Managerial prerogative content
Managerial prerogative is that employers and managers can freely supervise according to their own judgments. Its effective exercise includes recruitment, employment, job distribution, job supervision, working methods, working hours, employee rules and regulations, employee supervision, employee transfer, employee sanctions, layoffs, employee dismissals, employee recalls, and other employment matters. Its limitation lies in the policies, rules and regulations of different countries so that managerial prerogative must be fair and reasonable.Manager's right to manage
The rights of managers include abiding byManagement views on prerogative
The two streams of argument from management relate the primacy of market rationality. They are: #Trade union views on prerogative
Many workers and their representatives do acknowledge part of management’s role to manage. They often do not describe it as a right of management, but as part of the job managers are paid to do. Management use this term to defend their role, but also trade unions use this time to place an element of responsibility upon management. The function of trade unions is to place limits on managerial prerogatives. Trade unions protect employees by referring to their worker’s rights as well as their human rights. Without trade unions, managers have full power to practice their rights. Recent laws are imposing rules that employers have to use their prerogatives with good faith.Practice of managerial prerogatives in different countries
Australia
In Australia, the industrial relations policies of the Howard government during its initial terms increased the exercise of managerial prerogative by reducing the scope and importance of awards, encouraging decentralized enterprise bargaining, and reducing the power of unions and promoting individual contracts.United Kingdom
In the UK, there are constraints on managerial prerogative rights mainly pertaining to the right of firing employees. In order to successfully dismiss a worker, the manager must provide sufficient evidence that his decision to fire was fair to all parties. This is judged in a court of law.Bowers, J. and Clarke A. (1981) 'Unfair Dismissal and Managerial Prerogative: A Study of Other Substantial Reason', HeinOnline, 10(), pp. 34 nlinehttp://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/indlj10&div=13&id=&page= (Accessed: October 15, 2014).''Johnstone v Bloomsbury: Health Authority''
''Johnstone v Bloomsbury: Health Authority'' is an example of managerial prerogatives used in an abusive manner. Dr. Johnstone had been asked to work for a set time per week and also be ready when asked to work for additional hours. This was abused when his manager asked him to work inhumane hours, affecting Johnstone’s health and well-being. His manager was able to impose these hours on Dr. Johnstone but there are human rights in the UK that protect Johnstone and his health.Tufal, A. (n.d.) 'Cases of employers' liability', Law Teacher, (), pp. 1-18 nline Available at (Accessed: October 16, 2014).Finland
In Finland, there is a clear reciprocation of trust between employers and employees.European industrial relations glossaries (2009) Employer's Managerial Prerogative, available at (Accessed: 14 October 2014). The employees are expected to show a certain level of subordination to the employer as well as respect secondary duties such as following instructions given to them by employers. Loyalty is also seen as an essential part of most businesses in Finland, and it is seen as a secondary duty as well.Employer's Managerial Prerogative. 2014. nlineAvailable at . ccessed 15 October 2014Malaysia
In Malaysia, employers have the right to terminate employment under three circumstances. First, the employer has or intends to reduce or discontinue the business of the company in which the employee is employed; second, the employer has or intends to eliminate the business in the area in which the employee is employed; third, The employer has or intends to reduce or discontinue the business requirements in which the employee is engaged. In addition to the above three cases, the employer itself has the inherent right to restructure the enterprise, and no arbitration court will intervene unless the reorganization is proved to be conducted in bad faith or without reason.Unfair dismissal and managerial prerogative
See also
* Manager's right to manage *References
{{reflistFurther reading
*Kuhn, J W "Does Collective Bargaining Usurp the Manager's Right to Manage?" ''Journal of Occupational Medicine'' 2:11 1960, 570. *Jane Broadbent, Michael Dietrich, Jennifer Roberts "The end of the professions?" in ''The end of the professions?: the restructuring of professional work'' eds Jane Broadbent, Michael Dietrich, Jennifer Roberts, Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 1997: 4 Management