Supermarine 545

The Supermarine 545 was a supersonic jet fighter project designed by the British aircraft manufacturer Supermarine. A single aircraft was built, but remained unflown, largely due to the project having fallen out of political favour.

The project commenced during the early 1950s in response to interest in transonic aircraft within the Royal Air Force. Supermarine, who was at the time engaged in the development of another front-line fighter, the Swift, decided to use this existing programme as the Type 545's starting point. Major differences from the proceeding Swift was the adoption of a crescent wing and a more powerful powerplant in the form of the reheated Rolls-Royce Avon turbojet engine; amongst its performance capabilities, Supermarine claimed that the aircraft would be readily capable of achieving Mach 1.3.

During February 1952, the company received an order for a pair of prototypes to be built. However, by the time that the first was completed, the project had become politically unpalatable due to the considerable shortcomings of the Swift. Having lost confidence in Supermarine, on 25 March 1956, the contract was cancelled prior to the first aircraft ever taking flight. After a brief period in storage, the sole Type 545 was donated as an instructional aid to College of Aeronautics at Cranfield Airport, Bedfordshire; it was eventually scrapped in 1967. A few years later, Supermarine ceased to exist as an independent company.

Design and development

Background

The origins of the Type 545 can be traced back to the early 1950s and the Royal Air Force's (RAF) interest in developing transonic aircraft to serve as a stopgap while the next generation of supersonic fighters were being developed. Two rival aircraft manufacturers, Supermarine and Hawker, separately prepared proposed such aircraft, both choosing to design derivatives of their respective Swift and Hunter fighter aircraft, these being the Type 545 and Hawker P.1083 respectively.Wood 1975, pp. 48–51. During February 1951, Supermarine made its initial submission; it was formally accepted by the Air Ministry roughly one month later.Andrews and Morgan 1981, p. 294.

At this stage, the Swift programme was in development and its shortcomings were yet to become apparent, this fortunate timing is a factor that aviation author Derek Wood accredits as a major reason for Supermarine's submission having received greater favour over Hawker's bid amongst RAF officials reviewing the two proposals.

The Type 545 had been drawn up to conform with the requirements stipulated within the Air Ministry's Specification F.105D; it was projected to have been capable of attaining Mach 1.3; in comparison to the rival P.1083, the company had predicted it to attain superior performance.Wood 1975, pp. 50–51. Externally, the Type 545 bore a crude resemblance to the Swift, and would have served as a spiritual successor to it. However, the aircraft was radically redesigned, having been furnished with an area-ruled fuselage amongst other changes.

One of the most visually prominent feature of the Type 545 was its unorthodox crescent-shaped wing, which was envisioned as heavily contributing to the aircraft's performance characteristics, particularly during supersonic speeds.
It was paired with a somewhat bullet-shaped fuselage; the lower portion of the fuselage was flattened around the junction with the wings to smooth airflow and avoid the poor low-speed handling characteristics of the Swift.Andrews and Morgan 1981, pp. 294-296. The aircraft's structure comprised a relatively thick exterior skin supported by a thin closely-positioned spanwise web underneath that was claimed to provide the fuselage with an above-average strength-to-weight ratio amongst its contemporaries. The aircraft was powered by a single Rolls-Royce Avon turbojet, which was fitted with reheat, and supplied with air via elliptical intake near the nose. According to aviation author Francis Mason, the distinct design of this intake was the most obvious difference between the Type 545 and its precursor, which had side intakes.

The crescent wing had three sections, 50° of sweep inboard, 40° in the centre and 30° outboard, the mean aspect ratio would be 7.5 per cent and the thickness/chord ratio reduce from 8 per cent at the root to 6 per cent at the tips.

Order and termination

During February 1952, Supermarine received an order for two prototype Type 545s to be completed under contract 6/Acft/7711. During 1955, it was announced that work on the Type 545 project was to be cancelled. According to Wood, this was in part due to the considerable difficulties that had been experienced with the Swift, which largely remained unresolved.Wood 1975, pp. 51–52. Specifically, Wood observed that the Swift had become a national scandal by early 1955, which not only tarnished the aircraft but also the RAF and the British aircraft industry, the public and ministers alike generally adopting a more averse nature to aviation and other aircraft projects. The Type 545, with its close association to the Swift, thus became a particular target for scepticism. Others reasons, such as budget constraints having compelled cutbacks, were publicly spoken at the time.

The first of the prototypes, serial number ''XA181'', had been completed at Hursley Park and was preparing for its maiden flight when news was received of the contract's formal cancellation on 25 March 1956. The second aircraft, ''XA186'', which was to be furnished with a more powerful model of the Avon engine that was to enable a maximum speed of Mach 1.6 to be achieved, was cancelled prior to construction of the airframe being commenced.Halley 2001, p. 5.Andrews and Morgan 1981, p. 296. Roughly two years later, Supermarine was effectively dissolved, having been absorbed into what would emerge as the British Aircraft Corporation (BAC).Andrews and Morgan 1981, p. 307.

Shortly following its completion, the sole completed prototype was put into storage by Supermarine during mid-1950s. Several years later, the aircraft was donated to the College of Aeronautics at Cranfield Airport, Bedfordshire, where it was used as an instructional aid for aircraft engineering students attending the college.Andrews and Morgan 1987, pp. 294-296. During 1967, the sole Type 545 was scrapped.

Specifications (performance estimated)

References

Citations

Bibliography

* Andrews, C.F. and E.B. Morgan. ''Supermarine Aircraft Since 1914''. London: Putnam, 1981. .
* Andrews, C.F. and E.B. Morgan. ''Supermarine Aircraft since 1914''. London: Putnam, 1987, .
* Halley, J.J. ''Royal Air Force Aircraft XA100 to XZ999''. Air-Britain (Historians) Ltd, 2001, .
* Mason, Francis K. ''The British Fighter since 1912''. Annapolis, Maryland, USA: Naval Institute Press, 1992. .
* Wood, Derek. ''Project Cancelled''. Macdonald and Jane's Publishers, 1975.

External links

1963 Reference to the Type 545 in Flight magazine


{{Supermarine aircraft

1950s British fighter aircraft
545
Low-wing aircraft
Single-engined jet aircraft
Aircraft with retractable tricycle landing gear
Cancelled military aircraft projects of the United Kingdom
Unflown aircraft