Interfoto Picture Library Ltd V Stiletto Visual Programmes Ltd
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

''Interfoto Picture Library Ltd v Stiletto Visual Programmes Ltd'' EWCA Civ 6
is an English contract law">987
EWCA Civ 6
is an English contract law case on onerous clauses and the rule of
common law Common law (also known as judicial precedent, judge-made law, or case law) is the body of law primarily developed through judicial decisions rather than statutes. Although common law may incorporate certain statutes, it is largely based on prece ...
that reasonable notice of them must be given to a contracting party in order that they be effective. It also addressed, but did not decide, the position of onerous clauses as disguised penalties (which are ineffective under
common law Common law (also known as judicial precedent, judge-made law, or case law) is the body of law primarily developed through judicial decisions rather than statutes. Although common law may incorporate certain statutes, it is largely based on prece ...
).


Facts

Interfoto delivered 47 photographic transparencies to Stiletto in a jiffy bag. Stiletto was planning to use them for a presentation, but in the event it did not. It never opened the transparency bag or read Interfoto's standard terms and conditions, which were inside the bag. Condition 2 said there was a holding fee of £5 per transparency for each day over fourteen days. After around a month, Interfoto sent a bill for £3,783.50.


Judgment

The
Court of Appeal An appellate court, commonly called a court of appeal(s), appeal court, court of second instance or second instance court, is any court of law that is empowered to Hearing (law), hear a Legal case, case upon appeal from a trial court or other ...
held that the holding fee was ineffective. Dillon LJ said that a "particularly onerous or unusual" term must have special notice. However, Interfoto was entitled to a small restitutory charge of £3.50 per transparency per week for their holding. Bingham LJ held that the clause was not valid. It was "a venial period of delay oran inordinate liability". The issue was, he said, He advocated embracing
good faith In human interactions, good faith () is a sincere intention to be fair, open, and honest, regardless of the outcome of the interaction. Some Latin phrases have lost their literal meaning over centuries, but that is not the case with , which i ...
- "showing up your cards", "fair dealing", and so on. On penalty clauses, Bingham LJ noted at the end of his decision,


See also

*'' O'Brien v MGN Ltd''
002 002, 0O2, O02, OO2, or 002 may refer to: Airports *0O2, Baker Airport *O02, Nervino Airport Astronomy *1996 OO2, the minor planet 7499 L'Aquila *1990 OO2, the asteroid 9175 Graun Fiction *002, fictional British 00 Agent *''002 Operazione Luna'' ...
CLC 33, 3 where Hale LJ said that the words "onerous or unusual" are not "terms of art" *''
OFT v Abbey is a judicial decision of the United Kingdom Supreme Court relating to bank charges in the United Kingdom, with reference to the situation where a bank account holder goes into unplanned overdraft. When a bank customer uses an unplanned overdra ...
'' EWHC 875 (Comm)
*Bates & Others v Post Office Ltd#Judgment No 3 Common Issues – March 2019">''Bates & Others v Post Office Ltd'' (Judgment No 3), 019EWHC 606 (QB): where the judgment on "common issues" made several references to ''Interfoto''


References

{{reflist English incorporation case law Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases 1987 in United Kingdom case law