Species
45 species are accepted: *'' Cicer acanthophyllum'' *'' Cicer anatolicum'' *'' Cicer arietinum'' ** ''Cicer arietinum'' subsp. ''arietinum'' - cultivated annual chickpea ** ''Cicer arietinum'' subsp. ''reticulatum''Â (synonym '' Cicer reticulatum'') *'' Cicer atlanticum'' *'' Cicer balcaricum'' *'' Cicer baldshuanicum'' *'' Cicer bijugum'' *'' Cicer canariense'' *'' Cicer chorassanicum'' *'' Cicer cuneatum'' *'' Cicer echinospermum'' *'' Cicer fedtschenkoi'' *'' Cicer flexuosum'' *'' Cicer floribundum'' *'' Cicer graecum'' *'' Cicer grande'' *'' Cicer heterophyllum'' *'' Cicer incanum'' *'' Cicer incisum'' *'' Cicer judaicum'' *'' Cicer kermanense'' *'' Cicer korshinskyi'' *'' Cicer laetum'' *'' Cicer luteum'' *'' Cicer macracanthum'' *'' Cicer microphyllum'' *'' Cicer mogolatvicum'' *'' Cicer montbretii'' *'' Cicer multijugum'' *'' Cicer oxyodon'' *'' Cicer paucijugum'' *'' Cicer pinnatifidum'' *'' Cicer pungens'' *'' Cicer rasulovae'' *'' Cicer rechingeri'' *'' Cicer songaricum'' *'' Cicer spiroceras'' *'' Cicer stapfianum'' *'' Cicer subaphyllum'' *'' Cicer tragacanthoides'' *'' Cicer uludereensis'' *'' Cicer yamashitae''Cultivable species
Currently, the only cultivated species of the genus ''Cicer'' is ''C. arietinum'', commonly known as the chickpea. The wild progenitor of ''C. arietinum'' is '' Cicer reticulatum''. Since the chickpea has descended from this wild plant, there is a possibility that this wild progenitor can offer other forms of edible chickpeas after domestication. In wild chickpea (''C. reticulatum''), a considerable proportion of the mature pods remain intact, and this characteristic leads to the species being described as pre-adapted to domestication. This essentially means that the function of one of its traits can change, or evolve, as the progenitor is domesticated. This implies that traits such as texture, size, and most importantly, nutritional content can be adjusted in this species. Domesticated chickpea is considered vernalization insensitive (it can flower at all times of the year), whereas wild ''C. reticulatum'' shows a considerable flowering advance (of up to 30 days) in response to vernalization—which means that the plant would have to grow in areas where it is exposed to a prolonged period of cold before it can properly grow. Although there is promise for some kind of domestication process to allow for and create new sources of food through ''C. reticulatum'', there are several issues that make domestication of this wild species quite difficult. The first of these problems is that ''C. reticulatum'' may offer only limited adaptive allelic variation for improving the chickpea crop. Also, the narrow range of the ''C. reticulatum'' suggests that the prospects for improving the adaptive range of domesticated chickpea are quite limited. The patchy distribution of the wild plant, the small number of seeds produced per plant, and the relatively low allelic variation within populations (of the wild progenitor) makes germplasm conservation ( conservation of seeds or tissues, otherwise known as the livingResistances of various ''Cicer'' perennials and potential for plant improvement
''Cicer'' perennials harbor great resistances in particular environments in comparison to the resistances of otherEvolution
The genus, ''Cicer'', is composed of many species with different characteristics that make it an interesting candidate for a food crop. Currently, only one species of ''Cicer'', the modern chickpea, is domesticated as a cultivar, but there are many other options researchers are considering for further domestication and expansion into perennial crops. One of the most promising options that could lead to the expansion into perennial crops is hybridization between annual and perennial species. However, hybridization is only possible and/or successful between certain species, which have not been determined. The first step in this expansion is to examine the relationships between perennial and annual species of ''Cicer'' both morphologically and genetically to identify possible candidate species. Unfortunately, research shows stark morphological differences between perennial and annual species of ''Cicer'' which hints at difficulty that could result from attempting to cross these species into a hybridized species. More specifically, a study examining the seed coat morphology at several specific gene loci compared annual and perennial species that showed very distinct differences between the two branches of ''Cicer''. The research was able to create phylogenetic trees tracking the genetic divergence of ''Cicer'' species, and the data indicate "the rapid species differentiation of '' Monocicer'' including adaptation to the disturbed environment," showing much distance between annual species (''Monocicer'') and perennial species of ''Cicer''. Further research into these relationships has been performed to analyze the relatedness of perennial and annual species, both cultivated and wild, at 12 loci to see how closely they are related. The researchers were able to narrow down one perennial species, ''C. incisum'', that was more closely related to annual plants than other perennial species. Research also showed similar results upon genetic and phylogenetic analyses. While most annual and perennial species tend to form monophyletic clades, ''C. incisum'' is an exception to this rule. Another species that occurs outside of the typical monophylies is ''C. cuneatum'', an annual species more closely related to the perennial species ''C. canariense'' than any other annual species. These outsteps in the common trend of the phylogenies indicate that there may be close relatives that present as candidates for further cultivation. There is significant evolutionary distance between the common ancestors of the modern perennial and annual species, but this research gives hope that there may be a possibility of cultivating a perennial species as a food crop.Hybridization
Hybridization, or the reproduction of two species to create distinctive offspring, is especially important in developing new food crops from existing species. Because of the phylogenetic and genetic data studied and produced in the past, a hybrid between perennial and annual ''Cicer'' species is promising. Many steps have been taken to improve the hybridization techniques and results between perennial and annual species, but it has proven difficult to create a viable offspring from these crosses. Not surprisingly, it has been relatively easy to hybridize annuals together and perennials together. Other research has shown some success with crossing specific annual and perennial species of the genus. One particularly successful cross between "the annual ''C. cuneatum'' and perennial ''C. canariense''" showed a "partially fertile with intermediate morphology" F-1 generation. This success, however, is determined by which species provides each gamete and therefore presents some possible difficulties in cultivating the crop further. This cross is especially interesting because it is one of the few partial successes of the perennial and annual crosses, which have proven especially difficult. Furthermore, the species crossed, ''C. cuneatum'' and ''C. canariense'' were previously determined as sister species during evolutionary analysis in previous research. Such research is at the forefront of developing a perennial food crop for ''Cicer'' that is related to its modern cultivar, the chickpea. Perennial crops have an advantage to food production because they are a more sustainable food option than annual crops. As seen, the genetic and evolutionary relationships of the species play a crucial role in developing hybrids between the species, and can be used to determine further relationships.References
External links