Harassment in the workplace
The Canadian Human Rights Commission defines harassment as "a form of discrimination. It includes any unwanted physical or verbal behaviour that offends or humiliates you. Generally, harassment is a behaviour that persists over time. Serious one-time incidents can also sometimes be considered harassment." The Treasury Board Policy on Harassment Prevention and Resolution expands on this definition, defining harassment as: "Improper conduct by an individual, that is directed at and offensive to another individual in the workplace, including at any event or any location related to work, and that the individual knew or ought reasonably to have known would cause offence or harm. It comprises any objectionable act(s), comment(s) or display(s) that demean, belittle, or cause personal humiliation or embarrassment, and any act of intimidation or threat." Using data from the 2016 General Social Survey (GSS) on Canadians at Work and Home,Civilian Review and Complaints Commission (CRCC)
Created in 1988, the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission (originally known as the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP) is an independent, impartial body that receives complaints from the public and reviews the handling of complaints when the complainant is dissatisfied with the RCMP's review process. On average, the CRCC receives approximately 2,000 public complaints per year. The Commission helps to uphold various laws and legislations including: *''Enhancing Royal Canadian Mounted Police Accountability Act'' *''Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act'' *''Witness Protection Program Act''Public recognition of harassment
In June 2001, the Treasury Board amended its ''Policy on the Prevention and Resolution of Harassment in the Workplace''. In a statement by Odette Lalumière, Senior Counsel for the Canadian Judicial Counsel, spoke specifically to the RCMP's handling of internal harassment policy complaints, stating that their policy must comply with Treasury Board policy. Lalumière continues to say that “the Committee recently reminded the Force of this obligation in case G-251” in January–March 2001.Task Force on Governance and Cultural Change: The "Brown Report"
In 2007, the Government of Canada established a Task Force to address the "crises in governance, culture and public accountability" within the RCMP.Task Force on Governance and Cultural Change in the RCMP, ''Rebuilding the Trust'' (Ottawa: Government of Canada, 2007), p. 41, Retrieved from: ''<''https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/cntrng-crm/tsk-frc-rcmp-grc/_fl/archive-tsk-frc-rpt-eng.pdf . The report, presented to the Minister of Public Safety and the President of the Treasury Board, investigated these concerns including: human resource capacity; training for current and future persons in positions of authority; processing of complaints on all matters, and the "culture of policing" which they identify "one of fear and intimidation" by persons in positions of authority. The report makes 49 recommendations for structural change.Public Interest Investigation Report Into Issues of Workplace Harassment
In November 2011, Ian McPhail, the former Interim Chair of the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP (now known as Civilian Review and Complaints Commission) made an official complaint and declared the initiation of a public interest investigation regarding the process in which allegations of harassment within RCMP workplaces are handled. The Commission stated it will examine: * Whether those RCMP members notified of allegations of harassment adhered to the appropriate legislation, policies, procedures and guidelines in respect of workplace harassment; * Whether RCMP members conducting investigations into allegations of workplace harassment did so in a thorough and impartial manner; and * Whether existing RCMP policies, procedures and guidelines are adequate to ensure that allegations regarding RCMP members engaged in workplace harassment are dealt with fairly, effectively and thoroughly. In February 2013, the Report, ''Public Interest Investigation Report Into Issues of Workplace Harassment within the RCMP, was published.'' The Report examined 718 workplace harassment complaints against the RCMP from 2005–2001. The key findings from the report reveal that 90% of complaints could “readily be classified” as abuse of authority (e.g. bullying, psychological abuse, and belittling and demeaning behaviour), and that 386 (56%) were repeated incidents of “perceived harassment.” Additionally, 4% of all complaints reported sexual harassment.Civilian Review and Complaints Commission Recommendations
Based on the findings of the Report, the Commission made eleven recommendations in total, which address five areas that require improvement: * Independence of the process * The definition of harassment * Required standards for harassment investigations * Training and prevention * EvaluationCurrent harassment policy
Internal process for addressing complaints
Since 2014, the internal process for addressing complaints of harassment within the RCMP follows a review system as follows: (a) If an allegation of harassment is made and there is an early resolution (e.g. through mediation), this is the end of the process. (b) If a written complaint is made, it is referred to a Human Resources Officer who decides if there is sufficient evidence to warrant a final decision or if there needs to be a further investigation. The Human Resources Officer makes recommendations to the Responsible Officer (the Responsible Officer is typically a police officer from the same Division as the complainants) who makes the ultimate final decision regarding the complaint. (c) If the Human Resources Officer recommends a criminal investigation, they will inform the Responsible Officer who will initiate a Code of Conduct investigation pursuant to Part IV of the RCMP Act.Lawsuits & settlements
In 2015, four RCMP officers (Alice Fox, Catherine Galliford, Susan Gastaldo and Atoya Montague) who were in the midst of civil lawsuits against the RCMP for alleged harassment wrote to the Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, and the Liberal Members of Parliament and Senators. The letter asked these figures for support in ensuring the women were not discharged from the RCMP before their civil legal proceedings were concluded.Government of Canada. 2018Female policing class action
These four cases resulted in a significant win for current and former female RCMP employees who had experienced harassment within the workplace. On October 6, 2016, the thenFemale non-policing class action
In 2019, a class action lawsuit was formed on the grounds of alleged gender and sexual orientation-based discrimination and harassment within the RCMP. While the RCMP has not admitted liability, they have settled with compensation of $10,000 - $220,000 for public-identified females who experienced harassment (including sexual harassment, physical assault, bullying based on gender or sexual orientation, sexual assault, and intimidation or abuse based on gender or sexual orientation) from September 16, 1974 (the first year women were welcomed into the RCMP) to July 5, 2019 by RCMP personnel. This is the second $100 million settlement in 3 years. Eligible class members include publicly-identified females that “worked or volunteer in an RCMP controlled workplace supervised or managed by the RCMP” including but not limited to: public service employees, commissionaires, volunteers, contractors, and municipal or regional district employees.{{Cite web, url=https://www.callkleinlawyers.com/class-actions/current/female-non-policing-rcmp/?gclid=CjwKCAiA5o3vBRBUEiwA9PVzasnCCtCkxX7F9NVxmDAZH_Zv-JdJlYU-XxofHEGg7K-QBjPez8c_KBoC7vwQAvD_BwE, title=Female Non-Policing RCMP Class Action, last=Klein Lawyers LLP, date=2019, website=Klein Lawyers LLP: Personal Injury & Class Action Law, access-date=December 1, 2019References