is a book on the history of
ornament by the Austrian
art historian Alois Riegl
Alois Riegl (14 January 1858 – 17 June 1905) was an Austrian art historian, and is considered a member of the Vienna School of Art History. He was one of the major figures in the establishment of art history as a self-sufficient academic discipl ...
. It was published in
Berlin
Berlin ( ; ) is the Capital of Germany, capital and largest city of Germany, by both area and List of cities in Germany by population, population. With 3.7 million inhabitants, it has the List of cities in the European Union by population withi ...
in 1893. The English translation renders the title as ''Problems of style: foundations for a history of ornament'', although this has been criticized by some. It has been called "the one great book ever written about the history of ornament."
Riegl wrote the while employed as director of the textile department at what was then the Österreichisches Museum für Kunst und Industrie (today the
Museum für angewandte Kunst) in
Vienna
Vienna ( ; ; ) is the capital city, capital, List of largest cities in Austria, most populous city, and one of Federal states of Austria, nine federal states of Austria. It is Austria's primate city, with just over two million inhabitants. ...
. His primary intention was to argue that it was possible to write a continuous history of ornament. This position is argued in explicit opposition to that of the "technical-materialist" school, according to which "all art forms were always the direct products of materials and techniques" and that ornamental "motifs originated spontaneously throughout the world at a number of different locations." Riegl associates this view with the followers of
Gottfried Semper, who had advanced a related argument in his (''Style in the technical arts; or practical
aesthetics
Aesthetics (also spelled esthetics) is the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature of beauty and taste (sociology), taste, which in a broad sense incorporates the philosophy of art.Slater, B. H.Aesthetics ''Internet Encyclopedia of Ph ...
'', 1878–79). However, Riegl consistently disassociates Semper's followers from Semper himself, writing that
As the technical-materialist position had attained the status of dogma, Riegl stated that "the most pressing problem that confronts historians of the decorative arts today is to reintegrate the historical thread that has been severed into a thousand pieces." Accordingly, he argued for a continuous development of ornament from ancient Egyptian through Greek and Roman and up to early Islamic and, eventually, Ottoman art.
Contents
The is divided into an introduction, which sets out the purpose of the work, and four chapters, each on a theme in the history of artistic style.
The first chapter, "The Geometric Style," argues that geometric ornament originated, not from such technical processes as wickerwork and weaving, but rather from an "immanent artistic drive, alert and restless for action, that human beings possessed long before they invented woven protective coverings for their bodies." He supported this position through an analysis of geometric ornament in
Stone Age
The Stone Age was a broad prehistory, prehistoric period during which Rock (geology), stone was widely used to make stone tools with an edge, a point, or a percussion surface. The period lasted for roughly 3.4 million years and ended b ...
European art, in particular objects that had recently been discovered in the
Dordogne. This ornament, he argued, developed from attempts to represent natural forms in two dimensions, which gave rise to the idea of an outline. After this "invention of line," the cave-dwellers proceeded to arrange lines "according to the principles of rhythm and symmetry."
The second chapter, "The Heraldic Style," addresses compositions of "paired animals arranged symmetrically to either side of an intervening central element." This type of decoration had been associated by previous scholars, most notably
Ernst Curtius, with the technical demands of
silk-weaving. Riegl argued instead that heraldic ornament arose before the invention of mechanical weaving-looms, and stemmed from a desire for symmetry.
The third chapter, "The Introduction of Vegetal Ornament and the Development of the Ornamental Tendril," traces an unbroken evolution of vegetal ornament from ancient Egyptian through to late
Roman art. Here Riegl argues that motifs such as the
lotus flower, although they may originally have been endowed by the Egyptians with symbolic significance, were adopted by other cultures that "no longer understood their hieratic meaning," and thereby became purely decorative. In the most famous section of this chapter, Riegl argued that
acanthus ornament was not derived from the
acanthus plant, as had been believed since the time of
Vitruvius, but was rather a sculptural adaptation of the
palmette motif. It was therefore "a product of pure artistic invention," and not of "a simple compulsion to make direct copies of living organisms."
The fourth chapter, "The
Arabesque," continues the development of the previous chapter through late antique and early
Byzantine
The Byzantine Empire, also known as the Eastern Roman Empire, was the continuation of the Roman Empire centred on Constantinople during late antiquity and the Middle Ages. Having survived the events that caused the fall of the Western Roman E ...
and into
Islamic art. The arabesque is understood here as a geometricized version of earlier systems of tendril ornament, thereby establishing a "genetic relationship between the ornamental Islamic tendril and its direct predecessor, the tendril ornament of antiquity."
The final two chapters are therefore presented as a continuous history of vegetal ornament from ancient Egypt through to Ottoman Turkey, in which individual motifs develop according to purely artistic criteria, and not through the intervention of technical or mimetic concerns. In the introduction it is suggested that this development could be continued to Riegl's own time, and that "ornament experiences the same continuous, coherent development that prevails in the art of all periods."
Significance
The remains a fundamental work in the history of ornament, and has heavily influenced the work of
Paul Jacobsthal and
Ernst Gombrich, among others who have addressed the same themes.
Within Riegl's work as a whole, the constitutes his earliest general statement of principles, although his "theoretical thinking had not by any means reached maturity."
[Henri Zerner, "Preface," ''Problems of style'', xxii.] By severing stylistic development from external influences, such as technical procedures or a desire to imitate nature, Riegl raised an extremely complicated set of questions regarding the actual source and significance of stylistic change. As
Otto Pächt has written:
Thus the concerns of the led directly into those of Riegl's next major study, the (''Late Roman art industry'', 1901), in which he approached style change in
late antiquity
Late antiquity marks the period that comes after the end of classical antiquity and stretches into the onset of the Early Middle Ages. Late antiquity as a period was popularized by Peter Brown (historian), Peter Brown in 1971, and this periodiza ...
not as a symptom of decline, but as the result of positive artistic concerns.
See also
*
Scroll (art)
*
Master of Animals
Notes
References
{{reflist, 28em
Editions and translations
* German: ''Stilfragen: Grundlegungen zu einer Geschichte der Ornamentik''. First edition, Berlin, George Siemens, 1893. Second edition, Berlin, Richard Carl Schmidt, 1923.
* English: Evelyn Kain, tr., ''Problems of style: foundations for a history of ornament''. Princeton, Princeton University, 1992.
* French: Henri-Alexis Baatsch and Françoise Rolland, trs., ''Questions de style: fondements d'une histoire de l'ornementation''. Paris, Hazan, 2002.
* Spanish: Federico Miguel Saller, tr. ''Problemas de estilo: Fundamentos para una historia de la ornamentación''. Barcelona, Gustavo Gili, 1980.
1893 non-fiction books
Art history books