Michael B. Foster

Michael Beresford Foster (1903–1959) was a tutor in philosophy of Oxford University's Christ Church. For a period up until his death he was the chairman of the British Student Christian Movement. He was one of A. J. Ayer's tutors at Oxford, but their relationship is remembered more as a source of strained feelings than of scholarly fellowship. His disparate works on political science and various doctrines of Christianity (especially the doctrine of creation) have influenced philosophers such as George Grant, who had, when writing his doctoral thesis, in fact visited with Foster in England.

Education

His elementary schooling took place at a Merchant Taylors' School. He then proceeded to St John's College, Oxford, gaining a lifetime friend and colleague John Mabbott. In 1927–1928 he studied under Richard Kroner in Dresden, Germany.

Foster's creation-science thesis

Foster is remembered for his thesis that the idea of Christian creation and its view of nature—especially in contrast to various Greek views of nature—deeply influenced the development of early modern science. Mention of Foster's thesis can be found in the work of historian and theologian Alister E. McGrath, for example. Foster's thesis (published 1934–1936) differs greatly from the Merton thesis (published 1938) and other harmony-type historical investigations (e.g., that of Reijer Hooykaas) since rather than relying on historical contingencies to establish a relation, he abstractly asserts using analytical philosophy a logical necessity between an orthodox Christian view of creation and a modern view of science, i.e., Christianity is a necessary and sufficient condition for the development of modern science. Although when citing this thesis many scholars refer only to the three 1934–1936 ''Mind'' journal articles, an until-recently-sometimes-hard-to-locate conference paper given in Italy in 1933 by FosterMichael B. Foster. "The Opposition Between Hegel and the Philosophy of Empiricism". Given at the Third Congress of the International Hegel Society. Rome, 1933. Appeared in ''Verhandlungen des dritten Hegelkongresses vom. 19 bis 23. April 1933 in Rom.'' actually forms a "natural unit" with the three ''Mind'' articles. This first paper—"The Opposition Between Hegel and the Philosophy of Empiricism"—argued that there is "''one'' Christian truth incorporated in modern Empiricism which Hegel's Philosophy ignores. ... This truth is the truth contained in the Christian doctrine of Creation." Foster's creation-science thesis is actually a modern form of what historians and philosophers sometimes more technically label voluntarism, which is a worldview that tends to be held by empiricists: an historically opposing worldview was that of the "intellectualists" who tend to be rationalists.

Mystery and philosophy

In his book ''Mystery and Philosophy'' (SCM Press, 1957), Foster seeks to explore the existence of mystery in various secular and religious disciplines in order to discover whether it serves a legitimate function in theology and philosophy when possibly applied to scientific and political realities. Foster asserts that realities exist (i.e., those found in revelation and appealed to in prayer) that are mysterious and will remain so; Foster's view of mystery like that of Gabriel Marcel's is therefore quite different from his view of unsolved puzzles and problems, which he, here following Marcel, holds only temporarily appear mysterious. This idea of irresolvable mystery is similar to ones also found in the works of Eric L. Mascall and Norman Geisler. Foster concludes this book by stating "aithis directed upon mystery, as revelation springs from mystery, and as prayer seems properly to be directed upon mysterious objects." Mention of Foster's view of mystery can be found in the work of the philosopher Ann Hartle, for example.Ann Hartle
''Death and the disinterested spectator: an inquiry into the nature of philosophy''
SUNY Press, 1986. . p.231n4.

Works

Works of his that remain important to the history of science include "The Christian Doctrine of Creation and the Rise of Modern Natural Science" (''Mind'', Volume 43, 1934, p. 446–468), "Christian Theology and Modern Science of Nature." (''Mind'', Volume 44, 1935, pp. 439–466 (''part I'') and Volume 45, 1936, pp. 1–27 (''part II'')).
*''Mystery and Philosophy'', Michael Beresford Foster, SCM Press, 1957, pages 96
*"Man's Idea of Nature", '' The Christian Scholar'', Volume 41, Number 3, September 1958, pages 361–366
*''The Political Philosophies of Plato and Hegel'', Michael Beresford Foster, Major Bronson Foster, Russell & Russell, 1965 (originally published 1935), 207 pages
*Michael B. Foster. Ed. Edward McChesney Sait. ''Masters of Political Thought (Volume 1): Plato to Machiavelli''. Houghton Mifflin, 1941. (a 1974 edition has )
*"The Christian Doctrine of Creation and the Rise of Modern Natural Science" in "Daniel O'connor and Francis Christopher Oakley (eds.), ''Creation: The Impact of an Idea'', 1969, Charles Scribner's Sons set of 36 contemporary book citations

See also

* Eugene Marion Klaaren
* Christopher B. Kaiser

References

Further reading

*Edward B. Davis. "Christianity and Early Modern Science: The Foster thesis Reconsidered" (Chapter 3, pp. 75–95). ''Evangelicals and Science in Historical Perspective''. Edited by David N. Livingstone, D. G. Hart, and Mark A. Noll. Oxford University Press, 1999.
* Peter Harrison
"Voluntarism and Early Modern Science"
''History of Science''. Vol.40, no.1, 2002. pp. 63–89.

External links

''Political philosophies of Plato and Hegel''
(1935)

{{DEFAULTSORT:Foster, Michael
British Christians
Christian philosophers
Commanders Crosses of the Order of Merit of the Federal Republic of Germany
1903 births
1959 deaths