of adver ...
applications based on the
discrete logarithm problem In mathematics, for given real numbers ''a'' and ''b'', the logarithm log''b'' ''a'' is a number ''x'' such that . Analogously, in any group ''G'', powers ''b'k'' can be defined for all integers ''k'', and the discrete logarithm log''b ...
, such as
elliptic curve cryptography Elliptic-curve cryptography (ECC) is an approach to public-key cryptography based on the algebraic structure of elliptic curves over finite fields. ECC allows smaller keys compared to non-EC cryptography (based on plain Galois fields) to provid ...
, since arithmetic using a normal basis is typically more computationally efficient than using other bases. For example, in the field K=\mathrm(2^3)=\mathbb_ above, we may represent elements as bit-strings: \alpha \ =\ (a_2,a_1,a_0)\ =\ a_2\Phi^2(\beta) + a_1\Phi(\beta)+a_0\beta\ =\ a_2\beta^4 + a_1\beta^2 +a_0\beta, where the coefficients are bits a_i\in \mathrm(2)=\. Now we can square elements by doing a left circular shift, \alpha^2=\Phi(a_2,a_1,a_0) = (a_1,a_0,a_2), since squaring ''β''4 gives ''β''8 = ''β''. This makes the normal basis especially attractive for cryptosystems that utilize frequent squaring.


Proof for the case of infinite fields

Suppose K/F is a finite Galois extension of the infinite field ''F''. Let :F= n, \text(K/F) = G =\, where \sigma_1 = \text. By the
primitive element theorem In field theory, the primitive element theorem is a result characterizing the finite degree field extensions that can be generated by a single element. Such a generating element is called a primitive element of the field extension, and the extens ...
there exists \alpha \in K such i\ne j\implies \sigma_i(\alpha)\ne\sigma_j(\alpha) and K=F
alpha Alpha (uppercase , lowercase ; grc, ἄλφα, ''álpha'', or ell, άλφα, álfa) is the first letter of the Greek alphabet. In the system of Greek numerals, it has a value of one. Alpha is derived from the Phoenician letter aleph , whic ...
/math>. Let us write \alpha_i = \sigma_i(\alpha). \alpha's (monic) minimal polynomial ''f'' over ''K'' is the irreducible degree ''n'' polynomial given by the formula\begin f(X) &= \prod_^n(X - \alpha_i) \end Since ''f'' is separable (it has simple roots) we may define \begin g(X) &= \ \frac\\ g_i(X) &= \ \frac =\ \sigma_i(g(X)). \end In other words, \begin g_i(X)&= \prod_\frac\\ g(X)&= g_1(X). \end Note that g(\alpha)=1 and g_i(\alpha)=0 for i \ne 1. Next, define an n \times n matrix ''A'' of polynomials over ''K'' and a polynomial ''D'' by \begin A_(X) &= \sigma_i(\sigma_j(g(X)) = \sigma_i(g_j(X))\\ D(X) &= \det A(X). \end Observe that A_(X) = g_k(X), where ''k'' is determined by \sigma_k = \sigma_i \cdot \sigma_j; in particular k=1 iff \sigma_i = \sigma_j^. It follows that A(\alpha) is the permutation matrix corresponding to the permutation of ''G'' which sends each \sigma_i to \sigma_i^. (We denote by A(\alpha) the matrix obtained by evaluating A(X) at x=\alpha.) Therefore, D(\alpha) = \det A(\alpha) = \pm 1. We see that ''D'' is a non-zero polynomial, and therefore it has only a finite number of roots. Since we assumed ''F'' is infinite, we can find a\in F such that D(a)\ne 0. Define \begin \beta &= g(a) \\ \beta_i &= g_i(a) = \sigma_i(\beta). \end We claim that \ is a normal basis. We only have to show that \beta_1, \ldots,\beta_n are linearly independent over ''F'', so suppose \sum_^n x_j \beta_j = 0 for some x_1...x_n\in F. Applying the automorphism \sigma_i yields \sum_^n x_j \sigma_i(g_j(a)) = 0 for all ''i''. In other words, A(a) \cdot \overline = \overline . Since \det A(a) = D(a) \ne 0, we conclude that \overline x = \overline 0, which completes the proof. It is tempting to take a=\alpha because D(\alpha)\neq0. But this is impermissible because we used the fact that a \in F to conclude that for any ''F''-automorphism \sigma and polynomial h(X) over K the value of the polynomial \sigma(h(X)) at a equals \sigma(h(a)).


Primitive normal basis

A primitive normal basis of an extension of finite fields ''E''/''F'' is a normal basis for ''E''/''F'' that is generated by a primitive element of ''E'', that is a generator of the multiplicative group K^\times. (Note that this is a more restrictive definition of primitive element than that mentioned above after the general Normal Basis Theorem: one requires powers of the element to produce every non-zero element of ''K'', not merely a basis.) Lenstra and Schoof (1987) proved that every finite field extension possesses a primitive normal basis, the case when ''F'' is a prime field having been settled by Harold Davenport.


Free elements

If ''K''/''F'' is a Galois extension and ''x'' in ''K'' generates a normal basis over ''F'', then ''x'' is free in ''K''/''F''. If ''x'' has the property that for every subgroup ''H'' of the Galois group ''G'', with fixed field ''K''''H'', ''x'' is free for ''K''/''K''''H'', then ''x'' is said to be completely free in ''K''/''F''. Every Galois extension has a completely free element.Dirk Hachenberger, ''Completely free elements'', in Cohen & Niederreiter (1996) pp.97-107


See also

* Dual basis in a field extension * Polynomial basis * Zech's logarithm


References

* * * {{Authority control Linear algebra Field (mathematics) Abstract algebra Cryptography