''Re Cole'' (
964
Year 964 ( CMLXIV) was a leap year starting on Friday (link will display the full calendar) of the Julian calendar.
Events
Byzantine Empire
* Arab–Byzantine War: Emperor Nikephoros II continues the reconquest of south-eastern Anatoli ...
1 Ch 175, CA) also known as ''ex p. Trustee v Cole'' is a case in
English property law
English property law refers to the law of acquisition, sharing and protection of valuable assets in England and Wales. While part of the United Kingdom, many elements of Scots property law are different. In England, property law encompasses fou ...
dealing with the transfer of
gifts
A gift or a present is an item given to someone without the expectation of payment or anything in return. An item is not a gift if that item is already owned by the one to whom it is given. Although gift-giving might involve an expectation ...
.
Facts
Mr Cole bought, furnished and equipped a large house in London as the family home, costing him £20,000 overall. Later that year, his wife came to London to move into their new home. He said to her 'look, it's all yours'. Subsequently, Mr Cole went
bankrupt
Bankruptcy is a legal process through which people or other entities who cannot repay debts to creditors may seek relief from some or all of their debts. In most jurisdictions, bankruptcy is imposed by a court order, often initiated by the debto ...
and the contents of the home were claimed. However, Mrs Cole claimed that they had been gifted to her.
Judgment
The case establishes that a gift of chattels cannot be perfected by showing them to a donee and stating words of gift. In order to establish a gift there are three requirements.
Namely, perfecting a gift requires 1)
Intention
Intentions are mental states in which the agent commits themselves to a course of action. Having the plan to visit the zoo tomorrow is an example of an intention. The action plan is the ''content'' of the intention while the commitment is the '' ...
2) Delivery and 3) Acceptance. In this case Mr Cole had, by words, shown intention to make a gift to Mrs Cole. He had not however, delivered anything to her, and she had not accepted anything.
Therefore, in this case it was held that physical delivery (and some form of acceptance) is required by law to perfect a gift.
Further reading
Aubrey L. Diamond, 'When Is a Gift...?',The Modern Law Review, Vol. 27, No. 3 (May, 1964), pp. 357–360
English property case law
1964 in England
Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases
1964 in case law
1964 in British law
{{England-law-stub