Gyorin

Gyorin (lit. "neighborly relations") was a neo-Confucian term developed in Joseon Korea. The term was intended to identify and characterize a diplomatic policy which establishes and maintains amicable relations with neighboring states. It was construed and understood in tandem with a corollary term, which was the ''sadae'' or "serving the great" policy towards Imperial China.

Confucian learning contributed in the formation of ''gyorin'' and ''sadae'' as ritual, conceptual and normative frameworks for construing interactions and political decision-making.

Multi-national foreign policy

The rationale expressed by ''gyorin'' was applied to a multi-national foreign policy. Scholarly writing about the Joseon dynasty has tended to focus on diplomatic relations with China and Japan, but the intermediary nature of ''gyorin'' contacts—for example, Joseon-Ryukyuan diplomatic and trading contacts—were important as well. Envoys from the Ryūkyū Kingdom were received by Taejo of Joseon in 1392, 1394 and 1397. Siam sent an envoy to Taejo's court in 1393.Goodrich, L. Carrington ''et al.'' (1976)
''Dictionary of Ming biography, 1368-1644'' (明代名人傳), Vol. II, p. 1601.
/ref>

The long-term, strategic ''gyorin'' policy played out in bilateral diplomacy and trade dealings with the Jurchen tribes, Japan, the Ryūkyū Kingdom, Siam, and others. Over time, diplomatic and trade policies were perceived by Joseon's partners as the traditional door through which trends in neo-Confucian philosophical principles were recognized.

The Joseon kingdom made every effort to maintain a friendly bilateral relationship with China for reasons having to do with both ''realpolitik'' and a more idealist Confucian worldview wherein China was seen as the center of a Confucian moral universe. Joseon diplomacy was no less aware and sensitive to ''realpolitik'' in the implementation of ''gyorin'' policy.

The unique nature of ''gyorin'' bilateral diplomatic exchanges evolved from a conceptual framework developed by the Chinese. Gradually, the theoretical models would be modified, mirroring the evolution of a unique relationship.Toby, Ronald P. (1991)
''State and Diplomacy in Early Modern Japan: Asia in the Development of the Tokugawa Bakufu,'' p. 87.
/ref>

See also

* Joseon diplomacy
* Neo-Confucianism

Notes

References

* Goodrich, Luther Carrington and Zhaoying Fang. (1976)
''Dictionary of Ming biography, 1368-1644'' (明代名人傳), Vol. I ''Dictionary of Ming biography, 1368-1644'' (明代名人傳), Vol. II.
New York: Columbia University Press. ;
OCLC 1622199
* Kang, Etsuko Hae-jin. (1997). ''Diplomacy and Ideology in Japanese-Korean Relations: from the Fifteenth to the Eighteenth Century.'' Basingstoke, Hampshire; Macmillan. ;
* Kang, Jae-eun and Suzanne Lee. (2006). ''The Land of Scholars : Two Thousand Years of Korean Confucianism.'' Paramus, New Jersey: Homa & Sekey Books.
OCLC 60931394
* Kim, Chun-gil. (2005). ''The history of Korea.'' Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Group. ; ;
* Mansourov, Alexandre Y
"Will Flowers Bloom without Fragrance? Korean-Chinese Relations,"
''Harvard Asia Quarterly'' (Spring 2009).
* Oh Youngkyo
"State of Research on the Late Period of the Choson Dynasty,"
Yonsei University.
* Steben, Barry D.
"The Transmission of Neo-Confucianism to the Ryukyu (Liuqiu) Islands and Its Historical Significance: Ritual and Rectification of Names in a Bipolar Authority Field,"
National University of Singapore.
* Toby, Ronald P. (1991)
''State and Diplomacy in Early Modern Japan: Asia in the Development of the Tokugawa Bakufu.''
Stanford: Stanford University Press.

{{Authority control

Politics of Joseon
Diplomacy
Political theories
Korean philosophy
*
Ideologies
Korean Confucianism
Neo-Confucianism