Taxonomy
Current research places ''Shoshonius'' as the sister group of Tarsius within the suborder Haplorhini, a monophyletic clade which includes tarsiers, monkeys, apes, and humans. Tarsiers and ''Shoshonius'' share three unique cranial traits including a basioccipital phlange overlapping with the posteromedial bullar wall, a ventrolateral posterior carotid foramen, and a suprameatal foramen. Among primates, these features are unique to these two taxa, supporting the hypothesis that ''Shoshonius'' is the sister group to Tarsius.Cranial morphology
''Shoshonius'' has larger eye orbits in proportion to its skull length when compared to other Eocene omomyids and the snout is much smaller, both of these traits are also observed in tarsiers. ''Shoshonius'' lacks a postorbital septum, similar to the strepsirrhines Necrolemur and Rooneyia. Noticeably, ''Shoshonius'' has a basioccipital phlange that overlaps with the bullar wall. The posterior carotid foramen ventrolaterally intersects the bulla. ''Shoshonius''’ characteristically large orbits as well as the three cranial traits mentioned in the section above, are traits shared with tarsiers, which provides the main line of evidence which unites them taxonomically. Dental morphology reveals that ''Shoshonius'' shares dental features with other omomyids, namely; upper molar mesostyles, a protocone fold on upper molars, and lower molar metastylids. Additionally, ''Shoshonius'' retains some dental morphologies that are found in early primitive primates, namely, small lower incisors, indicating their dentition was not specialized for gouging tree bark as seen in other omomoyids.Postcranial morphology and locomotor behavior
Analysis of postcranial morphology suggests that ''Shoshonius'', like other omomyids, was quadrupedal with adaptations for leaping. The calcaneus of ''Shoshonius'' is elongated, although not to the extent seen in tarsiers, indicating that they may have had an affinity for leaping, but not the exceptional leaping abilities of tarsiers. Other aspects of the lower limb show similarities with modern day vertical clingers and leapers like tarsiers and galagoes, but the morphology of ''Shoshonius'' is not specialized to the extent seen in the modern taxa. Additionally, morphology of the upper limb of ''Shoshonius'' does not support vertical clinging and leaping as a locomotor behavior and instead shows similarities with other omomyids that were most likely more generalized quadrupeds. The hypothesis of occasional leaping in ''Shoshonius'' was further corroborated in 2002 when Ryan and Ketchum published a bone volume fracture analysis of the femoral head of ''Shoshonius'', Omomys, and multiple extant primate taxa with the hypothesis that the histologic structure of femoral heads could predict locomotor behavior. The results of this analysis showed that the histology of ''Shoshonius'' was most similar to that of the leaping galagoes and was significantly different than Omomys. The authors conclude that the histologic structure of the femur suggests ''Shoshonius'' was either an occasional or specialized leaper.References
External links
* {{Taxonbar, from=Q7502376 Prehistoric primate genera Eocene primates Eocene mammals of North America Omomyidae