Tragoportax

''Tragoportax'' is an extinct genus of bovid ungulate. It lived from the upper Miocene to the earliest Pliocene. ''Tragoportax'' was formerly considered a close relative of the extant nilgai, though more recent studies suggest that it, and several other Miocene " boselaphins", formed a tribe of their own. The number of ''Tragoportax'' species has varied over the years, and some have been reassigned to the related genus ''Miotragocerus''. The first ''Tragoportax'' specimens were discovered in Greece, and were originally assigned to '' Capra''. Subsequently, they were reassigned to ''Tragocerus''. This genus name was preoccupied by a beetle, and thus ''Tragoportax'' is the correct name.

Like many modern antelopes, ''Tragoportax'' exhibited sexual dimorphism. Both sexes were horned, with those of males being longer and slenderer, often curving backwards. The postcrania of the genus resemble those of large deer, such as red deer, and it may have been similar ecologically. Some species, like ''T. amalthea'', inhabited lightly wooded environments, and fed predominantly on leaves. Others, like ''T. rugosifrons'', were probably mixed feeders, feeding on both leaves and grasses. ''Tragoportax'' might have been cursorial.

Taxonomy

Early history

The first of the specimens currently assigned to ''Tragoportax'', three horn cores with parts of their skulls still attached, were discovered in Pikermi, Greece. In 1854, Johannes Roth and Johann Andreas Wagner assigned the fossils to the goat genus, '' Capra''. The new taxon was named ''Capra amalthea'', after Amalthea, a nymph that nursed the infant Zeus on goat milk in Greek mythology. A few years later, in 1861 Jean Albert Gaudry recognised that the Pikermi fossils were distinct enough from ''Capra'' to warrant a genus of their own. He assigned them to the genus ''Tragocerus''; however, ''Tragocerus'' was preoccupied by a longhorn beetle.Mindat.org: Tragocerus
''mindat.org''. Retrieved 2021-02-10. In 1937, Guy Ellcock Pilgrim coined the generic name ''Tragoportax'', to include fossils recovered from the Sivalik Hills in Pakistan. For the time being, the two genera were kept separate, though Pilgrim noted strong similarities between ''Tragocerus'' and the new genus. In 1971, Alan William Gentry rendered ''Tragocerus'' invalid, and assigned some of its species to ''Miotragocerus''. By 2009, ''Tragocerus amalthea'' had been reassigned to ''Tragoportax'', though ''Tragocerus'' was apparently regarded as valid by some authorities well into the 1980s.

In 1904, Max Schlosser named a second species of ''Tragoportax'' (then ''Tragocerus''), ''T. rugosifrons'', based on material recovered from Samos, Greece. Specimens from Bulgaria, Moldova, Pakistan and Ukraine have been subsequently assigned to ''T. rugosifrons'', as well as a possible specimen from Iran.

''Tragoportax curvicornis'', also originally found in Samos, was originally assigned to the genus ''Mirabilocerus'', though that genus may be a synonym of ''Tragocerus''. In 1941, Miklós Kretzoi described ''Gazelloportax'' and ''Pontoportax'' to accommodate fossils now assigned to ''Tragoportax''. In 1974, Gentry named ''Mesembriportax acrae'' based on remains from the Early Pliocene of South Africa. It has since been determined that ''Mesembriportax'' exhibits all of the cranial characteristics of ''Tragoportax'', and as such, it was reassigned to that genus in 2004. In 1968, Krezoi attempted to revive ''Tragocerus'' as a subgenus, ''Tragoceridus''; this was subsequently synonymised.

Classification

''Tragoportax'' has often been assigned to the tribe Boselaphini or subfamily Boselaphinae, alongside the modern nilgai (''Boselaphus tragocamelus'').Spassov N. & Geraads D. 2004.
Tragoportax Pilgrim, 1937 and Miotragocerus Stromer, 1928 (Mammalia, Bovidae) from the Turolian of Hadjidimovo, Bulgaria, and a revision of the late Miocene Mediterranean Boselaphini.
''Geodiversitas'' 26 (2): 339-370. However, Bibi et al. (2009) suggested that Boselaphinae as defined was probably non-monophyletic, and that ''Tragoportax'' and its relatives should form a separate tribe, Tragoportacini.Bibi, Faysal, Bukhsianidze, Maia, Gentry, Alan W., Geraads, Denis, Kostopoulos, Dimitris S., and Vrba, Elisabeth S., 2009. The Fossil Record and Evolution of Bovidae: State of the Field. Palaeontologia Electronica Vol. 12, Issue 3; 10A: 11p; http://palaeo-electronica.org/2009_3/169/index.html This tribe would additionally include '' Austroportax'', ''Kipsigicerus'', ''Miotragocerus'', ''Protragocerus'', and '' Strepsiportax''.''Qin-Qin Shi & Zhao-Qun Zhang (2023) New material of ''Miotragocerus'' (Bovidae, Artiodactyla) from northern China and its systematic implications, ''Journal of Systematic Palaeontology'', 21:1, ''

Inner systematics

''Tragoportax'' fossils have been recovered from southeastern Europe, Libya, South Africa, and the Indian subcontinent.Solounias N. 1981. - The Turolian fauna from the Island of Samos, Greece with special emphasis on the Hyaenids and the Bovids. Contribution to Vertebrate Evolution 6: 1-232. Most specimens are from the Turolian European Land Mammal Age (equivalent to the Tortonian and Messinian stages) of the Miocene, though there are some specimens that may date to the earliest Pliocene (the Ruscinian, corresponding to the Zanclean and early Piacenzian). The question of how many species are actually valid is a matter of debate: ''T. rugosifrons'' alone has five junior synonyms. Denis Geraads and Nikolai Spassov, in 2004, recognised only eight, or nine if ''T. maius'' is not a synonym of ''T. eldaricus''. A list of ''Tragoportax'' species, per that study, is as follows:

Multiple taxonomic revisions have taken place in the intervening years. ''T. macedoniensis'' is treated in some papers as a species of ''Miotragocerus''. In 2009, a new ''Tragoportax'' species, ''T. abyssinicus'', was described from the Late Miocene of Afar, Ethiopia. In 2023, another new species, ''T. perses'', was described from Iran.

Description

''Tragoportax'' species varied in size. Most species were approximately the size of a red deer. In 1993, Meike Köhler estimated the body mass of ''T. amalthea'' at around .

Skull and dentition

The snout of ''Tragoportax'' was short, though the basicranium was fairly long. As with many modern antelope species, the horns are fairly diagnostic, and can be used to differentiate species. In some species, like ''T. amalthea'', the horns were twisted, whereas in others they were relatively straight. The horns of adult males were longer and slenderer than those of females and younger individuals, and often curved backwards. They were triangular or sub-triangular in cross-section, and were less laterally compressed than those of the related ''Miotragocerus''. Some specimens of ''T. curvicornis'' are completely hornless. ''Tragoportax'''s teeth were brachydont (low-crowned) to mesodont (having mid-sized crowns). The premolars are fairly long and are not molarised, though show the first signs of it. They are shorter than those of ''Miotragocerus''. The second premolar is shorter than the third, particularly the anterior (front) portion, with a parastyle that curved backwards.

Postcrania

The postcranial elements of ''Tragoportax'' were similar in many respects to cervids. The limbs overall were fairly long, and it may have been at least somewhat cursorial. The metapodials were large, slender and transversally compressed, overall resembling those of cervids. They were robust compared to those of ''Miotragocerus''.

Palaeoecology

''Tragoportax amalthea'' likely inhabited lightly wooded environments. On the other hand, ''T. macedoniensis'' (if it is ''Tragoportax''), however, likely inhabited more forested environments, as it possesses traits characteristic of forest-dwelling bovids, such as reductions in body and horn size. Based on morphological similarities with cervids like the red deer, at least some species probably were folivorous (had a leaf-heavy diet), while others were graminivorous (had a grass-heavy diet). On the other hand, analysis of dental isotopes and microwear suggest that ''T. rugosifrons'' was a mixed feeder, eating both leaves and grasses. The evolution of browsing habits in ''Tragoportax'' may have been driven by increased competition from other grazing mammal clades, such as rhinocerotids and equids.

References

{{Taxonbar, from=Q15055090

Boselaphini
Prehistoric bovids
Mammals described in 1937
Fossil taxa described in 1937
Prehistoric Artiodactyla genera