Unity of science

The unity of science is a thesis in philosophy of science that says that all the sciences form a unified whole. The variants of the thesis can be classified as ontological (giving a unified account of the structure of reality) and/or as epistemic/pragmatic (giving a unified account of how the activities and products of science work). There are also philosophers who emphasize the disunity of science, which does not necessarily imply that there could be no unity in some sense but does emphasize pluralism in the ontology and/or practice of science.

Early versions of the unity of science thesis can be found in ancient Greek philosophers such as Aristotle, and in the later history of Western philosophy. For example, in the first half of the 20th century the thesis was associated with the unity of science movement led by Otto Neurath, and in the second half of the century the thesis was advocated by Ludwig von Bertalanffy in "General System Theory: A New Approach to Unity of Science" (1951) and by Paul Oppenheim and Hilary Putnam in "Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis" (1958). It has been opposed by, for example, Jerry Fodor in "Special Sciences (Or: The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis)" (1974), by Paul Feyerabend in ''Against Method'' (1975) and later works, by John Dupré in "The Disunity of Science" (1983) and ''The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science'' (1993), by Nancy Cartwright in ''The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science'' (1999) and other works, and by Evelyn Fox Keller in ''Making Sense of Life: Explaining Biological Development with Models, Metaphors, and Machines'' (2002) and other works.; .

Jean Piaget suggested, in his 1918 book ''Recherche'' and later works, that the unity of science can be considered in terms of a circle of the sciences, where logic is the foundation for mathematics, which is the foundation for mechanics and physics, and physics is the foundation for chemistry, which is the foundation for biology, which is the foundation for sociology, the moral sciences, psychology, and the theory of knowledge, and the theory of knowledge forms a basis for logic, completing the circle, without implying that any science could be reduced to any other. More recently, many complex systems are considered to be transdisciplinary objects of study. Such systems can be modeled as having emergent properties at different levels of organization, which do not neatly correspond to separate disciplines such as physics or biology, and which cannot be adequately modeled using a philosophy of extreme reductionism ("everything comes from the bottom", which does not fully account for emergent properties) or extreme holism ("everything comes from the top", which does not fully account for systems' components and interactions).

See also

* Consilience
* Hierarchy of sciences
* International Encyclopedia of Unified Science
* Logical positivism
* Scientific pluralism
* Special sciences
* Stanford School
* Systems theory
* Tektology
* The central science
* Theory of everything
* Unified Science

Notes

References

* Bertallanfy's article was part of a section that also included, in response, Carl G. Hempel's "General system theory and the unity of science" (pp. 313–322), Robert E. Bass's "Unity of nature" (pp. 323–327), and Hans Jonas's "Comment on general system theory" (pp. 328–335).
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
* Reprinted in .
*
*
*
*
*
* Reprinted in .
*
*
*
*

Further reading

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

External links

*
Guide to the Unity of Science Movement Records 1934–1968
at th
University of Chicago Special Collections Research Center

{{Science and technology studies

Science studies
Philosophy of science
Metaphysics of science
__NOTOC__