Objectivity
Unauthorized biographies may be considered more objective but less detailed than other biographies, because they are not contingent on the subject's approval (and therefore may contain accurate information that the subject would not have authorized), but are also not privy to information or corrections known only to the subject or the subject's close friends and family.Legality
The subjects of unauthorized biographies are almost always public figures. Rarely do public figures succeed in preventing the release of unauthorized biographies. Unauthorized biographies of people who are not deemed public figures may be considered violations of the right to privacy and subject to legal action. As Ted Schwarz (1992) writes: Speaking of U.S. courts, Lloyd Rich (2002) writes: The legality of unauthorized biographies varies by country. Brazil enacted a short-lived law in 2014 requiring permission from biographies' subjects before publication.Reception
Unauthorized biographies are not necessarily unwelcomed by their subjects, and in fact some unauthorized biographies have been criticized for displaying overeager admiration for them; however, unauthorized biographies have a wider reputation for fueling controversy and painting unflattering portraits of their subjects. While unauthorized biographies often receive significant news coverage, their writers tend to face "media disdain" due to the perception that their work isReferences
Citations
Bibliography
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * {{cite web , last=Waweru , first=Nduta , url=https://allafrica.com/stories/201404170420.html , title=Kenya: Thorny Issue of Unauthorised Biographies , date=2014 , website= The Star , access-date=May 4, 2019See also
* Shock value * Doomscrolling *