Differences from high dead space syringes
History of needle and syringe designs
The first hypodermic needle was first used by Dr. Alexander Wood and immediately efforts were made to improve the design. It was not until 1954, with the need for massive syringe distribution of Dr. Salk's polio vaccine, that the first disposable syringes were created. Initially, they were made of glass. In 1961 plastic disposable syringes became available. The advent of the first low dead space syringe occurred with the creation of 1-ml syringes designed specifically for the administration of insulin. Then amongst the scare of HIV and rising concern of other communicable diseases to healthcare workers the creation of safety syringes occurred in 1988. As of the last few years new designs have emerged that work on a needle that is low dead space and fits onto and transforms high dead space syringes into low dead space syringes. One design achieves this by creating a plunger that inserts itself into the syringe neck to expel as much fluid as possible from the syringe body, thus reducing the amount of space available within the neck.Various designs of low dead space syringes
Designs
Fixed needle design
The insulin syringe was the first syringe that is considered low dead space. It was initially created with low dead space for accurate measuring and mixing of fast and slow acting insulin, which had the added benefit of wasting as little of the expensive drug as possible. An attached short and small gauge needle was also designed into the syringe to prevent the needle from detaching during administration of insulin and to decrease pain from frequent injections.Detachable needle design
Low dead space can be achieved in detachable syringes and needles through designing either the syringe or needle components to have low dead space. Currently, the design of the low dead space needle incorporates a plastic neck that fits within the neck of a standard syringe hub. A low dead space syringe is accomplished by using a standard syringe body with an extended plunger that inserts into the neck of the syringe body to expel more fluid from the syringe.WHO guidelines for people who inject drugs
According to WHO guidelines for people who inject drugs it is suggested that needle exchange programs provide low dead space syringes for distribution to people who inject drugs due to evidence that the provision of low dead space syringes leads to a reduction in the transmission of HIV, and hepatitis B and C.Benefits of low dead space syringes
*Reduced drug waste. *Increase of 2-19% additional vaccine doses per vial if current 10-dose flu vaccine vials are used. Which in large flu vaccine campaigns suggests an instant increase of thousands to millions of additional persons who are vaccinated. *If 50% of people who inject drugs switch to low dead space syringes an estimated reduction of 33% of new HIV, and Hepatitis B and C infections will occur. *Reduce incidence of overdose in infants and premature babies. *Improve imaging of radiographic techniquesCriticism for distributing low dead space syringes
Criticism to proponents of low dead space syringes being distributed to needle exchange programs claim that real world pilot studies do not exist to support findings within labs. Some proponents point to America and its low prevalence of HIV and hepatitis among people who inject drugs and cite the reason for such low prevalence to low dead space syringes already being the standard preferred syringe in the United States and successful anti-needle sharing campaigns. Other critics argue that countries like Vietnam, where low dead space needles are distributed and available, have the highest rates of HIV among people who inject drugs. However, proponents claim that low dead space syringes are still difficult to get and many people who use low dead space syringes still use high dead space syringes and thus reduce the potential effect of using low dead space syringes.Could low dead-space syringes really reduce HIV transmission to low levels? International Journal of Drug Policy 955-3959Vickerman yr:2013 vol:24 iss:1 pg:8 -14References
{{reflist Medical equipment