alpha recursion theory

In recursion theory, α recursion theory is a generalisation of recursion theory to subsets of admissible ordinals $\alpha$. An admissible set is closed under $\Sigma_1(L_\alpha)$ functions, where $L_\xi$ denotes a rank of Godel's constructible hierarchy. $\alpha$ is an admissible ordinal if $L_$ is a model of Kripke–Platek set theory. In what follows $\alpha$ is considered to be fixed.

The objects of study in $\alpha$ recursion are subsets of $\alpha$. These sets are said to have some properties:
*A set $A\subseteq\alpha$ is said to be $\alpha$-recursively-enumerable if it is $\Sigma_1$ definable over $L_\alpha$, possibly with parameters from $L_\alpha$ in the definition.
*A is $\alpha$-recursive if both A and $\alpha \setminus A$ (its relative complement in $\alpha$) are $\alpha$-recursively-enumerable. It's of note that $\alpha$-recursive sets are members of $L_$ by definition of $L$.
*Members of $L_\alpha$ are called $\alpha$-finite and play a similar role to the finite numbers in classical recursion theory.
*Members of $L_$ are called $\alpha$-arithmetic.

There are also some similar definitions for functions mapping $\alpha$ to $\alpha$:Srebrny, Marian
Relatively constructible transitive models
(1975, p.165). Accessed 21 October 2021.
*A function mapping $\alpha$ to $\alpha$ is $\alpha$-recursively-enumerable, or $\alpha$-partial recursive, iff its graph is $\Sigma_1$-definable in $(L_\alpha,\in)$.
*A function mapping $\alpha$ to $\alpha$ is $\alpha$-recursive iff its graph is $\Delta_1$-definable in $(L_\alpha,\in)$.
*Additionally, a function mapping $\alpha$ to $\alpha$ is $\alpha$-arithmetical iff there exists some $n\in\omega$ such that the function's graph is $\Sigma_n$-definable in $(L_\alpha,\in)$.

Additional connections between recursion theory and α recursion theory can be drawn, although explicit definitions may not have yet been written to formalize them:
*The functions $\Delta_0$-definable in $(L_\alpha,\in)$ play a role similar to those of the primitive recursive functions.

We say R is a reduction procedure if it is $\alpha$ recursively enumerable and every member of R is of the form $\langle H,J,K \rangle$ where ''H'', ''J'', ''K'' are all α-finite.

''A'' is said to be α-recursive in ''B'' if there exist $R_0,R_1$ reduction procedures such that:

: K \subseteq A \leftrightarrow \exists H: \exists J: langle H,J,K \rangle \in R_0 \wedge H \subseteq B \wedge J \subseteq \alpha / B

: K \subseteq \alpha / A \leftrightarrow \exists H: \exists J: langle H,J,K \rangle \in R_1 \wedge H \subseteq B \wedge J \subseteq \alpha / B

If ''A'' is recursive in ''B'' this is written $\scriptstyle A \le_\alpha B$. By this definition ''A'' is recursive in $\scriptstyle\varnothing$ (the empty set) if and only if ''A'' is recursive. However A being recursive in B is not equivalent to A being \Sigma_1(L_\alpha .

We say ''A'' is regular if $\forall \beta \in \alpha: A \cap \beta \in L_\alpha$ or in other words if every initial portion of ''A'' is α-finite.

Results in α recursion

Shore's splitting theorem: Let A be $\alpha$ recursively enumerable and regular. There exist $\alpha$ recursively enumerable $B_0,B_1$ such that $A=B_0 \cup B_1 \wedge B_0 \cap B_1 = \varnothing \wedge A \not\le_\alpha B_i (i<2).$

Shore's density theorem: Let ''A'', ''C'' be α-regular recursively enumerable sets such that $\scriptstyle A <_\alpha C$ then there exists a regular α-recursively enumerable set ''B'' such that $\scriptstyle A <_\alpha B <_\alpha C$.

Barwise has proved that the sets $\Sigma_1$-definable on $L_$ are exactly the sets $\Pi_1^1$-definable on $L_\alpha$, where $\alpha^+$ denotes the next admissible ordinal above $\alpha$, and $\Sigma$ is from the Levy hierarchy.

Relationship to analysis

Some results in $\alpha$-recursion can be translated into similar results about second-order arithmetic. This is because of the relationship $L$ has with the ramified analytic hierarchy, an analog of $L$ for the language of second-order arithmetic, that consists of sets of integers.

In fact, when dealing with first-order logic only, the correspondence can be close enough that for some results on $L_\omega=\textrm{HF}$, the arithmetical and Levy hierarchies can become interchangeable. For example, a set of natural numbers is definable by a $\Sigma_1^0$ formula iff it's $\Sigma_1$-definable on $L_\omega$, where $\Sigma_1$ is a level of the Levy hierarchy. More generally, definability of a subset of ω over HF with a $\Sigma_n$ formuls coincides with its arithmetical definability using a $\Sigma_n^0$ formula.P. Odifreddi, ''Classical Recursion Theory'' (1989), theorem IV.3.22.

References

* Gerald Sacks, ''Higher recursion theory'', Springer Verlag, 1990 https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.pl/1235422631
* Robert Soare, ''Recursively Enumerable Sets and Degrees'', Springer Verlag, 1987 https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.bams/1183541465
* Keith J. Devlin
''An introduction to the fine structure of the constructible hierarchy''
(p.38), North-Holland Publishing, 1974
* J. Barwise, ''Admissible Sets and Structures''. 1975

Inline references

Computability theory