Advantages and disadvantages versus fixed-point detectors
An open path detector usually costs more than a single point detector, so there is little incentive for applications that play to a point detector's strengths: where the point detector can be placed at the known location of the highest gas concentration, and a relatively slow response is acceptable. The open path detector excels in outdoor situations where, even if the likely source of the gas release is known, the evolution of the developing cloud or plume is unpredictable. Gas will almost certainly enter an extended linear beam before finding its way to any single chosen point. Also, point detectors in exposed outdoor locations require weather shields to be fitted, increasing the response time significantly. Open path detectors can also show a cost advantage in any application where a row of point detectors would be required to achieve the same coverage, for instance monitoring along a pipeline, or around the perimeter of a plant. Not only will one detector replace several, but the costs of installation, maintenance, cabling etc. are likely to be lower.Component parts
In principle any source of infrared radiation could be used, together with an optical system of lenses or mirrors to form the transmitted beam. In practice the following sources have been used, always with some form ofOperating wavelengths
The choice of infrared wavelengths used for the measurement largely defines the detector's suitability for a particular applications. Not only must the target gas (or gases) have a suitableHistory
The first open-path detector offered for routine industrial use, as distinct from research instruments built in small numbers, was the Wright and Wright 'Pathwatch' in the US, 1983. Acquired by Det-Tronics (Detector Electronics Corporation) in 1992, the detector operated in the 3.4 μm region with a powerful incandescent source and a mechanical chopper. It did not achieve large volume sales, mainly because of cost and doubts about long-term reliability with moving parts. Beginning in 1985, Shell Research in UK was funded by Shell Natural Gas to develop an open-path detector with no moving parts. The advantages of the 2.3 μm wavelength were identified, and a research prototype was demonstrated. This design had a combined transmitter-receiver with a corner-cubeReferences
* Explosive atmospheres – Part 29-4: Gas detectors – Performance requirements of open-path detectors for flammable gases; IEC 60079-29-4 * Explosive atmospheres. Gas detectors. Performance requirements of open-path detectors for flammable gases; EN 60079-29-4:2010 * UK Health and Safety Executive, Fire and Explosion Strategy; http://www.hse.gov.uk/offshore/strategy/fgdetect.htm Optoelectronics Chemical engineering Fire prevention Oil platforms Offshore engineering Petroleum production Oil refineries Petroleum technology Safety equipment Detectors Gas sensors