Shang Jun Shu

The ''Book of Lord Shang'' () is an ancient Chinese text from the 3rd century BC, regarded as a foundational work of "Chinese Legalism". The earliest surviving of such texts (the second being the ''Han Feizi''), it is named for and to some extent attributed to major Qin reformer Shang Yang, who served as minister to Duke Xiao of Qin (r. 361338 BC) from 359 BC until his death in 338 BC and is generally considered to be the father of that state's "legalism".

The ''Book of Lord Shang'' includes a large number of ordinances, essays, and courtly petitions attributed to Shang Yang, as well as discourses delivered at the Qin court. The book focuses mainly on maintaining societal order through a system of impartial laws that strictly mete out rewards and punishments for citizens' actions. The first chapters advise promoting agriculture and suppressing other low-priority secondary activities, as well as encouraging martial virtues for use in creating and maintaining a state army for wars of conquest.

Dating

Translator Sinologist Yuri Pines' dating for the work's chapters range from 300 BCE to 230 BCE, near the time of the Qin state's unification of China. The work matures philosophically in chapters 6 (Calculating the Land) and 7 (Opening the Blocked), becomes more administrative and accommodating in chapter 14 (Cultivation of Authority), and has its more sophisticated chapters at the end of its work, chapters 24 (Interdicting and Encouraging) and 25 (Attention to Law), with Chapter 26 (Fixing Divisions) "reflecting administrative realities from the eve of imperial unification."

While some of the work came from Shang Yang's life time, or shortly thereafter, it likely took over a century to write. Even in Imperial China, Huang Zhen of the Southern Song dynasty did not believe it to have been written by Shang Yang himself, considering him to have been a more 'gifted law official', at least as compared with the Records of the Grand Historian. As noted by the early scholarship of J.J.L. Duyvendak, apart from the work's stylistic inconsistencies, most of it would unlikely have been written by Shang Yang himself if, as Sima Qian states, he was killed almost immediately after resigning from office.

Nonetheless, not making use of cavalry, Pines believes that military chapters like 10, 11 and 19 definitely did come from the fourth century B.C., just as the book would suggest.

Textual tradition

With some chapters written decades or even more than a century after his death, no critical scholar supposes the text to have been written by Shang Yang. Pines nonetheless believes that "some chapters were likely penned by Shang Yang himself; others may come from the hand of his immediate disciples and followers." Although highly composite, it forms a "relatively coherent ideological vision", likely reflecting the evolution of what Zheng Liangshu (1989) dubbed Shang Yang's 'intellectual current' (xuepai 學派). Its first chapter is especially associated with him, purportedly portraying court debates.

Like the later Han Feizi, the Book of Lord Shang insists on the anachronism of the policies of the distant past, drawing on more recent history. In comparison with the Han Feizi, though considering them to be "digressions of minor importance", Yuri Pines notes in ''Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy'' that the Book of Lord Shang "allowed for the possibility that the need for excessive reliance on coercion would end and a milder, morality-driven political structure would evolve." In Pines opinion, the Han Feizi does not. Although not implying any direct connection, Michael Puett and Mark Edward Lewis compare the Rites of Zhou to the "Legalism" of Shang Yang.

Overview

Pines considered the Shangjunshu probably the earliest text taking the ruler's ''position'' (not simply the ruler himself) as pivotal for the state's well-being. However, the text is largely focused on the relation between the state and society, not 'monarchical power'.

The Book of Lord Shang teaches that "The law is an expression of love for the people... The sage, if he is able to strengthen the state thereby, does not model himself on antiquity, and if he is able to benefit the people thereby, does not adhere to the established rites." As such, the philosophy espoused is quite explicitly anti-Confucian:

Translations

* Duyvendak, J. J. L. (1928). ''The Book of Lord Shang''. London: Arthur Probsthain; reprinted (1963), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
* Shimizu, Kiyoshi 清水潔 (1970). ''Shōshi'' 商子 '' hangzi'. Tokyo: Meitoku shuppansha.
* Levi, Jean (1981). ''Le Livre du prince Shang he Book of Prince Shang'. Paris: Flammarion.
* Pines, Yuri (2017). ''The Book of Lord Shang - Apologetics of State Power in Early China (Translations from the Asian Classics)''. New York: Columbia University Press.
* Vogelsang, Kai (2017) ''Shangjun shu – Schriften des Fürsten von Shang''. Stuttgart, Alfred Kröner Verlag, ISBN 978-3-520-16801-6

References

;Footnotes

;Works cited
*
*

External links

Text of the work

''The Book of Lord Shang''
Chinese-English parallel text, Chinese Text Project

Text of ''The Book of Lord Shang''
-(translated by J.J.-L. Duyvendak (1889–1954) into English in 1928)

''Shangzi'' by Lord Shang
-(Chinese; from Project Gutenberg)

{{DEFAULTSORT:Book of Lord Shang, The
Legalist texts
Chinese law
Qin (state)
Ancient Chinese philosophical literature