Events
Marcos impeachment attempt
On August 13, 1985, 56 assemblymen signed a resolution calling for the impeachment of President Marcos for graft and corruption, culpable violation of the Constitution, gross violation of his oath of office and other high crimes. They cited the '' San Jose Mercury News'' exposé of the Marcoses' multimillion-dollar investment and property holdings in the United States. The properties allegedly amassed by the First Family were the Crown Building, Lindenmere Estate, and a number of residential apartments (in New Jersey and New York), a shopping center in New York, mansions (in London, Rome and Honolulu), the Helen Knudsen Estate in Hawaii and three condominiums in San Francisco, California. The Assemblymen also included in the complaint the misuse and misapplication of funds "for the construction of the Film Center, where X-rated and pornographic films are exhibited, contrary to public morals and Filipino customs and traditions". The following day, the Committee on Justice, Human Rights and Good Government dismissed the impeachment complaint for being insufficient in form and substance:The resolution is no more than a hodge-podge of unsupported conclusions, distortion of law, exacerbated by ultra partisan considerations. It does not allege ultimate facts constituting an impeachable offense under the Constitution. In sum, the Committee finds that the complaint is not sufficient in form and substance to warrant its further consideration. It is not sufficient in form because the verification made by the affiants that the allegations in the resolution "are true and correct of our own knowledge" is transparently false. It taxes the ken of men to believe that the affiants individually could swear to the truth of allegations, relative to the transactions that allegedly transpired in foreign countries given the barrier of geography and the restrictions of their laws. More important, the resolution cannot be sufficient in substance because its careful assay shows that it is a mere charade of conclusions.
The People Power Revolution
The People Power Revolution from February 22–25, 1986 was a series of mostly nonviolent mass demonstrations in theAbolition
On March 25, 1986, President Aquino signed Presidential Proclamation No. 3, known as the "Freedom Constitution". Article I, Section 3 of this provisional constitution abolished the Regular Batasang Pambansa '' inter alia'':Section 3. ARTICLE VIII (The Batasang Pambansa), ARTICLE IX (The Prime Minister and the Cabinet), ARTICLE XVI (Amendments), ARTICLE XVII (Transitory Provisions) and all amendments thereto are deemed superseded by this Proclamation.
Sessions
*First Regular Session: July 23, 1984 – June 7, 1985 *Second Regular Session: July 22, 1985 – March 25, 1986Leadership
*Prime Minister :: Cesar E. A. Virata ( KBL, Parliamentary District of Cavite) :: Salvador H. Laurel ( UNIDO) ''appointed on February 25, 1986, concurrently Vice-President'' *Deputy Prime Minister ::Jose A. Roño, Jr. ( KBL, Parliamentary District of Samar) *Speaker of the Batasan :: Nicanor E. Yñiguez, Jr. ( KBL, Parliamentary District of Southern Leyte) *Speaker Pro-Tempore ::Salipada K. Pendatun ( KBL, Parliamentary District of Maguindanao) ::Macacuna B. Dimaporo ( KBL, Parliamentary District of Lanao del Sur), ''elected 1985'' *Majority Floor Leader ::Jose A. Roño ( KBL, Parliamentary District of Samar) *Minority Floor Leader ::Legislation
The Regular Batasang Pambansa passed a total of 181 laws: Mga Batas Pambansa Blg. 703 to 884.Major legislation
Members
Member of Parliament
: TheSee also
* Congress of the Philippines * 1984 Philippine parliamentary electionReferences
External links