Examples
Logarithm and exponential
Let be the multiplicative group of positive real numbers, and let be the additive group of real numbers. The logarithm function satisfies for all so it is a group homomorphism. The exponential function satisfies for all so it too is a homomorphism. The identities and show that and are inverse function, inverses of each other. Since is a homomorphism that has an inverse that is also a homomorphism, is an Group isomorphism, isomorphism of groups, i.e., via the isomorphism . The function is an isomorphism which translates multiplication of positive real numbers into addition of real numbers. This facility makes it possible to multiply real numbers using a ruler and a table of logarithms, or using a slide rule with a logarithmic scale.Integers modulo 6
Consider the group the integers from 0 to 5 with addition Modular arithmetic, modulo 6. Also consider the group the ordered pairs where the ''x'' coordinates can be 0 or 1, and the y coordinates can be 0, 1, or 2, where addition in the ''x''-coordinate is modulo 2 and addition in the ''y''-coordinate is modulo 3. These structures are isomorphic under addition, under the following scheme: or in general For example, which translates in the other system as Even though these two groups "look" different in that the sets contain different elements, they are indeed isomorphic: their structures are exactly the same. More generally, the direct product of groups, direct product of two cyclic groups and is isomorphic to if and only if ''m'' and ''n'' are coprime, per the Chinese remainder theorem.Relation-preserving isomorphism
If one object consists of a set ''X'' with a binary relation R and the other object consists of a set ''Y'' with a binary relation S then an isomorphism from ''X'' to ''Y'' is a bijective function such that: S is Reflexive relation, reflexive, Irreflexive relation, irreflexive, Symmetric relation, symmetric, Antisymmetric relation, antisymmetric, Asymmetric relation, asymmetric, Transitive relation, transitive, Connected relation, total, Homogeneous relation#Properties, trichotomous, a partial order, total order, well-order, strict weak order, Strict weak order#Total preorders, total preorder (weak order), an equivalence relation, or a relation with any other special properties, if and only if R is. For example, R is an Order theory, ordering ≤ and S an ordering then an isomorphism from ''X'' to ''Y'' is a bijective function such that Such an isomorphism is called an or (less commonly) an . If then this is a relation-preserving automorphism.Applications
In algebra, isomorphisms are defined for all algebraic structures. Some are more specifically studied; for example: * Linear isomorphisms between vector spaces; they are specified by invertible matrices. * Group isomorphisms between group (mathematics), groups; the classification of isomorphism classes of finite groups is an open problem. * Ring isomorphism between ring (mathematics), rings. * Field isomorphisms are the same as ring isomorphism between field (mathematics), fields; their study, and more specifically the study of field automorphisms is an important part of Galois theory. Just as the automorphisms of an algebraic structure form a group (mathematics), group, the isomorphisms between two algebras sharing a common structure form a heap (mathematics), heap. Letting a particular isomorphism identify the two structures turns this heap into a group. In mathematical analysis, the Laplace transform is an isomorphism mapping hard differential equations into easier algebraic equations. In graph theory, an isomorphism between two graphs ''G'' and ''H'' is a bijective map ''f'' from the vertices of ''G'' to the vertices of ''H'' that preserves the "edge structure" in the sense that there is an edge from Vertex (graph theory), vertex ''u'' to vertex ''v'' in ''G'' if and only if there is an edge from to in ''H''. See graph isomorphism. In order theory, an isomorphism between two partially ordered sets ''P'' and ''Q'' is a bijective map from ''P'' to ''Q'' that preserves the order structure in the sense that for any elements and of ''P'' we have less than in ''P'' if and only if is less than in ''Q''. As an example, the set of whole numbers ordered by the ''is-a-factor-of'' relation is isomorphic to the set of ABO blood group system, blood types ordered by the ''can-donate-to'' relation. See order isomorphism. In mathematical analysis, an isomorphism between two Hilbert spaces is a bijection preserving addition, scalar multiplication, and inner product. In early theories of logical atomism, the formal relationship between facts and true propositions was theorized by Bertrand Russell and Ludwig Wittgenstein to be isomorphic. An example of this line of thinking can be found in Russell's ''Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy''. In cybernetics, the good regulator theorem or Conant–Ashby theorem is stated as "Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system". Whether regulated or self-regulating, an isomorphism is required between the regulator and processing parts of the system.Category theoretic view
In category theory, given a category (mathematics), category ''C'', an isomorphism is a morphism that has an inverse morphism that is, and Two categories and are Isomorphism of categories, isomorphic if there exist functors and which are mutually inverse to each other, that is, (the identity functor on ) and (the identity functor on ).Isomorphism vs. bijective morphism
In a concrete category (roughly, a category whose objects are sets (perhaps with extra structure) and whose morphisms are structure-preserving functions), such as the category of topological spaces or categories of algebraic objects (like the category of groups, the category of rings, and the category of modules), an isomorphism must be bijective on the underlying sets. In algebraic categories (specifically, categories of variety (universal algebra), varieties in the sense of universal algebra), an isomorphism is the same as a homomorphism which is bijective on underlying sets. However, there are concrete categories in which bijective morphisms are not necessarily isomorphisms (such as the category of topological spaces).Isomorphism class
Since a composition of isomorphisms is an isomorphism, the identity is an isomorphism, and the inverse of an isomorphism is an isomorphism, the relation that two mathematical objects are isomorphic is an equivalence relation. An equivalence class given by isomorphisms is commonly called an isomorphism class.Examples
Examples of isomorphism classes are plentiful in mathematics. * Two sets are isomorphic if there is a bijection between them. The isomorphism class of a finite set can be identified with the non-negative integer representing the number of elements it contains. * The isomorphism class of a finite-dimensional vector space can be identified with the non-negative integer representing its dimension. * The classification of finite simple groups enumerates the isomorphism classes of all finite simple groups. * The Surface (topology)#Classification of closed surfaces, classification of closed surfaces enumerates the isomorphism classes of all connected closed surfaces. * ordinal number, Ordinals are essentially defined as isomorphism classes of well-ordered sets (though there are technical issues involved). * There are three isomorphism classes of the planar subalgebras of M(2,R), the 2 x 2 real matrices. However, there are circumstances in which the isomorphism class of an object conceals vital information about it. * Given a mathematical structure, it is common that two substructure (mathematics), substructures belong to the same isomorphism class. However, the way they are included in the whole structure can not be studied if they are identified. For example, in a finite-dimensional vector space, all Linear subspace, subspaces of the same dimension are isomorphic, but must be distinguished to consider their intersection, sum, etc. * In homotopy theory, the fundamental group of a topological space, space at a point , though technically denoted to emphasize the dependence on the base point, is often written lazily as simply if is connected space#Path connectedness, path connected. The reason for this is that the existence of a path between two points allows one to identify loop (topology), loops at one with loops at the other; however, unless is abelian group, abelian this isomorphism is non-unique. Furthermore, the classification of covering spaces makes strict reference to particular subgroups of , specifically distinguishing between isomorphic but conjugacy class, conjugate subgroups, and therefore amalgamating the elements of an isomorphism class into a single featureless object seriously decreases the level of detail provided by the theory.Relation to equality
Although there are cases where isomorphic objects can be considered equal, one must distinguish and . Equality is when two objects are the same, and therefore everything that is true about one object is true about the other. On the other hand, isomorphisms are related to some structure, and two isomorphic objects share only the properties that are related to this structure. For example, the sets are ; they are merely different representations—the first an intensional definition, intensional one (in set builder notation), and the second extensional definition, extensional (by explicit enumeration)—of the same subset of the integers. By contrast, the sets and are not since they do not have the same elements. They are isomorphic as sets, but there are many choices (in fact 6) of an isomorphism between them: one isomorphism is : while another is : and no one isomorphism is intrinsically better than any other. have a conventional order, namely the alphabetical order, and similarly 1, 2, 3 have the usual order of the integers. Viewed as ordered sets, there is only one isomorphism between them, namely On this view and in this sense, these two sets are not equal because one cannot consider them : one can choose an isomorphism between them, but that is a weaker claim than identity and valid only in the context of the chosen isomorphism. Also, integers and even numbers are isomorphic as ordered sets and abelian groups (for addition), but cannot be considered equal sets, since one is a proper subset of the other. On the other hand, when sets (or other mathematical objects) are defined only by their properties, without considering the nature of their elements, one often considers them to be equal. This is generally the case with solutions of universal properties. For example, the rational numbers are formally defined as equivalence classes of pairs of integers, although nobody thinks of a rational number as a set (equivalence class). The universal property of the rational numbers is essentially that they form a field (mathematics), field that contains the integers and does not contain any proper subfield. Given two fields with these properties, there is a unique field isomorphism between them. This allows identifying these two fields, since every property of one of them can be transferred to the other through the isomorphism. The real numbers that can be expressed as a quotient of integers form the smallest subfield of the reals. There is thus a unique isomorphism from this subfield of the reals to the rational numbers defined by equivalence classes.See also
*Bisimulation *Equivalence relation *Heap (mathematics) *Isometry *Isomorphism class *Isomorphism theorem *Universal property *Coherent isomorphism *Balanced categoryNotes
References
Further reading
*External links
* * {{Authority control Morphisms Equivalence (mathematics)