Spherical Functions

In mathematics and physical science, spherical harmonics are special functions defined on the surface of a sphere. They are often employed in solving partial differential equations in many scientific fields.

Since the spherical harmonics form a complete set of orthogonal functions and thus an orthonormal basis, each function defined on the surface of a sphere can be written as a sum of these spherical harmonics. This is similar to periodic functions defined on a circle that can be expressed as a sum of circular functions (sines and cosines) via Fourier series. Like the sines and cosines in Fourier series, the spherical harmonics may be organized by (spatial) angular frequency, as seen in the rows of functions in the illustration on the right. Further, spherical harmonics are basis functions for irreducible representations of SO(3), the group of rotations in three dimensions, and thus play a central role in the group theoretic discussion of SO(3).

Spherical harmonics originate from solving Laplace's equation in the spherical domains. Functions that are solutions to Laplace's equation are called harmonics. Despite their name, spherical harmonics take their simplest form in Cartesian coordinates, where they can be defined as homogeneous polynomials of degree $\ell$ in $(x, y, z)$ that obey Laplace's equation. The connection with spherical coordinates arises immediately if one uses the homogeneity to extract a factor of radial dependence $r^\ell$ from the above-mentioned polynomial of degree $\ell$; the remaining factor can be regarded as a function of the spherical angular coordinates $\theta$ and $\varphi$ only, or equivalently of the orientational unit vector $\mathbf r$ specified by these angles. In this setting, they may be viewed as the angular portion of a set of solutions to Laplace's equation in three dimensions, and this viewpoint is often taken as an alternative definition. Notice, however, that spherical harmonics are ''not'' functions on the sphere which are harmonic with respect to the Laplace-Beltrami operator for the standard round metric on the sphere: the only harmonic functions in this sense on the sphere are the constants, since harmonic functions satisfy the Maximum principle. Spherical harmonics, as functions on the sphere, are eigenfunctions of the Laplace-Beltrami operator (see the section ''Higher dimensions'' below).

A specific set of spherical harmonics, denoted $Y_\ell^m(\theta,\varphi)$ or $Y_\ell^m()$, are known as Laplace's spherical harmonics, as they were first introduced by Pierre Simon de Laplace in 1782. These functions form an orthogonal system, and are thus basic to the expansion of a general function on the sphere as alluded to above.

Spherical harmonics are important in many theoretical and practical applications, including the representation of multipole electrostatic and electromagnetic fields, electron configurations, gravitational fields, geoids, the magnetic fields of planetary bodies and stars, and the cosmic microwave background radiation. In 3D computer graphics, spherical harmonics play a role in a wide variety of topics including indirect lighting (ambient occlusion, global illumination, precomputed radiance transfer, etc.) and modelling of 3D shapes.

History

Spherical harmonics were first investigated in connection with the Newtonian potential of Newton's law of universal gravitation in three dimensions. In 1782, Pierre-Simon de Laplace had, in his ''Mécanique Céleste'', determined that the gravitational potential $\R^3 \to \R$ at a point associated with a set of point masses located at points was given by

$V(\mathbf) = \sum_i \frac.$

Each term in the above summation is an individual Newtonian potential for a point mass. Just prior to that time, Adrien-Marie Legendre had investigated the expansion of the Newtonian potential in powers of and . He discovered that if then

$\frac = P_0(\cos\gamma)\frac + P_1(\cos\gamma)\frac + P_2(\cos\gamma)\frac+\cdots$

where is the angle between the vectors and . The functions $P_i:$1, 1\to \R are the Legendre polynomials, and they can be derived as a special case of spherical harmonics. Subsequently, in his 1782 memoir, Laplace investigated these coefficients using spherical coordinates to represent the angle between and . (See Applications of Legendre polynomials in physics for a more detailed analysis.)

In 1867, William Thomson (Lord Kelvin) and Peter Guthrie Tait introduced the solid spherical harmonics in their ''Treatise on Natural Philosophy'', and also first introduced the name of “spherical harmonics” for these functions. The solid harmonics were homogeneous polynomial solutions $\R^3 \to \R$ of Laplace's equation
$\frac + \frac + \frac = 0.$
By examining Laplace's equation in spherical coordinates, Thomson and Tait recovered Laplace's spherical harmonics. (See the section below, “Harmonic polynomial representation”.) The term “Laplace's coefficients” was employed by William Whewell to describe the particular system of solutions introduced along these lines, whereas others reserved this designation for the zonal spherical harmonics that had properly been introduced by Laplace and Legendre.

The 19th century development of Fourier series made possible the solution of a wide variety of physical problems in rectangular domains, such as the solution of the heat equation and wave equation. This could be achieved by expansion of functions in series of trigonometric functions. Whereas the trigonometric functions in a Fourier series represent the fundamental modes of vibration in a string, the spherical harmonics represent the fundamental modes of vibration of a sphere in much the same way. Many aspects of the theory of Fourier series could be generalized by taking expansions in spherical harmonics rather than trigonometric functions. Moreover, analogous to how trigonometric functions can equivalently be written as complex exponentials, spherical harmonics also possessed an equivalent form as complex-valued functions. This was a boon for problems possessing spherical symmetry, such as those of celestial mechanics originally studied by Laplace and Legendre.

The prevalence of spherical harmonics already in physics set the stage for their later importance in the 20th century birth of quantum mechanics. The (complex-valued) spherical harmonics $S^2 \to \Complex$ are eigenfunctions of the square of the orbital angular momentum operator
$-i\hbar\mathbf\times\nabla,$
and therefore they represent the different quantized configurations of atomic orbitals.

Laplace's spherical harmonics

Laplace's equation imposes that the Laplacian of a scalar field is zero. (Here the scalar field is understood to be complex, i.e. to correspond to a (smooth) function $f:\R^3 \to \Complex$.) In spherical coordinates this is:

$\nabla^2 f = \frac \frac\left(r^2 \frac\right) + \frac \frac\left(\sin\theta \frac\right) + \frac \frac = 0.$

Consider the problem of finding solutions of the form . By separation of variables, two differential equations result by imposing Laplace's equation:
$\frac\frac\left(r^2\frac\right) = \lambda,\qquad \frac\frac\frac\left(\sin\theta \frac\right) + \frac\frac\frac = -\lambda.$
The second equation can be simplified under the assumption that has the form . Applying separation of variables again to the second equation gives way to the pair of differential equations

$\frac \frac = -m^2$
$\lambda\sin^2\theta + \frac \frac \left(\sin\theta \frac\right) = m^2$

for some number . A priori, is a complex constant, but because must be a periodic function whose period evenly divides , is necessarily an integer and is a linear combination of the complex exponentials . The solution function is regular at the poles of the sphere, where . Imposing this regularity in the solution of the second equation at the boundary points of the domain is a Sturm–Liouville problem that forces the parameter to be of the form for some non-negative integer with ; this is also explained below in terms of the orbital angular momentum. Furthermore, a change of variables transforms this equation into the Legendre equation, whose solution is a multiple of the associated Legendre polynomial . Finally, the equation for has solutions of the form ; requiring the solution to be regular throughout forces .

Here the solution was assumed to have the special form . For a given value of , there are independent solutions of this form, one for each integer with . These angular solutions $Y_^m : S^2 \to \Complex$ are a product of trigonometric functions, here represented as a complex exponential, and associated Legendre polynomials:

$Y_\ell^m (\theta, \varphi ) = N e^ P_\ell^m (\cos )$

which fulfill
$r^2\nabla^2 Y_\ell^m (\theta, \varphi ) = -\ell (\ell + 1 ) Y_\ell^m (\theta, \varphi ).$

Here $Y_^m:S^2 \to \Complex$ is called a spherical harmonic function of degree and order , P_^m: 1,1to \R is an associated Legendre polynomial, is a normalization constant, and and represent colatitude and longitude, respectively. In particular, the colatitude , or polar angle, ranges from at the North Pole, to at the Equator, to at the South Pole, and the longitude , or azimuth, may assume all values with . For a fixed integer , every solution , $Y: S^2 \to \Complex$, of the eigenvalue problem
$r^2\nabla^2 Y = -\ell (\ell + 1 ) Y$
is a linear combination of $Y_\ell^m : S^2 \to \Complex$. In fact, for any such solution, is the expression in spherical coordinates of a homogeneous polynomial $\R^3 \to \Complex$ that is harmonic (see below), and so counting dimensions shows that there are linearly independent such polynomials.

The general solution $f:\R^3 \to \Complex$ to Laplace's equation $\Delta f = 0$ in a ball centered at the origin is a linear combination of the spherical harmonic functions multiplied by the appropriate scale factor ,

$f(r, \theta, \varphi) = \sum_^\infty \sum_^\ell f_\ell^m r^\ell Y_\ell^m (\theta, \varphi ),$

where the $f_^m \in \Complex$ are constants and the factors are known as (''regular'') solid harmonics $\R^3 \to \Complex$. Such an expansion is valid in the ball

$r < R = \frac.$

For $r > R$, the solid harmonics with negative powers of $r$ (the ''irregular'' solid harmonics $\R^3 \setminus \ \to \Complex$) are chosen instead. In that case, one needs to expand the solution of known regions in Laurent series (about $r=\infty$), instead of the Taylor series (about $r = 0$) used above, to match the terms and find series expansion coefficients $f^m_\ell \in \Complex$.

Orbital angular momentum

In quantum mechanics, Laplace's spherical harmonics are understood in terms of the orbital angular momentum
$\mathbf = -i\hbar (\mathbf\times \mathbf) = L_x\mathbf + L_y\mathbf+L_z\mathbf.$
The is conventional in quantum mechanics; it is convenient to work in units in which . The spherical harmonics are eigenfunctions of the square of the orbital angular momentum
$\begin \mathbf^2 &= -r^2\nabla^2 + \left(r\frac+1\right)r\frac\\ &= -\frac \frac\sin\theta \frac - \frac \frac. \end$
Laplace's spherical harmonics are the joint eigenfunctions of the square of the orbital angular momentum and the generator of rotations about the azimuthal axis:
$\begin L_z &= -i\left(x\frac - y\frac\right)\\ &=-i\frac. \end$

These operators commute, and are densely defined self-adjoint operators on the weighted Hilbert space of functions ''f'' square-integrable with respect to the normal distribution as the weight function on R³:
$\frac\int_ , f(x), ^2 e^\,dx < \infty.$
Furthermore, L² is a positive operator.

If is a joint eigenfunction of and , then by definition
$\begin \mathbf^2Y &= \lambda Y\\ L_zY &= mY \end$
for some real numbers ''m'' and ''λ''. Here ''m'' must in fact be an integer, for ''Y'' must be periodic in the coordinate ''φ'' with period a number that evenly divides 2''π''. Furthermore, since
$\mathbf^2 = L_x^2 + L_y^2 + L_z^2$
and each of ''L''_''x'', ''L''_''y'', ''L''_''z'' are self-adjoint, it follows that .

Denote this joint eigenspace by , and define the raising and lowering operators by
$\begin L_+ &= L_x + iL_y\\ L_- &= L_x - iL_y \end$
Then and commute with , and the Lie algebra generated by , , is the special linear Lie algebra of order 2, $\mathfrak_2(\Complex)$, with commutation relations
_z,L_+= L_+,\quad _z,L_-= -L_-, \quad _+,L_-= 2L_z.
Thus (it is a "raising operator") and (it is a "lowering operator"). In particular, must be zero for ''k'' sufficiently large, because the inequality must hold in each of the nontrivial joint eigenspaces. Let be a nonzero joint eigenfunction, and let be the least integer such that
$L_+^kY = 0.$
Then, since
$L_-L_+ = \mathbf^2 - L_z^2 - L_z$
it follows that
$0 = L_-L_+^k Y = (\lambda - (m+k)^2-(m+k))Y.$
Thus for the positive integer .

The foregoing has been all worked out in the spherical coordinate representation, $\langle \theta, \varphi, l m\rangle = Y_l^m (\theta, \varphi)$ but may be expressed more abstractly in the complete, orthonormal spherical ket basis.

Harmonic polynomial representation

The spherical harmonics can be expressed as the restriction to the unit sphere of certain polynomial functions $\R^3 \to \Complex$. Specifically, we say that a (complex-valued) polynomial function $p: \R^3 \to \Complex$ is ''homogeneous'' of degree $\ell$ if
$p(\lambda\mathbf x)=\lambda^\ell p(\mathbf x)$
for all real numbers $\lambda \in \R$ and all $x \in \R^3$. We say that $p$ is ''harmonic'' if
$\Delta p=0,$
where $\Delta$ is the Laplacian. Then for each $\ell$, we define
$\mathbf_\ell = \left\.$

For example, when $\ell=1$, $\mathbf_1$ is just the 3-dimensional space of all linear functions $\R^3 \to \Complex$, since any such function is automatically harmonic. Meanwhile, when $\ell = 2$, we have a 5-dimensional space:
$\mathbf_2 = \operatorname_(x_1 x_2,\, x_1 x_3,\, x_2 x_3,\, x_1^2-x_2^2,\, x_1^2-x_3^2).$

For any $\ell$, the space $\mathbf_$ of spherical harmonics of degree $\ell$ is just the space of restrictions to the sphere $S^2$ of the elements of $\mathbf_\ell$. As suggested in the introduction, this perspective is presumably the origin of the term “spherical harmonic” (i.e., the restriction to the sphere of a harmonic function).

For example, for any $c \in \Complex$ the formula
$p(x_1, x_2, x_3) = c(x_1 + ix_2)^\ell$
defines a homogeneous polynomial of degree $\ell$ with domain and codomain $\R^3 \to \Complex$, which happens to be independent of $x_3$. This polynomial is easily seen to be harmonic. If we write $p$ in spherical coordinates $(r,\theta,\varphi)$ and then restrict to $r = 1$, we obtain
$p(\theta,\varphi) = c \sin(\theta)^\ell (\cos(\varphi) + i \sin(\varphi))^\ell,$
which can be rewritten as
$p(\theta,\varphi) = c\left(\sqrt\right)^\ell e^.$
After using the formula for the associated Legendre polynomial $P^\ell_\ell$, we may recognize this as the formula for the spherical harmonic $Y^\ell_\ell(\theta, \varphi).$ (See the section below on special cases of the spherical harmonics.)

Conventions

Orthogonality and normalization

Several different normalizations are in common use for the Laplace spherical harmonic functions $S^2 \to \Complex$. Throughout the section, we use the standard convention that for $m>0$ (see associated Legendre polynomials)
$P_\ell ^ = (-1)^m \frac P_\ell ^$
which is the natural normalization given by Rodrigues' formula.

In acoustics, the Laplace spherical harmonics are generally defined as (this is the convention used in this article)
$Y_\ell^m( \theta , \varphi ) = \sqrt \, P_\ell^m ( \cos ) \, e^$
while in quantum mechanics:
$Y_\ell^m( \theta , \varphi ) = (-1)^m \sqrt \, P_^m ( \cos ) \, e^$

where $P_^$ are associated Legendre polynomials without the Condon–Shortley phase (to avoid counting the phase twice).

In both definitions, the spherical harmonics are orthonormal
$\int_^\pi\int_^Y_\ell^m \, Y_^^* \, d\Omega=\delta_\, \delta_,$
where is the Kronecker delta and . This normalization is used in quantum mechanics because it ensures that probability is normalized, i.e.,
$\int = 1.$

The disciplines of geodesy and spectral analysis use

$Y_\ell^m( \theta , \varphi ) = \sqrt \, P_\ell^m ( \cos )\, e^$

which possess unit power

$\frac \int_^\pi\int_^Y_\ell^m \, Y_^^* d\Omega=\delta_\, \delta_.$

The Magnetism, magnetics community, in contrast, uses Schmidt semi-normalized harmonics

$Y_\ell^m( \theta , \varphi ) = \sqrt \, P_\ell^m ( \cos ) \, e^$

which have the normalization

$\int_^\pi\int_^Y_\ell^m \, Y_^^*d\Omega = \frac \delta_\, \delta_.$

In quantum mechanics this normalization is sometimes used as well, and is named Racah's normalization after Giulio Racah.

It can be shown that all of the above normalized spherical harmonic functions satisfy

$Y_\ell^^* (\theta, \varphi) = (-1)^m Y_\ell^ (\theta, \varphi),$

where the superscript denotes complex conjugation. Alternatively, this equation follows from the relation of the spherical harmonic functions with the Wigner D-matrix#Relation to spherical harmonics and Legendre polynomials, Wigner D-matrix.

Condon–Shortley phase

One source of confusion with the definition of the spherical harmonic functions concerns a phase factor of $(-1)^m$, commonly referred to as the Edward Condon, Condon–Shortley phase in the quantum mechanical literature. In the quantum mechanics community, it is common practice to either include this phase factor in the definition of the associated Legendre polynomials, or to append it to the definition of the spherical harmonic functions. There is no requirement to use the Condon–Shortley phase in the definition of the spherical harmonic functions, but including it can simplify some quantum mechanical operations, especially the application of Ladder operator, raising and lowering operators. The geodesy and magnetics communities never include the Condon–Shortley phase factor in their definitions of the spherical harmonic functions nor in the ones of the associated Legendre polynomials.

Real form

A real basis of spherical harmonics $Y_:S^2 \to \R$ can be defined in terms of their complex analogues $Y_^m: S^2 \to \Complex$ by setting
$\begin Y_ &= \begin \dfrac \left(Y_\ell^ - (-1)^m\, Y_\ell^\right) & \text\ m < 0\\ Y_\ell^0 & \text\ m=0\\ \dfrac \left(Y_\ell^ + (-1)^m\, Y_\ell^\right) & \text\ m > 0. \end\\ &= \begin \dfrac \left(Y_\ell^ - (-1)^\, Y_\ell^\right) & \text\ m < 0\\ Y_\ell^0 & \text\ m=0\\ \dfrac \left(Y_\ell^ + (-1)^\, Y_\ell^\right) & \text\ m>0. \end\\ &= \begin \sqrt \, (-1)^m \, \Im [] & \text\ m<0\\ Y_\ell^0 & \text\ m=0\\ \sqrt \, (-1)^m \, \Re [] & \text\ m>0. \end \end$
The Condon–Shortley phase convention is used here for consistency. The corresponding inverse equations defining the complex spherical harmonics $Y_^m : S^2 \to \Complex$ in terms of the real spherical harmonics $Y_:S^2 \to \R$ are
$Y_^ = \begin \dfrac \left(Y_ - i Y_\right) & \text\ m<0 \\[4pt] Y_ &\text\ m=0 \\[4pt] \dfrac \left(Y_ + i Y_\right) & \text\ m>0. \end$

The real spherical harmonics $Y_:S^2 \to \R$ are sometimes known as ''tesseral spherical harmonics''. These functions have the same orthonormality properties as the complex ones $Y_^m : S^2 \to \Complex$ above. The real spherical harmonics $Y_$ with are said to be of cosine type, and those with of sine type. The reason for this can be seen by writing the functions in terms of the Legendre polynomials as
$Y_ = \begin \left(-1\right)^m\sqrt \sqrt \; P_\ell^(\cos \theta) \ \sin( , m, \varphi ) &\text m<0 \\[4pt] \sqrt \ P_\ell^m(\cos \theta) & \text m=0 \\[4pt] \left(-1\right)^m\sqrt \sqrt \; P_\ell^m(\cos \theta) \ \cos( m\varphi ) & \text m>0 \,. \end$

The same sine and cosine factors can be also seen in the following subsection that deals with the Cartesian representation.

See Table of spherical harmonics#Real spherical harmonics, here for a list of real spherical harmonics up to and including $\ell = 4$, which can be seen to be consistent with the output of the equations above.

Use in quantum chemistry

As is known from the analytic solutions for the hydrogen atom, the eigenfunctions of the angular part of the wave function are spherical harmonics. However, the solutions of the non-relativistic Schrödinger equation without magnetic terms can be made real. This is why the real forms are extensively used in basis functions for quantum chemistry, as the programs don't then need to use complex algebra. Here, it is important to note that the real functions span the same space as the complex ones would.

For example, as can be seen from the Table of spherical harmonics#Spherical harmonics, table of spherical harmonics, the usual functions ($\ell = 1$) are complex and mix axis directions, but the Table of spherical harmonics#Real spherical harmonics, real versions are essentially just , , and .

Spherical harmonics in Cartesian form

The complex spherical harmonics $Y_\ell^m$ give rise to the solid harmonics by extending from $S^2$ to all of $\R^3$ as a homogeneous function of degree $\ell$, i.e. setting
$R_\ell^m(v) := \, v\, ^\ell Y_\ell^m\left(\frac\right)$
It turns out that $R_\ell^m$ is basis of the space of harmonic and homogeneous polynomials of degree $\ell$. More specifically, it is the (unique up to normalization) Gelfand-Tsetlin-basis of this representation of the rotational group $SO(3)$ and an Solid harmonics#Complex form, explicit formula for $R_\ell^m$ in cartesian coordinates can be derived from that fact.

The Herglotz generating function

If the quantum mechanical convention is adopted for the $Y_^m: S^2 \to \Complex$, then
$e^ = \sum_^ \sum_^ \sqrt \frac Y_^m (\mathbf/r).$
Here, $\mathbf r$ is the vector with components $(x, y, z) \in \R^3$, $r = , \mathbf,$, and
$= - \frac\left( + i \right) + \frac\left( - i \right).$
$\mathbf a$ is a vector with complex coordinates:

$\mathbf a =[\frac(\frac-\lambda),-\frac(\frac +\lambda),1 ] .$

The essential property of $\mathbf a$ is that it is null:
$\mathbf a \cdot \mathbf a = 0.$

It suffices to take $v$ and $\lambda$ as real parameters.
In naming this generating function after Gustav Herglotz, Herglotz, we follow , who credit unpublished notes by him for its discovery.

Essentially all the properties of the spherical harmonics can be derived from this generating function. An immediate benefit of this definition is that if the vector $\mathbf r$ is replaced by the quantum mechanical spin vector operator $\mathbf J$, such that $\mathcal_^m()$ is the operator analogue of the Solid harmonics, solid harmonic $r^Y_^m (\mathbf/r)$, one obtains a generating function for a standardized set of spherical tensor operators, $\mathcal_^m()$:

$e^ = \sum_^ \sum_^ \sqrt \frac _^m().$

The parallelism of the two definitions ensures that the $\mathcal_^m$'s transform under rotations (see below) in the same way as the $Y_^m$'s, which in turn guarantees that they are spherical tensor operators, $T^_q$, with $k =$ and $q = m$, obeying all the properties of such operators, such as the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, Clebsch-Gordan composition theorem, and the Wigner-Eckart theorem. They are, moreover, a standardized set with a fixed scale or normalization.

Separated Cartesian form

The Herglotzian definition yields polynomials which may, if one wishes, be further factorized into a polynomial of $z$ and another of $x$ and $y$, as follows (Condon–Shortley phase):
$r^\ell\, \begin Y_\ell^ \\ Y_\ell^ \end = \left[\frac\right]^ \bar^m_\ell(z) \begin \left(-1\right)^m (A_m + i B_m) \\ (A_m - i B_m) \end , \qquad m > 0.$
and for :
$r^\ell\,Y_\ell^ \equiv \sqrt \bar^0_\ell .$
Here
$A_m(x,y) = \sum_^m \binom x^p y^ \cos \left((m-p) \frac\right),$
$B_m(x,y) = \sum_^m \binom x^p y^ \sin \left((m-p) \frac\right),$
and
$\bar^m_\ell(z) = \left[\frac\right]^ \sum_^ (-1)^k 2^ \binom\binom \frac \; r^\; z^.$
For $m = 0$ this reduces to
$\bar^0_\ell(z) = \sum_^ (-1)^k 2^ \binom\binom \; r^\; z^.$

The factor $\bar_\ell^m(z)$ is essentially the associated Legendre polynomial $P_\ell^m(\cos\theta)$, and the factors $(A_m \pm i B_m)$ are essentially $e^$.

Examples

Using the expressions for $\bar_\ell^m(z)$, $A_m(x,y)$, and $B_m(x,y)$ listed explicitly above we obtain:
$Y^1_3 = - \frac \left[\tfrac\cdot \tfrac \right]^ \left(5z^2-r^2\right) \left(x+iy\right) = - \left[\tfrac\cdot \tfrac\right]^ \left(5\cos^2\theta-1\right) \left(\sin\theta e^\right)$

$Y^_4 = \frac \left[\tfrac\cdot\tfrac\right]^ \left(7z^2-r^2\right) \left(x-iy\right)^2 = \left[\tfrac\cdot\tfrac\right]^ \left(7 \cos^2\theta -1\right) \left(\sin^2\theta e^\right)$
It may be verified that this agrees with the function listed Table of spherical harmonics#ℓ = 3, here and Table of spherical harmonics#ℓ = 4, here.

Real forms

Using the equations above to form the real spherical harmonics, it is seen that for $m>0$ only the $A_m$ terms (cosines) are included, and for $m<0$ only the $B_m$ terms (sines) are included:

$r^\ell\, \begin Y_ \\ Y_ \end = \sqrt \bar^m_\ell(z) \begin A_m \\ B_m \end , \qquad m > 0.$
and for ''m'' = 0:
$r^\ell\,Y_ \equiv \sqrt \bar^0_\ell .$

Special cases and values

# When $m = 0$, the spherical harmonics $Y_^m: S^2 \to \Complex$ reduce to the ordinary Legendre polynomials: $Y_^0(\theta, \varphi) = \sqrt P_(\cos\theta).$
# When $m = \pm\ell$, $Y_^(\theta,\varphi) = \frac \sqrt \sin^\theta\, e^,$ or more simply in Cartesian coordinates, $r^ Y_^() = \frac \sqrt (x \pm i y)^.$
# At the north pole, where $\theta = 0$, and $\varphi$ is undefined, all spherical harmonics except those with $m = 0$ vanish: $Y_^m(0,\varphi) = Y_^m() = \sqrt \delta_.$

Symmetry properties

The spherical harmonics have deep and consequential properties under the operations of spatial inversion (parity) and rotation.

Parity

The spherical harmonics have definite parity. That is, they are either even or odd with respect to inversion about the origin. Inversion is represented by the operator $P\Psi(\mathbf r) = \Psi(-\mathbf r)$. Then, as can be seen in many ways (perhaps most simply from the Herglotz generating function), with $\mathbf r$ being a unit vector,
$Y_\ell^m(-\mathbf r) = (-1)^\ell Y_\ell^m(\mathbf r).$

In terms of the spherical angles, parity transforms a point with coordinates $\$ to $\$. The statement of the parity of spherical harmonics is then
$Y_\ell^m(\theta,\varphi) \to Y_\ell^m(\pi-\theta,\pi+\varphi) = (-1)^\ell Y_\ell^m(\theta,\varphi)$
(This can be seen as follows: The associated Legendre polynomials gives and from the exponential function we have , giving together for the spherical harmonics a parity of .)

Parity continues to hold for real spherical harmonics, and for spherical harmonics in higher dimensions: applying a point reflection to a spherical harmonic of degree changes the sign by a factor of .

Rotations

Consider a rotation $\mathcal R$ about the origin that sends the unit vector $\mathbf r$ to $\mathbf r'$. Under this operation, a spherical harmonic of degree $\ell$ and order $m$ transforms into a linear combination of spherical harmonics of the same degree. That is,
$Y_\ell^m(') = \sum_^\ell A_ Y_\ell^(),$
where $A_$ is a matrix of order $(2\ell + 1)$ that depends on the rotation $\mathcal R$. However, this is not the standard way of expressing this property. In the standard way one writes,

$Y_\ell^m(') = \sum_^\ell [D^_()]^* Y_\ell^(),$
where $D^_()^*$ is the complex conjugate of an element of the Wigner D-matrix. In particular when $\mathbf r'$ is a $\phi_0$ rotation of the azimuth we get the identity,

$Y_\ell^m(') = Y_\ell^() e^.$

The rotational behavior of the spherical harmonics is perhaps their quintessential feature from the viewpoint of group theory. The $Y_\ell^m$'s of degree $\ell$ provide a basis set of functions for the irreducible representation of the group SO(3) of dimension $(2\ell + 1)$. Many facts about spherical harmonics (such as the addition theorem) that are proved laboriously using the methods of analysis acquire simpler proofs and deeper significance using the methods of symmetry.

Spherical harmonics expansion

The Laplace spherical harmonics $Y_^m:S^2 \to \Complex$ form a complete set of orthonormal functions and thus form an orthonormal basis of the Hilbert space of square-integrable functions $L^2_(S^2)$. On the unit sphere $S^2$, any square-integrable function $f:S^2 \to \Complex$ can thus be expanded as a linear combination of these:

$f(\theta,\varphi)=\sum_^\infty \sum_^\ell f_\ell^m \, Y_\ell^m(\theta,\varphi).$

This expansion holds in the sense of mean-square convergence — convergence in Lp space, L² of the sphere — which is to say that

$\lim_ \int_0^\int_0^\pi \left, f(\theta,\varphi)-\sum_^N \sum_^\ell f_\ell^m Y_\ell^m(\theta,\varphi)\^2\sin\theta\, d\theta \,d\varphi = 0.$

The expansion coefficients are the analogs of Fourier series, Fourier coefficients, and can be obtained by multiplying the above equation by the complex conjugate of a spherical harmonic, integrating over the solid angle Ω, and utilizing the above orthogonality relationships. This is justified rigorously by basic Hilbert space theory. For the case of orthonormalized harmonics, this gives:

$f_\ell^m=\int_ f(\theta,\varphi)\, Y_\ell^(\theta,\varphi)\,d\Omega = \int_0^d\varphi\int_0^\pi \,d\theta\,\sin\theta f(\theta,\varphi)Y_\ell^ (\theta,\varphi).$

If the coefficients decay in ''ℓ'' sufficiently rapidly — for instance, exponential decay, exponentially — then the series also uniform convergence, converges uniformly to ''f''.

A square-integrable function $f:S^2 \to \R$ can also be expanded in terms of the real harmonics $Y_:S^2 \to \R$ above as a sum

$f(\theta, \varphi) = \sum_^\infty \sum_^\ell f_ \, Y_(\theta, \varphi).$

The convergence of the series holds again in the same sense, namely the real spherical harmonics $Y_:S^2 \to \R$ form a complete set of orthonormal functions and thus form an orthonormal basis of the Hilbert space of square-integrable functions $L^2_(S^2)$. The benefit of the expansion in terms of the real harmonic functions $Y_$ is that for real functions $f:S^2 \to \R$ the expansion coefficients $f_$ are guaranteed to be real, whereas their coefficients $f_^m$ in their expansion in terms of the $Y_^m$ (considering them as functions $f: S^2 \to \Complex \supset \R$) do not have that property.

Spectrum analysis

Power spectrum in signal processing

The total power of a function ''f'' is defined in the signal processing literature as the integral of the function squared, divided by the area of its domain. Using the orthonormality properties of the real unit-power spherical harmonic functions, it is straightforward to verify that the total power of a function defined on the unit sphere is related to its spectral coefficients by a generalization of Parseval's theorem (here, the theorem is stated for Schmidt semi-normalized harmonics, the relationship is slightly different for orthonormal harmonics):

$\frac \int_\Omega , f(\Omega), ^2\, d\Omega = \sum_^\infty S_(\ell),$
where
$S_(\ell) = \frac\sum_^\ell , f_, ^2$

is defined as the angular power spectrum (for Schmidt semi-normalized harmonics). In a similar manner, one can define the cross-power of two functions as
$\frac \int_\Omega f(\Omega) \, g^\ast(\Omega) \, d\Omega = \sum_^\infty S_(\ell),$
where
$S_(\ell) = \frac\sum_^\ell f_ g^\ast_$

is defined as the cross-power spectrum. If the functions and have a zero mean (i.e., the spectral coefficients and are zero), then and represent the contributions to the function's variance and covariance for degree , respectively. It is common that the (cross-)power spectrum is well approximated by a power law of the form

$S_(\ell) = C \, \ell^.$

When , the spectrum is "white" as each degree possesses equal power. When , the spectrum is termed "red" as there is more power at the low degrees with long wavelengths than higher degrees. Finally, when , the spectrum is termed "blue". The condition on the order of growth of is related to the order of differentiability of in the next section.

Differentiability properties

One can also understand the derivative, differentiability properties of the original function in terms of the asymptotics of . In particular, if decays faster than any rational function of as , then is infinitely differentiable. If, furthermore, decays exponentially, then is actually real analytic on the sphere.

The general technique is to use the theory of Sobolev spaces. Statements relating the growth of the to differentiability are then similar to analogous results on the growth of the coefficients of Fourier series. Specifically, if
$\sum_^\infty (1+\ell^2)^s S_(\ell) < \infty,$
then is in the Sobolev space . In particular, the Sobolev embedding theorem implies that is infinitely differentiable provided that
$S_(\ell) = O(\ell^)\quad\rm\ell\to\infty$
for all .

Algebraic properties

Addition theorem

A mathematical result of considerable interest and use is called the ''addition theorem'' for spherical harmonics. Given two vectors and , with spherical coordinates $(r,\theta,\varphi)$ and $(r ', \theta ', \varphi ')$, respectively, the angle $\gamma$ between them is given by the relation
$\cos\gamma = \cos\theta'\cos\theta + \sin\theta\sin\theta' \cos(\varphi-\varphi')$
in which the role of the trigonometric functions appearing on the right-hand side is played by the spherical harmonics and that of the left-hand side is played by the Legendre polynomials.

The ''addition theorem'' states

where is the Legendre polynomial of degree . This expression is valid for both real and complex harmonics. The result can be proven analytically, using the properties of the Poisson kernel in the unit ball, or geometrically by applying a rotation to the vector y so that it points along the ''z''-axis, and then directly calculating the right-hand side.

In particular, when , this gives Unsöld's theorem
$\sum_^\ell Y_^*(\mathbf) \, Y_(\mathbf) = \frac$
which generalizes the identity to two dimensions.

In the expansion (), the left-hand side is a constant multiple of the degree zonal spherical harmonic. From this perspective, one has the following generalization to higher dimensions. Let be an arbitrary orthonormal basis of the space of degree spherical harmonics on the -sphere. Then $Z^_$, the degree zonal harmonic corresponding to the unit vector , decomposes as

Furthermore, the zonal harmonic $Z^_()$ is given as a constant multiple of the appropriate Gegenbauer polynomial:

Combining () and () gives () in dimension when and are represented in spherical coordinates. Finally, evaluating at gives the functional identity
$\frac = \sum_^, Y_j(), ^2$
where is the volume of the (''n''−1)-sphere.

Contraction rule

Another useful identity expresses the product of two spherical harmonics as a sum over spherical harmonics
$Y_\left(\theta,\varphi\right)Y_\left(\theta,\varphi\right) = \sqrt\sum_^\sum_^\left(-1\right)^\sqrt\begin a & b & c\\ \alpha & \beta & -\gamma \end \begin a & b & c\\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end Y_\left(\theta,\varphi\right).$
Many of the terms in this sum are trivially zero. The values of $c$ and $\gamma$ that result in non-zero terms in this sum are determined by the selection rules for the 3j-symbols.

Clebsch–Gordan coefficients

The Clebsch–Gordan coefficients are the coefficients appearing in the expansion of the product of two spherical harmonics in terms of spherical harmonics themselves. A variety of techniques are available for doing essentially the same calculation, including the Wigner 3-jm symbol, the Racah coefficients, and the Slater integrals. Abstractly, the Clebsch–Gordan coefficients express the tensor product of two irreducible representations of the rotation group SO(3), rotation group as a sum of irreducible representations: suitably normalized, the coefficients are then the multiplicities.

Visualization of the spherical harmonics

The Laplace spherical harmonics $Y_\ell^m$ can be visualized by considering their "nodal lines", that is, the set of points on the sphere where $\Re [Y_\ell^m] = 0$, or alternatively where $\Im [Y_\ell^m] = 0$. Nodal lines of $Y_\ell^m$ are composed of ''ℓ'' circles: there are circles along longitudes and ''ℓ''−, ''m'', circles along latitudes. One can determine the number of nodal lines of each type by counting the number of zeros of $Y_\ell^m$ in the $\theta$ and $\varphi$ directions respectively. Considering $Y_\ell^m$ as a function of $\theta$, the real and imaginary components of the associated Legendre polynomials each possess ''ℓ''−, ''m'', zeros, each giving rise to a nodal 'line of latitude'. On the other hand, considering $Y_\ell^m$ as a function of $\varphi$, the trigonometric sin and cos functions possess 2, ''m'', zeros, each of which gives rise to a nodal 'line of longitude'.

When the spherical harmonic order ''m'' is zero (upper-left in the figure), the spherical harmonic functions do not depend upon longitude, and are referred to as zonal spherical harmonics, zonal. Such spherical harmonics are a special case of zonal spherical functions. When (bottom-right in the figure), there are no zero crossings in latitude, and the functions are referred to as sectoral. For the other cases, the functions English draughts, checker the sphere, and they are referred to as tesseral.

More general spherical harmonics of degree are not necessarily those of the Laplace basis $Y_\ell^m$, and their nodal sets can be of a fairly general kind.

List of spherical harmonics

Analytic expressions for the first few orthonormalized Laplace spherical harmonics $Y_^m : S^2 \to \Complex$ that use the Condon–Shortley phase convention:
$Y_^(\theta,\varphi) = \frac\sqrt$

$\begin Y_^(\theta,\varphi) &= \frac\sqrt \, \sin\theta \, e^ \\ Y_^(\theta,\varphi) &= \frac\sqrt\, \cos\theta \\ Y_^(\theta,\varphi) &= \frac\sqrt\, \sin\theta\, e^ \end$

$\begin Y_^(\theta,\varphi) &= \frac\sqrt \, \sin^\theta \, e^ \\ Y_^(\theta,\varphi) &= \frac\sqrt\, \sin\theta\, \cos\theta\, e^ \\ Y_^(\theta,\varphi) &= \frac \sqrt\, (3\cos^\theta-1) \\ Y_^(\theta,\varphi) &= \frac\sqrt\, \sin\theta\,\cos\theta\, e^ \\ Y_^(\theta,\varphi) &= \frac\sqrt\, \sin^\theta \, e^ \end$

Higher dimensions

The classical spherical harmonics are defined as complex-valued functions on the unit sphere $S^2$ inside three-dimensional Euclidean space $\R^3$. Spherical harmonics can be generalized to higher-dimensional Euclidean space $\R^n$ as follows, leading to functions $S^ \to \Complex$. Let P_''ℓ'' denote the vector space, space of complex-valued homogeneous polynomials of degree in real variables, here considered as functions $\R^n \to \Complex$. That is, a polynomial is in provided that for any real $\lambda \in \R$, one has

$p(\lambda \mathbf) = \lambda^\ell p(\mathbf).$

Let A_''ℓ'' denote the subspace of P_''ℓ'' consisting of all harmonic polynomials:
$\mathbf_ := \ \,.$
These are the (regular) solid spherical harmonics. Let H_''ℓ'' denote the space of functions on the unit sphere
$S^ := \$
obtained by restriction from
$\mathbf_ := \left\ .$

The following properties hold:
* The sum of the spaces is dense set, dense in the set $C(S^)$ of continuous functions on $S^$ with respect to the uniform convergence, uniform topology, by the Stone–Weierstrass theorem. As a result, the sum of these spaces is also dense in the space of square-integrable functions on the sphere. Thus every square-integrable function on the sphere decomposes uniquely into a series of spherical harmonics, where the series converges in the sense.
* For all , one has $\Delta_f = -\ell(\ell+n-2)f.$ where is the Laplace–Beltrami operator on . This operator is the analog of the angular part of the Laplacian in three dimensions; to wit, the Laplacian in dimensions decomposes as $\nabla^2 = r^\fracr^\frac + r^\Delta_ = \frac + \frac\frac + r^\Delta_$
* It follows from the Stokes theorem and the preceding property that the spaces are orthogonal with respect to the inner product from . That is to say, $\int_ f\bar \, \mathrm\Omega = 0$ for and for .
* Conversely, the spaces are precisely the eigenspaces of . In particular, an application of the Spectral theorem#Compact self-adjoint operators, spectral theorem to the Riesz potential $\Delta_^$ gives another proof that the spaces are pairwise orthogonal and complete in .
* Every homogeneous polynomial can be uniquely written in the form $p(x) = p_\ell(x) + , x, ^2p_ + \cdots + \begin , x, ^\ell p_0 & \ell \rm\\ , x, ^ p_1(x) & \ell\rm \end$ where . In particular, $\dim \mathbf_\ell = \binom-\binom.$

An orthogonal basis of spherical harmonics in higher dimensions can be constructed mathematical induction, inductively by the method of separation of variables, by solving the Sturm-Liouville problem for the spherical Laplacian
$\Delta_ = \sin^\varphi\frac\sin^\varphi\frac + \sin^\varphi \Delta_$
where ''φ'' is the axial coordinate in a spherical coordinate system on ''S''^''n''−1. The end result of such a procedure is
$Y_ (\theta_1, \dots \theta_) = \frac e^ \prod_^ _j \bar^_ (\theta_j)$
where the indices satisfy and the eigenvalue is . The functions in the product are defined in terms of the Legendre function
$_j \bar^\ell_ (\theta) = \sqrt \sin^ (\theta) P^_ (\cos \theta) \,.$

Connection with representation theory

The space of spherical harmonics of degree is a group representation, representation of the symmetry group (mathematics), group of rotations around a point (SO(3)) and its double-cover Special unitary group, SU(2). Indeed, rotations act on the two-dimensional sphere, and thus also on by function composition
$\psi \mapsto \psi\circ\rho^$
for a spherical harmonic and a rotation. The representation is an irreducible representation of SO(3).

The elements of arise as the restrictions to the sphere of elements of : harmonic polynomials homogeneous of degree on three-dimensional Euclidean space . By polarization of an algebraic form, polarization of , there are coefficients $\psi_$ symmetric on the indices, uniquely determined by the requirement
$\psi(x_1,\dots,x_n) = \sum_\psi_x_\cdots x_.$
The condition that be harmonic is equivalent to the assertion that the tensor $\psi_$ must be tensor contraction, trace free on every pair of indices. Thus as an irreducible representation of , is isomorphic to the space of traceless symmetric tensors of degree .

More generally, the analogous statements hold in higher dimensions: the space of spherical harmonics on the N-sphere, -sphere is the irreducible representation of corresponding to the traceless symmetric -tensors. However, whereas every irreducible tensor representation of and is of this kind, the special orthogonal groups in higher dimensions have additional irreducible representations that do not arise in this manner.

The special orthogonal groups have additional spin representations that are not tensor representations, and are ''typically'' not spherical harmonics. An exception are the spin representation of SO(3): strictly speaking these are representations of the double cover (topology), double cover SU(2) of SO(3). In turn, SU(2) is identified with the group of unit quaternions, and so coincides with the 3-sphere. The spaces of spherical harmonics on the 3-sphere are certain spin representations of SO(3), with respect to the action by quaternionic multiplication.

Connection with hemispherical harmonics

Spherical harmonics can be separated into two set of functions. One is hemispherical functions (HSH), orthogonal and complete on hemisphere. Another is complementary hemispherical harmonics (CHSH).

Generalizations

The conformal geometry, angle-preserving symmetries of the two-sphere are described by the group of Möbius transformations PSL(2,C). With respect to this group, the sphere is equivalent to the usual Riemann sphere. The group PSL(2,C) is isomorphic to the (proper) Lorentz group, and its action on the two-sphere agrees with the action of the Lorentz group on the celestial sphere in Minkowski space. The analog of the spherical harmonics for the Lorentz group is given by the hypergeometric series; furthermore, the spherical harmonics can be re-expressed in terms of the hypergeometric series, as is a subgroup of .

More generally, hypergeometric series can be generalized to describe the symmetries of any symmetric space; in particular, hypergeometric series can be developed for any Lie group.A. Wawrzyńczyk, ''Group Representations and Special Functions'', Polish Scientific Publishers. Warszawa (1984).

See also

* Cubic harmonic (often used instead of spherical harmonics in computations)
* Cylindrical harmonics
* Spherical basis
* Spinor spherical harmonics
* Spin-weighted spherical harmonics
* Sturm–Liouville theory
* Table of spherical harmonics
* Vector spherical harmonics
* Atomic orbital

Notes

References

Cited references

* .
*
*
*
* .
* .
* .
* .
* .
* .

General references

* E.W. Hobson, ''The Theory of Spherical and Ellipsoidal Harmonics'', (1955) Chelsea Pub. Co., .
* C. Müller, ''Spherical Harmonics'', (1966) Springer, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 17, .
* E. U. Condon and G. H. Shortley, ''The Theory of Atomic Spectra'', (1970) Cambridge at the University Press, , ''See chapter 3''.
* J.D. Jackson, ''Classical Electrodynamics'',
* Albert Messiah, ''Quantum Mechanics'', volume II. (2000) Dover. .
*
* D. A. Varshalovich, A. N. Moskalev, V. K. Khersonskii ''Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum'',(1988) World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore,
*
*

{{DEFAULTSORT:Spherical Harmonics
Atomic physics
Fourier analysis
Harmonic analysis
Partial differential equations
Rotational symmetry
Special hypergeometric functions

External links

Spherical Harmonics
at MathWorld

Spherical Harmonics 3D representation