HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

"Imminent lawless action" is one of several legal standards American courts use to determine whether certain speech is protected under the
First Amendment of the United States Constitution The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prevents Congress from making laws respecting an establishment of religion; prohibiting the free exercise of religion; or abridging the freedom of speech, the freedom ...
. The standard was first established in 1969 in the
United States Supreme Court The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court cases, and over state court cases that turn on question ...
case '' Brandenburg v. Ohio.''


History

''Brandenburg'' clarified what constituted a "
clear and present danger ''Clear and Present Danger'' is a political thriller novel, written by Tom Clancy and published on August 17, 1989. A sequel to '' The Cardinal of the Kremlin'' (1988), main character Jack Ryan becomes acting Deputy Director of Intelligence i ...
", the standard established by ''
Schenck v. United States ''Schenck v. United States'', 249 U.S. 47 (1919), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court concerning enforcement of the Espionage Act of 1917 during World War I. A unanimous Supreme Court, in an opinion by Justice Oliver Wendell Hol ...
'' (1919) and overruled by ''
Whitney v. California ''Whitney v. California'', 274 U.S. 357 (1927), was a United States Supreme Court decision upholding the conviction of an individual who had engaged in speech that raised a clear and present danger to society.''Whitney v. California''274 U.S. 357 ...
'' (1927), which had held that speech that merely advocated violence could be made illegal. Under the imminent lawless action test, speech is not protected by the
First Amendment First most commonly refers to: * First, the ordinal form of the number 1 First or 1st may also refer to: Acronyms * Faint Images of the Radio Sky at Twenty-Centimeters, an astronomical survey carried out by the Very Large Array * Far Infrared a ...
if the speaker intends to incite a violation of the law that is both imminent and likely. While the precise meaning of "imminent" may be ambiguous in some cases, the Supreme Court provided later clarification in '' Hess v. Indiana'' (1973), which found that Hess's words were protected under "his rights to
free speech Freedom of speech is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or a community to articulate their opinions and ideas without fear of retaliation, censorship, or legal sanction. The right to freedom of expression has been recognise ...
",''Hess v. Indiana'', . in part because his speech "amounted to nothing more than advocacy of illegal action at some indefinite future time," and therefore did not meet the imminence requirement. The two legal prongs that constitute incitement of imminent lawless action are as follows: : Advocacy of force or criminal activity does not receive First Amendment protections if (1) the advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action, and (2) is likely to incite or produce such action.


Quotation


See also

* '' Hit Man: A Technical Manual for Independent Contractors'' *
Clear and present danger ''Clear and Present Danger'' is a political thriller novel, written by Tom Clancy and published on August 17, 1989. A sequel to '' The Cardinal of the Kremlin'' (1988), main character Jack Ryan becomes acting Deputy Director of Intelligence i ...
* List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 395 * Shouting ''fire'' in a crowded theater * Threatening the president of the United States *'' Abrams v. United States'', *'' Brandenburg v. Ohio'' *'' Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire'', *'' Dennis v. United States'' *'' Feiner v. New York'', *'' Hess v. Indiana'' *'' Korematsu v. United States'' *'' Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten'' (1917) *'' Sacher v. United States'', *''
Schenck v. United States ''Schenck v. United States'', 249 U.S. 47 (1919), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court concerning enforcement of the Espionage Act of 1917 during World War I. A unanimous Supreme Court, in an opinion by Justice Oliver Wendell Hol ...
'' *'' Terminiello v. Chicago'', *''
Whitney v. California ''Whitney v. California'', 274 U.S. 357 (1927), was a United States Supreme Court decision upholding the conviction of an individual who had engaged in speech that raised a clear and present danger to society.''Whitney v. California''274 U.S. 357 ...
'',


References


Further reading

* * * *


External links


''Hess v. Indiana'', 414 U.S. 105 (1973)


Illegal speech in the United States American legal terminology * {{law-term-stub