Context
Complexity
Squeeze plays are considered by many "to be the domain of the experts but many of the positions are straightforward once the basic principles are understood." And according to Terence Reese, the squeeze play "in its practical aspects is not particularly difficult. It takes time, admittedly...and has...to be learned – it cannot be 'picked up'".Reese and Jourdain (1980), Preface.Significance and prevalence
Squeeze plays are important in difficult-to-make high-level contracts and in matchpoint play where the taking of one more trick than generally achieved by the field is a real difference-maker likely to result in a top . The opportunity to employ a squeeze play arises sufficiently frequently that it is essential to learn if one aspires to become an advanced player.,Terminology
* : Cards held by defenders which are winners or protecting winners. * : Determining or assuming the location of the opponents' cards. * The : The number of tricks that must be lost before the squeeze can function. * : To lose the necessary number of tricks. *Conditions
The most basic forms of squeeze require all the following conditions to be in place before the squeeze can operate: * The defense's guards in the threat suits must be held by one defender only. * The count has been rectified which ensures that: **Declarer has enough winners to take all the remaining tricks but one, which is to be gained from the squeeze; and **The defender being squeezed has no idle cards. * Between them, declarer and dummy have threat cards in two suits that the squeeze may establish as winners: ** At least one of the threat cards must be in the hand opposite the squeeze card; and ** At least one of the threat cards must lie in the hand that plays after the squeezed defender. * There is an entry to the threat card opposite the squeeze card.Examples
Classification
There are several ways to classify squeezes: * According to which opponent can be squeezed: **In a ''positional'' squeeze, only one opponent can be squeezed. **In an ''automatic'' squeeze, either opponent can be squeezed. * According to number of opponents squeezed: **In a ''single'' squeeze, only one opponent is squeezed. **In a ''double'' squeeze, both opponents are squeezed. * According to number of suits involved: **In a ''two-suit'' squeeze, there are menaces in two suits. **In a ''three-suit'' squeeze, there are menaces in three suits. **In a ''compound'' squeeze, there are menaces in three suits (against one); then, menaces in three suits (against both opponents). It could be named a ''six-suit'' squeeze.Clyde Love in '' Bridge Squeezes Complete'' proposes the term ''quintuple squeeze'' as it is a triple squeeze followed by a double squeeze **The peculiar and rare '' single-suit squeeze'' is actually a type of endplay rather than a real squeeze. * According to what is gained: **In a ''material'' squeeze, the opponents are forced to give up a trick directly. **In a ''non-material'' squeeze, the opponents are forced to give up strategic position. For example, an opponent can be squeezed out of an exit card or a card that disturbs declarer's entries. An extra trick, however, may materialize later. * According to the count rectification: **In a squeeze ''with the count'', the count is rectified before the squeeze card is played, and declarer will lose no more tricks. These are typically material squeezes. **In a squeeze ''without the count'', the count is not yet rectified. These are typically non-material squeezes, often with a throw-in in the end position. Most of the common types of squeezes (and some of the rare ones) have names:See also
* Bridge Squeezes Complete byNotes
Further reading
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Also, * / * Reese, Terence. ''Master Play in Contract Bridge'' * * * Thoma, Peter. ''The Art of Bridge Squeezes'' * {{DEFAULTSORT:Squeeze Play (Bridge) * fr:Squeeze#Bridge