Rendered to Egypt for torture
Combatant Status Review
Muhammad Saad Iqbal was among the 60% of prisoners who participated in the tribunal hearings. A Summary of Evidence memo was prepared for the tribunal of each detainee. The memo accused him of the following: Summarized transcripts (.pdf)from Hafez Qari Mohamed Saad Iqbal Madni's '' Combatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 46-58Transcript
The Department of Defense published a 13 summarized transcript from his 2004 CSR Tribunal.Testimony
Madni told his Tribunal that he was wearing the orange jumpsuit that non-compliant captives were made to wear because of a suicide attempt he had made on the 191st day of his detention.Publication of captives' CSR Tribunal documents
In September 2007 the Department of Justice published dossiers of unclassified documents arising from the Combatant Status Review Tribunals of 179 captives. A habeas corpus petition was filed on behalf of ''" Muhammed Saad Iqbal Madni"'' on December 13, 2005. But his dossier was not one of those the DoD published.Administrative Review Board
Detainees whose Combatant Status Review Tribunal labeled them "enemy combatants" were scheduled for annual Administrative Review Board hearings. These hearings were designed to assess the threat a detainee might pose if released or transferred, and whether there were other factors that warranted his continued detention.First annual Administrative Review Board
A Summary of Evidence memo was prepared for Hafez Qari Mohamed Saad Iqbal Madni's first annual Administrative Review Board on October 19, 2005. The two page memo listed nine "primary factors favor ngcontinued detention" and zero "primary factors favor ngrelease or transfer". Those factors included denunciations from unnamed informants that he claimed to be a member of al Qaida, that he plotted assassinations, that he was related to a female member of the extremist Ak Ikhwan Al Muslimoon Group in Indonesia, and that he had stated:Transcript
Madni chose to participate in his Administrative Review Board hearing. Summarized transcript (.pdf) from Hafez Qari Mohamed Saad Iqbal Madni's '' Administrative Review Board hearing'', December 1, 2005 - page 146Preliminary meeting with Assisting Military Officer
Madni's preliminary meeting with his Assisting Military Officer took place on November 29, 2005. Madni said he would attend. His Assisting Military Officer described him as responsive, polite and attentive, during this meeting, but highly skeptical, based on his experience Combatant Status Review Tribunal.Second annual Administrative Review Board
A Summary of Evidence memo was prepared for Hafes Qari Mohammed Saad Iqbal Madni's second annual Administrative Review Board on October 19, 2005. The two page memo listed nine "primary factors favor ngcontinued detention" and two "primary factors favor ngrelease or transfer". In addition to the allegations listed on the earlier memos the 2006 memo stated he had visited with members of al Qaida in Jakarta, Indonesia, that he met the Secretary General of the Islamic Defenders Front, that he had seen weapons at the house of his new militant acquaintances, and he had been told about two failed terrorist attacks in which they had participated—an attempt to use a car bomb against the US embassy, and an attempt to attack an airliner. One factor offered as a justification for his further detention stated:Third annual Administrative Review Board
A Summary of Evidence memo was prepared for Hafes Qari Mohammed Saad Iqbal Madni's annual Administrative Review Board on December 27, 2007. The two page memo listed just four "primary factors favor ngcontinued detention" and two "primary factors favor ngrelease or transfer". All four of the factors favoring his continued detention concerned a leadership role he played in a student group, the Sipah-e-Islam Pakistan, which was an adjunct to a violent anti-Shi'a group, the Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan. The factors stated these two groups followed theThird annual Board recommendations
One January 9, 2009, the Department of Defense released two heavily redacted memos, from his Board, toHabeas corpus petition
A writ of habeas corpus was filed on Hafez Qari Mohamed Saad Iqbal Madni's behalf.Military Commissions Act
The Military Commissions Act of 2006 mandated that Guantanamo captives were no longer entitled to access the US civil justice system, so all outstanding habeas corpus petitions were stayed.Boumediene v. Bush
On June 12, 2008 the United States Supreme Court ruled, in Boumediene v. Bush, that the Military Commissions Act could not remove the right for Guantanamo captives to access the US Federal Court system. And all previous Guantanamo captives' habeas petitions were eligible to be re-instated. The judges considering the captives' habeas petitions would be considering whether the evidence used to compile the allegations the men and boys were enemy combatants justified a classification of "enemy combatant".Protective order
On 15 July 2008Repatriation
A former Guantanamo captive named as ''"Qari Saad Madni"'' was repatriated on September 8, 2008. Pakistani officials stated he would soon be released without charge, following a debriefing. The ''Associated Press'' reported that Madni claimed he had tried to commit suicide during his first year in detention. On September 19, 2008 Richard L. Cys, James P. Walsh filed ''"Petitioner Muhammed Saad Iqbal Madni's response to court order to show cause why his petition should not be dismissed as moot"'', as part of 05-CV-2385, on behalf of Muhammed Saad Iqbal Madni. Madni's lawyers argued his habeas petition should not be dismissed because he was entitled to continue to seek relief if his original detention was not legally justified. Further, his lawyer had not been advised of the conditions agreed upon by the US Government and the Pakistani Government: On 5 January 2009 the '' New York Times'' published a profile of Mohammed Saad Iqbal. The profile chronicled serious health problems during and after his repatriation, and was illustrated with a picture of him standing in a walker. The New York Times reported that senior US officials were prepared to confirm aspects of his account of himself—off the record. They informed the New York Times that, shortly after he had apprehended in Jakarta, during his first two days of interrogation analysts had decided he was a braggart and "wannabe" and should be immediately released: He was first transferred for four months to a brutal interrogation center in Egypt, where he was housed in a 4 x cell he said "like a grave", and subjected to electric shocks during his interrogation. He was then transferred, for a year to the Bagram Theater Internment Facility. He described harassment from other captives because he had never trained in Afghanistan. Richard L. Cys ofMadani's declaration
UK Legal Action
On August 19, 2009, the UK arm of the legal charity Reprieve commenced legal action on behalf of Mr Madni against the UKdisclosure of material held by the Secretary of State or within his control that evidences his extraordinary rendition through Diego Garcia and that would assist him in identifying and bringing proceedings against those US (and, if applicable, UK) personnel involved in his detention, unlawful rendition and torture''R (Madni) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs'', Claim Form and Grounds of Judicial Review
, August 19, 2009
See also
* Bagram torture and prisoner abuseReferences
External links