Jeffrey Conditioning

Richard Carl Jeffrey (August 5, 1926 – November 9, 2002) was an American philosopher, logician, and probability theorist. He is best known for developing and championing the philosophy of radical probabilism and the associated heuristic of probability kinematics, also known as Jeffrey conditioning.

Life and career

Born in Boston, Massachusetts, Jeffrey served in the U.S. Navy during World War II. As a graduate student he studied under Rudolf Carnap and Carl Hempel. He received his M.A. from the University of Chicago in 1952 and his Ph.D. from Princeton in 1957. After holding academic positions at MIT, City College of New York, Stanford University, and the University of Pennsylvania, he joined the faculty of Princeton in 1974 and became a professor emeritus there in 1999. He was also a visiting professor at the University of California, Irvine.

Jeffrey, who died of lung cancer at the age of 76, was known for his sense of humor, which often came through in his breezy writing style. In the preface of his posthumously published ''Subjective Probability'', he refers to himself as "a fond foolish old fart dying of a surfeit of Pall Malls".

Philosophical work

As a philosopher, Jeffrey specialized in epistemology and decision theory. He is perhaps best known for defending and developing the Bayesian approach to probability.

Jeffrey also wrote, or co-wrote, two widely used and influential logic textbooks: ''Formal Logic: Its Scope and Limits'', a basic introduction to logic, and ''Computability and Logic'', a more advanced text dealing with, among other things, the famous negative results of twentieth-century logic such as Gödel's incompleteness theorems and Tarski's indefinability theorem.

Radical probabilism

In frequentist statistics, Bayes' theorem provides a useful rule for updating a probability when new frequency data becomes available. In Bayesian statistics, the theorem itself plays a more limited role. Bayes' theorem connects probabilities that are held simultaneously. It does not tell the learner how to update probabilities when new evidence becomes available over time. This subtlety was first pointed out in terms by Ian Hacking in 1967.

However, adapting Bayes' theorem, and adopting it as a rule of updating, is a temptation. Suppose that a learner forms probabilities ''P''_old(''A''&''B'')=''p'' and ''P''_old(''B'')=''q''.
If the learner subsequently learns that ''B'' is true, nothing in the axioms of probability or the results derived therefrom tells him how to behave. He might be tempted to adopt Bayes' theorem by analogy and set his ''P''_new(''A'') = ''P''_old(''A'' ,  ''B'') = ''p''/''q''.

In fact, that step, Bayes' rule of updating, can be justified, as necessary and sufficient, through a ''dynamic'' Dutch book argument that is additional to the arguments used to justify the axioms. This argument was first put forward by David Lewis in the 1970s though he never published it.

That works when the new data is certain. C. I. Lewis had argued that "If anything is to be probable then something must be certain". There must, on Lewis' account, be some certain facts on which probabilities were conditioned. However, the principle known as Cromwell's rule declares that nothing, apart from a logical law, can ever be certain, if that. Jeffrey famously rejected Lewis' ''dictum'' and quipped, "It's probabilities all the way down." He called this position ''radical probabilism''.

In this case Bayes' rule isn't able to capture a mere subjective change in the probability of some critical fact. The new evidence may not have been anticipated or even be capable of being articulated after the event. It seems reasonable, as a starting position, to adopt the law of total probability and extend it to updating in much the same way as was Bayes' theorem.

: ''P''_new(''A'') = ''P''_old(''A'' ,  ''B'')''P''_new(''B'') + ''P''_old(''A'' ,  not-''B'')''P''_new(not-''B'')

Adopting such a rule is sufficient to avoid a Dutch book but not necessary. Jeffrey advocated this as a rule of updating under radical probabilism and called it probability kinematics. Others have named it Jeffrey conditioning.

It is not the only sufficient updating rule for radical probabilism. Others have been advocated including E. T. Jaynes' maximum entropy principle and Brian Skyrms' principle of reflection.

Jeffrey conditioning can be generalized from partitions to arbitrary condition events by giving it a frequentist semantics.

See also

* Bayesian epistemology

Selected bibliography

* ''Formal Logic: Its Scope and Limits''. 1st ed. McGraw Hill, 1967.
** 2nd ed. McGraw Hill, 1981.
** 3rd ed. McGraw Hill, 1990.
** 4th ed., John P. Burgess (editor), Hackett Publishing, 2006,
* ''The Logic of Decision''. 2nd ed. University of Chicago Press, 1990.
* ''Probability and the Art of Judgment''. Cambridge University Press, 1992.
* ''Computability and Logic'' (with George Boolos and John P. Burgess). 4th ed. Cambridge University Press, 2002.
* ''Subjective Probability: The Real Thing''. Cambridge University Press, 2004.

References

External links

His website at Princeton; includes several manuscripts, including ''Subjective Probability''






by philosophe
Mathias Rissethe then forthcoming entry on Jeffrey
in the Dictionary of Modern American Philosophersbr>and Remarks on Dick Jeffrey given during his 2003 Memorial Service
rchived on Wayback Machine">Wayback_Machine.html" ;"title="rchived on Wayback Machine">rchived on Wayback Machine

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on Bayes' Theorem
(discusses Jeffrey conditioning)

Tribute, by Brian Skyrms''In Memory of Richard Jeffrey: Some Reminiscences, and Some Reflections on The Logic Of Decision''
by Alan Hájek {Archived on Wayback Machine].
Guide to the Richard C. Jeffrey Papers, 1934-2002
ASP.2003.02, Archives of Scientific Philosophy, Special Collections Department, University of Pittsburgh)

{{DEFAULTSORT:Jeffrey, Richard
1926 births
2002 deaths
20th-century American non-fiction writers
20th-century American philosophers
20th-century essayists
21st-century American non-fiction writers
21st-century American philosophers
21st-century essayists
American logicians
American male essayists
American male non-fiction writers
American philosophy academics
Analytic philosophers
City College of New York faculty
Deaths from lung cancer
Epistemologists
People from Boston
Philosophers of logic
Philosophers of science
Philosophy writers
Princeton University alumni
Stanford University Department of Philosophy faculty
University of Chicago alumni
University of Pennsylvania faculty
20th-century American male writers
21st-century American male writers