Patauga Jungle Boot

The Patauga jungle boot or French Army bush boot (French: ''chaussure de brousse'' or ''chaussure de brousse de l'armée française''), commonly known as the "splasher" (''Patauga''), is a lightweight cotton canvas and rubber boot worn by the members of the French Armed Forces when deployed overseas. First introduced in the late 1940s, the Patauga boot, along with the French M1949 Bush Hat, became an icon associated with France's decolonization wars in Indochina and Algeria throughout the 1950s and 1960s. The Pataugas boots were popular not only among members of the French military, but also among civilians engaging in outdoor activities. Its design was subsequently copied and adopted by several militaries worldwide.

History

In the aftermath of World War II, the French began to reassert their lost influence over their colonies in French Indochina, comprising Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos, which had been occupied by the Imperial Japanese Army late in the War and were now vying for independence. The troops of the French Far East Expeditionary Corps (CEFEO) that was sent by the French Army to participate in the reoccupation of the Indochinese territories in September 1945 wore on the field a mixture of French regulation and American surplus footwear, including French M1917, M1941, M1945 brown (or black) leather hobnailed ankle boots (French: ''Brodequins modéle 1917, modéle 1941, modéle 1945''), brown leather US 1941 Type II Service Shoes, 1943 Type III Service Shoes, 1943 Service Shoes Reverse Uppers, dual-buckled M1943 Combat Service Boots, and calf-length US M1942 "Corcoran" paratrooper boots, but they had no specifically-designed footwear for tropical climates.

Variants

The Portuguese Army model

The Portuguese Army and the Portuguese Marine Corps adopted in the early 1960s the Canvas boot model 1964 ( Portuguese: ''Bota de lona m/964''), whose design appears to have been based on the French Army M1954 Patauga boot used during the Algerian War. As per in the French model, the Portuguese Model 1964 boot is characterised by his double colour construction, with the upper and the counter (heel) being made of olive green canvas and the toe in black canvas. The low-top upper has 5 lace eyelets made of stainless steel and is reinforced by metal rivets at the base of the lacing system. The tongue is not sewn to the top of the boot by side stitches and although this provides better ventilation, it also allows the infiltration of humidity and small pebbles into the boot. In contrast to the French original, the Portuguese version features built-in double round eyelets at the inside shank of the boot, intended for both fast drainage and ventilation, allowing the circulation of air on the inside.

The Italian Army model

Introduced in the late 1950s, the Italian Army's version of the Patauga boot consisted of high-top khaki or olive canvas uppers provided with 4 metal lace eyelets and 5 speed-lace eyelets, a toe cap and black rubber outsole, and was produced in two variants: one basic model lacking built-in ventilation eyelets (Italian: ''Stivaletti'') and a second model, designated "landing boots" (Italian: ''Stivaletti da sbarco'', ''Scalfarotii''), in which the outsoles were provided with 5 fast drainage eyelets – 3 on the inside arch and 2 on the outside –, and a slip-resistant "ripple" pattern tread. Also known as the "Amphibians, Lagoon, Italian Army" (Italian: ''Anfibi Lagunari Esercito Italiano''), the landing boots were issued to the soldiers of the Lagunari Regiment "Serenissima", an Italian Army amphibious infantry unit formed in 1957 at Venice, who wore them while operating in the marshy ground environment typical of the coastal lagoons in the northern Adriatic Sea – the Venetian Lagoon, the Marano Lagoon, and the Grado Lagoon. The Landing boots were also provided to the Italian Navy's 1st San Marco Naval Infantry Regiment.

The Indigenous Combat Boot

Developed by the U.S. Army Natick Laboratories in Natick, Massachusetts in the early 1960s, the Indigenous Combat Boot was an American-designed jungle boot derived from the French Patauga boot for use in Vietnam. It consisted of high-top black canvas uppers provided with 8 metal lace eyelets, a toe cap and outsole made of rubber in the same colour that contained an anti-Punji stick metal plate on the inside. Other features that distinguished the Indigenous Combat Boot from the original French model were the two screened drainage eyelets on the inner arch and the plain round rubber ankle reinforcements lacking the manufacturer's markings. Like the Vibram-soled U.S. Army Jungle boots, the tread gave poor traction and tended to get clogged with mud. In addition, since they were produced in Japan using Japanese foot lasts, most South Vietnamese soldiers often found the indigenous boots to be ill-suited to the local conditions and uncomfortable to wear.

The Bata boot

In response to the complaints regarding the indigenous combat boot, the Canadian-based Bata Shoes Company began developing in 1968 a new, improved jungle boot that used anthropometric Vietnamese foot lasts produced by Natick Laboratories, bringing it closer to the French Patauga design favoured by the South Vietnamese. Like its predecessor, the new jungle boot consisted of cotton canvas uppers, sometimes reinforced by metal rivets at the base of the lacing system, and a toe cap and ribbed outsole made of black rubber; it also retained the screened drainage eyelets on the inner arch and the (Bata-marked) round rubber ankle reinforcements, though the latter was often absent in the high-top version. Made under contract in Canada, the improved Bata Jungle Boots were produced in three sizes (6-eyelets, 7-eyelets, and 11-eyelets), being also available in khaki and olive green versions.

Chinese and North Vietnamese variants

First adopted in 1950 by the General Logistics Department of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA), the Type 50 combat sneaker, best known as the "liberation shoe", is a Chinese-designed canvas-and-rubber low-rise plimsoll-type shoe that was used by both the PLA during the Korean War and the Vietnamese communist Viet Minh regular guerrilla forces fighting in the northern Tonkin region of French Indochina during the First Indochina War, which were trained, armed and supplied since 1949 by the People's Republic of China. It consists of reed green canvas uppers provided with four aluminium eyelets and a tan or black rubber outsole with raised lines and toe cap; the thick outsole has a simple "ripple" or zigzag pattern tread and lacks a raised heel. Simple and cheap to produce, the "liberation shoes" were provided in large quantities to the Viet Minh and its successor, the People's Army of Vietnam (PAVN) of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (DRV) throughout the 1950s, 1960s and the early 1970s, eventually becoming their standard footwear throughout the Indochina and Vietnam Wars.

These plimsoll shoes were not hardwearing, however, and tended to disintegrate through operational use, especially during the long journey from North Vietnam down the Ho Chi Minh trail into South Vietnam. As they marched through the rugged hot and wet jungle terrain of Laos, North Vietnamese soldiers quicky realized that their Chinese-made shoes were not suitable for a tropical environment, since they retained humidity and perspiration due to a lack of proper ventilation, took a long time to dry when soaked in water, and if not removed regularly, they were prone to causing malodorous fungal and bacterial infections such as Trench foot and Athlete's foot that ruined the wearer's feet. Moreover, the shoes offered limited ankle support, though most North Vietnamese had grown up barefoot or wearing sandals, so this presented few problems. Eventually, the "liberation shoes" lasted no more than two months in the field, so replacements were constantly sought. One quick solution for PAVN soldiers was to remove the Bata boots, Indigenous Combat Boots and US-style jungle boots from any dead South Vietnamese CIDG militiamen or ARVN regular soldier they encountered and use these to replace their worn-out footwear, although the preferred option taken by most North Vietnamese infantrymen was to exchange at first opportunity their rotten and smelly Chinese shoes for the famous, locally produced Ho Chi Minh sandals (Vietnamese: ''dép lốp'' or "tire sandal") made of black rubber soles cut from discarded truck tires and held on by inner-tube straps.

Despite their shortcomings, the Type 50 "liberation shoes" remained standard issue with Chinese PLA troops and People's Armed Police (PAP) personnel until 2015, when they began to be replaced by a new, better-designed model of anti-bacterial, anti-fungal and odour resistant black combat trainers.

Although almost completely dependent on Chinese logistical support, with PAVN combat footwear being all imported from PLA sources, the North Vietnamese did developed their own model of jungle combat boot after 1954, based upon captured French Patauga jungle boots. Known as the PAVN jungle boot, its design appears to have been directly inspired by the Palladium "Pampa" and "Pallabrousse" models, consisting of khaki, reed green or (rarely) black cotton canvas uppers and a black or slightly brownish rubber outsole with raised lines, a slightly raised heel and toe cap. The PAVN jungle boot is manufactured locally in two high-cut versions, one with just six metal eyelets and another with nine metal eyelets, whilst the upper incorporates a single diagonal reinforcement stripe along the side, as per in the Palladium models. Early production batches of the PAVN jungle boot had khaki uppers and Vibram-type rubber soles, though khaki canvas had ceased to be used for the uppers several years before the end of the Vietnam War and a distinctive rubber sole tread pattern incorporating notches, V- and crescent-shaped lugs and small raised "commas" under the studs became standard. Unlike the Chinese plimsolls, the PAVN jungle boots were better adapted to the tropical climate and dried quickly when wet. The Chinese soon produced their own version of the PAVN jungle boot, the Type 65 combat boot, which featured high-rise reed green canvas uppers (with or without the reinforcement strap at the side) provided with six aluminium eyelets and a black or olive-brown rubber outsole (with either raised lines or smooth) and toe cap (sometimes with an heel cap added at the back). Eventually, the Type 65 jungle boot was adopted as standard combat footwear by the Chinese PLA, being also provided as military aid to North Vietnam.

The PAVN jungle boot has proved so popular that eventually Vietnam started exporting its canvas-and-rubber boot to East European armies in the early 1990s.

Combat use

Users

* : used by the National Liberation Army (1954–1962).
*
*
* : used by the Biafran Armed Forces (1968–1970).
*
* : used by the Royal Khmer Armed Forces (1950–1970) and the Khmer National Armed Forces (1970–1975).
* : used by the Cameroon Armed Forces.
*
* : used by the Chadian Armed Forces (FAT), Chadian National Armed Forces (FANT) and Chadian National Army (ANT).
* : used by the People's Liberation Army.
*
*
*
* : used by the French Armed Forces (1947–2000).
*
*
* : used by the Revolutionary Armed Forces of the People (FARP).
* Kingdom of Laos: used by the Royal Lao Armed Forces and Special Guerrilla Units (1950–1975).
* : used by several Christian Lebanese Front and Muslim Lebanese National Movement militias during the Lebanese Civil War (1975–1993).
* : used by the Iraqi Army during the Iran–Iraq War (1980–88).
* : used by the Israel Defense Forces and Israel security forces.
* : used by the Italian Army's Lagunari Regiment "Serenissima" and the Italian Navy's 1st San Marco Regiment.
*
* : used by the Sahrawi People's Liberation Army.
* Syria: used by the Syrian Arab Armed Forces.
*
*
* : used by the South African Defence Force, South African Police, South West Africa Territorial Force and the South West African Police.
* : used by the Vietnamese National Army (1950–1955) and the Army of the Republic of Vietnam (1960–1975).
*
*
* : used by the Viet Minh and the People's Army of Vietnam.
* : used by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) guerrilla groups and Palestine Liberation Army units in Jordan, Syria and Lebanon.
* Rodrigues, ''The Overseas Campaigns 1961–1974 – Guinea-Angola-Mozambique – Army (I)'' (2000), pp. 15–16.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
* : used by the Rhodesian Security Forces.

See also

*Combat boot
*Jungle boot
* Safari boot
* Palladium Boots (French footwear manufacturer)
* SAS Pataugas (French footwear manufacturer)
* Teva Naot (Israeli footwear manufacturer)
* Bata Shoes (Czech/Canadian footwear manufacturer)

Notes

References

*Bassel Abi-Chahine, ''The People's Liberation Army through the eyes of a lens, 1975–1991'', Éditions Dergham, Jdeideh (Beirut) 2019.
*Benjamin Lai and Adam Hook, ''The Chinese People's Liberation Army since 1949 – Ground Forces'', Elite series 194, Osprey Publishing Ltd., Oxford 2012.
*Chris McNab, ''20th Century Military Uniforms'' (2nd ed.), Grange Books, Kent 2002.
*Chris McNab and Johnny Shumate, ''US Air Cavalry Trooper versus North Vietnamese Soldier: Vietnam 1965–68'', Combat series 51, Osprey Publishing Ltd., Oxford 2020.
*Edward J. Emering, ''Weapons and Field Gear of the North Vietnamese Army and Viet Cong'', Schiffer Publishing Ltd., Atglen, PA 1998.
*Frédéric Serra, ''L'armée nord-vietnamienne, 1954–1972 : Uniformes et équipements (1re partie)'', Militaria Magazine No. 320, March 2012, Histoire & Collections, Paris, pp. 70–75. (in French)
*Frédéric Serra, ''L'armée nord-vietnamienne, 1954–1972 : Uniformes et équipements (2e partie)'', Militaria Magazine No. 322, May 2012, Histoire & Collections, Paris, pp. 34–39. (In French)
*Gordon L. Rottman and Ramiro Bujeiro, ''Army of the Republic of Vietnam 1955–75'', Men-at-arms series 458, Osprey Publishing Ltd., Oxford 2010.
*Gordon L. Rottman and Brian Delf, ''North Vietnamese Army Soldier 1958–75'', Warrior series 135, Osprey Publishing Ltd., Oxford 2009.
*Helmoed-Romer Heitman and Paul Hannon, ''Modern African Wars (3): South-West Africa'', Men-at-arms series 242, Osprey Publishing Ltd., London 1991.
*John Laffin and Mike Chappell, ''Arab Armies of the Middle East Wars 1948–73'', Men-at-Arms series 128, Osprey Publishing Ltd., London 1982.
*Kenneth Conboy and Don Greer, ''War in Laos 1954–1975'', Squadron/Signal Publications, Inc., Carrollton, Texas 1994.
*Kenneth Conboy and Simon McCouaig, ''The War in Laos 1960–75'', Men-at-arms series 217, Osprey Publishing Ltd., London 1989.
*Kenneth Conboy and Simon McCouaig, ''The NVA and Viet Cong'', Elite series 38, Osprey Publishing Ltd., Oxford 1992.
*Kenneth Conboy, Kenneth Bowra and Mike Chappell, ''War in Cambodia 1970–75'', Men-at-arms series 209, Osprey Publishing Ltd., London 1989.
*Ken Conboy, ''The Erawan War – Volume 3: The Royal Lao Armed Forces 1961–1974'', Asia@War Volume 37, Helion & Company Limited, Warwick UK 2022.
*Lee E. Russell and Mike Chappell, ''Armies of the Vietnam War (2)'', Men-at-arms 143, Osprey Publishing Ltd., London 1983.
*Samuel M. Katz, Lee E. Russel and Ron Volstad, ''Armies in Lebanon 1982–84'', Men-at-Arms series 165, Osprey Publishing Ltd., London 1985.
*Samuel M. Katz and Ron Volstad, ''Arab Armies of the Middle East Wars (2)'', Men-at-Arms series 194, Osprey Publishing Ltd., London 1988.
*Patrice Pivetta, ''Soldats d'Algérie, 1954–1962'', Armes Militaria Magazine No. 200, March 2002, Histoire & Collections, Paris, pp. 13–54. (In French)
*Peter Abbott, Manuel Ribeiro Rodrigues and Ron Volstad, ''Modern African Wars (2): Angola and Mozambique 1961–74'', Men-at-Arms series 202, Osprey Publishing Ltd., London 1988.
*Philip S. Jowett and Raffaele Ruggeri, ''Modern African Wars (5): The Nigerian-Biafran War 1967–70'', Men-at-arms series 507, Osprey Publishing Ltd., Oxford 2016.
*Martin Windrow, Wayne Braby and Kevin Lyles, ''French Foreign Legion Paratroops'', Elite series 6, Osprey Publishing Ltd., London 1985.
*Martin Windrow and Mike Chappell, ''The Algerian War 1954–1962'', Men-at-arms series 312, Osprey Publishing Ltd., Oxford 1997.
*Martin Windrow and Mike Chappell, ''The French Indochina War 1946–1954'', Men-at-arms series 322, Osprey Publishing Ltd., Oxford 1998.
*Martin Windrow and Johnny Shumate, ''French Foreign Légionnaire versus Viet Minh Insurgent: North Vietnam 1948–52'', Combat series 36, Osprey Publishing Ltd., Oxford 2018.
*Manuel A. Ribeiro Rodrigues, ''The Overseas Campaigns 1961–1974 – Guinea-Angola-Mozambique – Army (I)'', Edições Destarte Lda., Lisbon 2000. (Bi-lingual edition)
*Phillip Katcher and Mike Chappell, ''Armies of the Vietnam War 1962–1975'', Men-at-arms series 104, Osprey Publishing Ltd., London 1980.
*Robert Pitta, Jeff Fannell and Simon McCouaig, ''South African Special Forces'', Elite series 47, Osprey Publishing Ltd., London 1993.

External links

"Pataugas" - canvas and rubber boots of the French army ("Pataugas" - les chaussures de brousse de l'armée française)French Pataugas/Chaussures de brousse Francaises (French bush/jungle boots)Palladium Boots official websitePalladium Boots HistorySAS Pataugas official websiteAigle official websiteSturm MIL-TEC official website

{{DEFAULTSORT:jungle boot
French military uniforms
French Foreign Legion
Military boots
Military equipment of France
Jungle warfare