vocative

In grammar, the vocative case (abbreviated ) is a grammatical case which is used for a noun that identifies a person (animal, object, etc.) being addressed or occasionally for the noun modifiers (determiners, adjectives, participles, and numerals) of that noun. A vocative expression is an expression of direct address by which the identity of the party spoken to is set forth expressly within a sentence. For example, in the sentence "I don't know, John," ''John'' is a vocative expression that indicates the party being addressed, as opposed to the sentence "I don't know John", in which "John" is the direct object of the verb "know".

Historically, the vocative case was an element of the Indo-European case system and existed in Latin, Sanskrit, and Ancient Greek. In many modern Indo-European languages (English, Spanish, etc.) the vocative case has been absorbed by the nominative, but others still distinguish it, including the Baltic languages, some Celtic languages and most Slavic languages. Some linguists, such as , argue that the vocative form is not a case but a special form of nouns not belonging to any case, as vocative expressions are not related syntactically to other words in sentences.''Реформатский А. А.'' Введение в языковедение / Под ред. В. А. Виноградова. — М.: Аспект Пресс. 1998. С. 488. Pronouns usually lack vocative forms.

Indo-European languages

Comparison

Distinct vocative forms are assumed to have existed in all early Indo-European languages and survive in some. Here is, for example, the Indo-European word for "wolf" in various languages:

The elements separated with hyphens denote the stem, the so-called thematic vowel of the case and the actual suffix. In Latin, for example, the nominative case is and the vocative case is , but the accusative case is . The asterisks before the Proto-Indo-European words means that they are theoretical reconstructions and are not attested in a written source. The symbol ◌̩ (vertical line below) indicates a consonant serving as a vowel (it should appear directly below the "l" or "r" in these examples but may appear after them on some systems from issues of font display). All final consonants were lost in Proto-Slavic, so both the nominative and vocative Old Church Slavonic forms do not have true endings, only reflexes of the old thematic vowels.

The vocative ending changes the stem consonant in Old Church Slavonic because of the so-called First Palatalization. Most modern Slavic languages that retain the vocative case have altered the ending to avoid the change: Bulgarian occurs far more frequently than .

Baltic languages

Lithuanian

The vocative is distinct in singular and identical to the nominative in the plural, for all inflected nouns. Nouns with a nominative singular ending in ''-a'' have a vocative singular usually identically written but distinct in accentuation.

In Lithuanian, the form that a given noun takes depends on its declension class and, sometimes, on its gender. There have been several changes in history, the last being the ''-ai'' ending formed between the 18th and 19th centuries. The older forms are listed under "other forms".

Some nouns of the e- and a- stems declensions (both proper ones and not) are stressed differently: "aikštė": "aikšte!" (''square''); "tauta": "tauta!". In addition, nouns of e-stems have an ablaut of long vowel ė in nominative and short vowel e in vocative. In pronunciation, ė is close-mid vowel , and e is open-mid vowel .

The vocative of diminutive nouns with the suffix ''-(i)ukas'' most frequently has no ending: ''broliùk'' "brother!", etc. A less frequent alternative is the ending ''-ai'', which is also slightly dialectal: ''broliùkai'', etc.

Colloquially, some personal names with a masculine ''-(i)(j)o'' stem and diminutives with the suffixes ''-elis, -ėlis'' have an alternative vocative singular form characterized by a zero ending (i.e. the stem alone acts as the voc. sg.): ''Adõm'' "Adam!" in addition to ''Adõmai'', ''Mýkol'' "Michael!" in addition to ''Mýkolai'', ''vaikẽl'' "kid!" in addition to ''vaikẽli'', etc.

Celtic languages

Goidelic languages

=Irish

=
The vocative case in Irish operates in a similar fashion to Scottish Gaelic. The principal marker is the vocative particle , which causes lenition of the following initial letter.

In the singular there is no special form, except for first declension nouns. These are masculine nouns that end in a broad (non-palatal) consonant, which is made slender (palatal) to build the singular vocative (as well as the singular genitive and plural nominative). Adjectives are also lenited. In many cases this means that (in the singular) masculine vocative expressions resemble the genitive and feminine vocative expressions resemble the nominative.

The vocative plural is usually the same as the nominative plural except, again, for first declension nouns. In the standard language first declension nouns show the vocative plural by adding . In the spoken dialects the vocative plural is often has the same form as the nominative plural (as with the nouns of other declensions) or the dative plural (e.g. = Men!)

=Scottish Gaelic

=
The vocative case in Scottish Gaelic follows the same basic pattern as Irish. The vocative case causes lenition of the initial consonant of nouns. Lenition changes the initial sound of the word (or name).

In addition, masculine nouns are slenderized if possible (that is, in writing, an 'i' is inserted before the final consonant) This also changes the pronunciation of the word.

Also, the particle is placed before the noun unless it begins with a vowel (or f followed immediately by a vowel, which becomes silent when lenited). Examples of the use of the vocative personal names (as in Irish):

The name "Hamish" is just the English spelling of (the vocative of and pronounced ), and thus is actually a Gaelic vocative. Likewise, the name "Vairi" is an English spelling of , the vocative for .

=Manx

=
The basic pattern is similar to Irish and Scottish. The vocative is confined to personal names, in which it is common. Foreign names (not of Manx origin) are not used in the vocative. The vocative case causes lenition of the initial consonant of names. It can be used with the particle "".

The name is actually the Manx vocative of (Mary).

Brythonic languages

=Welsh

=

Welsh lacks case declension but marks vocative constructions by lenition of the initial consonant of the word, with no obligatory particle. Despite its use being less common, it is still used in formal address: the common phrase means "gentlemen and ladies", with the initial consonant of undergoing a soft mutation; the same is true of (" earfriends") in which has been lenited. It is often used to draw attention to at public notices orally and written – teachers will say "" (mutation of ) and signage such as one right show mutation of to draw attention to the importance of the notice.

Germanic languages

English

The vocative is not a grammatical case in English. Expressions for which the vocative would be used in languages which have that case, are nominative in English. In translations of languages that use the vocative case, translators have added the particle "O" before the noun, as is often seen in the King James Version of the Bible: for example the Greek ''ὀλιγόπιστοι'', vocative masculine plural, (in Matthew 8:26) is translated "O ye of little faith". While it is not strictly archaic, it is sometimes used to "archaeise" speech; it is often seen as very formal, and sees use in rhetoric and poetry, or as a comedic device to subvert modern speech. Another example is the recurrent use of the phrase "O (my) Best Beloved" by Rudyard Kipling in his '' Just So Stories''. The use of ''O'' may be considered a form of clitic and should not be confused with the interjection ''oh''. However, as the Oxford English Dictionary points out, "O" and "oh" were originally used interchangeably.

Modern English commonly uses the objective case for vocative expressions but sets them off from the rest of the sentences with pauses as interjections, rendered in writing as commas (the vocative comma). Two common examples of vocative expressions in English are the phrases "Mr. President" and "Madam Chairwoman".

Some traditional texts use ''Jesu'', the Latin vocative form of ''Jesus''. One of the best-known examples is '' Jesu, Joy of Man's Desiring''.

German dialects

In some German dialects, like the Ripuarian dialect of Cologne, it is common to use the (gender-appropriate) article before a person's name. In the vocative phrase then the article is, as in Venetian and Catalan, omitted. Thus, the determiner precedes nouns in all cases except the vocative. Any noun not preceded by an article or other determiner is in the vocative case. It is most often used to address someone or some group of living beings, usually in conjunction with an imperative construct. It can also be used to address dead matter as if the matter could react or to tell something astonishing or just happening such as "Your nose is dripping."

Colognian examples:

Icelandic

The vocative case generally does not appear in Icelandic, but a few words retain an archaic vocative declension from Latin, such as the word , which is in the vocative. That comes from Latin, as the Latin for Jesus in the nominative is and its vocative is .
That is also the case in traditional English (without the accent) (see above):

The native words and also sometimes appear in the shortened forms and in vocative phrases. Additionally, adjectives in vocative phrases are always weakly declined, but elsewhere with proper nouns, they would usually be declined strongly:

Norwegian

Nouns in Norwegian are not inflected for the vocative case, but adjectives qualifying those nouns are; adjectival adjuncts modifying vocative nouns are inflected for the definite (see: Norwegian language#Adjectives). The definite and plural inflections are in most cases identical, so it is more easily observable with adjectives that inflect for plural and definite differently, e.g. being when definite, but when plural, an instance of suppletion.

In several Norwegian dialects, north of an isogloss running from Oslo to Bergen, names in argument position are associated with proprial articles, e.g. gendered pronouns such as or , which either precede or follow the noun in question. This is not the case when in vocative constructions.

Greek

In Ancient Greek, the vocative case is usually identical to the nominative case, with the exception of first-declension masculine nouns (ending in -ας or -ης), second-declension non-neuter nouns (ending in -ος) and third-declension non-neuter nouns.

In the first declension, masculines in -ᾱς have the vocative in -ᾱ (νεᾱνίᾱ); those in -της have -ᾰ (πολῖτα), all others in -ης have -η (Ἀτρείδη) except names of nations and compounds: Πέρσᾰ, Σκύθᾰ, γεω-μέτρᾰ, παιδο-τρίβᾰ. has a recessive accent vocative . Second-declension masculine and feminine nouns have a regular vocative ending in -ε. Third-declension nouns with one syllable ending in -ς have a vocative that is identical to the nominative (, night); otherwise, the stem (with necessary alterations, such as dropping final consonants) serves as the vocative (nom. , voc. ; nom. , gen. , voc. ). Irregular vocatives exist as well, such as nom. Σωκράτης, voc. Σώκρατες.

In Modern Greek, second-declension masculine nouns still have a vocative ending in -ε. However, the accusative case is often used as a vocative in informal speech for a limited number of nouns, and always used for certain modern Greek person names: "" "Come here, Christos" instead of "". Other nominal declensions use the same form in the vocative as the accusative in formal or informal speech, with the exception of learned '' Katharevousa'' forms that are inherited from Ancient Greek (Demotic , "Greek man"), which have the same nominative and vocative forms instead.

Iranian languages

Kurdish

Kurdish has a vocative case. For instance, in the dialect of Kurmanji, it is created by adding the suffix at the end of masculine words and the suffix at the end of feminine ones. In the Jafi dialect of Sorani it is created by adding the suffix of at the end of names.

Instead of the vocative case, forms of address may be created by using the grammatical particles (feminine) and (masculine):

Indo-Aryan languages

Hindi-Urdu

In Hindi-Urdu ( Hindustani), the vocative case has the same form as the nominative case for all singular nouns except for the singular masculine nouns that terminate in the vowel and for all nouns in their plural forms the vocative case is always distinct from the nominative case. Adjectives in ''Hindi-Urdu'' also have a vocative case form. In the absence of a noun argument, some adjectives decline like masculine nouns that do not end in . The vocative case has many similarities with the oblique case in Hindustani.

Sanskrit

In Sanskrit, the vocative ( ) has the same form as the nominative except in the singular. In vowel-stem nouns, if there is a in the nominative, it is omitted and the stem vowel may be altered: and become , becomes , and become short and becomes . Consonant-stem nouns have no ending in the vocative:

The vocative form is the same as the nominative except in the masculine and feminine singular.

Slavic languages

Old Church Slavonic

Old Church Slavonic has a distinct vocative case for many stems of singular masculine and feminine nouns, otherwise it is identical to the nominative. When different from the nominative, the vocative is simply formed from the nominative by appending either ( : ) or ( : ), but occasionally ( : , : , : ) and ( : , : , : , : ) appear. Nouns ending with have a vocative ending of ( : , : ), likewise nouns ending with assume the vocative suffix ( : ). This is similar to Greek, Latin, Lithuanian, and Sanskrit, which also employ the ''-e'' suffix in vocatives.

Bulgarian

Unlike most other Slavic languages, Bulgarian has lost case marking for nouns. However, Bulgarian preserves vocative forms. Traditional male names usually have a vocative ending.

More-recent names and foreign names may have a vocative form but it is rarely used (, instead of simply Richard, sounds unusual or humorous to native speakers).

Vocative phrases like (Mr. Minister) have been almost completely replaced by nominative forms, especially in official writing. Proper nouns usually also have vocative forms, but they are used less frequently. Here are some proper nouns that are frequently used in vocative:

Vocative case forms also normally exist for female given names:

Except for forms that end in -, they are considered rude and are normally avoided. For female kinship terms, the vocative is always used:

Czech

In Czech, the vocative (, or – ) usually differs from the nominative in masculine and feminine nouns in the singular.

In older common Czech (19th century), vocative form was sometimes replaced by nominative form in case of female names () and in case of male nouns past a title (, , ). This phenomenon was caused mainly by the German influence, and almost disappeared from the modern Czech. It can be felt as rude, discourteous or uncultivated, or as familiar, and is associated also with Slovakian influence (from the Czechoslovak Army) or Russian. In informal speech, it is common (but grammatically incorrect) to use the male surname (see also Czech name) in the nominative to address men: ''pane Novák!'' instead of ''pane Nováku!'' (Female surnames are adjectives, and their nominative and vocative have the same form: see Czech declension.) Using the vocative is strongly recommended in official and written styles.

Polish

In Polish, the vocative () is formed with feminine nouns usually taking except those that end in , , , and , which take , and those that end in , which take . Masculine nouns generally follow the complex pattern of the locative case, with the exception of a handful of words such as , and . Neuter nouns and all plural nouns have the same form in the nominative and the vocative:

{, class="wikitable"
! Nominative case
! Vocative case
! Gloss
, -
! colspan=3 , Feminine
, -
,
,
,
, -
,
,
, {{gloss, diminutive form of {{lang, pl, Ewa)
, -
, {{lang, pl, ciemność
, {{lang, pl, ciemności!
, {{gloss, darkness
, -
, {{lang, pl, książka
, {{lang, pl, książko!
, {{gloss, book
, -
! colspan=3 , Masculine
, -
, {{lang, pl, Pan profesor
, {{lang, pl, Panie profesorze!
, {{gloss, Mr. Professor
, -
, {{lang, pl, Krzysztof
, {{lang, pl, Krzysztofie!
, {{gloss, Christopher!
, -
, {{lang, pl, Krzyś
, {{lang, pl, Krzysiu!
, {{gloss, Chris
, -
, {{lang, pl, wilk
, {{lang, pl, wilku!
, {{gloss, wolf
, -
, {{lang, pl, człowiek
, {{lang, pl, człowieku!
{{lang, pl, człowiecze! (poetic)
, {{gloss, human

The latter form of the vocative of {{lang, pl, człowiek {{gloss, human is now considered poetical.

The nominative is increasingly used instead of the vocative to address people with their proper names. In other contexts the vocative remains prevalent. It is used:
*To address an individual with the function, title, other attribute, family role
**{{lang, pl, Panie doktorze (Doctor!), {{lang, pl, Panie prezesie! (Chairman!)
**{{lang, pl, Przybywasz za późno, pływaku (You arrive too late, swimmer)
**{{lang, pl, synu (son), {{lang, pl, mamo (mum), {{lang, pl, tato (dad)
*After adjectives, demonstrative pronouns and possessive pronouns
**{{lang, pl, Nie rozumiesz mnie, moja droga Basiu! (You don't understand me, my dear Basia!)
*To address an individual in an offensive or condescending manner:
**{{lang, pl, Zamknij się, pajacu! ("Shut up, you buffoon!")
**{{lang, pl, Co się gapisz, idioto? ("What are you staring at, idiot?")
**{{lang, pl, Nie znasz się, baranie, to nie pisz! ("Stop writing, idiot, you don't know what you're doing!")
**{{lang, pl, Spadaj, wieśniaku! ("Get lost, hillbilly!")
*After "Ty" (second person singular pronoun)
**{{lang, pl, Ty kłamczuchu! (You liar!)
*Set expressions:
**{{lang, pl, (O) Matko!, (O) Boże!, chłopie

The vocative is also often employed in affectionate and endearing contexts such as {{lang, pl, Kocham Cię, Krzysiu! ("I love you, Chris!") or {{lang, pl, Tęsknię za Tobą, moja Żono ("I miss you, my wife."). In addition, the vocative form sometimes takes the place of the nominative in informal conversations: {{lang, pl, Józiu przyszedł instead of {{lang, pl, Józio przyszedł ("Joey's arrived"). When referring to someone by their first name, the nominative commonly takes the place of the vocative as well: {{lang, pl, Ania, chodź tu! instead of {{lang, pl, Aniu, chodź tu! ("Anne, come here!").

Russian

=Historic vocative

=
The historic Slavic vocative has been lost in Russian and is now used only in archaic expressions. Several of them, mostly of Old Church Slavonic origin, are common in colloquial Russian: "{{lang, ru, Боже!, italic=no" ({{Transliteration, ru, Bože, vocative of "{{lang, ru, Бог, italic=no" {{Transliteration, ru, Bog, "God") and "{{lang, ru, Боже мой!, italic=no" ({{Transliteration, ru, Bože moj, "My God!"), and "{{lang, ru, Господи!, italic=no" ({{Transliteration, ru, Gospodi, vocative of "{{lang, ru, Господь, italic=no" {{Transliteration, ru, Gospodj, "Lord"), which can also be expressed as "{{lang, ru, Господи Иисусе!, italic=no" ({{Transliteration, ru, Gospodi Iisuse!, {{Transliteration, ru, Iisuse vocative of "{{lang, ru, Иисус, italic=no" {{Transliteration, ru, Iisus, "Jesus"). The vocative is also used in prayers: "{{lang, ru, Отче наш!, italic=no" ({{Transliteration, ru, Otče naš, "Our Father!"), or the Russian version of the Jesus Prayer ("Господи Иисусе Христе"). Such expressions are used to express strong emotions (much like English "O my God!"), and are often combined ("{{lang, ru, Господи, Боже мой, italic=no"). More examples of the historic vocative can be found in other Biblical quotes that are sometimes used as proverbs: "{{lang, ru, Врачу, исцелися сам, italic=no" ({{Transliteration, ru, Vraču, iscelisia sam, "Physician, heal thyself", nom. "{{lang, ru, врач, italic=no", {{Transliteration, ru, vrač). Vocative forms are also used in modern Church Slavonic. The patriarch and bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church are addressed as "{{lang, ru, владыко, italic=no" ({{Transliteration, ru, vladyko, hegemon, nom. "{{lang, ru, владыка, italic=no", {{Transliteration, ru, vladyka). In the latter case, the vocative is often also incorrectly used for the nominative to refer to bishops and patriarchs. These Old Church Slavonic words that are present in the current Russian language are known as "fossil words".

=New vocative

=
In modern colloquial Russian, given names and a small family of terms often take a special "shortened" form that some linguists consider to be a re-emerging vocative case. It is used only for given names and nouns that end in {{lang, ru, -a, italic=no and {{lang, ru, -я, italic=no, which are sometimes dropped in the vocative form: "{{lang, ru, Лен, где ты?, italic=no" ("Lena, where are you?"). It is basically equivalent to "{{lang, ru, Лена, где ты?, italic=no" but suggests a positive personal and emotional bond between the speaker and the person being addressed. Names that end in {{lang, ru, -я, italic=no then acquire a soft sign: "{{lang, ru, Оль!, italic=no" = "{{lang, ru, Оля!, italic=no" ("Olga!"). In addition to given names, the form is often used with words like "{{lang, ru, мама, italic=no" (mom) and "{{lang, ru, папа, italic=no" (dad), which would be respectively shortened to "{{lang, ru, мам, italic=no" and "{{lang, ru, пап, italic=no". The plural form is used with words such as "{{lang, ru, ребят, italic=no", "{{lang, ru, девчат, italic=no" (nom: "{{lang, ru, ребята, italic=no", "{{lang, ru, девчата, italic=no" guys, gals).

Such usage differs from the historic vocative, which would be "{{lang, ru, Лено, italic=no" and is not related.

Serbo-Croatian

In Serbo-Croatian languages, distinct vocatives exist only for singular masculine and feminine nouns. Nouns of the neuter gender and all nouns in plural have a vocative equal to the nominative. All vocative suffixes known from Old Church Slavonic also exist in Serbo-Croatian.{{cite book , last1= Barić , first1= Eugenija , last2= Lončarić , first2= Mijo , last3= Malić , first3= Dragica , last4= Pavešić , first4= Slavko , last5= Peti , first5= Mirko , last6= Zečević , first6= Vesna , last7= Znika , first7= Marija , title= Hrvatska gramatika , publisher= Školska knjiga , year= 1997 , isbn= 953-0-40010-1

The vocative in Serbo-Croatian is formed according to one of three types of declension, which are classes of nouns with the same declension suffixes.

= First declension

=
The first declension comprises masculine nouns that end with a consonant. These have a vocative suffix of either {{lang, sh, -e ({{lang, sh, doktor : doktore {{gloss, doctor) or {{lang, sh, -u ({{lang, sh, gospodar : gospodaru {{gloss, master).

Nouns terminating in {{lang, sh, -or have the {{lang, sh, -e vocative suffix: {{lang, sh, doktor : doktore {{gloss, doctor, {{lang, sh, major : majore {{gloss, major, {{lang, sh, majstor : majstore {{gloss, artisan, as well as nouns possessing an unsteady {{lang, sh, a: {{lang, sh, vetar : vetre {{gloss, wind, {{lang, sh, svekar : svekre {{gloss, father-in-law, and the noun {{lang, sh, car : care {{gloss, emperor. All other nouns in this class form the vocative with {{lang, sh, -u: {{lang, sh, gospodar : gospodaru {{gloss, master, {{lang, sh, pastir : pastiru {{gloss, shepherd, {{lang, sh, inženjer : inženjeru {{gloss, engineer, {{lang, sh, pisar : pisaru {{gloss, scribe, {{lang, sh, sekretar : sekretaru {{gloss, secretary.

In particular, masculine nouns ending with a palatal or prepalatal consonant {{lang, sh, j, lj, nj, č, dž, ć, đ or {{lang, sh, š form vocatives with the {{lang, sh, -u suffix: {{lang, sh, heroj : heroju {{gloss, hero, {{lang, sh, prijatelj : prijatelju {{gloss, friend, {{lang, sh, konj : konju {{gloss, horse, {{lang, sh, vozač : vozaču {{gloss, driver, {{lang, sh, mladić : mladiću {{gloss, youngster, {{lang, sh, kočijaš : kočijašu {{gloss, coachman, {{lang, sh, muž : mužu {{gloss, husband.

Nouns ending with the velars {{lang, sh, -k, -g and {{lang, sh, -h are palatalized to {{lang, sh, -č, -ž, -š in the vocative: {{lang, cs, vojnik : vojniče {{gloss, soldier, {{lang, cs, drug : druže {{gloss, comrade, {{lang, sh, duh : duše {{gloss, ghost. A final {{lang, sh, -c becomes {{lang, sh, -č in the vocative: {{lang, sh, stric : striče {{gloss, uncle, {{lang, sh, lovac : lovče {{gloss, hunter. Likewise, a final {{lang, sh, -z becomes {{lang, sh, -ž in only two cases: {{lang, sh, knez : kneže {{gloss, prince and {{lang, sh, vitez : viteže {{gloss, knight.

The loss of the unsteady {{lang, sh, a can trigger a sound change by hardening consonants, as in {{lang, sh, vrabac : vrapče {{gloss, sparrow (not {{lang, sh, *vrabče), {{lang, sh, lisac : lišče {{gloss, male fox (not {{lang, sh, *lisče) and {{lang, sh, ženomrzac : ženomršče {{gloss, misogynist (not {{lang, sh, *ženomrzče). There may be a loss of {{lang, sh, -t before {{lang, sh, -c like in {{lang, sh, otac : oče {{gloss, father (instead of {{lang, sh, *otče), {{lang, sh, svetac : sveče {{gloss, saint (instead of {{lang, sh, *svetče). When these phonetic alterations would substantially change the base noun, the vocative remains equal to the nominative, for example {{lang, sh, tetak {{gloss, uncle, {{lang, sh, mačak {{gloss, male cat, {{lang, sh, bratac {{gloss, cousin. This also holds true for foreign names ending with {{lang, sh, -k, -g and {{lang, sh, -h like {{lang, sh, Džek {{gloss, Jack, {{lang, sh, Dag {{gloss, Doug, {{lang, sh, King, Hajnrih.

Male names ending with {{lang, sh, -o and {{lang, sh, -e have a vocative equal to the nominative, for example: {{lang, sh, Marko, Mihailo, Danilo, Đorđe, Pavle, Radoje.

= Second declension

=
The second declension affects nouns with the ending ''{{lang, sh, -a''. These are mainly of feminine but sometimes also of masculine gender. These nouns have a vocative suffix ''{{lang, sh, -o'': {{lang, sh, riba : ribo {{gloss, fish, {{lang, sh, sluga : slugo {{gloss, servant, {{lang, sh, kolega : kolego {{gloss, colleague, {{lang, sh, poslovođa : poslovođo {{gloss, manager.

Exemptions to this rule are male and female given names, which have a vocative equal to the nominative, e. g. {{lang, sh, Vera, Zorka, Olga, Marija, Gordana, Nataša, Nikola, Kosta, Ilija etc. However, this is different for twosyllabic names with an ascending accent such as female names {{lang, sh, Nâda, Zôra, Mîca, Nêna and male names {{lang, sh, Pêra, Bôža, Pâja, etc., which form vocatives with ''{{lang, sh, -o'': {{lang, sh, Nâdo, Zôro, Mîco, Pêro, Bôžo, Pâjo, etc.

Denominations of relatives like {{lang, sh, mama {{gloss, mom, {{lang, sh, tata {{gloss, dad, ''{{lang, sh, baba'' {{gloss, grandmother, {{lang, sh, deda {{gloss, grandfather, {{lang, sh, tetka {{gloss, aunt (parent's sister), ''{{lang, sh, ujna'' {{gloss, aunt (mother's brother's wife), ''{{lang, sh, strina'' {{gloss, aunt (father's brother's wife) have vocatives equal to the nominative. This also holds true for country names ending in ''{{lang, sh, -ska, -čka, -ška''.

Nouns ending with the diminutive suffix ''-ica'' that consist of three or more syllables have a vocative with ''-e'': ''učiteljica: učiteljice'' "female teacher", ''drugarica: drugarice'' "girlfriend", ''tatica: tatice'' "daddy", ''mamica: mamice'' "mommy". This also applies to female names ''Danica: Danice'', ''Milica: Milice'', ''Zorica: Zorice'', and the male names ''Perica: Perice'', ''Tomica: Tomice''. Nouns of this class that can be applied to both males and females usually have a vocative ending of ''-ico'' (''pijanica: pijanico'' "drunkard", ''izdajica: izdajico'' "traitor", ''kukavica: kukavico'' "coward"), but vocatives with ''-ice'' are also seen.

The use of vocative endings for names varies among Serbo-Croatian dialects. People in Croatia often use only nominative forms as vocatives, while others are more likely to use grammatical vocatives.{{cite web, url=https://repozitorij.ffos.hr/islandora/object/ffos%3A3127/datastream/PDF/view, title=Vokativ osobnih imena u hrvatskom jeziku, author=Alen Orlić, publisher= University of Osijek, date=2011, language=hr, access-date=17 October 2018

= Third declension

=
The third declension affects feminine nouns ending with a consonant. The vocative is formed by appending the suffix ''{{lang, sh, -i'' to the nominative ({{lang, sh, reč : reči {{gloss, word, {{lang, sh, noć : noći {{gloss, night).

Slovak

Until the end of the 1980s, the existence of a distinct vocative case in Slovak was recognised and taught at schools. Today, the case is no longer considered to exist except for a few archaic examples of the original vocative remaining in religious, literary or ironic contexts:
{, class="wikitable"
!Nominative
!Vocative
!Translation
!Nominative
!Vocative
!Translation
!Nominative
!Vocative
!Translation
, -
, {{lang, sk, Boh ''m.''
, {{lang, sk, Bože
, God
, {{lang, sk, Ježiš ''m.''
, {{lang, sk, Ježišu
, Jesus
, {{lang, sk, mama ''f.''
, {{lang, sk, mamo
, mother
, -
, {{lang, sk, Kristus ''m.''
, {{lang, sk, Kriste
, Christ
, {{lang, sk, priateľ ''m.''
, {{lang, sk, priateľu
, friend
, {{lang, sk, žena ''f.''
, {{lang, sk, ženo
, woman
, -
, {{lang, sk, pán ''m.''
, {{lang, sk, pane
, lord
, {{lang, sk, brat ''m.''
, {{lang, sk, bratu, {{lang, sk, bratku
, brother
,
,
,
, -
, {{lang, sk, otec ''m.''
, {{lang, sk, otče
, father
, {{lang, sk, syn ''m.''
, {{lang, sk, synu, {{lang, sk, synku
, son
,
,
,
, -
, {{lang, sk, človek ''m.''
, {{lang, sk, človeče
, man, human
,
,
,
,
,
,
, -
, {{lang, sk, chlap ''m.''
, {{lang, sk, chlape
, man
,
,
,
,
,
,
, -
, {{lang, sk, chlapec ''m.''
, {{lang, sk, chlapče
, boy
,
,
,
,
,
,

In everyday use, the Czech vocative is sometimes retrofitted to certain words:
{, class="wikitable"
!Nominative
!Vocative
!Translation
, -
, {{lang, sk, majster ''m.''
, {{lang, sk, majstre
, maestro
, -
, {{lang, sk, šéf ''m.''
, {{lang, sk, šéfe
, boss
, -
, {{lang, sk, švagor ''m.''
, {{lang, sk, švagre
, brother-in-law

Another stamp of vernacular vocative is emerging, presumably under the influence of Hungarian for certain family members or proper names:
{, class="wikitable"
!Nominative
!Vocative
!Translation
, -
, {{lang, sk, otec ''m.''
, {{lang, sk, oci
, father
, -
, {{lang, sk, mama ''f.''
, {{lang, sk, mami
, mother
, -
, {{lang, sk, babka ''f.''
, {{lang, sk, babi
, grandmother, old woman
, -
, {{lang, sk, Paľo ''m.''
, {{lang, sk, Pali
, Paul, domestic form
, -
, {{lang, sk, Zuza ''f.''
, {{lang, sk, Zuzi
, Susan, domestic form

Ukrainian

Ukrainian has retained the vocative case mostly as it was in Proto-Slavic:
{, class="wikitable"
! colspan="3" , Masculine nouns
! colspan="3" , Feminine nouns
, -
!Nominative
!Vocative
!Translation
!Nominative
!Vocative
!Translation
, -
, {{lang, uk, бог, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, boh
, {{lang, uk, боже, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, bože
, god
, {{lang, uk, матуся, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, matusja
, {{lang, uk, матусю, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, matusju
, minnie
, -
, {{lang, uk, друг, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, druh
, {{lang, uk, друже, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, druže
, friend
, {{lang, uk, неня, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, nenja
, {{lang, uk, нене, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, nene
, nanny
, -
, {{lang, uk, брат, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, brat
, {{lang, uk, брате, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, brate
, brother
, {{lang, uk, бабця, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, babcja
, {{lang, uk, бабцю, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, babcju
, granny
, -
, {{lang, uk, чоловік, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, čolovik
, {{lang, uk, чоловіче, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, čoloviče
, man
, {{lang, uk, жінка, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, žinka
, {{lang, uk, жінко, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, žinko
, woman
, -
, {{lang, uk, хлопець, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, chlopec'
, {{lang, uk, хлопче, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, chlopče
, boy
, {{lang, uk, дружина, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, družyna
, {{lang, uk, дружино, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, družyno
, wife
, -
, {{lang, uk, святий отець, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, svjatyj otec'
, {{lang, uk, святий отче, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, svjatyj otče
, Holy Father
, {{lang, uk, дівчина, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, divčyna
, {{lang, uk, дівчино, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, divčyno
, girl
, -
, {{lang, uk, пан, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, pan
, {{lang, uk, пане, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, pane
, sir, Mr.
, {{lang, uk, сестра, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, sestra
, {{lang, uk, сестро, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, sestro
, sister
, -
, {{lang, uk, приятель, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, pryjatel'
, {{lang, uk, приятелю, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, pryjatelju
, fellow
, {{lang, uk, людина, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, ljudyna
, {{lang, uk, людино, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, ljudyno
, human, person
, -
, {{lang, uk, батько, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, bat'ko
, {{lang, uk, батьку, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, bat'ku
, father
,
,
,
, -
, {{lang, uk, син, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, syn
, {{lang, uk, сину, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, synu
, son
,
,
,

There are some exceptions:
{, class="wikitable"
!Nominative
!Vocative
!Translation
, -
, {{lang, uk, мати, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, maty f.
, {{lang, uk, мамо, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, mamo
, mother
, -
, {{lang, uk, божа матір, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, boža matir f.
, {{lang, uk, матір божа, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, matir boža
, God's Mother

It is used even for loanwords and foreign names:
{, class="wikitable"
!Nominative
!Vocative
!Translation
, -
, {{lang, uk, Джон, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, Džon m.
, {{lang, uk, Джоне, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, Džone
, John
, -
, {{lang, uk, пан президент, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, pan prezydent m.
, {{lang, uk, пане президенте, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, pane prezydente
, Mr. President

It is obligatory for all native names:
{, class="wikitable"
! colspan="2" , Masculine
! colspan="2" , Feminine
, -
!Nominative
!Vocative
!Nominative
!Vocative
, -
, {{lang, uk, Володимир, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, Volodymyr
, {{lang, uk, Володимире, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, Volodymyre
, {{lang, uk, Мирослава, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, Myroslava
, {{lang, uk, Мирославо, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, Myroslavo
, -
, {{lang, uk, Святослав, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, Svjatoslav
, {{lang, uk, Святославе, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, Svjatoslave
, {{lang, uk, Ганна, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, Hanna
, {{lang, uk, Ганно, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, Hanno

It is used for patronymics:
{, class="wikitable"
!Nominative
!Vocative
, -
, {{lang, uk, Андрій Васильович, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, Andrij Vasylovyč m.
, {{lang, uk, Андрію Васильовичу, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, Andriju Vasyliovyču
, -
, {{lang, uk, Ірина Богданівна, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, Iryna Bohdanivna f.
, {{lang, uk, Ірино Богданівно, italic=no {{lang, uk-latn, Iryno Bohdanivno

Latin

In Latin, the form of the vocative case of a noun is often the same as the nominative. Exceptions include singular non-neuter second-declension nouns that end in {{lang, la, -us in the nominative case. An example would be the famous line from Shakespeare, "{{lang, la, Et tu, Brute?" (commonly translated as "And you, Brutus?"): {{lang, la, Brute is the vocative case and {{lang, la, Brutus would be the nominative.

Nouns that end in {{lang, la, -ius end with {{lang, la, -ī instead of the expected {{lang, la, -ie. Thus, {{lang, la, Julius becomes {{lang, la, Julī and {{lang, la, filius becomes {{lang, la, filī. The shortening does not shift the accent so the vocative of {{lang, la, Vergilius is {{lang, la, Vergilī, with accent on the second syllable even though it is short. Nouns that end in {{lang, la, -aius and {{lang, la, -eius have vocatives that end in {{lang, la, -aī or {{lang, la, -eī even though the {{lang, la, -i- in the nominative is consonantal.

First-declension and second-declension adjectives also have distinct vocative forms in the masculine singular if the nominative ends in {{lang, la, -us, with the ending {{lang, la, -e. Adjectives that end in {{lang, la, -ius have vocatives in {{lang, la, -ie so the vocative of {{lang, la, eximius is {{lang, la, eximie.

Nouns and adjectives that end in {{lang, la, -eus do not follow the rules above. {{lang, la, Meus forms the vocative irregularly as {{lang, la, mī or {{lang, la, meus, while Christian {{lang, la, Deus does not have a distinct vocative and retains the form {{lang, la, Deus. "My God!" in Latin is thus {{lang, la, mī Deus!, but Jerome's Vulgate consistently used {{lang, la, Deus meus as a vocative. Classical Latin did not use a vocative of {{lang, la, deus either (in reference to pagan gods, the Romans used the suppletive form {{lang, la, dive).

Romance languages

West Iberian languages

Portuguese drops the article to form the vocative. The vocative is always between commas and, like in many other languages, a particle ''Ó'' is commonly used:
{, class="wikitable"
, ''{{lang, pt, Ó Jesus, ajude-nos!''
, O Jesus, help us!
, -
, ''{{lang, pt, Menino, vem cá!''
, Boy, come here!
, -
, ''{{lang, pt, Não faças isso, amigo.''
, Don't do that, yfriend.

In Extremaduran and Fala, some post-tonical vowels open in vocative forms of nouns, a new development that is unrelated to the Latin vocative case.

Catalan

Catalan drops the article to form the vocative.

French

Like English, French sometimes uses (or historically used) a particle ''Ô'' to mark vocative phrases rather than by change to the form of the noun. A famous example is the title and first line of the Canadian national anthem, '' O Canada'' (French title: ''Ô Canada''), a vocative phrase addressing Canada.

Romanian

The vocative case in Romanian is partly inherited, occasionally causing other morphophonemic changes (see also the article on Romanian nouns):

*singular masculine/neuter: {{lang, ro, -e as in
**{{lang, ro, om: {{lang, ro, omule! (man, human being),
**{{lang, ro, băiat: {{lang, ro, băiete! or {{lang, ro, băiatule! (boy),
**{{lang, ro, văr: {{lang, ro, vere! (cousin),
**{{lang, ro, Ion: {{lang, ro, Ioane! (John);
*singular feminine: {{lang, ro, -o as in
**{{lang, ro, soră: {{lang, ro, soro! (sister),
**{{lang, ro, nebună: {{lang, ro, nebuno! (mad woman), also in masculine ({{lang, ro, nebunul)
**{{lang, ro, deșteaptă: {{lang, ro, deșteapto! (smart one (f), often used sarcastically),
**{{lang, ro, Ileana: {{lang, ro, Ileano! (Helen);
Since there is no ''-o'' vocative in Latin, it must have been borrowed from Slavic: compare the corresponding Bulgarian forms {{lang, bg, сестро, italic=no ({{lang, uk-latn, sestro), {{lang, bg, откачалко, italic=no ({{lang, bg-latn, otkachalko), {{lang, bg, Елено, italic=no ({{lang, bg-latn, Eleno).

*plural, all genders: {{lang, ro, -lor as in
**{{lang, ro, frați: {{lang, ro, fraților! (brothers),
**{{lang, ro, boi: {{lang, ro, boilor! (oxen, used toward people as an invective),
**{{lang, ro, doamne și domni: {{lang, ro, doamnelor și domnilor! (ladies and gentlemen).

In formal speech, the vocative often simply copies the nominative/accusative form even when it does have its own form. That is because the vocative is often perceived as very direct and so can seem rude.

Romanesco dialect

In Romanesco dialect the vocative case appears as a regular truncation immediately after the stress.

Compare (vocative, always truncated)

: ''France', vie' qua!''
:: "Francesco/Francesca, come here!"

with (nominative, never truncated)

: ''Francesco/Francesca viene qua''
:: "Francesco/Francesca comes here"

Venetian

Venetian has lost all case endings, like most other Romance languages. However, with feminine proper names the role of the vocative is played by the absence of the determiner: the personal article {{lang, vec, ła / l' usually precedes feminine names in other situations, even in predicates. Masculine names and other nouns lack articles and so rely on prosody to mark forms of address:

{, class="wikitable"
, -
! Case
! Fem. proper name
! Masc. proper name and other nouns
, -
! Nom./Acc.
, {{lang, vec, ła Marìa ła vien qua / varda ła Marìa!
{{gloss, Mary comes here / look at Mary!
, {{lang, vec, Marco el vien qua / varda Marco!
{{gloss, Mark comes here / look at Mark!
, -
! Vocative
, {{lang, vec, Marìa vien qua! / varda, Marìa!
{{gloss, Mary, come here! / look, Mary!
, {{lang, vec, Marco vien qua! / varda, Marco!
{{gloss, Mark, come here! / look, Mark!

Predicative constructions:

{, class="wikitable"
, -
! Case
! Fem. proper name
! Masc. proper name and other nouns
, -
! Pred.
, {{lang, vec, so' mi ła Marìa
{{gloss, I am Mary.
, {{lang, vec, so' mi Marco / so' tornà maestra
{{gloss, I am Mark. / I am a teacher again.
, -
! Vocative
, {{lang, vec, so' mi Marìa!
{{gloss, It's me, Mary!
, {{lang, vec, so' mi, Marco! / so' tornà, maestra!
{{gloss, It's me, Mark! / I am back, teacher!

Arabic

{{Wiktionary, يا
Properly speaking, Arabic has only three cases: nominative, accusative and genitive. However, a meaning similar to that conveyed by the vocative case in other languages is indicated by the use of the particle ''yā'' ({{langx, ar, يا) placed before a noun inflected in the nominative case (or accusative if the noun is in construct form). In English translations, it is often translated literally as ''O'' instead of being omitted. A longer form used in Classical Arabic is {{lang, ar, أيّها ''{{Transliteration, ar, ALA, ayyuhā'' (masculine), {{lang, ar, أيّتها ''{{Transliteration, ar, ALA, ayyatuhā'' (feminine), sometimes combined with ''yā''. The particle ''yā'' was also used in the old Castilian language because of Arabic influence via Mozarabic immigrations.

Mandarin

Mandarin uses no special inflected forms for address. However, special forms and morphemes (that are not inflections) exist for addressing.

Mandarin has several particles that can be attached to the word of address to mark certain special vocative forces, where appropriate. A common one is 啊( zh, c=啊, p=a) attached to the end of the address word. For example, 日记( zh, c=日记, p=Rìjì) "diary" becomes 日记啊 ( zh, c=日记啊, p=Rìjì a).

Certain specialized vocative morphemes also exist, albeit with limited applicabilities. For instance, the Beijing dialect of Mandarin Chinese, to express strong feelings (especially negative ones) to someone, a neutral tone suffix ''-ei'' may be attached to certain address words. It is most commonly applied to the word {{lang, cmn, 孙子 (''sūnzi'', "grandson"), to form ''sūnzei'', meaning approximately "Hey you nasty one!". Another example is {{lang, cmn, 小子 (''xiǎozi'', lit. "kid; young one"), resulting in ''xiǎozei'' "Hey kiddo!".

Japanese

{{See also, Japanese particles#yo
The vocative case is present in Japanese as the particle {{lang, ja, よ. This usage is often literary or poetic. For example:

{, class="wikitable"
, {{lang, ja, 雨よ雪に変わってくれ！
{{Transliteration, ja, Ame yo yuki ni kawatte kure!
, O Rain! Please change to snow!
, -
, {{lang, ja, 万国の労働者よ、団結せよ！
{{Transliteration, ja, Bankoku no rōdō-sha yo, danketsu seyo!
, Workers of the world, unite!
, -
, {{lang, ja, 少年よ、神話になれ！
{{Transliteration, ja, Shōnen yo, shinwa ni nare!
, Young boy, become a legend!

In conversational Japanese, this same particle is often used at the end of a sentence to indicate assertiveness, certainty or emphasis.

Georgian

In Georgian, the vocative case is used to address the second-person singular and plural. For word roots that end with a consonant, the vocative case suffix is -''o'', and for the words that end with a vowel, it is -''v'' like in Old Georgian, but for some words, it is considered archaic. For example, ''kats-'' is the root for the word "man". If one addresses someone with the word, it becomes ''katso''.

Adjectives are also declined in the vocative case. Just like nouns, consonant final stem adjectives take the suffix -''o'' in the vocative case, and the vowel final stems are not changed:

:''lamazi kali'' "beautiful woman" (nominative case)
:''lamazo kalo!'' "beautiful woman!" (vocative case)

In the second phrase, both the adjective and the noun are declined. The personal pronouns are also used in the vocative case. ''Shen'' "you" (singular) and ''tkven'' "you" (plural) in the vocative case become ''she!'' and ''tkve'', without the -''n''. Therefore, one could, for instance, say, with the declension of all of the elements:

''She lamazo kalo!'' "you beautiful woman!"

Korean

The vocative case in Korean is commonly used with first names in casual situations by using the vocative case marker {{lang, ko, (호격 조사) 아 ({{Transliteration, ko, a) if the name ends in a consonant and {{lang, ko, 야 ({{Transliteration, ko, ya) if the name ends with a vowel:

{{fs interlinear, lang=ko, number=1a., 미진이 집에 가?, Mijini jibe ga?, Is Mijin going home?
{{fs interlinear, lang=ko, number=1b., 미진아, 집에 가?, Mijina, jibe ga?, Mijin, are you going home?
{{fs interlinear, lang=ko, number=2a., 동배 뭐 해?, Dongbae mwo hae?, What is Dongbae doing?
{{fs interlinear, lang=ko, number=2b., 동배야, 뭐 해?, Dongbaeya, mwo hae?, Dongbae, what are you doing?

In formal Korean, the marker {{lang, ko, 여 ({{Transliteration, ko, yeo) or {{lang, ko, 이여 ({{Transliteration, ko, iyeo) is used, the latter if the root ends with a consonant. Thus, a quotation of William S. Clark would be translated as follows:

{{fs interlinear, lang=ko, indent=2, 소년이여, 야망을 가져라., sonyeoniyeo, yamangeul gajyeora., Boys, be ambitious.

The honorific infix {{lang, ko, 시 ({{Transliteration, ko, si) is inserted in between the {{lang, ko, 이 ({{Transliteration, ko, i) and {{lang, ko, 여 ({{Transliteration, ko, yeo).

{{fs interlinear, lang=ko, indent=2, 신이시여, 부디 저들을 용서하소서., sinisiyeo, budi jeodeureul yongseohasoseo., Oh god, please forgive them.

In Middle Korean, there were three honorific classes of the vocative case:
{, class="wikitable"
!Form
, 하
, 아/야
, 여/이여
, -
!Honorific
, High
, Plain
, Low with added nuance of exclamation

Hungarian

Hungarian has a number of vocative-like constructions, even though it lacks an explicit vocative inflection.

Noun phrases in a vocative context always take the zero article. While noun phrases can take zero articles for other reasons, the lack of an article otherwise expected marks a vocative construction. This is especially prominent in dialects of Hungarian where personal proper names and other personal animate nouns tend to take the appropriate definite article, similarly to certain dialects of German detailed above. For example:

{, class="wikitable"
, -
! Nominative
! Vocative
, -
, {{lang, hu, (Az) Olivér még beszélget.
Oliver is still chatting.
, , {{lang, hu, Olivér, gyere ide!
Oliver, come over here.
, -
, {{lang, hu, Kiönthette voln’ a honfi megtelt szívét.
Might have pour'd the full tide of a patriot's heart.
, {{lang, hu, Honfi, mit ér epedő kebel e romok ormán?
Patriot, why do you yearn on these ruins?
, -
, {{lang, hu, A szerelem csodaszép.
Love is wonderful.
, {{lang, hu, Látod, szerelem, mit tettél!
O Love, look what you have done!
, -
, {{lang, hu, (Az) Isten szerelmére!
For the love of God!
, {{lang, hu, Isten, áldd meg a magyart!
God, bless the Hungarians!

With certain words such as {{lang, hu, barát ("friend"), {{lang, hu, hölgy ("lady"), {{lang, hu, úr ("gentleman, lord"), vocation is, in addition to the zero article, always{{cite journal , last1=Láncz , first1=Irén , title=A megszólítás nyelvi eszközei Mikszáth Kálmán műveiben , journal=Híd , date=July–August 1997 , volume=LXI , issue=7–8 , pages=535–543 , url=http://adattar.vmmi.org/folyoiratszamok/1602/hid_1997_07-08_.pdf , access-date=2 October 2022 marked by the first person possessive:{{cite book , last1=Albertné Herbszt , first1=Mária , editor1-last=A. László , editor1-first=Anna , title=A magyar nyelv könyve , date=2007 , publisher=Trezor Kiadó , location=Budapest , isbn=978-963-8144-19-5 , page=708 , edition=9 kiad , chapter=Pragmatika

{, class="wikitable"
, -
! Nominative
! Vocative
, -
, {{lang, hu, A nemesek báljára megérkeztek a hölgyek és az urak.
The ladies and the gentlemen have arrived to the nobility's ball.
, {{lang, hu, Hölgyeim és uraim, kezdődjék a tánc!
(My) Ladies and (my) gentlemen, let the dancing begin!
, -
, {{lang, hu, Ha az Úr nem építi a házat, hiába fáradoznak az építők.
Unless the Lord builds the house, its builders labor in vain.
, {{lang, hu, Magasztallak Uram, felemeltél engem!
I will exalt you, O (my) Lord, for you lifted me out of the depth!
, -
, {{lang, hu, A barát mindig segít.
A friend always helps out.
{{lang, hu, A barátom fiatal.
My friend is young.
, {{lang, hu, Tudnál segíteni, barátom?
Could you help out, (my) friend?

Words like {{lang, hu, testvér ("sibling, brother") and other words of relation do not require the first person possessive, but it is readily used in common speech, especially in familiar contexts:

{, class="wikitable"
, -
! Nominative
! Vocative
, -
, {{lang, hu, A testvérek elsétáltak a boltba.
The siblings walked to the shop.
, {{lang, hu, Kedves testvéreim! / {{lang, hu, Kedves testvérek!
(My) dear brothers (and sisters)!
, -
, {{lang, hu, (Az) apához megyek.
I'm going to dad.
, {{lang, hu, Apám, hogy vagy? / {{lang, hu, Apa, hogy vagy?
Dad, how are you?

The second-person pronoun can be used to emphasize a vocation when appropriate: {{lang, hu, Hát miért nem adtad oda neki, te bolond? ("Why did you not give it to him, you fool?"), {{lang, hu, Te Karcsi, nem láttad a szemüvegem? ("Charlie, have you seen my glasses?"), {{lang, hu, Lógtok ezért még, ti gazemberek. ("You shall yet hang for this, crooks!"), etc.

References

* Eleanor Dickey: ''Greek forms of address. From Herodotus to Lucian''. Clarendon, Oxford 1996, ISBN 0-19-815054-7.
* Eleanor Dickey: ''Latin forms of address. From Plautus to Apuleius''. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2002, ISBN 0-19-924287-9.
* Espinal, Teresa M. 2013
On the structure of vocatives.
In Barbara Sonnenhauser & Patrizia Noel Aziz Hanna (eds.). Vocative! Addressing between system and performance. Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 261, 109-132 Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110304176.109
* Virginia Hill: ''Vocatives. How Syntax meets with Pragmatics''. Brill, Leiden 2014, ISBN 978-90-04-26079-5.
* Hill, Virginia. 2007
“Vocatives and the pragmatics–syntax interface”.
In: Lingua 117.12, pp. 2077–2105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.01.002.
*Ladd, Robert D. (1978)
“Stylized intonation”.
In: Language 54.3, pp. 517–540. DOI:http://www.jstor.org/stable/412785.
*Leech, Geoffrey N. 1999. “The distribution and function of vocatives in American and British English conversation”. In: Out of corpora. Ed. by Hilde Hasselgård and Signe Oksefjell. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 107–118.
*Maché, Jakob. 2025.
“The diversity of vocative formation across languages”
In: Catalan Journal of Linguistics 24.1, pp. 211–271. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.475.
*Portner, Paul. 2007a
“Imperatives and modals”.
In: Natural Language Semantics 15.4, pp. 351–383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-007-9022-y.
*Portner, Paul. 2007b
“Instructions for interpretations as separate performatives”.
In: On Information Structure, Meaning and Form. Ed. by Kerstin Schwabe and Susanne Winkler. John Benjamins, pp. 407–426. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1075/la.100.22por
*Stavrou, Melita. 2013
“About the Vocative”.
In: The Nominal Structure in Slavic and Beyond. Ed. by Lilia Schürks, Anastasia Giannakidou, and Urtzi Etxeberria. Studies in Generative Grammar 116. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 299–342. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614512790.299.
*Zwicky, Arnold. 1974
““Hey, Whatsyourname””
In: Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. April 19–21, 1974. Ed. by Michael La Galy,Robert A. Fox, and Bruck Anthony. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 787–801. URL: https://web.stanford.edu/~zwicky/hey-whatsyourname.pdf.

{{Wiktionary, vocative
{{Reflist

{{Grammatical cases
{{Authority control

{{DEFAULTSORT:Vocative Case
Grammatical cases