Historism

Historism () is a philosophical and historiographical theory, founded in 19th-century Germany (as ) and especially influential in 19th- and 20th-century Europe. In those times there was not a single natural, humanistic or philosophical science that would not reflect, in one way or another, the historical type of thought (cf. comparative historical linguistics etc.). It pronounces the historicity of humanity and its binding to tradition.

Historist historiography rejects historical teleology and bases its explanations of historical phenomena on sympathy and understanding for the events, acting persons, and historical periods. The historist approach takes to its extreme limits the common observation that human institutions (language, Art, religion, law, State) are subject to perpetual change.

''Historism'' is not to be confused with ''historicism'', nevertheless the English habits of using both words are very similar. (The term ''historism'' is sometimes reserved to identify the specific current called in the tradition of German philosophy and historiography.)

Notable exponents

Notable exponents of historism were primarily the German 19th-century historians Leopold von Ranke and Johann Gustav Droysen, 20th-century historian Friedrich Meinecke, and the philosopher Wilhelm Dilthey. Dilthey was influenced by Ranke.Wallace and Gach 2008
p. 27
The jurists Friedrich Carl von Savigny and Karl Friedrich Eichhorn were strongly influenced by the ideas of historism and founded the German Historical School of Law. The Italian philosopher, anti-fascist and historian Benedetto Croce and his British colleague Robin George CollingwoodCollingwood himself used the term "historicism"—a term he apparently coined—to describe his approach—for example in his 'Ruskin's Philosophy', lecture delivered to the Ruskin Centenary Conference Exhibition, Coniston, Cumbria (see Jan van der Dussen, ''History as a Science: The Philosophy of R.G. Collingwood'', Springer, 2012, p. 49)—, but some later historiographers describe him as a proponent of "historism," in accordance with the current meaning of the term in English (see F. R. Ankersmit, ''Sublime Historical Experience'', Stanford University Press, 2005, p. 404). were important European exponents of historism in the late 19th and early 20th century. Collingwood was influenced by Dilthey.

Ranke's arguments can be viewed as an antidote to the lawlike and quantitative approaches common in sociology and most other social sciences.Wallace and Gach 2008
p. 14

The principle of historism has a universal methodological significance in Marxism. The essence of this principle, in brief, is:

Contemporary thought

20th-century German historians promoting some aspects of historism are Ulrich Muhlack, Thomas Nipperdey and Jörn Rüsen.

The Spanish philosopher José Ortega y Gasset was influenced by historism.

Criticism

Because of the power held on the social sciences by logical positivism, historism or historicism is deemed unpopular.

Georg G. Iggers is one of the most important critical authors on historism. His book ''The German Conception of History: The National Tradition of Historical Thought from Herder to the Present'', first published in 1968 (by Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, Ct.) is a "classic” among critiques of historism.

Another critique is presented by the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, whose essay ( ''On the Use and Abuse of History for Life'', 1874) denounces “a malignant historical fever”. Nietzsche contends that the historians of his times, the historists, damaged the powers of human life by relegating it to the past instead of opening it to the future. For this reason, he calls for a return, beyond historism, to humanism.

Karl Popper was one of the most distinguished critics of historicism. He differentiated between both phenomena as follows: The term ''historicism'' is used in his influential books ''The Poverty of Historicism'' and '' The Open Society and Its Enemies'' to describe “an approach to the social sciences which assumes that ''historical prediction'' is their primary aim, and which assumes that this aim is attainable by discovering the 'rhythms' or the 'patterns', the 'laws' or the 'trends' that underlie the evolution of history”.Karl Popper, ''The Poverty of Historicism'', Routledge, 1993, p. 3 (italics in original). Popper wrote with reference to Hegel's theory of history, which he criticized extensively. By ''historism'' on the contrary, he means the tendency to regard every argument or idea as completely accounted for by its historical context, as opposed to assessing it by its merits. ''Historism'' does not aim for the 'laws' of history, but premises the individuality of each historical situation.

On the basis of Popper's definitions, the historian Stefan Berger proposes as a proper word usage:

See also

*Heinrich Rickert
*Historical school of economics

Notes

References

* Georg G. Iggers
''The German Conception of History: The National Tradition of Historical Thought from Herder to the Present''
2nd rev. edn., Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, Ct., 1983, .
* Stefan Berger, ''Stefan Berger responds to Ulrich Muhlack''. In: Bulletin of the German Historical Institute London, Volume XXIII, No. 1, May 2001, pp. 21–33 (contemporary debate between a historism-critic and a historism-supporting historian).
* Frederick C. Beiser
''The German Historicist Tradition''
Oxford University Press, 2011.
* Frederick C. Beiser
''After Hegel: German Philosophy, 1840-1900''
Princeton University Press, 2014.
* Wallace, Edwin R. and Gach, John (eds.), ''History of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology: With an Epilogue on Psychiatry and the Mind-Body Relation'', Springer, 2008.
* Peter Koslowski (ed.), ''The Discovery of Historicity in German Idealism and Historism'', Springer, 2006.

{{Social philosophy

Historiography
Philosophy of history