Moldavian dialect

The Moldavian dialect is one of several dialects of the Romanian language (Daco-Romanian). It is spoken across the approximate area of the historical region of Moldavia, now split between the Republic of Moldova, Romania, and Ukraine.

The delimitation of the Moldavian dialect, as with all other Romanian dialects, is made primarily by analyzing its phonetic features and only marginally by morphological, syntactical, and lexical characteristics.

Classification

The Moldavian dialect is the representative of the northern grouping of Romanian dialects and has influenced the Romanian spoken over large areas of Transylvania.

The Moldavian and the Wallachian dialects are the only two that have been consistently identified and recognized by linguists. They are clearly distinct in dialect classifications made by Heimann Tiktin, Mozes Gaster, Gustav Weigand, Sextil Pușcariu, Sever Pop, Emil Petrovici, Romulus Todoran, Ion Coteanu, Alexandru Philippide, Iorgu Iordan, Emanuel Vasiliu, and others, whereas the other dialects have been considerably more controversial and difficult to classify.

The Moldavian dialect is not synonymous with Moldovan language. The latter is another term for the Romanian language as used in the Republic of Moldova. The border between Romania and the Republic of Moldova does not correspond to any significant isoglosses to justify a dialectal division; phonetics and morphology (which normally define dialectal classifications) are nearly identical across the border, whereas lexical differences are minimal.

Geographic distribution

The Moldavian dialect is spoken in the northeastern part of Romania, the Republic of Moldova, and small areas of Ukraine. It is the only Romance variety spoken east of the Eastern Carpathians. In detail, its distribution area covers the following administrative or historical regions:

*in Western Moldavia: the counties of Bacău, Botoșani, Galați, Iași, Neamț, Suceava, Vaslui, Vrancea;
*in Muntenia and Northern Dobruja, some isoglosses extend over the northern parts of the following counties: Buzău, Brăila, Tulcea;
*in the Republic of Moldova: the whole territory, including the breakaway region of Transnistria;
*in Ukraine:
** Chernivtsi Oblast: Northern Bukovina, the Hertsa region, and Northern Bessarabia;
**Odesa Oblast: the historical region of Budjak (consisting of the current raions of Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi, Bolhrad, Izmail) and other hromadas in the Odesa Oblast;
**smaller pockets in other parts of Ukraine;
*in the north-eastern half of Transylvania, various isoglosses include all or part of the following counties: Bistrița-Năsăud, Harghita, Covasna, Cluj (eastern half), Mureș (northern half).

Transitional areas

Transitional varieties of the Moldavian dialect are found in areas of contact with the other dialects. As such, Moldavian features often occur outside the historical Moldavia: in northern Dobruja, in northeastern Muntenia, and in north-east Transylvania.

Phonology

There are also the Standard Romanian diphthongs, though these are largely undifferentiated from the equivalent vowel-glide combinations.

Particularities

Phonetic features

The Moldavian dialect has the following phonetic particularities that contrast it with the other Romanian dialects:

;Consonants
The dialect has a tendency to innovate and amplify more features compared to Standard Romanian, like heavy palatalization and labialization, simplifying affricates, as well as a trend of more frequent lenition and cluster simplification, while still retaining some archaic qualities.
*The postalveolar affricates become the fricatives : for standard , , (they are not also palatalized like in the Banat dialect). As a consequence, the affricate and the fricative merge into the latter: for ''joc'', ''sânĝe''. However, the ''Atlasul lingvistic român'' (1938–1942) and other field works record examples of pronunciations showing that, while the merger covers most of the dialect area, it is not systematic and sometimes found in free variation. In parts of the south-western and north-eastern Moldavia the distinction is preserved.
*After the sibilants (sometimes also after ), a vowel shift occurs that changes into , into , and into : for ''sĕmn'', ''sîngur'', ''séră'', ''ḑer'', ḑ''id'', ḑé''mă'', ''șàle'', ''rășină'', ''jale'', ''țes'', ''țeapăn'', ''reci''. In the same phonetic contexts, the phoneme , which is generally responsible for indicating the plural in nouns and adjectives or the second person in verbs, is no longer realized: (for standard ''părinți'', ''vezi''). As a consequence, the number distinction is completely lost in some nouns and adjectives, such as ''moș'', ''leneș'', ''colț'', ''ursuz''.
*The labials receive a palatalized pronunciation when followed by front vowels and become , respectively: for , , . So, in Moldavian dialect of Romanian language becomes and sounds like oˈkʲilor op̚ˈkʲil becomes " chept" or " chiapt" or " cheapt", "piatră" becomes " chetră", "Petre" becomes " Chetre", "pilos" becomes " chilos", "pili" becomes " chili", "piuar" becomes " chiuar", "pitic" becomes " chitic", "pirandă" becomes " chirandă", "pizdă" becomes "chizdă", "piper" becomes " chiper"''. It corresponds with Aromanian where Slavic borrowing *kopylъ became " cochil", Latin "pectus" became " cheptu", Latin "petra" became " cheatrã".''
*Similarly, the palatalization of the labio-dentals occurs, but in two different ways. In the southern half of the dialect area they become , respectively, whereas in the northern half they become : for ''fierbe'', ''vițel''.
*All non-palatal consonants become labialized before the vowel , especially in monosyllabic words: for ''boli, zori''.
*The dentals are left unchanged before : . However, there is a tendency for affrication to occur due to the frequent palatalization of stop consonants before front vowels.
*The voiceless plosives are more frequently becoming unreleased at the end of utterances and in stop clusters across word boundaries and in middle positions.
*The affricate occurs, as in , as in the Banat dialect, the Maramureș dialect and the Aromanian language, whereas it evolved to in the Wallachian dialect, the Criș dialect, and standard Romanian: Matilda Caragiu Marioțeanu, ''Compendiu de dialectologie română'', Editura Științifică și Enciclopedică, 1975, p. 90 for ''zic'' (Latin ''dico'').
*In the northern part, followed by changes into : ''holbură'', ''hulpe'', ''hultan'' (compare with standard ''volbură'', ''vulpe'', ''vultan'').

;Vowels
The dialect tends to simplify and reduce unstressed vowels and diphthongs, much like in European Portuguese. Vowel hiatus is also restricted by adding a glide between conflicting vowels. New vowel-glide sequences also come about from the frequent palatalization and labialization. There can be considerable syncopation in polysyllabic words.
* After the labial , changes into and into : for ''lovesc'', ''să lovească''.
*Word-final becomes : for ''mamă'', ''casă''. Sometimes can become unvoiced , when there is strong stress placed on the first syllable, and it may labialize the preceding consonant.
*Unstressed closes to : for ''acoperit'' (rare).
*The diphthong is often realized as : for ''soare'', ''boală''.
*The diphthong becomes for almost all speakers, and most do not distinguish between the two.
*Unstressed in middle and final positions closes to : for ''lapte'', ''desfac''.
*In the northern areas, the vowel immediately before the stress opens to : for ''măgar'', ''bătrân'', ''tăcut'', ''pădure''.
*The diphthong becomes : for ''băiat'', ''încuiat''.
*Etymologic is preserved in the words for ''câine'', ''mâine'', ''mâini'', ''pâine''.
*The diphthong in final positions becomes the monophthong : for ''avea'', ''spunea''.
*Asyllabic versions of and occur in word-final positions: for ''pădurar'', ''cojocar''.

Morphological features

The dialect is characterized by its tendency toward more analytical, regular, and simplified morphological structures compared to Standard Romanian.
*Feminine nouns ending in ''-că'' have genitive and dative forms ending in ''-căi'': ''maicăi'', ''puicăi'' (compare with standard ''maicii'', ''puicii'').
*The noun ''tată'' "father" with the definite article has the form ''tatul'' (standard ''tatăl'').
*The possessive article is invariable: ''a meu'', ''a mea'', ''a mei'', ''a mele'' ("mine", standard ''al meu'', ''a mea'', ''ai mei'', ''ale mele'').
*The number distinction is made in verbs in the imperfect at the 3rd person: ''era / erau'', ''făcea / făceau'' (like in the standard language).
*The simple perfect is not used, except rarely, only in the 3rd person, with the simple value of a past tense.
*The auxiliary for the compound perfect has the same form for both the singular and the plural of the 3rd person: ''el o fost / ei o fost'' ("he was / they were", standard ''el a fost'', ''ei au fost'').
*In northern Moldavia, the pluperfect is also made analytically: ''m-am fost dus'', ''am fost venit'' ("I had gone, I had come", standard ''mă dusesem'', ''venisem'').
*The future tense in verbs uses the infinitive and is sometimes identical to it: ''va veni'', ''a veni'' ("he will come", standard only ''va veni'').
*The following subjunctive forms occur: ''să deie'', ''să steie'', ''să beie'', ''să ieie'', ''să vreie'' (standard ''să dea'', ''să stea'', ''să bea'', ''să ia'', ''să vrea'').
*The following imperatives occur: ''ádă'', ''vină'' (standard ''adú'', ''vino'').
*When the object of a verb is another verb, the latter is in its infinitive form, including the isolated morpheme ''a'': ''prinde a fierbe'' ("starts to boil", the standard uses the subjunctive: ''prinde să fiarbă'' or ''începe să fiarbă'').
*Genitives and datives of nouns tend to be formed analytically: ''dă mâncare la pisică'' ("give food to the cat", standard ''dă mâncare pisicii'').

Lexical particularities

*Some words have preserved archaic forms: ''îmblu'', ''împlu'', ''întru'', ''înflu'', ''nour'', ''dirept'' (compare with standard ''umblu'', ''umplu'', ''intru'', ''umflu'', ''nor'', ''drept'').
*A particular variant for the personal pronoun for the 3rd person occurs frequently and is used for animates and inanimates alike: ''dânsul'', ''dânsa'', ''dânșii'', ''dânsele'' ("he, she, they" as well as "it, they", compare with ''el'', ''ea'', ''ei'', ''ele''). In the standard language, these forms have started being used as 3rd person polite pronouns.
*The demonstrative pronouns have particular forms: ("this" masculine and feminine, "that" masculine and feminine; compare with standard ''acesta'', ''aceasta'', ''acela'', ''aceea'').
*Other specific words: ''omăt'' ("snow", ''zăpadă''), ''agudă'' ("mulberry", ''dudă''), ''poame'' ("grapes", ''struguri''), ''perje'' ("plums", ''prune''), ''ciubotă'' ("high boot", ''cizmă''), ''cori'' ("measles", ''pojar''), etc.

Sample

Moldavian dialect:

Standard Romanian: ''Ea avea două vaci și se mirau oamenii de vacile ei că dădeau un ciubăraș de lapte. Și așa de la o vreme stârpiseră vacile, nu mai dădeau lapte.''

English translation: "She had two cows and people were amazed at her cows for giving a bucketful of milk. And so from a while the cows became dry, they stopped giving milk."

Gustav Weigand:" widths="100px" heights="100px" perrow="6">
File:Sprachatlas Weigand 67.JPG, The Romanian linguistic areal (1908)
File:Sprachatlas Weigand 65.JPG, The extension of the Moldovan characteristic isoglosses (1908)
File:Sprachatlas Weigand 25.jpg,
File:Sprachatlas Weigand 33.jpg,
File:Sprachatlas Weigand 26.jpg
File:Sprachatlas Weigand 34.jpg,
File:Sprachatlas Weigand 27.jpg
File:Sprachatlas Weigand 35.jpg,
File:Sprachatlas Weigand 28.jpg
File:Sprachatlas Weigand 36.jpg,
File:Sprachatlas Weigand 29.jpg
File:Sprachatlas Weigand 37.jpg,
File:Sprachatlas Weigand 30.jpg
File:Sprachatlas Weigand 38.jpg,
File:Sprachatlas Weigand 31.jpg
File:Sprachatlas Weigand 39.jpg,
File:Sprachatlas Weigand 32.jpg
File:Sprachatlas Weigand 40.jpg,

See also

*Moldovan language
*Romanian dialects
* Romanian phonology

Notes

Bibliography

*Vasile Ursan
"Despre configurația dialectală a dacoromânei actuale"
''Transilvania'' (new series), 2008, No. 1, pp. 77–85
*Spînu, Stela, "Graiurile româneşti din nord-estul Republicii Moldova", Chişinău, 2011
*Ilona Bădescu
"Dialectologie"
teaching material for the University of Craiova.
*Elena Buja, Liliana Coposescu, Gabriela Cusen, Luiza Meseșan Schmitz, Dan Chiribucă, Adriana Neagu, Iulian Pah
''Raport de țară: România''
country report for the Lifelong Learning Programme MERIDIUM

Further reading

*Marian Antofi
"Evoluția consoanelor africate în subdialectul moldovenesc"
Ovidius University Annals of Philology, vol. XIV, nr. 15-21, 2003, pp. 15–21

{{Romanian language

Romanian language varieties and styles
Moldavia